Electric Cars Not Yet Viable

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:8usehe5gmd1a4v2h2mnj3ba9ai9u1e1uq0@4ax.com:

Electrivity? No, I don't know much avout that.

Are you devout in your position?

It's avout time... it's avout space...
 
upsidedown@downunder.com wrote in
news:7ngehelnkhiifgocmb28e9daic9j08bkkq@4ax.com:

3.) Power lost in the cable is critical especially in high voltage
(high power) lines, i.e. how many power plants are needed for just
generate the power losses dissipated in a national grid. At some
point it becomes more economical to add thicker lines or complete
new lines.

The reason it is at high voltage is because losing 150 volts out
of 11,000 is no big deal, but that same run on 120 volts means next
to nothing makes it to the other end voltage wise.

So smaller conductors are fine. Using silver clad conductors
would not provide enough of a gain to make it worth doing. The
losses at hudreds of thousands of volts are even less.

We generate power and not much is lost on the wire. More is lost
in leakage due to dirty insulators and carbon paths along the
distribution runs. Once down to residential voltages, the
transformer can be set up to make up for a long run and have the
same voltage at the taps for the customer.

We had a huge Sola power conditioning transformer on our entire
house feed. Keeps the UPS happy when the Generac is in service.
Power outage used to kick them on as they did not like the Generac's
waveform. Outside spikes would kick them on occasionally too. So
the Sola made everything happy and soaks up external spikes and such
as well.
 
upsidedown@downunder.com wrote in
news:7ngehelnkhiifgocmb28e9daic9j08bkkq@4ax.com:

There are several situations that limits how much power can be
transferred in a wire, some technical, some economical.

The main 'limit' factor is temperature rise at 100% duty.

A wire must maintain integrity in its installed location through
its entire 'run' or 'path'.

That rise must be lower than that which would affect any
surrounding elements, so for the most part, that rise is kept pretty
low, Usually less than the actual capacity for the conductor to
carry from an engineering POV. But then, engineers are those that
set the standards and observe the function of such elements of
electrical circuits.
Our standards are put in place by the NFPA.
https://www.nfpa.org/


It is usually kept low enough so as not to soften regular PVC
coverings. That is also low enough to keep nearby elements unharmed
as well.

That is why pushing the wrong loads on a circuit with a slow to
act breaker might cause the wires in that branch to become warmer
than they should. This is why branch design and breaker choice is
important, as are the standards.

One good analysis of this whole thing might be to discuss what the
difference is between our fifty foot extension cord at #14 Ga. 120V
and the UK 15 meter version at 240 volts. What do you guys do on a
job site with a circular saw? Do you Amercian circular saws or are
there 240 volt version everywhere else in the world?
 
On Sunday, June 30, 2019 at 1:43:10 AM UTC+2, k...@notreal.com wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:29:09 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 8:06:41 AM UTC-7, k...@notreal.com wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:01:23 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Monday, June 24, 2019 at 7:52:00 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:

<snip>

In the old garden of Eden, there was no economy; all needs were
satisfied. For breathing air, that's still the economic model,
but it's an illusion: the (1952?) black fog in London killed thousands,
and air-quality regulation, with its associated costs, has been with us
ever since.

The problem with you lefties is that you _really_ believe that
government can deliver you to the Garden of Eden, when in reality,
your socialist ideas bring hell on Earth.

Totalitarian regimes casn create hell on Earth, and some have chosen to call themselves socialist.

Democratic socialist governmens in Scandinavia and northern Europe get rather closer to delivering a garden of Eden that the current US system, but krw is too dim to appreciate the difference between how regimes chose to describe themselves and the way they actualy work.

The last hundred years
should be plenty of evidence but your eyes will never see.

There is, but krw can't see that it contradicts his blinkered point of view..

We don't just WANT air, we need it. Oil and gas, we just want. People
can live without consuming petrochemicals.

Petrochemicals like CO2?

Corporate sales of air are not distorting your perceptions, but those of gas and oil and coal put a LOT of PR money between your eyes and the reality.

They make my life *immensely* better.

