Interesting Letter-to-the-Editor

R. Steve Walz wrote:
Chris Carlen wrote:
You are filled with the desire to kill and obliterate those "rightists"
as evidenced clearly by the years of vitriolic posts that I have read of
you expressing explicitly your wish to kill them, and you simultaneously
imply that you are one with a conscience because you are a leftist?

----------------------------
In that Rightists are wannbe enslavers and thieves, there is nothing
wrong with killing them.



What you really are is simply ignorant and insane.

---------------------
And is the man resisting being enslaved and robbed also "insane"?
What an insipid effort to defelct blame from your crimes!
Certainly resisting enslavement is not insane, depending on how one does
it. You propose killing people. I maintain that as insanity no matter
what. I don't care who is being killed or why. Killing is wrong, and
the wish to kill is insane, as is any logical process that leads to the
conclusion that killing is not wrong to rectify political problems. I
know that I might kill if I have to defend myself, but it isn't my
intention to kill at the first opportunity to defend myself. That is
the difference. It would still be wrong to kill in self defense, albeit
understandable, and forgivable. Then again, everything is forgivable,
even your hatefullness. I hope one day you can discover this, however
improbable. However if you can pull it off, you will know the only
freedom that exists, and the burden of your political religion will be
ended.

Don't go trying to stick identities in my mind, because you haven't a
clue where I'm coming from.

-----------------------
Ewww, now you're afraid I might gain control of your MIND!
You must not have a very good hold on it!
I don't need to have control of it. I know what it is, and I know what
it isn't. It isn't me. What I think, my views, my feelings, all of
that isn't me. It is a meaningless and fleeting pattern of phenomena.
You can no more gain control of it than I. But you worship the
intellect and are thus confined to it, whereas I know it's limitations
and can thus use it as a tool when desired, or ignore it when it's
utility has reached its limits. There are other modes of knowledge than
the rational intellect, you know, which isn't really a mode of knowing
at all, just labeling.

Perhaps what I should have said, is that if you assume you have any idea
of what I maintain as a political identity, you will be in err. This
remains the truth, though you will go on assuming because you need to.
I know why this is so. You do not.


Yes, it's about time for revolution again!

You're true ambition is to become exactly like the "inner party" members
of Orwell's 1984. You don't fool me.

-----------------------------
Nonsense, nothing REAL has ever been remotely like ANY of the several
mewling anti-utopian novelists have posited!
You are quite incorrect. North Korea makes "1984" look like an
understatement. There are other examples. Try reading Christopher
Hitchens "Why Orwell Matters."

Anyway, what you dream of I maintain is exactly what "the several
mewling anti-utopian novelists have posited."

As an architect of utopia, so filled with the eagerness to kill, don't
you see that there is something wrong with this picture? You don't want
to free or help anyone. You just want to be the enslaver yourself but
the positions are all filled, and your damned jealous.


P.S. I am *not* a liberal, conservative, independent, or any other sort
of political or ideological identity.

----------------
Liar.

Oh?

--------------------
Precisely.
And so I expect you will argue that I was being a "rightist" when I
voted for Al Gore? Then again, I'm sure Al Gore is way to much of a
fascist right-wing racist for your liking.

I am a human, from a place called
Earth, that is all.

-------------------
Disingenuous liar!

-Steve

Well in that case, would you care to tell me what I am if not human, and
where I could possibly be from other than Earth?

--------------------------
"is all" !!
Your pretense to innocence despite defending criminality is obtuse!
You are evading my question. I asked why it is I am a liar for claiming
to be a human from Earth. If you know something I don't, please
divulge, as I would be most fascinated to hear about my alien origins.

But now you accuse me of things again. Please tell me exactly what my
crimes are? How is it that I enslave the poor and oppressed racially
disciminated against minority masses, while I pay the rent each month
for my apartment, unable to afford a house because of the inflated
prices conjured by Alan Greenspan and the CEO's of Freddie Mac and
Fannie Mae, to keep the economy floating on borrowed money? How is that
my crime? How is it my crime that the oil companies keep us mired in a
backward energy system in order to enrich themselves, while I work in a
government lab to research and develop cleaner and more efficient energy
sources, as well as working with beaurocrats who are persistenly albeit
in futility attempting to advocate for intelligent energy policies,
while the Bush administration consistently attempts to zero our budgets,
and every budget of any program remotely associated with reducing energy
inefficiency and pollutant emissions from combustion processes. But I
do this work despite having had opportunities to jump ship from public
service into some high-profit bucket of dollars pocketing start up tech
firm, for salaries 50% or more over what I get?

Please do explain exactly what my crimes are. Or perhaps they are only
thought crimes? Since I barely participate in any activity that can
remotely be called "the owners of the means of production," I fall
squarely into the category of workers. Yet you claim that I am guilty
of the crimes of the exploiters. Why? Because I levied a few
criticisms at the ultra-leftists? That makes me a rightist, right? But
I am guilty of only a thought-act, of positing a view. Yet you condemn
me for this view, and are quick to lump me into the group that you are
eager to kill. For having a thought. Oh but that's not it really.
What irks you is that I am not a dumb enough worker to fall for your
phony promises of liberation. It is the crime of seeing you for what
you are, that is why I must be labeled a rightist and destroyed, isn't it?

This is the world you would create, for which you aspire and advocate.
A world of killing people who don't think the party line, which is no
thinking at all. You make the capitalists look like the good guys.
That is what is so sad about the intellectually dishonest left these
days. I was really quite liberal a few years ago, before I started
putting the food on the table. But views like yours make me sick, and
unable to associate with the left. The right is just as grisly in many
ways and so I reject them as well in terms of considering any
possibility of joining their parties, so I know where I stand. But you
just go on assuming what you will. It's all you've got.

Good day!

