EAGLE Netlist conversion

Rich Grise · Jan 21, 2005

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:05:25 +0000, John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Charles Edmondson
edmondson@ieee.org> wrote (in <41eff7fb$1@news.cadence.com&gt about 'OT:
Red States to Secede', on Thu, 20 Jan 2005:
Because that corporation employs thousands of persons whoe EACH pay
taxes...

and issues dividends to stockholders who EACH pay taxes...

They get their cut, eventually!

You could be right. If the corp pays little tax but high dividends, then
indeed there is a compensation effect. It's up to the government then to
set the corporation and personal tax rates to achieve a suitable
balance. There could even be an argument for abolishing corporation tax
and make it all personal. But then there are arguments against any
income tax at all ......

The primary one being, taxation is theft. The highwayman robs you once,
and goes away. The tax collector robs you repeatedly, year after year.

What gives any person the right to benefit from the fruits of another's
labor? Or Labour, for the Brits amongst us. ;-)

Thanks,
Rich

Rich Grise · Jan 21, 2005

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:02:43 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote:

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:52:42 -0800, the renowned John Larkin
jjSNIPlarkin@highTHISlandPLEASEtechnology.XXX> wrote:

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:43:07 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:28:00 -0500, Chuck Harris
cf-NO-SPAM-harris@erols.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

John, Don't waste your breath. Leftists just can not cope with the
concept that LESS taxes is a GOOD thing. Leftists throw up this
"corporate welfare" BS to confuse the masses... the masses who have NO
CLUE what it really is to PAY massive taxes... the masses who have NO
CLUE that it is THEY who are on welfare.

...Jim Thompson

It is really quite simple: If I pay more taxes, so you can pay less,
I am paying your way, and you are on welfare.

-Chuck

Yup. Just what I said. I'd just like to pay LESS of your way.

I pray for tax reform... but I doubt that it will ever happen... the
leftists won't allow anything that approaches fair taxation.

...Jim Thompson

The only rational taxation is a universal sales tax, with exemptions
for basics.

Screw the exemptions for "basics" (that's the politically easier
route, however). Give people money if they need it. The exemptions
cause a LOT of complexity with a reasonable VAT/GST type system
because of the way input tax credits have to be handled. AFAIK no
country has been able to do that (politically) at a useful tax rate.

That would reduce the huge disadvantage that domestic
manufacturers/employers face.

Income tax is a job-destroying machine.
John

*Replacing* IT with a GST/VAT at a reasonable rate would be nothing
short of revolutionary. Estate taxes should probably be jacked up
(make it easier to make money in this generation rather than
accumulate it over many), but that's another story.

What really needs to be repaired is the mindset that there's any
justification whatsoever for institutionalized theft.

Thanks,
Rich

David · Jan 21, 2005

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:16:03 +0000, John S. Dyson wrote:

In article <pan.2005.01.21.09.34.08.841000@westcontrol.removethis.com>,
David <david.nospam@westcontrol.removethis.com> writes:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 04:21:46 +0000, John S. Dyson wrote:

I don't know why the left hates Bush.

Gee, where do I begin?

He lied to get us into a war.

There is no proof that Bush lied. Please refer to a dictionary

Look, it's quite simple - what Bush said about WMD in Iraq was untrue.

That doesn't make it a lie... Note that the info sources had been damaged
by the Demoncrats (e.g. the CIA/Church Commission or Clinton in 1995/1996.)
That doesn't guarantee that Bush was telling the truth, but you have still
not given ANY ANY proof that Bush had lied. You keep on making up supposition,
and that isn't sufficient to condemn somone to be a liar. In essense,
you show your own dishonesty.

John

Perhaps I confused you by snipping too much of the attributions, but I did
not say he was a liar (although I personally believe he is). What I said
here, as you quoted me, is that he said things that were not true. Forget
your attempts at passing the buck to previous administrations for a
minute, and answer me this: was Bush telling the factual truth when he
said that Iraq had large quantities of WMD?

Given that there is exactly zero evidence of such weapons now or when the
claim was made, the obvious answer is no, it was not the truth. As you
say, this does not make it a lie - it is only a lie if Bush knew it was
not the truth. So tell me, why do you think Bush said it, and then based
a war on this claim? Do you think he knew? Do you think his advisors
knew and lied to him? Or do you think this is all a conspiracy by
previous democrate administrations to build a web of false information to
embarass future republicans?

John S. Dyson · Jan 21, 2005

In article <pan.2005.01.21.09.34.08.841000@westcontrol.removethis.com>,
David <david.nospam@westcontrol.removethis.com> writes:

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 04:21:46 +0000, John S. Dyson wrote:

I don't know why the left hates Bush.

Gee, where do I begin?

He lied to get us into a war.

There is no proof that Bush lied. Please refer to a dictionary

Look, it's quite simple - what Bush said about WMD in Iraq was untrue.