Burning them currently supplies most of the electric power that makes krw's life better than it would have been a few hundred yers ago. If the electric power came from some other source, krw would live just as well, apart from a nagging feeling that things weren't the way they used to be.

> They _allow_ all good things from clean water to clean air for a few billion people. But your eyes will never see.

Krw's eyes are blind to the fact that it's the energy being gnerated that makes the difference, and that if it were generated some way other than it used to be life would be equally good (and anthropogenic global warming might slow down).

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 17:25:20 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 19:50:31 -0400, krw@notreal.com wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 08:13:49 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 07:51:03 -0700 (PDT), trader4@optonline.net wrote:

On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 10:50:32 PM UTC-4, Rick C wrote:
On Tuesday, June 25, 2019 at 10:47:16 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 6/24/19 3:52 PM, omnilobe@gmail.com wrote:
A battery exchange station will replace the gas station.
It is faster to remove a battery block and put a fresh
block in than it is to fill a tank with gasoline. It is
safer than a self-driving auto-pilot tesla.


The flat packs weigh the better part of a 1000 lbs and fill most of the
negative space under the floor of the car how do you propose to swap
them out rapidly? they're part of the structure of the car

Tesla was working on this approach. I believe it was fairly recently (last four years maybe) they decided to drop the idea.

I would assume this was for something like taxis or other use where you need to keep the vehicle on the road most of the time. It's really not that big of a deal for a standard use vehicle even on trips.


See what you say when you have a family emergency and need to travel 400
miles and your car is near empty Even to go on a ski trip from NYC to VT
it's absurd. It's already a five or six hour trip and who wants to
make it even longer? I'm not going to plan my life around my car's
limitations.




Does it get cold in the winter in Vermont? E cars don't like cold.

No, never. It's always 75F and sunny in Vermont, except on the ski
slopes. All lefties should move there now! It's one place their
politics can't destroy.

We need to invent a car that runs on wood, or maple syrup.

You must be quite desperate (as in Europe during WWII) if you really
want wood gas cars https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wood_gas
 
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:hc5fhe9f1b3vh0qphqhaq2tao6cc31h5pj@4ax.com:

On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:03:08 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net
wrote:

On 6/25/19 3:38 AM, upsidedown@downunder.com wrote:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 03:21:13 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net
wrote:


as far as I can tell JL neither believes that there are
environmental consequences to burning fossil fuels, or that
the supply of fossil fuels is in any way practically limited
in other than a theoretical sense.

CO2 is greening the Earth. We have been in danger of running
out over the last hundred million years. The plants would all
die if we don't feed them.

As long as there are also sufficient more water and nutrients,
the higher CO2 level will increase plant growth.

Oh, do you suppose fresh water supplies _increase_ with
increasing human population and average temperatures?

With higher temperatures, the evaporation from sea and land will
increase, adding H2O into the atmosphere. To maintain humidity
levels below saturation, this will also increase total rainfall.

The rain might not fall in the same places as previously, but
the total rainfall is proportional to evaporation.


Right, fat lot of good it does if all that snow melt evaporates
away in the summer and rains out over the ocean before it can be
used.

Lake Powell:

https://yourhub.denverpost.com/blog/2019/01/alert-lake-powell-is-
n
ear-historic-lows-and-thats-a-big-deal-for-denver/233480/

about 10% or more of the Colorado River's total yearly flow is now
lost in Lake Powell; the sandstone leaks about 3% of it away and
the rest into the evaporation rate which is increasing each year.

Lake Powell is artificial, and most of its water is exported to
Arizona, Nevada, and California. There's nothing natural going on
there.

We have made reservoirs all over the world for millennia.

There is nothing intelligent going on between your ears.

They release as much water as the river ever flowed before it was
created. Damn you guys are stupid sometimes.

If there is less water, it is not the fault of the fucking lake.

A slight bit more evaporation, but even that is not even a drop in
the bucket compared to what is actually happening.
 
Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:aaf5705b-5633-4857-aa8d-025c0e6c4afa@googlegroups.com:

On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 10:34:08 AM UTC-4, John Larkin
wrote:

Electric metering has some interesting math. It's actually hard
to make an electronic meter that's as good as the old rotating
disk things.

