Electric Cars Not Yet Viable

John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in news:qfou5l$6an$2
@dont-email.me:

Even AlwaysWrong should know that imitating a brutal dictator
is disgusting and pathetic...

You embracing the near dead KRW retard's lame moniker makes you...

YASEDRT

Yet Another SED Retarded Troll.

Your troll post claiming that someone imitates some lame past
despot is 100% retarded Usenet baby bullshit.

Good job, DoeTard.

Fuck the message header, dumbfuck... you need content, and this
pissy bitch baby bullshit ain't it.

You rate about 1 out of ten in electronics, and even less in
Usenet.

 

upsidedown@downunder.com wrote in
news:k811ie9cvlih27j4h4dqurssbgsm28nk6v@4ax.com:

The largest sensible (unsegmented) conductor diameter is 15-20 mm
(150 - 300 mmý) due to the skin effect at 50/60 Hz.

Overhead power lines run the current on the smaller guage wire wrap
on the cable's outer diameter and the carry strand for the weight is in
the center. Skin effect is minimized. Diameters are larger than that
which you state.

Bundled HV cables run some 46 cm in diameter.

You say 'sensible' as if you are unaware of modern HV transmission
line construction and how they abate skin effect issues.

 

upsidedown@downunder.com wrote in
news:k811ie9cvlih27j4h4dqurssbgsm28nk6v@4ax.com:

There is time for them. How many electric trucks are on the road
these days ?

It seems that even if a viable offering existed, we are not yet ready
to integrate them into a trucking company's profile. Up front costs
are high, and the ROI would be decades in length.

They already operate pretty thin.

It's gonna be a bit.

 

upsidedown@downunder.com wrote in
news:k811ie9cvlih27j4h4dqurssbgsm28nk6v@4ax.com:

The problems is the age
and leakage rate of said current system.

While I have heard horror stories about the problems with the
electrification systems in the USA, I still do not believe that
_leakage_ would be the problem.

_leakage_ IS currently the MAIN problem with our grid. Bad, old,
leaky insulators, good insulators that need cleaning.

There are leakage paths all over the place, and I have lived in
places where while travelling to work on my bike at 4:30 in the
morning and hearing huge amount of leakage, and even smelling the
Ozone falling off the things... WAY too much.

We already pay for those losses. We do not need to further tax
the system. We need to replace much of it FIRST. BEFORE we go
adding another ten percent or more to the entire grid loading.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 2:40:07 PM UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in news:f531a10f-cdb0-4ffe-
8670-06e11dc04207@googlegroups.com:

The grid isn't some kind of static monolith.

Don't need a primer from a retard like you about the US electrical
grid.

You clearly need it from somebody.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 2:38:28 PM UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in news:f531a10f-cdb0-4ffe-
8670-06e11dc04207@googlegroups.com:

There certainly are underwater HV lines.

NOT ANY that get tapped along their entire length, you fucking idiot.
Look at the application. NOT transmission lines. Line which get
power pulled from the by nearby watercraft.

I said that. Of course your limited attention span meant that you didn't get that far into my post and snipped the restr of what I'd posted.

"Nobody has used them to power under-water inductive charging stations yet, but it's an idea. "

> You really have serious reading comprehension problems.

Yours would seem to be quite a bit worse. Try reading the whole post next time, and spelling out the longer words.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 2:35:33 PM UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in news:e0656687-f4de-4e2f-
b758-cecd6b76e323@googlegroups.com:

You might have meant "self important".

You misspell all the time. I do not. You are impotent, and you did
it to yourself. Hence, self impotent.

I was generously giving you the benefit of the doubt.

There may be a joke to be made out of the acoustic similarity of the words "impotent" and "important" but this isn't it. Go back and take a few lessons in elementary word-play, and shut up until you've got through the basics.

You get it now, chump!

No. Whatever you have - and it seems to be serviously disabling - doesn't seem to be contagious over the web.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Friday, July 5, 2019 at 6:57:52 PM UTC+2, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Thu, 04 Jul 2019 23:06:50 -0700, Rick C wrote:

In case you aren't aware, he makes up what he wants to believe without a
shred of evidence. This guy is pretty sad really. Rather than learning
about the world, he prefers to live in a make believe world and
criticize anyone who actually lives in the real world.

You're only saying that because you have issues with his politics. I
don't recognise that description of Michael and it seems to have come out
of nothing more substantial than pure spite on your part.

Cursitor Doom doesn't recognise much because he does have this habit of over-simplifying reality to get it down to the point that his feeble cognitive apparatus can cope with.

