Interesting Letter-to-the-Editor

"Brian" <big@bad.com> wrote in message
news:EdadnXQBru9zuliiRVn-tA@centurytel.net...
No, I am a boring monodimensional supercool automaton.
But I'm cute, too.
Click to expand...
My heart be still. Now if you were only dumb and blond too [sigh] :)

Happy Thanksgiving all!

snip...snip...snip...
 
Jim Thompson wrote:
Interesting Letter-to-the-Editor:

http://www.analog-innovations.com/Musings/LiberalRacists.pdf

...Jim Thompson
Click to expand...

The "racism" by the left that is really of concern is much more subtle
and insidious than the article implies.

I am convinced that the reason for the blockade by liberal minded folks
against non-white judges is due to the fact that they cannot risk
allowing successful minorities to get into positions of judicial power
where they can tell criminally charged minorities that the root cause of
their problems is not oppression by whites but their own personal
irresponsibility.

The very fact of successful minorities is the one that the people of
liberal views want to suppress in order to preserve their power base
which heavily depends upon pandering to those who want to blame others
for their failure rather than to work hard and earn success. I even
think they are trying to pull in normally successful minorities such as
Asians into their delusion. Note that it is never the case to hear it
mentioned in the media that Chinese and Japanese families earn more than
whites on average in the USA, though this fact was spelled out plainly
in a sociology text that I browsed a few years ago. But it doesn't fit
the plan so well, so it isn't spoken. Rather, all you hear is the
minorities=lower income than whites mantra repeated ad nauseum.

I don't really believe that most people with liberal politics are overt
racists in the sense of fitting the dictionary definition. I believe
they want power, and some of them are willing to try to hype an illusion
of a society pervaded by racism in order to get power. Then again, I
think some conservatives are willing to engage in similar manipulations
in order to gain power.

Thus, I find most of what I see happening in politics disgusting, and it
repels me from wanting to participate. There is a dangerous
polarization into increasingly extreme liberal and conservative camps
taking place here in the USA, leaving us moderate folks high and dry.
When we are no longer calling each other "people" but only "liberals"
and "conservatives" then we are in grave danger.

Good day!

P.S. I am *not* a liberal, conservative, independent, or any other sort
of political or ideological identity. I am a human, from a place called
Earth, that is all.

--
_____________________
Christopher R. Carlen
crobc@earthlink.net
Suse 8.1 Linux 2.4.19
 
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:32:10 -0600, "Brian" <big@bad.com> Gave us:

DarkMatter, do you come here to be punished? Do you want HUGE man to enter
you from behind? Psychology suggests that your action may be related to the
desire for flesh to fill your rectum.
Click to expand...
Again, you have nothing but retarded top posted baby bullshit to
contribute.

Along with the retarded, baby bullshit slurs, you are batting 1000
for the Most Retarded Usenet Poster Award.

Yer email should read lameboy@here.com

You couldn't punish an ant, you lame fuk. You are about as mature
as a fresh turd.
 
Odd how "shit" and "turd" are recurring themes in your posts. Is this what
you crave on your tiny member? Are you so bunghole oriented that this is
where your mind is trapped?

Tell us about your Daddy....


"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:f3icsv02o6ips4ds35t07hb082tmeplcj2@4ax.com...
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:32:10 -0600, "Brian" <big@bad.com> Gave us:

DarkMatter, do you come here to be punished? Do you want HUGE man to
enter
you from behind? Psychology suggests that your action may be related to
the
desire for flesh to fill your rectum.

Again, you have nothing but retarded top posted baby bullshit to
contribute.

Along with the retarded, baby bullshit slurs, you are batting 1000
for the Most Retarded Usenet Poster Award.

Yer email should read lameboy@here.com

You couldn't punish an ant, you lame fuk. You are about as mature
as a fresh turd.
Click to expand...
 
"John S. Dyson" <toor@iquest.net> wrote in message
news:bq5v3e$12cp$1@news.iquest.net...
In article <bq5bma02pbb@enews4.newsguy.com>,
Chris Carlen <crobc@BOGUS_FIELD.earthlink.net> writes:

Thus, I find most of what I see happening in politics disgusting, and it
repels me from wanting to participate. There is a dangerous
polarization into increasingly extreme liberal and conservative camps
taking place here in the USA, leaving us moderate folks high and dry.
When we are no longer calling each other "people" but only "liberals"
and "conservatives" then we are in grave danger.