Quite doable, just a different but similar approach. The problem
is the range of power draw under which it must accurately gauge
usage.
It's easy to make one better. The rotating disk meter is easily
mucked by a simple magnet.

No, it is not (easily mucked up with a simple magnet)
..
You *might* be able to make a barely discernable difference in
reading the same loading IF you were spinning a magnet nearby.
Almost always will get zero net result, however.

Still not likely at all considering the construction.

The externally applied mag field will have virtually zero effect
on the disc while it is reading the same load. The two coils of AC
that actually "motor" the disc will not be influenced enough by your
static mag field to change their rotation pressure on the disc.
Any momentary perturbations will have a zero net result.
 
On 2019-06-30, John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 23:27:16 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts
jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

On 2019-06-29, John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote:
Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

For 115V you need wires 4 with times cross section to get the same
power loss as for and equivalent power load at 240V

I need a translation.

I'm talking about how much copper is needed to meet a fractional power
loss target in power distriution, somehow I seem to have substiuted
115 for 120

Ag assume a 1200W load,

At 120V that's 10A , and a 0.01 ohm resustiance in the wires dissipates 1W

At 240V that's 5A, and you can use thinner wires ( 0.04 ohms) and
still see 1W loss.

But 120-N-120 at 10 amps per hot wire delivers 2400 watts. So does
240-N at 10 amps per wire.

So you want to change the subject again (and/or back), ok.

The wires from the transformer down the street, to my house, are
120-N-120. I think the neutral wire is smaller than the hot ones. The
only copper penalty for the US residential distribution scheme is
adding 1 neutral wire to two hot ones, as compared to one neutral
added to three in europe.

yeah but the voltage is significantly lower.
and because of that the currents are higher.

--
When I tried casting out nines I made a hash of it.
 
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:m7ufhe5cim579bqacjk8n7ag9nu07mdk4s@4ax.com:

On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 19:44:17 -0400, krw@notreal.com wrote:

On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 09:50:00 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:53:15 -0400, krw@notreal.com wrote:

On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 19:34:57 -0000 (UTC), John Doe
always.look@message.header> wrote:

Wait a minute... Just yesterday, Loony was bashing me for
"knowing nothing about electronics design". Now, Loony is
bashing electronics engineers...

What's so surprising? He's a coastal elite liberal-arts
snowflake, not an electronics engineer.

Isn't he a coder?

Script kiddie, at best.

I wonder what fraction of coders recognize the term "state
machine."

Down in Florida, that is what they use to fuck with election
results...

Yeah... that's it...
 
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:ce009f82-38ee-4e36-9fbe-c3ec821fda33@googlegroups.com:

Sadly, even burning natural gas injects enough CO2 into the
atmosphere that we can't afford to get much of our energy that
way.

We should all pack up and move to Tralfamador then.

The toxic atmosphere there has to be better than what we are doing to
ourselves here.

Of all the things that are bad when they burn, NG is one of the
cleanest. At least available ones. We could burn Hydrogen, if it were
easier to gather.
 
keith wright <keith@kjwdesigns.com> wrote in
news:2de79dd6-3b43-4285-a5c8-180763723e65@googlegroups.com:

On Saturday, 29 June 2019 10:15:42 UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
...
Pay with a credit card and plug in, then the next guy parks in
between stations that are in use, so he unplugs you and
connects himself. Extension cords would have become available
by then.

The paying-for-charging negotiation would be electronic, between
the car and the charger. Next guy might unplug you and connect
himself, but he'd pay for the current.

Currently only Tesla uses authentication between the car and
charging station for billing purposes.

The high-speed DC charging standard implemented on all EVs that
support it has a communication channel provided for car to charger
negotiation for such purposes - only needs appropriate software,
no physical changes required to existing designs.

An electronically controlled mechanical lock on the charging
plug/socket wouldn't be impractical.

Most EVs already do that and lock the charging plug in place when
the car doors are locked..

...

Things are likely to move toward cable free inductive charging
stations. They could still have ID signatures in the system.

A person should do the main charging overnight at home. The
charge one gets on the road only needs be supplemental and not at
full rate. Inductive proximity type charging could end up in many
locations.