That doesn't make it a lie... Note that the info sources had been damaged

by the Demoncrats (e.g. the CIA/Church Commission or Clinton in 1995/1996.)
That doesn't guarantee that Bush was telling the truth, but you have still
not given ANY ANY proof that Bush had lied. You keep on making up supposition,
and that isn't sufficient to condemn somone to be a liar. In essense,
you show your own dishonesty.

John

Clarence_A · Jan 21, 2005

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message
news:SJVBkuAxfL8BFwMT@jmwa.demon.co.uk...

I read in sci.electronics.design that Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote (in
22p0v014iurg4i51d90o6aptvk7la26ilc@
4ax.com&gt about 'OT: Red States to Secede', on Thu, 20 Jan 2005:

He's senile. Most ineffective Pope EVER!

Popes are always against war - it goes with the job in the same
way as
they tend to be against sin. But this Pope hasn't been
ineffective; he's
pronounced, often, very conservative dogma that I thought you
would
support.

As if anyone really cares what he says!
He can barely even talk, (or stand,) and it's not understandable
when he tries!

This pope is "conservative" if it means he is listened to and
followed. Otherwise he is an arrogant elitist!

Jim Thompson · Jan 21, 2005

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:06:09 +0000, John Woodgate
<jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote (in <22p0v014iurg4i51d90o6aptvk7la26ilc@
4ax.com&gt about 'OT: Red States to Secede', on Thu, 20 Jan 2005:

He's senile. Most ineffective Pope EVER!

Popes are always against war - it goes with the job in the same way as
they tend to be against sin. But this Pope hasn't been ineffective; he's
pronounced, often, very conservative dogma that I thought you would
support.

And what would be "very conservative dogma that I thought you would
support"?

You misread me completely. In personal matters I'm basically a
libertarian... live and let live. Just don't do anything to me and I
won't do anything to you, or tell you how to live.

But, attack me or my country, and your ass is grass ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

Jim Thompson · Jan 21, 2005

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:34:12 +0100, David
<david.nospam@westcontrol.removethis.com> wrote:

,snip]

My personal opinion is that
while Bush probably knowingly lied on several occasions (he apparently has
no feelings of responsibility or scrupples),

[snip]

"Scrupples", is that like hemorrhoids ?

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

John Larkin · Jan 21, 2005

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:46:40 -0700, Jim Thompson
<thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:06:09 +0000, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote (in <22p0v014iurg4i51d90o6aptvk7la26ilc@
4ax.com&gt about 'OT: Red States to Secede', on Thu, 20 Jan 2005:

He's senile. Most ineffective Pope EVER!

Popes are always against war - it goes with the job in the same way as
they tend to be against sin. But this Pope hasn't been ineffective; he's
pronounced, often, very conservative dogma that I thought you would
support.

And what would be "very conservative dogma that I thought you would
support"?

You misread me completely. In personal matters I'm basically a
libertarian... live and let live. Just don't do anything to me and I
won't do anything to you, or tell you how to live.

But is a libertarian willing to help people who are far less well off?
Libertarianism is, after all, a hobby of the lucky and the wealthy.

The Est movement was the essence of libertarianism. It said,
essentially, "sure, for a tiny bit of consideration on my part, I
could greatly reduce your unhappiness. But screw you, it's your
problem."

John

Chuck Harris · Jan 21, 2005

John Larkin wrote:

You misread me completely. In personal matters I'm basically a
libertarian... live and let live. Just don't do anything to me and I
won't do anything to you, or tell you how to live.

But is a libertarian willing to help people who are far less well off?

Being a libertarian is a subscribing to a certain political philosophy.

Being charitable is caring for the well being others. They are
not mutually exclusive of each other.

-Chuck Harris

Rich The Newsgropup Wacko · Jan 22, 2005

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:13:46 -0800, John Larkin wrote:

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:42:31 GMT, Rich Grise <richgrise@example.net
wrote:

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:54:54 -0500, Spehro Pefhany wrote:

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 12:50:07 -0800, the renowned John Larkin
jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:

Simple fix: neither subsidize nor tax corporations.
John

Works for me! But who would contribute to election campaigns if there
were no money to fight over?

Well, first, we kill all the lawyers...

;-)

We always appreciate your original insights.

John, if it weren't for your insightful analysis, I'd have almost no

motivation to make up stupid crap! Or quote Shakespeare! ;-P

Thanks!
Rich

Jim Thompson · Jan 22, 2005

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:14:40 -0800, Mike <mike@nospam.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:53:14 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

http://www.analog-innovations.com/SED/JustaDoorDing.wmv

...Jim Thompson

ROFLMAO!

Of course, even though no politicians were mentioned by name, it's easy to
see who the two protagonists represent... ;-)

-- Mike --

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

Richard Henry · Jan 22, 2005

"Rich Grise" <richgrise@example.net> wrote in message
news

an.2005.01.22.10.24.19.551382@example.net...