--
_____________________
Christopher R. Carlen
crobc@earthlink.net
Suse 8.1 Linux 2.4.19
 
Chris Carlen wrote:
R. Steve Walz wrote:
Chris Carlen wrote:
You are filled with the desire to kill and obliterate those "rightists"
as evidenced clearly by the years of vitriolic posts that I have read of
you expressing explicitly your wish to kill them, and you simultaneously
imply that you are one with a conscience because you are a leftist?
----------------------------
In that Rightists are wannbe enslavers and thieves, there is nothing
wrong with killing them.

What you really are is simply ignorant and insane.
---------------------
And is the man resisting being enslaved and robbed also "insane"?
What an insipid effort to defelct blame from your crimes!

Certainly resisting enslavement is not insane, depending on how one does
it. You propose killing people.
-----------------
It's a time-honored method for doing away with thieves who persist.


I maintain that as insanity no matter
what.
-----------------
Is your objection that death is too great a punishment for thieves
who won't desist? That's stupid, I don't want to chain them in the
garage and have to take care of them.


I don't care who is being killed or why. Killing is wrong, and
the wish to kill is insane, as is any logical process that leads to the
conclusion that killing is not wrong to rectify political problems.
-----------------
While a soft and fuzzy sentiment for movies, and telling small chldren
before the age of reason, it is often quite impractical. When a person
acts from rage or insanity, it is okay to be lenient, but when a person
calculatedly sets about thievery merely to enrich himself at our
expense, and when he believes such is his "right", (laughable), and
will not desist from threat of death if he ever does so again, he
simply makes it necessary that we kill him, unless we have an
established means of keeping him chained up reliably and we can get
his upkeep out of him in labor. Doing that is beyond our obligation
if it does not suffice to deter future thieves of his sort, so killing
is an important tool to deter crimes of calculated thievery and
selfishness.


I
know that I might kill if I have to defend myself, but it isn't my
intention to kill at the first opportunity to defend myself. That is
the difference. It would still be wrong to kill in self defense, albeit
understandable, and forgivable. Then again, everything is forgivable,
even your hatefullness. I hope one day you can discover this, however
improbable. However if you can pull it off, you will know the only
freedom that exists, and the burden of your political religion will be
ended.
-------------------------------------
Xtian guilt. Pitiful. Your lot was brainwashed with that by the rich
who hijacked the religion as a tool of horrible nameless terror and
guilt to keep their serfs in line. If someone cannot be made to be
fair to others and stop trying to enslave them, by however circuitous
and complex a contrived methodology, then they should be killed as
we have promised, so that others of their ilk give it up and behave
reasonably! Human life is only perfectable by the right set of laws,
arrived at together by human reason unclouded by religion or the
thieving bandit lords of old telling us superstition, and adminstered
without exception, and with death as the only penalty. When you're
finally right, you don't NEED to worry over severity, because when
you're right you have the right to expect obediance from everyone to
the rules you have agreed upon together, without oppression.


Don't go trying to stick identities in my mind, because you haven't a
clue where I'm coming from.
-----------------------
Ewww, now you're afraid I might gain control of your MIND!
You must not have a very good hold on it!

I don't need to have control of it. I know what it is, and I know what
it isn't. It isn't me. What I think, my views, my feelings, all of
that isn't me. It is a meaningless and fleeting pattern of phenomena.
You can no more gain control of it than I. But you worship the
intellect and are thus confined to it, whereas I know it's limitations
and can thus use it as a tool when desired, or ignore it when it's
utility has reached its limits. There are other modes of knowledge than
the rational intellect, you know, which isn't really a mode of knowing
at all, just labeling.
------------------------
You're blathering. Just because you can string words together without
making logical sense, doesn't mean you're engaging in something else
that's actually valid.


Perhaps what I should have said, is that if you assume you have any idea
of what I maintain as a political identity, you will be in err. This
remains the truth, though you will go on assuming because you need to.
I know why this is so. You do not.
------------------------------
Irrelevant, you're either a duper, or a dupee.


Yes, it's about time for revolution again!

You're true ambition is to become exactly like the "inner party" members
of Orwell's 1984. You don't fool me.
-----------------------------
Nonsense, nothing REAL has ever been remotely like ANY of the several
mewling anti-utopian novelists have posited!

You are quite incorrect. North Korea makes "1984" look like an
understatement. There are other examples. Try reading Christopher
Hitchens "Why Orwell Matters."
-------------------------------
They don't have the technology to make a "1984", they can't even keep
their fires lit.


Anyway, what you dream of I maintain is exactly what "the several
mewling anti-utopian novelists have posited."
-----------------------------
Total garbage. This is the crap claimed by every posturing little simp
who's ever fallen off the brainwashing table of the rich. Your kind
has been programmed to "achieve spirituality in the mold of civility"
so well, that you don't even realize that this mold was created
intentionally by Rightist brigands to BIND YOU TO THEM!


As an architect of utopia, so filled with the eagerness to kill, don't
you see that there is something wrong with this picture? You don't want
to free or help anyone. You just want to be the enslaver yourself but
the positions are all filled, and your damned jealous.
-------------------------------
Abject nonsense. All I want is to live as the simplest of people in
such a society, to have my lovers, my friends, and my hobbies, and
not to have to worry about being cheated anymore and to never fear
eviction again, or the deprivation of the rights TRUE Civil societies
have, the right to care by others in adversity, and the guarantee of
labor and of exactly fair recompense for my labor, right beside the
rest of everyone else, and to see all the vile enemies of that great
fairness be vanquished totally.


P.S. I am *not* a liberal, conservative, independent, or any other sort
of political or ideological identity.

----------------
Liar.

Oh?

--------------------
Precisely.

And so I expect you will argue that I was being a "rightist" when I
voted for Al Gore? Then again, I'm sure Al Gore is way to much of a
fascist right-wing racist for your liking.
-----------------------------------
No, I voted for him too, but only because he was the lesser evil.