What we need to do is change the entire driving paradigm, and that
means an entire new type of city need to be started.

Remember that guy in Arizona back in the '70s?

My ancestors were 'land speculators' and started many towns in
many states in this nation.

I want to build a city over the salt in Death Valley.

First: Place 100 foot by 1000 foot tanks in the ground. The salt
will be easy digging, so we can literally screw them in. Cover
several sqaure miles with these tanks, all filled with fresh water
from the pole (or Greenland) and all segregated from each other so
no cross contamination can take place.

Second, build the city above the tanks on a stilt array that
covers those square miles and shades the tanks. Under that layer,
one can have water curtain coolers to cool the air coming under they
city. Build another cover OVER the city and have water to the
leading edge facing the wind cooling up there as well.

Then, lightweight, 2 passenger electrics and single passenger
bikes, etc. for transit, plus some city level stuff like trolley
cars.

Rerservoir Cities like this need to be built in the desert band
all around the world and get polar ice into them.

Death valley is three miles deep of salt, so the digging is easy.
The tank base makes for the most stable 'platform' to built the
stilt array onto.

This would be a zero concrete city.
 
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 16:42:09 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 30 Jun 2019 00:48:36 +0300, upsidedown@downunder.com wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:12:01 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 07:05:14 +0300, upsidedown@downunder.com wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:04:02 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 16:17:35 -0700 (PDT), Lasse Langwadt Christensen
langwadt@fonz.dk> wrote:

fredag den 28. juni 2019 kl. 01.12.45 UTC+2 skrev John Larkin:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:31:20 +0300, upsidedown@downunder.com wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 07:55:53 +0100, Tom Gardner
spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

On 27/06/19 07:20, upsidedown@downunder.com wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 23:42:43 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 6/26/19 10:09 PM, Rick C wrote:
On Wednesday, June 26, 2019 at 9:57:47 PM UTC-4, keith wright wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 June 2019 18:14:57 UTC-7, bitrex wrote:
...
"Charging at home will require
the installation of a dedicated high-capacity outlet"

a 40 amp level 2 charger unit is plenty for many use cases and
installing one is not a complex job. it won't charge up the car in a
couple hours. it'll charge a 3 up ~150 miles overnight, how many people
are driving 150 miles a day every day goddamn.

The summary seems to make it out like you can either charge from a 120
volt outlet over 1.5 days or you have to install a three phase AC-DC
level 3 charger with a cable 4" in diameter to charge the car.

...

'Which' is a UK magazine so a normal wall socket can do up to 2-3kW (as a reference other cars in the UK seem to be set to 10A resulting in 2.4kW).

I did forget that this was a UK magazine. I have talked about this with folks from there and I never got a clear answer, but it seems like they do 13 amp outlets easily, but to get more they wire 3 phase, which *is* a lot more hassle... at least I guess so. They talk about totally different wiring methods than we use and smaller service to the house, so maybe higher current 240 volt outlets aren't so easy. On the other hand, they tend to drive shorter distances so the daily need for charging is not as much. The 3 kW available from a standard outlet gets you around 180 miles on a model 3... assuming they don't do the derating thing that we do in the US. Can someone confirm that?

In the UK there are a number of smaller EVs available with smaller batteries and higher mileage. I don't know the names, but they seem to work well according to the owners.


I believe it's common in the UK and Europe to have smaller per-dwelling
or per apartment (flat?) structure distribution transformer/pole pig as
compared to the US where there's usually one large pole pig to supply a
neighborhood

It is the other way around. In Europe pole mounted transformers are
typically 100-315 kVA feeding dozens of detached houses up to several
hundred meters from the distribution transformer.

Here you /never/ see pole mounted transformers for
domestic properties.

So you have those low transformer buildings every few hundred meters
feeding the houses around it.

In Finland, you can get at least a 3x63 A 230/400 V up to 600 m from
the (ground or pole mounted) distribution transformer from most
electric companies.

In the US, due to lower voltage and hence large currents, a
distribution "pig" transformer only serves one or at most a few
houses.

That's silly. The size of a transfomer depends on KVAs, not voltage.