A most interesting item of note: Did you notice that when someone
has a reasonable, cogent, practical set of ideas, and advocates
some kind of 'independent' thought, that the lefties will call that
person any name EXCEPT liberal or leftist? In essense, the lefties
tend to trick themselves into calling honest/intelligent/successful
people ANYTHING except leftist?

snip

In actuality, you'll find the right-wing (non-far-right) to be
much more tolerant and liberal than most of the left wing (in
the US.) So, the terminology: liberal, isn't really an accurate
description of the American left. The American left tends towards
reactionary, intolerant/doctorinare and narrow-minded conservative.
Click to expand...
My, my, if you were a Senator, the filibuster would never end.
First I'd like to say that before we get into how far "right"
or "left" someone is, we must look at the 2 main methods with
which politics is viewed. (1) There is the "Me" factor, which
most of the public uses. How what the government affects "ME",
and (2) The overall affect of the same on the sociological and
financial well-being of the nation in general, or moreover, the
entire world. The question remains. How many of the "ME"'s have
enough knowledge of the sociological and financial fabric of the
nation to even decide whether to be "left", "right" or
"far-right", and how many politicians are there that are remotely
dedicated to upholding that fabric? There is a fine line between
stability and instability, and who among us has the intelligence
and education in such matters to ensure that line is not crossed.
Many times it is, but sometimes a compromise is necessary in order
to bring an issue that has crossed that line back into perspective.
For me, specifically, the consideration concerning Medicare and
Prescription Drugs "is" very important. I am on Disability, and I
have prescriptions that cost quite a bit. I am all for a plan that
will help me to acquire these drugs, even if most of the nation
works and has a plan through their employers. If we're going to
discuss politics, at least pick a topic that can be discussed.
All this talk of "right and left" gets us nowhere. It's been going
on too long, probably since the US became a country.

Bill @ GarberStreet Enterprizez };-)
Web Site - http://garberstreet.netfirms.com
Email - willy4SPAM6pa@comXcast.net
Remove - SPAM and X to contact me



If you look at 'Archie Bunker', but insert leftist ideas into his
mind -- you'll find the typical leftist like Slow-man nowadays.

John
Click to expand...

---
This email ain't infected, dude!

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 11/25/03
 
In news:bq5bma02pbb@enews4.newsguy.com,
Chris Carlen typed:
Thus, I find most of what I see happening in politics disgusting, and
it repels me from wanting to participate. There is a dangerous
polarization into increasingly extreme liberal and conservative camps
taking place here in the USA, leaving us moderate folks high and dry.
When we are no longer calling each other "people" but only "liberals"
and "conservatives" then we are in grave danger.
Click to expand...
If you choose not to participate, then who is it who leaves you high and
dry?

Get into the action. I was a Forbes delegate candidate in the 2000
primary. (Had he won my district I would have been a delegate at the
convention.) At least I have a great souvenir: a presidential primary
ballot sheet with my name on it!

Question to panel of 2000 primary candidates: "Who is your favorite
philosopher?"

Bush: "Jesus Christ"
Keyes: "Jesus Christ"
Forbes: "I like John Locke."

My man! But where were people like you?


--
-Reply in group, but if emailing add 2 more zeros-
-and remove the obvious-
 
In article <bq5bma02pbb@enews4.newsguy.com>,
Chris Carlen <crobc@BOGUS_FIELD.earthlink.net> writes:
Thus, I find most of what I see happening in politics disgusting, and it
repels me from wanting to participate. There is a dangerous
polarization into increasingly extreme liberal and conservative camps
taking place here in the USA, leaving us moderate folks high and dry.
When we are no longer calling each other "people" but only "liberals"
and "conservatives" then we are in grave danger.

A most interesting item of note: Did you notice that when someone
Click to expand...
has a reasonable, cogent, practical set of ideas, and advocates
some kind of 'independent' thought, that the lefties will call that
person any name EXCEPT liberal or leftist? In essense, the lefties
tend to trick themselves into calling honest/intelligent/successful
people ANYTHING except leftist?

An anathema to most of the left and the far right is when ideas
are expressed that are 'reasonable' and respectful and truly
accepting of different cultural ideas. The leftists do tend to
wish to expunge all ideas except for their own narrow minded
views of reality. The far-right is similar in some ways, but
luckily they have little control over the prominent educational
establishment or significant editorial control in the general
mainstream media. Oh so horribly, the left does have too much
influence in those critical constituents of freedom -- and
the left works aggressively to suppress alternative ideas.
(A perfect and simple example is the aggressive suppression of
speeches by right-wing (not just far-right-wing advocates.)

In actuality, you'll find the right-wing (non-far-right) to be
much more tolerant and liberal than most of the left wing (in
the US.) So, the terminology: liberal, isn't really an accurate
description of the American left. The American left tends towards
reactionary, intolerant/doctorinare and narrow-minded conservative.

If you look at 'Archie Bunker', but insert leftist ideas into his
mind -- you'll find the typical leftist like Slow-man nowadays.

John
 
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:41:25 -0600, "Brian" <big@bad.com> Gave us:

Odd how "shit" and "turd" are recurring themes in your posts. Is this what
you crave on your tiny member? Are you so bunghole oriented that this is
where your mind is trapped?

Tell us about your Daddy....
Click to expand...
You are completely oblivious to how fucked in the head you are. It
is you that reveals tid bits about yourself.

I never said anything about any of the things you mention. The
fantasies appear to be 100% yours.