See, he's an ignorant Liberal. He still happens to be a Capitalist.
He still actually thinks that Capitalism can be made to be civil.
He believes this mostly because he was made guilty for being rich,
but also he was made terrified of being poor, and so this oxymoron,
the imaginary impossibility of a benificent Capitalism, comforts
him about both.


I am a human, from a place called
Earth, that is all.
-------------------
Disingenuous liar!

-Steve

Well in that case, would you care to tell me what I am if not human, and
where I could possibly be from other than Earth?
--------------------------
"is all" !!
Your pretense to innocence despite defending criminality is obtuse!

You are evading my question. I asked why it is I am a liar for claiming
to be a human from Earth. If you know something I don't, please
divulge, as I would be most fascinated to hear about my alien origins.
----------------
That's NOT ALL you are, liar, you're minimizing.


But now you accuse me of things again. Please tell me exactly what my
crimes are? How is it that I enslave the poor and oppressed racially
disciminated against minority masses, while I pay the rent each month
for my apartment, unable to afford a house because of the inflated
prices conjured by Alan Greenspan and the CEO's of Freddie Mac and
Fannie Mae, to keep the economy floating on borrowed money? How is that
my crime?
---------------
You DEFEND THEIR CRIMES! That makes you culpable for them!


How is it my crime that the oil companies keep us mired in a
backward energy system in order to enrich themselves, while I work in a
government lab to research and develop cleaner and more efficient energy
sources, as well as working with beaurocrats who are persistenly albeit
in futility attempting to advocate for intelligent energy policies,
while the Bush administration consistently attempts to zero our budgets,
and every budget of any program remotely associated with reducing energy
inefficiency and pollutant emissions from combustion processes. But I
do this work despite having had opportunities to jump ship from public
service into some high-profit bucket of dollars pocketing start up tech
firm, for salaries 50% or more over what I get?
-------------------------------
Salvation is by faith, you fail to side with those who would end
these criminals' crimes!


Please do explain exactly what my crimes are. Or perhaps they are only
thought crimes? Since I barely participate in any activity that can
remotely be called "the owners of the means of production," I fall
squarely into the category of workers. Yet you claim that I am guilty
of the crimes of the exploiters. Why? Because I levied a few
criticisms at the ultra-leftists? That makes me a rightist, right? But
I am guilty of only a thought-act, of positing a view. Yet you condemn
me for this view, and are quick to lump me into the group that you are
eager to kill. For having a thought. Oh but that's not it really.
What irks you is that I am not a dumb enough worker to fall for your
phony promises of liberation. It is the crime of seeing you for what
you are, that is why I must be labeled a rightist and destroyed, isn't it?
------------------------
You don't need killing, you're too useless to deserve much of anything
except to ignore you till it's time to tell you your new rights and to
go back to work, and forget you ever even having the gumption to say
thanks when your REAl rights are returned to you and your purchasing
power triples and your work week is reduced and you don't even have
house payments or rent anymore!


This is the world you would create, for which you aspire and advocate.
A world of killing people who don't think the party line, which is no
thinking at all.
---------------
I don't give a fuck what they think, only what they say and do!
And there is no "party line", there is only whether or not a person
is actively threatening the first finally fair and decent society or
not.

THAT'S worth defending from ANYTHING, even his stupid "freedom"
of shitty lying uneducated moronic speech. I'm sorry, but NO ONE has
the right to deluded or defraud others, and that IS what ANY speech
opposing a TRULY DECENT society would do!


You make the capitalists look like the good guys.
------------------------
YOU don't REALLY EVEN believe such crap. To you it is merely a
metaphoric way of speaking, a modus loquendi, a way to maximize
a minimal difference just to get attention.


That is what is so sad about the intellectually dishonest left these
days. I was really quite liberal a few years ago, before I started
putting the food on the table. But views like yours make me sick, and
unable to associate with the left. The right is just as grisly in many
ways and so I reject them as well in terms of considering any
possibility of joining their parties, so I know where I stand. But you
just go on assuming what you will. It's all you've got.
Christopher R. Carlen
--------------------
There have always been mugwumps, fence sitters, who couldn't decide
to commit to any ideal, and who try to reject both for fear of being
taken to the cleaners intellectually, terrified of being deceived,
but finally yours is merely another form of cowardice.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
 
In article <bqblpa0gs2@enews1.newsguy.com>,
Chris Carlen <crobc@BOGUS_FIELD.earthlink.net> writes:
R. Steve Walz wrote:

But now you accuse me of things again. Please tell me exactly what my
crimes are? How is it that I enslave the poor and oppressed racially
disciminated against minority masses, while I pay the rent each month
for my apartment, unable to afford a house because of the inflated
prices conjured by Alan Greenspan and the CEO's of Freddie Mac and
Fannie Mae, to keep the economy floating on borrowed money? How is that
my crime?

Note that as an assumed middle-income individual, your biggest
single expense is that of the government (where entitlements
and/or welfare being an 'optional' function of the federal government
are an incredibly large part of that cost.) The defense of the
nation (one of the original and primary purposes of government)
isn't really all that outlandish in comparison.

It is interesting where the 'socialist meccas' like France and
Germany are also having problems with their budgets, and they
don't even do a competent job of providing for their own defense.
If they provided for their defense, it wouldn't really make that
much difference to their budgets, because it is the morally
destrictive socialist programs that cost so very much!!!

In the US, consider that a person making $80K/yr will be paying
approx 38% (or more) to the federal government (assuming no major
deductions -- perhaps assuming that you have paid off your
house as a responsible individual.) For the state governments,
you will pay typically 3-10% (or more) of your income. Also,
there are various other taxes that punish small amounts
of success (e.g. property tax, etc.)

By the time that all of the taxes are paid (for a middle income
person), it isn't incredibly out-of-the norm to have paid 50%
of your income!!!

So, when you have problems paying your bills for a month (due
to unforseen expenses), remember all of the irresponsible
people who aren't taking care of their own children (or
too willing to have children without preparing adequately.)