My house is 120-0-120. In other words, it is fed 240 volts.


and here we get 3*240V using only one extra wire


Residential three phase?

I even have three phases in my top floor city apartment, although it
currently just feeds the electric stove. In my country house, the
electric sauna, electric stove and a small water pump is all three
phase.

Are any of those loads actually 3-phase devices, or are they just
three single-phase loads? Controlling true three power takes more
switches or triacs than single phase, and there is no benefit for
resistive or small motor loads.

The largest single phase motors I have seen here are less than 2 kW,
everything larger are three phase. A typical example would be the heat
pump.

The nice features of 3p motors is that no starter capacitor is needed,
you can change the rotation direction by swapping two phases, you can
easily make a wye/delta soft starter etc.

Large resistive heaters are 3p, such as sauna or indirect electric
heaters. If the resistive elements are connected in wye, you could in
principle feed them with a single phase paralleling the hot ends of
the elements, but the neutral current may be too large. If the
resistive elements are connected in delta, paralleling the phase wires
doesn't obviously work. Connecting one phase wire to neutral, a
greatly reduced power would be available.


Are there 3-phase outlets?

There are often a single 3x16 A three phase socket close to the
distribution panel, thus in practice you would need a long 3p
extension cords for ad hoc 3p loads. Such might be used especially
during the of the house to run some high power tools or temporary
heaters.

I do not know if it is even legal today, but a few decades ago some
welding transformers had taps for 220 V and 380 V. If only 220 V 10 A
was available, the 220 V tap was used and you could nominally load
with 2.2 kW. However if 3x10 A 220/380 V was available, connect the
primary 380 V tap between two phase wires from a three phase feed,
thus nominally 3.8 kW would be available.

These days a 6 pulse rectifier fed from a 3p supply would be used and
then a DC/DC converter at a higher frequency to generate the actual
(DC) welding arc. Older welders complained that the new welding
transformer was too light like a toy and did not remain in place when
moving the thick welding cables. Extra weight was added to some models
so that they looked more professional :).

I can't imagine that an electric stove has 3-phase heater elements.

Each element is single phase in domestic stoves.

One problem with ABCN (wye) 3-phase systems is neutral current. It is
zero in a well balanced system and no more than any leg current in a
badly balanced one... for sine wave loads. Nonlinear loads, particular
rectifiers followed by filter caps, can overload the neutral, because
the timing of the peak currents prevents cancellation.

Yes, this was a real problem a decade or two ago, especially with a
lot of single phase rectifier loads, such as a computer class full of
table top computers. There was problems especially with RCDs which
could malfunction in such situations.

Fires have
resulted in buildings with a lot of computers, neutral wires getting
hot.

That must have been with cables with the neutral cross section smaller
than any phase conductor cross section or the neutral conductor used
different metals with worse conductivity than phase conductors. This
assumed that most of the neutral current will cancel.

In modern installations the neutral conductivity is about the same as
the phase conductors and haven¨t heard of fires with such cables.

With big true three phase six pulse rectifier loads, such neutral wire
problem do not exist, since there is no neutral connection to the six
pulse rectifier ;-) nor are any big storage capacitors needed. The
very dirty phase connector current waveforms may require some form of
PFC.


>Which is why we have PFC power supplies now.

Power supplies grater than 70 W are required to have some sort of PFC,
thus extending the conduction angle and some neutral current overlap
and is canceled.

In Finland, the matriculation exams are done on laptops, so there
might be more than 100 computers in a big hall, but I haven't heard of
recent RCD or UPS problems in several hundred schools around the
country.
 
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote in news:1ca205ec-9276-49fb-bf30-
0cb88861870c@googlegroups.com:

People
can live without consuming petrochemicals.

Do you really think the infrastructure of any modern nation's cities
could do what you say? Food distribution logistics alone say you are
incorrect.

So, you are going to walk to what local market to buy your lettuce?

I do not think you have thought your position through very well.
 
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote in news:qf9p7o$966$2
@gioia.aioe.org:

> Damn you guys are stupid sometimes.

Should have said:

"Damn, you guys are dam stupid sometimes."
 
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 17:25:20 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

> We need to invent a car that runs on wood, or maple syrup.

Corn syrup more like.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
 
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 21:08:07 -0700, Rick C wrote:

Cities like Washington, DC already have streets lined with parking
meters. They have more recently introduced kiosks where you pay for
anywhere on the block and put the receipt visible in the car, so a
single larger ugly thing rather than a number of smaller ugly things.

I'll bet few buyers have considered the implications if they live in a
conservation area where stuff like that would never get passed. Not sure
if you have those in America, but they're extremely common in the UK.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
 
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 17:13:06 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

But 120-N-120 at 10 amps per hot wire delivers 2400 watts. So does 240-N
at 10 amps per wire.

I think the problem we're seeing here is complete failure to understand
in detail how things are done in another country. We're making
assumptions about other countries methods of power distribution that are
a fundamentally flawed. Hence we see normally intelligent people talking
what appears to be complete nonsense. And that is the nub of it.




--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
 
On 30/06/19 10:30, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 21:08:07 -0700, Rick C wrote:

Cities like Washington, DC already have streets lined with parking
meters. They have more recently introduced kiosks where you pay for
anywhere on the block and put the receipt visible in the car, so a
single larger ugly thing rather than a number of smaller ugly things.

I'll bet few buyers have considered the implications if they live in a
conservation area where stuff like that would never get passed. Not sure
if you have those in America, but they're extremely common in the UK.

I wouldn't say they are /extremely/ common, but there
are significant numbers of them.

More relevantly they are by definition pretty, so the
flats/houses are expensive which means that they tend
to be inhabited by Tesla's target demographics.
 
Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in news:qf9ufm$n0f$1@dont-
email.me:

On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 17:25:20 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

We need to invent a car that runs on wood, or maple syrup.

Corn syrup more like.

Why not water?
 
On 6/29/19 4:22 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 7:56:23 PM UTC+2, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 07:51:55 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:52:23 -0700 (PDT), omnilobe@gmail.com wrote:

A battery exchange station will replace the gas station.
It is faster to remove a battery block and put a fresh
block in than it is to fill a tank with gasoline. It is
safer than a self-driving auto-pilot tesla.

Is anyone doing that?

Around ten years ago I thought, if this EV thing continues, then we'll
have to go that way. Like a car wash where your car is pulled in and the
battery pack swapped.

Since a lot of the enviro-left live in cities where they park on the
street you'd think they would have thought about the impossibility of
charging "at home." Imagine what would happen if there were charging
stations all along the sidewalk, aside from being ugly. Pay with a
credit card and plug in, then the next guy parks in between stations
that are in use, so he unplugs you and connects himself. Extension cords
would have become available by then.



https://www.nhm.ac.uk/press-office/press-releases/leading-scientists-set-out-resource-challenge-of-meeting-net-zer.html

====

The metal resource needed to make all cars and vans electric by 2050
and all sales to be purely battery electric by 2035. To replace all
UK-based vehicles today with electric vehicles (not including the LGV
and HGV fleets), assuming they use the most resource-frugal
next-generation NMC 811 batteries, would take 207,900 tonnes cobalt,
264,600 tonnes of lithium carbonate (LCE), at least 7,200 tonnes of
neodymium and dysprosium, in addition to 2,362,500 tonnes copper. This
represents, just under two times the total annual world cobalt
production, nearly the entire world production of neodymium, three
quarters the world’s lithium production and at least half of the
world’s copper production during 2018. Even ensuring the annual supply
of electric vehicles only, from 2035 as pledged, will require the UK
to annually import the equivalent of the entire annual cobalt needs of
European industry.

=====

So what? Increase the demand, and the price goes up. Raise the price and a whole lot of mines will open up again that got closed down because their deposits weren't as easy to extract as those at the happy few who were able to satisfy world demand when it was lower.

When I was growing up in Tasmania, Tasmania's tin mines were forever being opened up again when the tin price was high, and closed down again as soon as there was enough supply to push the tin price back down again.

Some people don't seem to understand how free markets work.

Each year, the world's gasoline-powered vehicles consume nearly the
entire world's annual production of gasoline
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top