J
John Larkin
Guest
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:20:49 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Seeing if you can think. Seems not.
Bye.
<tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 15/11/2022 16:17, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 16:04:36 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 15/11/2022 15:41, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 16:25:22 +0100, Jeroen Belleman
jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
On 2022-11-15 12:42, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:21:30 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On 14/11/2022 22:40, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:38:59 +0100, \"Carlos E.R.\"
robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
On 2022-11-14 01:27, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 12:07:43 -0000, SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk
wrote:
On 09/11/2022 00:14, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 12:35:03 -0000, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
On 08/11/2022 01:22, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2022 11:27:33 -0000, John Larkin
jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:
We heat our kettle with gas. All that heat winds up in the house,
which usually needs it. An open flame is a more efficient heater than
a gas furnace; no heat is vented.
Even resistive heating is better than a furnace. Except for gas being
cheaper for some reason.
I find it hard to believe that you don\'t realise that this is due to
the
Second Law of Thermodynamics.
I know why it happens, just not why people use a furnace with gas. It\'s
a waste.
The highest efficiency gas fired power station is aroung 62% efficient.
Then there are 5% transmission losses.
A condensing gas boiler is over 90% efficient.
Then why don\'t they make the power station like the boiler?
Because the exhaust gasses can not be colder than the hot water output.
With a heat pump, they can. Imagine a boost converter.
Oh dear.
I think John is mentally ill.
I think you are an amateur flamer who doesn\'t want to, probably can\'t,
intelligently discuss electronics or thermals. Your prime motivation
is to be nasty.
Imagine a boost converter.
Imagine a water heater that has exhaust flue gas temp of 100c and
heats water to 200c. Try.
Actually, it doesn\'t even need a heat pump.
With a counter-flow heat exchanger, flue gasses could easily be colder
than the hot water output.
Jeroen Belleman
Yes, that\'s one obvious way.
So obvious that in 200 years of steam engines no one has thought of it
I used to design control systems for steamships. Water temp was maybe
1000F above stack temp.
Wow! Fucking Genius!
So I\'m not mentally ill after all. What a relief.
There are lots of other examples of water hotter than flue gas. Your
turn.
What are you dribbling on about?
Seeing if you can think. Seems not.
Bye.