It really isn't possible for the current wasteful government
to provide many more services without additional damage against
the middle income people. Already, the lower income individuals
don't pay much tax in the scheme of things. The rich are already
paying most of the tax bills (perhaps a little more can be
coerced from them), and the middle income people could probably
be pressured a little also. Perhaps we need to grab more money
from the groups who really pay little or no income tax? (Those
who make less than $20-$30K/yr.)


John
 
John S. Dyson wrote:
It is interesting where the 'socialist meccas' like France and
Germany are also having problems with their budgets, and they
don't even do a competent job of providing for their own defense.
----------------------
They have the industrial output, they simply prefer to spend it
on luxuries as long as they can.


If they provided for their defense, it wouldn't really make that
much difference to their budgets, because it is the morally
destrictive socialist programs that cost so very much!!!
-------------------------
Social programs are EVIDENCE or morality, they don't DESTROY
morality, except the stupid hidebound antisexual forms.


In the US, consider that a person making $80K/yr will be paying
approx 38% (or more) to the federal government (assuming no major
deductions -- perhaps assuming that you have paid off your
house as a responsible individual.) For the state governments,
you will pay typically 3-10% (or more) of your income. Also,
there are various other taxes that punish small amounts
of success (e.g. property tax, etc.)
--------------------------------
Irrelevant, the Majority derives the right to tax from what it gives,
the social system that permits ownership AT ALL, when the "natural"
state is one of banditry and murder at every step! Whatever you are
taxed was NEVER actually yours in the FIRST place, and it only causes
trouble and confusion for you to even learn of it!


By the time that all of the taxes are paid (for a middle income
person), it isn't incredibly out-of-the norm to have paid 50%
of your income!!!
------------------------------
Gee, the same the poor pay in rent/tribute to the rich.

I say kill the rich who won't stop lying and claiming that they
"own" all our houses, and own your own home by Majority Democratic
fiat! WE ALL own the world, and its resources and land AND AEDIFICES
collectively as our inheritance from ALL our common ancestors! The
rich have no special right to them, they were born exactly as naked
and stupid as we were, but they were handed a socio-economic situation
that allowed them to steal for a living, rather than do HONEST work!!


So, when you have problems paying your bills for a month (due
to unforseen expenses), remember all of the irresponsible
people who aren't taking care of their own children (or
too willing to have children without preparing adequately.)
--------------------------
People do what they must because of their circumstances of life,
over which they have NO control. There is NO free will, we are a
result of cause and effect in physics, and what we become comes
directly from our experiences. You cannot change the tiniest thing
you believe by some effort of whim/will, and you KNOW it! There is
no such thing as "free will", it was invented to relieve the guilt
of torturers in the Spanish Inquisition, pretending that people
control what they believe, when they DON'T!! And what we do is a
direct result of what we believe!

In short, we can change each other by the effect we can have on
each other, however unopredictable, but we cannot change OURSELVES!
It would be like lifting yourself into the air!


It really isn't possible for the current wasteful government
to provide many more services without additional damage against
the middle income people.
------------------------
Until everyone has virtually equal property and incomes, the class
you speak of lies when it laughably calls itself "middle class"!
And when we are equal, and our taxes are equal, then the services
we get are also the same, and these services are impossible to obtain
by ourselves!


Already, the lower income individuals
don't pay much tax in the scheme of things.
----------------------
Nor should they, their contribution comes from the monies that the
rich steal from them and for which the rich are more taxed!!!!!


The rich are already
paying most of the tax bills (perhaps a little more can be
coerced from them),
------------------------
They are stealing it from the poor to pay it, you mean!!


and the middle income people could probably
be pressured a little also. Perhaps we need to grab more money
from the groups who really pay little or no income tax? (Those
who make less than $20-$30K/yr.)
John
----------------------------
Absurd, exactly because, by their thefts, the rich already steal
that income from the poor, which is why we come after the rich
for it!

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
 
In article <3FCBFB88.22C7@armory.com>,
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> writes:
John S. Dyson wrote:

It is interesting where the 'socialist meccas' like France and
Germany are also having problems with their budgets, and they
don't even do a competent job of providing for their own defense.
----------------------
They have the industrial output, they simply prefer to spend it
on luxuries as long as they can.

The cost of defense isn't really that great (very few defense
plants per-se in the US.) It is that the LAZY-ASS socialist meccas
choose to suckle off the American teat.

If they provided for their defense, it wouldn't really make that
much difference to their budgets, because it is the morally
destrictive socialist programs that cost so very much!!!
-------------------------
Social programs are EVIDENCE or morality, they don't DESTROY
morality, except the stupid hidebound antisexual forms.

Don't you understand anything about the psychological aspects
of enabling (or encouraging) stupid behavior? Of course you
don't. (It isn't really 'morality' or 'ethics' that are actually
destroyed, it is more that STUPID behavior is encoraged by
socalist programs.)

Socialism is plain and clear evidence of social decay -- whereby
the basis of growth and encouraging productive behavior (and
discouraging stupidity) is long forgotten. So, it is VERY CLEAR
that the regression in France (and somewhat Germany -- and
other wakko-leftist regimes) is progressing quite sadly. (Geesh,
they obviously don't even learn from their mistakes WRT the
anti-Jew attitudes.) The 'new' mistake of embracing the terrorists
(e.g. Saddam) seems to result from an overwhelming growing
stupidity.

John
 
John S. Dyson wrote...
R. Steve Walz writes:
John S. Dyson wrote:

It is interesting where the 'socialist meccas' like France and
Germany are also having problems with their budgets, and they
don't even do a competent job of providing for their own defense.
----------------------
They have the industrial output, they simply prefer to spend it
on luxuries as long as they can.