Mike Terrell - good - Rick C - bad - is about what he can manage.

Mike Terrell seems to have spent his career as a very good technician, and has the technician's tendency to devalue to the fancy stuff he gets told by engineers in favour of the stuff that works for him.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:3ab50963-0ca2-40a8-8930-9a2d94ae90f6@googlegroups.com:

"Nobody has used them to power under-water inductive charging
stations yet, but it's an idea. "

You really have serious reading comprehension problems.

Yours would seem to be quite a bit worse. Try reading the whole
post next time, and spelling out the longer words.

Figure it out, dipshit. I DELIBERATELY IGNORED your "idea" remark.
Doh!

 

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in news:4ea5cfd4-3f4a-4a97-
9f7f-63e281e09355@googlegroups.com:

You clearly need it from somebody.

Not true, and for one thing because YOU wouldn't and do not know.
You rank below abject idiot.

 

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:db08404a-76d8-4696-9963-e48fd2d54ed5@googlegroups.com:

There may be a joke to be made out of the acoustic similarity of
the words "impotent" and "important" but this isn't it.

Yes, it most certainly is exactly that. Doh!

You should have quit when you were behind.

Impotent it is! Bwuahahahahahahahahah!

That's OK, both it and you are also... not important.

So yes... Impotent... and yes... NOT important.

 

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in news:b909ca2f-73c8-4dd3-
945d-18f7f5466af2@googlegroups.com:

> The twaddle you were posting

Fuck you, BillyWad. Back in the shithead bin.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Tuesday, July 9, 2019 at 3:58:00 PM UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:5e9113bb-debf-460a-83f7-3ad6a77e21a9@googlegroups.com:

On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 10:36:03 PM UTC+2,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:4ea5cfd4-3f4a-4a97- 9f7f-63e281e09355@googlegroups.com:


You clearly need it from somebody.

Not true, and for one thing because YOU wouldn't and do not
know.
You rank below abject idiot.

How would you know? We all know that you might find it comforting
to think that, but "knowing" implies a bit more than that.


"You wouldn't and do not know" is the same as your "clearly need
it" crack, you retarded twit.

"You wouldn't and do not know" is your somewhat under-informed opinion.

The twaddle you were posting about a need to rip up and rebuild the electricity generating network to accomodate a 30% higher load makes it perfectly clear that you haven't got a clue about the subject.

I did provide a link to demonstate that the US electricity generation system has been growing steadily ever since it was set up - coping with a progressivley increasing number of electric cars that are going to need recharging from the grid isn't going to create a new and exciting situation.

> Hypocrite fucktard.

Nothing hypocritical about pointing out that you can act like an idiot when you feel you aren't being taken as seriously as you'd like - it does make you look like a fucktard, though you can do better when your fragile ego is less involved.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:5e9113bb-debf-460a-83f7-3ad6a77e21a9@googlegroups.com:

On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 10:36:03 PM UTC+2,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:4ea5cfd4-3f4a-4a97- 9f7f-63e281e09355@googlegroups.com:


You clearly need it from somebody.

Not true, and for one thing because YOU wouldn't and do not
know.
You rank below abject idiot.

How would you know? We all know that you might find it comforting
to think that, but "knowing" implies a bit more than that.

"You wouldn't and do not know" is the same as your "clearly need
it" crack, you retarded twit.

Hypocrite fucktard.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 10:36:03 PM UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in news:4ea5cfd4-3f4a-4a97-
9f7f-63e281e09355@googlegroups.com:


You clearly need it from somebody.

Not true, and for one thing because YOU wouldn't and do not know.
You rank below abject idiot.

How would you know? We all know that you might find it comforting to think that, but "knowing" implies a bit more than that.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Monday, July 8, 2019 at 10:34:57 PM UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:3ab50963-0ca2-40a8-8930-9a2d94ae90f6@googlegroups.com:


"Nobody has used them to power under-water inductive charging
stations yet, but it's an idea. "

You really have serious reading comprehension problems.

Yours would seem to be quite a bit worse. Try reading the whole
post next time, and spelling out the longer words.

Figure it out, dipshit. I DELIBERATELY IGNORED your "idea" remark.
Doh!

That's what they all say when they get caught out.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Tuesday, July 9, 2019 at 4:21:16 PM UTC+2, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in news:b909ca2f-73c8-4dd3-
945d-18f7f5466af2@googlegroups.com:

The twaddle you were posting

Fuck you, BillyWad. Back in the shithead bin.

You do leave it from time to time, but it is starting to look like your natural home.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney