J
John Larkin
Guest
On Tue, 08 Nov 2022 01:29:44 -0000, \"Commander Kinsey\"
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
Yes. Late-70s.
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
On Mon, 07 Nov 2022 15:47:13 -0000, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandsnipmetechnology.com> wrote:
On Sun, 06 Nov 2022 22:30:36 GMT, Cindy Hamilton
hamilton@invalid.com> wrote:
On 2022-11-06, Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <op.1u73hbz8mvhs6z@ryzen.home>, CK1@nospam.com says...
Not necessarily. We have a \"guaranteed\" minimum and maximum supply
voltage. Why should a company spend extra designing and installing
protection against supplies (not temporary aberrations) outside them?
Because other things could cause lower voltage, like a wiring fault in the device or the building. Especially in dual voltage countries like the US where you can lose one live.
If the neutral line is lost or a bad connection the line voltage in a
house could have one side to be very low and the other side very high in
the US system.
Funny you should mention that. Our neutral broke in high winds
yesterday. Both remaining legs seem to be well balanced.
That happened to me once. We had 90 and 135 vrms on various outlets.
The PG&E guys didn\'t want to believe me but I finally convenced them
(some of the lights were BRIGHT)
Incandescent?!
Yes. Late-70s.