The cost of defense isn't really that great (very few defense
plants per-se in the US.) It is that the LAZY-ASS socialist
meccas choose to suckle off the American teat.
Your ideas and expressions are so far to the far right that
I rarely find myself in agreement with them, but here I nod
my head. Hmm, perhaps not so much lazy as greedy like Steve
says. For example, surely you wouldn't call South Koreans lazy,
nor socialist either, yet Rumsfield says they are dramatically
underspending on defense weaponry. This, even with the serious
threat of North Korea. Not lazy, they simply prefer to spend
their money elsewhere if we fill the gap. As Steve said.

Social programs are EVIDENCE of morality, they don't DESTROY
morality, except the stupid hidebound antisexual forms.

Don't you understand anything about the psychological aspects
of enabling (or encouraging) stupid behavior? Of course you
don't. (It isn't really 'morality' or 'ethics' that are actually
destroyed, it is more that STUPID behavior is encoraged by
socalist programs.)

Socialism is plain and clear evidence of social decay ...
OK, I knew finding intelligence in your statements had to be a
short-lived phenomena, especially since you consider much of
the most basic spending a society decides to spend on itself
to be socialist.

Thanks,
- Win

whill_at_picovolt-dot-com
 
On 2 Dec 2003 03:17:01 -0800, the renowned Winfield Hill
<Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote:

Your ideas and expressions are so far to the far right that
I rarely find myself in agreement with them, but here I nod
my head. Hmm, perhaps not so much lazy as greedy like Steve
says. For example, surely you wouldn't call South Koreans lazy,
nor socialist either, yet Rumsfield says they are dramatically
underspending on defense weaponry. This, even with the serious
threat of North Korea. Not lazy, they simply prefer to spend
their money elsewhere if we fill the gap. As Steve said.
Asking a Rumsfeld if you're spending enough on lethal weapons and tear
gas is a bit like asking your barber if you need a haircut.

More by googling on "Sunshine policy" +blocking.

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
 
In article <bqhsbd0j92@drn.newsguy.com>,
Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> writes:
John S. Dyson wrote...

R. Steve Walz writes:
John S. Dyson wrote:

It is interesting where the 'socialist meccas' like France and
Germany are also having problems with their budgets, and they
don't even do a competent job of providing for their own defense.
----------------------
They have the industrial output, they simply prefer to spend it
on luxuries as long as they can.

The cost of defense isn't really that great (very few defense
plants per-se in the US.) It is that the LAZY-ASS socialist
meccas choose to suckle off the American teat.

Your ideas and expressions are so far to the far right that
I rarely find myself in agreement with them, but here I nod
my head.

That is very sad that you believe that I am right-wing, because
I am quite centrist (believing both in safety nets and coherent
defense.) What I dislike is the loss of self-reliance and
the misassignment of American greed to America instead of the
corrupt French (Yes, it isn't just the government.) We have
a sector of people (including some of Hollywood) who are also
quite mentally/socially corrupt (in the sense of being STUPID
and not really morally.)

Social programs are EVIDENCE of morality, they don't DESTROY
morality, except the stupid hidebound antisexual forms.

Don't you understand anything about the psychological aspects
of enabling (or encouraging) stupid behavior? Of course you
don't. (It isn't really 'morality' or 'ethics' that are actually
destroyed, it is more that STUPID behavior is encoraged by
socalist programs.)

Socialism is plain and clear evidence of social decay ...

OK, I knew finding intelligence in your statements had to be a
short-lived phenomena, especially since you consider much of
the most basic spending a society decides to spend on itself
to be socialist.

ENABLING stupid behavior is one of the biggest strengthing aspects
of socialism. The ethic that creates dependency and entitlement
is a self sustaining 'opiate' of socialism. (A little socialism
isn't a bad thing, however dishonest wakko socialism typical of
the European left isn't good.)

Moderation is the key -- and typical leftists aren't moderate anymore.
(JFK was moderate. Dean/Kucinich/Cephardt are either VERY dishonest
or immoderate.)

The US left has radicalized because the centrists have lost interest
in the leftist lies. (The right has also had similar problems.)

This is why I am a radical centrists, where moderation is the ONLY
way to maintain a stable and healthy populace. Creating dependency
doesn't maintain a stable system.

John
 
John S. Dyson wrote:
|| That is very sad that you believe that I am right-wing, because
|| I am quite centrist (believing both in safety nets and coherent
|| defense.) What I dislike is the loss of self-reliance and
|| the misassignment of American greed to America instead of the
|| corrupt French (Yes, it isn't just the government.) We have
|| a sector of people (including some of Hollywood) who are also
|| quite mentally/socially corrupt (in the sense of being STUPID
|| and not really morally.)
||
snip snip

I bet you have never been to France and neither speak French. I'm living
here only 10 miles away from the border, which has been abolished since a
couple of years and I often go shopping there, as here in Italy we are a bit
short of diversity.
The French make excellent croissants, which I deep freeze and warm up for
breakfast, they have also an incredible variety of goat-cheeses and a lot of
other delicatessen.
People are just as polite and friendly as anywhere else, now there is
growing a number of environmentalists. In Nice, Cannes and Monte Carlo you
can meet a lot of celebrities when there is Formula1 or a film festival. I
have not heard them speaking bad about Americans, we have learned to
tolerate each others customs and habits, and Europe slowly grows into a big
single country with less chauvinism and nationality.
We have even lost our fear of Russia and they are as much Europeans as we
are. I thing this is a far better approach than your utterly uninformed
nationalistic aggressive rage and poison you are spreading here.
--
ciao Ban
Bordighera, Italy
electronic hardware designer
 
In article <fG4zb.39527$AX1.1556685@news1.tin.it>,
"Ban" <bansuri@web.de> writes:
John S. Dyson wrote:
|| That is very sad that you believe that I am right-wing, because
|| I am quite centrist (believing both in safety nets and coherent
|| defense.) What I dislike is the loss of self-reliance and
|| the misassignment of American greed to America instead of the
|| corrupt French (Yes, it isn't just the government.) We have
|| a sector of people (including some of Hollywood) who are also
|| quite mentally/socially corrupt (in the sense of being STUPID
|| and not really morally.)
||
snip snip

I bet you have never been to France and neither speak French.

I have done both, while working. Thank you for playing...
Still have the visa stamps on my old passport :).

John
 
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 18:16:43 GMT, "Ban" <bansuri@web.de> wrote:

I bet you have never been to France and neither speak French. I'm living
here only 10 miles away from the border, which has been abolished since a
couple of years and I often go shopping there, as here in Italy we are a bit
short of diversity.
The French make excellent croissants, which I deep freeze and warm up for
breakfast, they have also an incredible variety of goat-cheeses and a lot of
other delicatessen.
People are just as polite and friendly as anywhere else, now there is
growing a number of environmentalists. In Nice, Cannes and Monte Carlo you
can meet a lot of celebrities when there is Formula1 or a film festival. I
have not heard them speaking bad about Americans, we have learned to
tolerate each others customs and habits, and Europe slowly grows into a big
single country with less chauvinism and nationality.
That might be *your* dream, but for the vast majority of us in
Britain, it's a nightmare that we won't suffer to happen. To hell with
EUrope!


--

"I expect history will be kind to me, since I intend to write it."
- Winston Churchill
 
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 18:16:43 GMT, "Ban" <bansuri@web.de> wrote:

John S. Dyson wrote:
|| That is very sad that you believe that I am right-wing, because
|| I am quite centrist (believing both in safety nets and coherent
|| defense.) What I dislike is the loss of self-reliance and
|| the misassignment of American greed to America instead of the
|| corrupt French (Yes, it isn't just the government.) We have
|| a sector of people (including some of Hollywood) who are also
|| quite mentally/socially corrupt (in the sense of being STUPID
|| and not really morally.)
||
snip snip

I bet you have never been to France and neither speak French. I'm living
here only 10 miles away from the border, which has been abolished since a
couple of years and I often go shopping there, as here in Italy we are a bit
short of diversity.
The French make excellent croissants, which I deep freeze and warm up for
breakfast, they have also an incredible variety of goat-cheeses and a lot of
other delicatessen.
People are just as polite and friendly as anywhere else, now there is
growing a number of environmentalists. In Nice, Cannes and Monte Carlo you
can meet a lot of celebrities when there is Formula1 or a film festival. I
have not heard them speaking bad about Americans, we have learned to
tolerate each others customs and habits, and Europe slowly grows into a big
single country with less chauvinism and nationality.
We have even lost our fear of Russia and they are as much Europeans as we
are. I thing this is a far better approach than your utterly uninformed
nationalistic aggressive rage and poison you are spreading here.
And ALL of it *smell* like eastern France? No thanks.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
Jim Thompson wrote...
And ALL of it *smell* like eastern France? No thanks.
Yeah? Well, who can say, maybe someday after we get over
our extreme bout of nationalism one of our companies will
make a killing opening up some new deodorant markets.

Thanks,
- Win

whill_at_picovolt-dot-com
 
On 2 Dec 2003 16:30:08 -0800, Winfield Hill
<Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote...

And ALL of it *smell* like eastern France? No thanks.

Yeah? Well, who can say, maybe someday after we get over
our extreme bout of nationalism one of our companies will
make a killing opening up some new deodorant markets.

Thanks,
- Win

whill_at_picovolt-dot-com
The French indeed could use some deodorant, but that-to-which-I-refer
is due to a poor sewage system... really rank and noticeable as you
drive across the Rhein into France.

Then, of course, there's the Social Security Office on every corner...
just what we need here in the good ol' USA ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
toor@iquest.net (John S. Dyson) wrote in message news:<bqh4dd$1etf$2@news.iquest.net>...
In article <3FCBFB88.22C7@armory.com>,
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> writes:
John S. Dyson wrote:

It is interesting where the 'socialist meccas' like France and
Germany are also having problems with their budgets, and they
don't even do a competent job of providing for their own defense.
----------------------
They have the industrial output, they simply prefer to spend it
on luxuries as long as they can.

The cost of defense isn't really that great (very few defense
plants per-se in the US.) It is that the LAZY-ASS socialist meccas
choose to suckle off the American teat.
American spending in defence is equal to the sum of the total defence
spending of the next ten nations down the pecking order. This is an
unprecedented high - the classical pattern is for the top nation to
spend as much as the next two closest nations.

The paranoid reaction to this would be to assume that you plan to
invade the lot of us at once.

The realistic reaction is probably that your politico-economic
structure is in a mess, and your defence budget is a massive channel
for corrupt pay-offs between politicians and people selling stuff to
the military - the tax-payers are paying about twice as much as they
should for the defence they are getting, and the rest is being creamed
off as bribes and excess profits.

The rest of world would appear to have their military industrial
complexes under better control, which may reflect better control
electoral expenditures.

So it may be that we are not LAZY-ASS socialist meccas - which doesn't
exactly fit South Korea - but rather that you are a bunch of
over-taxed suckers.

If they provided for their defense, it wouldn't really make that
much difference to their budgets, because it is the morally
destructive socialist programs that cost so very much!!!
-------------------------
Social programs are EVIDENCE or morality, they don't DESTROY
morality, except the stupid hidebound antisexual forms.

Don't you understand anything about the psychological aspects
of enabling (or encouraging) stupid behavior? Of course you
don't. (It isn't really 'morality' or 'ethics' that are actually
destroyed, it is more that STUPID behavior is encouraged by
socalist programs.)
A famous right-wing claim, not supported by any objective evidence.

Socialism is plain and clear evidence of social decay -- whereby
the basis of growth and encouraging productive behavior (and
discouraging stupidity) is long forgotten. So, it is VERY CLEAR
that the regression in France (and somewhat Germany -- and
other wakko-leftist regimes) is progressing quite sadly. (Geesh,
they obviously don't even learn from their mistakes WRT the
anti-Jew attitudes.) The 'new' mistake of embracing the terrorists
(e.g. Saddam) seems to result from an overwhelming growing
stupidity.
On most evidences of social progress, including crude things like
infant mortality and life expectancy, France and Germany are ahead of
the U.S. rather than behind.

Will Hutton's "The World we're In" ISBN: 0349114714, available
ex-stock from www.amazon.co.uk and with more difficulty (surprise,
surprise!) from www.amazon.com, claims higher labour productivity and
higher social mobility, both driven by better social welfare programs
than those available in the U.S. which provide a better educated and
more flexible work-force . I could dig out the relevant references
from my copy - Will Hutton is largely a populariser of non-monetarist
academic economics - but they'd be wasted on you.

And the French and German attitude to the invasion of Irak wasn't
pro-terrorist, or even pro-Saddam, but merely aimed at getting an
internationally acceptable intervention. In so far as such an
intervention wouldn't have been as provocative to the Arab countries
as your ham-fisted little military adventure, their stance should
probably be counted as anti-terrorist.

As Win Hill has pointed out, Irak is now a terrorist's amusement
arcade - the infidel invaders are the targets to be knocked down, and
the rewards are instant promotion to heaven by being killed while
pursuing a holy war (jihad) - and the customers are flocking in. A
really effective anti-terrorist move on your part :-(

To accomodate the average right-wing nit-wit, I'll point out that the
last sentence of the above paragraph is intended to be read
ironically, not literally.

-------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
 
Excellent response. A tad kinder than I would have been.:)


"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message
news:7c584d27.0312030857.28ad03ff@posting.google.com...
toor@iquest.net (John S. Dyson) wrote in message
news:<bqh4dd$1etf$2@news.iquest.net>...
In article <3FCBFB88.22C7@armory.com>,
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> writes:
John S. Dyson wrote:

It is interesting where the 'socialist meccas' like France and
Germany are also having problems with their budgets, and they
don't even do a competent job of providing for their own defense.
----------------------
They have the industrial output, they simply prefer to spend it
on luxuries as long as they can.

The cost of defense isn't really that great (very few defense
plants per-se in the US.) It is that the LAZY-ASS socialist meccas
choose to suckle off the American teat.

American spending in defence is equal to the sum of the total defence
spending of the next ten nations down the pecking order. This is an
unprecedented high - the classical pattern is for the top nation to
spend as much as the next two closest nations.

The paranoid reaction to this would be to assume that you plan to
invade the lot of us at once.

The realistic reaction is probably that your politico-economic
structure is in a mess, and your defence budget is a massive channel
for corrupt pay-offs between politicians and people selling stuff to
the military - the tax-payers are paying about twice as much as they
should for the defence they are getting, and the rest is being creamed
off as bribes and excess profits.

The rest of world would appear to have their military industrial
complexes under better control, which may reflect better control
electoral expenditures.

So it may be that we are not LAZY-ASS socialist meccas - which doesn't
exactly fit South Korea - but rather that you are a bunch of
over-taxed suckers.

If they provided for their defense, it wouldn't really make that
much difference to their budgets, because it is the morally
destructive socialist programs that cost so very much!!!
-------------------------
Social programs are EVIDENCE or morality, they don't DESTROY
morality, except the stupid hidebound antisexual forms.

Don't you understand anything about the psychological aspects
of enabling (or encouraging) stupid behavior? Of course you
don't. (It isn't really 'morality' or 'ethics' that are actually
destroyed, it is more that STUPID behavior is encouraged by
socalist programs.)

A famous right-wing claim, not supported by any objective evidence.

Socialism is plain and clear evidence of social decay -- whereby
the basis of growth and encouraging productive behavior (and
discouraging stupidity) is long forgotten. So, it is VERY CLEAR
that the regression in France (and somewhat Germany -- and
other wakko-leftist regimes) is progressing quite sadly. (Geesh,
they obviously don't even learn from their mistakes WRT the
anti-Jew attitudes.) The 'new' mistake of embracing the terrorists
(e.g. Saddam) seems to result from an overwhelming growing
stupidity.

On most evidences of social progress, including crude things like
infant mortality and life expectancy, France and Germany are ahead of
the U.S. rather than behind.

Will Hutton's "The World we're In" ISBN: 0349114714, available
ex-stock from www.amazon.co.uk and with more difficulty (surprise,
surprise!) from www.amazon.com, claims higher labour productivity and
higher social mobility, both driven by better social welfare programs
than those available in the U.S. which provide a better educated and
more flexible work-force . I could dig out the relevant references
from my copy - Will Hutton is largely a populariser of non-monetarist
academic economics - but they'd be wasted on you.

And the French and German attitude to the invasion of Irak wasn't
pro-terrorist, or even pro-Saddam, but merely aimed at getting an
internationally acceptable intervention. In so far as such an
intervention wouldn't have been as provocative to the Arab countries
as your ham-fisted little military adventure, their stance should
probably be counted as anti-terrorist.

As Win Hill has pointed out, Irak is now a terrorist's amusement
arcade - the infidel invaders are the targets to be knocked down, and
the rewards are instant promotion to heaven by being killed while
pursuing a holy war (jihad) - and the customers are flocking in. A
really effective anti-terrorist move on your part :-(

To accomodate the average right-wing nit-wit, I'll point out that the
last sentence of the above paragraph is intended to be read
ironically, not literally.

-------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
 
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:22:16 -0000, "Mjolinor" <mjolinor@hotmail.com>
wrote:

Excellent response. A tad kinder than I would have been.:)
I wouldn't normally be replying at all, given the source (Sloman),
but...

Sloman says, "...you are a bunch of over-taxed suckers."

We are *far* less taxed than you socialist-mecca village idiots.

I already see the signs of your economies going to hell, and you are
already reverting to blaming the Jews, so I look forward to bombing
you off the face of the earth.