You are so obviously adolescent, regardless of any numerical age you
may have reached.
 
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 23:32:05 GMT, "Tom Del Rosso"
<tdnews01@att.net.invalid> wrote:

In news:bq5bma02pbb@enews4.newsguy.com,
Chris Carlen typed:

Thus, I find most of what I see happening in politics disgusting, and
it repels me from wanting to participate. There is a dangerous
polarization into increasingly extreme liberal and conservative camps
taking place here in the USA, leaving us moderate folks high and dry.
When we are no longer calling each other "people" but only "liberals"
and "conservatives" then we are in grave danger.

If you choose not to participate, then who is it who leaves you high and
dry?

Get into the action. I was a Forbes delegate candidate in the 2000
primary. (Had he won my district I would have been a delegate at the
convention.) At least I have a great souvenir: a presidential primary
ballot sheet with my name on it!

Question to panel of 2000 primary candidates: "Who is your favorite
philosopher?"

Bush: "Jesus Christ"
Keyes: "Jesus Christ"
Forbes: "I like John Locke."

My man! But where were people like you?
Click to expand...
I voted for Forbes here in AZ.

I'm for John Locke and John Stuart Mill ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
In news:m85dsvsf7q1m0o8gid0iiufsdhsfmgjenu@4ax.com,
Jim Thompson typed:
I'm for John Locke and John Stuart Mill ;-)
Click to expand...
And Kant isn't bad either.


--
-Reply in group, but if emailing add 2 more zeros-
-and remove the obvious-
 
"Tom Del Rosso" <tdnews01@att.net.invalid> wrote:
In news:m85dsvsf7q1m0o8gid0iiufsdhsfmgjenu@4ax.com,
Jim Thompson typed:
I'm for John Locke and John Stuart Mill ;-)

And Kant isn't bad either.
Click to expand...
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
Who was very rarely stable.


Tim
--
And the beast shall be made legion. Its numbers shall be increased a
thousand thousand fold. The din of a million keyboards like unto a great
storm shall cover the earth, and the followers of Mammon shall tremble.
- The Book of Mozilla, 3:31
 
In news:088dsv4m0vlj38jne9lsih7gm9fojp9vm9@4ax.com,
Tim Auton typed:
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
Who was very rarely stable.
Click to expand...
What's the rest of the limerick?


--
-Reply in group, but if emailing add 2 more zeros-
-and remove the obvious-
 
John S. Dyson wrote:
In article <bq5bma02pbb@enews4.newsguy.com>,
Chris Carlen <crobc@BOGUS_FIELD.earthlink.net> writes:

Thus, I find most of what I see happening in politics disgusting, and it
repels me from wanting to participate. There is a dangerous
polarization into increasingly extreme liberal and conservative camps
taking place here in the USA, leaving us moderate folks high and dry.
When we are no longer calling each other "people" but only "liberals"
and "conservatives" then we are in grave danger.

A most interesting item of note: Did you notice that when someone
has a reasonable, cogent, practical set of ideas, and advocates
some kind of 'independent' thought, that the lefties will call that
person any name EXCEPT liberal or leftist? In essense, the lefties
tend to trick themselves into calling honest/intelligent/successful
people ANYTHING except leftist?

An anathema to most of the left and the far right is when ideas
are expressed that are 'reasonable' and respectful and truly
accepting of different cultural ideas. The leftists do tend to
wish to expunge all ideas except for their own narrow minded
views of reality.
Click to expand...
They use the media to distort a moderate idea by twisting words to make it
look extreme.

In actuality, you'll find the right-wing (non-far-right) to be
much more tolerant and liberal than most of the left wing (in
the US.) So, the terminology: liberal, isn't really an accurate
description of the American left. The American left tends towards
reactionary, intolerant/doctorinare and narrow-minded conservative.
Click to expand...
They're just liberal with the facts.
 
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 01:33:38 GMT, the renowned "Tom Del Rosso"
<tdnews01@att.net.invalid> wrote:

In news:088dsv4m0vlj38jne9lsih7gm9fojp9vm9@4ax.com,
Tim Auton typed:

Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
Who was very rarely stable.

What's the rest of the limerick?
Click to expand...
Immanuel Kant was a real pissant
who was very rarely stable.

Heidegger, Heidegger was a boozy beggar
who could think you under the table.

David Hume could out consume
Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel,

And Wittgenstein was a beery swine
who was just as sloshed as Schlegel.

There's nothing Nietzsche couldn't teach ya
'bout the raisin' of the wrist.

Socrates himself was permanently pissed.

John Stuart Mill, of his own free will,
after half a pint of shandy was particularly ill.

Plato, they say, could stick it away,
'alf a crate of whiskey every day!

Aristotle, Aristotle was a bugger for the bottle,
and Hobbes was fond of his Dram.

And Rene Descartes was a drunken fart:
"I drink, therefore I am."

Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed.

http://www.library.adelaide.edu.au/guide/hum/philosophy/philos_song.au

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top