"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message
[tripe snipped]
-------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On 3 Dec 2003 08:57:00 -0800, Bill Sloman wrote:

toor@iquest.net (John S. Dyson) wrote in message news:<bqh4dd$1etf$2@news.iquest.net>...
In article <3FCBFB88.22C7@armory.com>,
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> writes:
John S. Dyson wrote:

It is interesting where the 'socialist meccas' like France and
Germany are also having problems with their budgets, and they
don't even do a competent job of providing for their own defense.
----------------------
They have the industrial output, they simply prefer to spend it
on luxuries as long as they can.

The cost of defense isn't really that great (very few defense
plants per-se in the US.) It is that the LAZY-ASS socialist meccas
choose to suckle off the American teat.

American spending in defence is equal to the sum of the total defence
spending of the next ten nations down the pecking order. This is an
unprecedented high - the classical pattern is for the top nation to
spend as much as the next two closest nations.

The paranoid reaction to this would be to assume that you plan to
invade the lot of us at once.

The realistic reaction is probably that your politico-economic
structure is in a mess, and your defence budget is a massive channel
for corrupt pay-offs between politicians and people selling stuff to
the military - the tax-payers are paying about twice as much as they
should for the defence they are getting, and the rest is being creamed
off as bribes and excess profits.

The rest of world would appear to have their military industrial
complexes under better control, which may reflect better control
electoral expenditures.

So it may be that we are not LAZY-ASS socialist meccas - which doesn't
exactly fit South Korea - but rather that you are a bunch of
over-taxed suckers.

If they provided for their defense, it wouldn't really make that
much difference to their budgets, because it is the morally
destructive socialist programs that cost so very much!!!
-------------------------
Social programs are EVIDENCE or morality, they don't DESTROY
morality, except the stupid hidebound antisexual forms.

Don't you understand anything about the psychological aspects
of enabling (or encouraging) stupid behavior? Of course you
don't. (It isn't really 'morality' or 'ethics' that are actually
destroyed, it is more that STUPID behavior is encouraged by
socalist programs.)

A famous right-wing claim, not supported by any objective evidence.

Socialism is plain and clear evidence of social decay -- whereby
the basis of growth and encouraging productive behavior (and
discouraging stupidity) is long forgotten. So, it is VERY CLEAR
that the regression in France (and somewhat Germany -- and
other wakko-leftist regimes) is progressing quite sadly. (Geesh,
they obviously don't even learn from their mistakes WRT the
anti-Jew attitudes.) The 'new' mistake of embracing the terrorists
(e.g. Saddam) seems to result from an overwhelming growing
stupidity.

On most evidences of social progress, including crude things like
infant mortality and life expectancy, France and Germany are ahead of
the U.S. rather than behind.

Will Hutton's "The World we're In" ISBN: 0349114714, available
ex-stock from www.amazon.co.uk and with more difficulty (surprise,
surprise!) from www.amazon.com, claims higher labour productivity and
higher social mobility, both driven by better social welfare programs
than those available in the U.S. which provide a better educated and
more flexible work-force . I could dig out the relevant references
from my copy - Will Hutton is largely a populariser of non-monetarist
academic economics - but they'd be wasted on you.

And the French and German attitude to the invasion of Irak wasn't
pro-terrorist, or even pro-Saddam, but merely aimed at getting an
internationally acceptable intervention. In so far as such an
intervention wouldn't have been as provocative to the Arab countries
as your ham-fisted little military adventure, their stance should
probably be counted as anti-terrorist.

As Win Hill has pointed out, Irak is now a terrorist's amusement
arcade - the infidel invaders are the targets to be knocked down, and
the rewards are instant promotion to heaven by being killed while
pursuing a holy war (jihad) - and the customers are flocking in. A
really effective anti-terrorist move on your part :-(

To accomodate the average right-wing nit-wit, I'll point out that the
last sentence of the above paragraph is intended to be read
ironically, not literally.

-------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
Hmmm. "CAD" ?
let's see "Complain about democracy?"
" Cast aspersions directly?"
"Can't avoid digressing? "

Must be something along those lines ;-~
 
In article <7c584d27.0312030857.28ad03ff@posting.google.com>,
bill.sloman@ieee.org (Bill Sloman) writes:
toor@iquest.net (John S. Dyson) wrote in message news:<bqh4dd$1etf$2@news.iquest.net>...
In article <3FCBFB88.22C7@armory.com>,
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> writes:
John S. Dyson wrote:

It is interesting where the 'socialist meccas' like France and
Germany are also having problems with their budgets, and they
don't even do a competent job of providing for their own defense.
----------------------
They have the industrial output, they simply prefer to spend it
on luxuries as long as they can.

The cost of defense isn't really that great (very few defense
plants per-se in the US.) It is that the LAZY-ASS socialist meccas
choose to suckle off the American teat.

American spending in defence is equal to the sum of the total defence
spending of the next ten nations down the pecking order.

This shows how inadequate an incapable most of the other nations
are. I doubt that any European nation other than Switzerland
or perhaps UK could actually defend themselves on their own
soil.

The paranoid reaction to this would be to assume that you plan to
invade the lot of us at once.

Yes -- you do show some serious paranoid/incompetent thinking.


The realistic reaction is probably that your politico-economic
structure is in a mess,

Actually, it has some problems, but our productivity is still
pretty damned good. The biggest problem is that your own nations
are mostly basket cases -- IN-EXTREMIS, both culturally and
economically. Geesh, are the Europeans starting to go around Jew
bashing yet? Sure looks like that is the trend.

In a funny (in a sad way), you have demonstrated your rot that
I have been trying to explain to you.

John
 
["Followup-To:" header set to sci.electronics.design.]
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 10:32:14 -0700,
Jim Thompson <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote
in Msg. <d37ssvs5ocpjqvlg08qated2pm1vd35gmq@4ax.com>

I look forward to bombing you off the face of the earth.
Thanks for a valuable piece of insight from an American standpoint.

--Daniel

--
"With me is nothing wrong! And with you?" (from r.a.m.p)
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top