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:53:13 -0800, Richard Henry wrote:

"Rich Grise" <richgrise@example.net> wrote in message
Well, first, we kill all the lawyers...

Did you hear about the guys in New York who were arrested for making
jokes
about lawyers?

No, what happened to them?

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/01/12/lawyer.jokes.arrest.ap/

David · Jan 24, 2005

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:55:05 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:34:12 +0100, David
david.nospam@westcontrol.removethis.com> wrote:

,snip]

My personal opinion is that
while Bush probably knowingly lied on several occasions (he apparently has
no feelings of responsibility or scrupples),

[snip]

"Scrupples", is that like hemorrhoids ?

...Jim Thompson

I don't know - is "hemorrhoids" incorrectly spelt too?

Clarence_A · Jan 24, 2005

"David" <david.nospam@westcontrol.removethis.com> wrote in message
news

an.2005.01.24.08.28.12.842000@westcontrol.removethis.com...

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:55:05 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:34:12 +0100, David
david.nospam@westcontrol.removethis.com> wrote:

,snip]

My personal opinion is that
while Bush probably knowingly lied on several occasions (he
apparently has
no feelings of responsibility or scrupples),

[snip]

"Scrupples", is that like hemorrhoids ?

...Jim Thompson

I don't know - is "hemorrhoids" incorrectly spelt too?

No, it's not!

Jim Thompson · Feb 2, 2005

On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 03:53:36 GMT, "Ban" <bansuri@web.de> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
http://awwa.org/communications/journal/2005/January/ExecSumm/ES3calles0105.cfm

by Jennifer Renee (Thompson) Calles

(Number 2 daughter ;-)

Hey Jim,
who was it giving a *FRENCH* name to his daughter?

41 years ago, who was to know ?

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

Tom Del Rosso · Feb 2, 2005

"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in message
news

jk0015csksq5n39dqep9t28ekmni3tphr@4ax.com...

On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 03:53:36 GMT, "Ban" <bansuri@web.de> wrote:

Hey Jim,
who was it giving a *FRENCH* name to his daughter?

41 years ago, who was to know ?

Well, Eisenhower did say, "Never trust the French", but I guess we needed a
reminder.

--

Reply in group, but if emailing add
2 more zeros and remove the obvious.

Watson A.Name - \"Watt Su · Feb 2, 2005

"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in message
news:5s5001hpj4uapgmhvdjfrk9js1t9bnmr19@4ax.com...

http://awwa.org/communications/journal/2005/January/ExecSumm/ES3calles01

05.cfm

by Jennifer Renee (Thompson) Calles

(Number 2 daughter ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--

The AWWA rents our campus every year and holds a 1 day affair that shows
off the latest technology and instruments that they are marketing to the
industry. It's really interesting to walk thru the booths they set up
on the mall with all the high tech instruments that are now available.
I think one of the devices is a flowmeter that doesn't use a propeller
and/or venturi like the old ones used. I forget if it uses ultrasonics
or the diff between two thermal sensors, sort of like an anemometer.

They have alot of the remote instrumentation stuff, on VHF or UHF freqs.
Like those small cabinets with the DIN thingys that allow you to snap in
modules for sensing pressure or level, etc. The master then polls these
remotes over the radio channel. Lotsa neat, cool stuff.

Also they show off these remote cameras that they put down the pipes to
inspect them. Sort of like that scope the doc uses on your anal cavity,
but a lot longer.

Jim Thompson · Feb 2, 2005

On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:41:19 +1300, Terry Given <my_name@ieee.org>
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:
http://awwa.org/communications/journal/2005/January/ExecSumm/ES3calles0105.cfm

by Jennifer Renee (Thompson) Calles

(Number 2 daughter ;-)

...Jim Thompson

Hi Jim,

good stuff. One day I too hope to bask in the reflected glory of my
progeny. I tried to download the PDF, but its for AWWA members only. Any
chance of making the PDF available - its interesting stuff, and I for
one would like to read the entire article.

Cheers
Terry

480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax

Terry Given · Feb 3, 2005

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 17:41:19 +1300, Terry Given <my_name@ieee.org
wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

http://awwa.org/communications/journal/2005/January/ExecSumm/ES3calles0105.cfm

by Jennifer Renee (Thompson) Calles

(Number 2 daughter ;-)

...Jim Thompson

Hi Jim,

good stuff. One day I too hope to bask in the reflected glory of my
progeny. I tried to download the PDF, but its for AWWA members only. Any
chance of making the PDF available - its interesting stuff, and I for
one would like to read the entire article.

Cheers
Terry

I see if and can get and post a copy.

...Jim Thompson

Many thanks.

Cheers
Terry

Genome · Feb 3, 2005

"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in message
news:5s5001hpj4uapgmhvdjfrk9js1t9bnmr19@4ax.com...

http://awwa.org/communications/journal/2005/January/ExecSumm/ES3calles0105.c

fm

by Jennifer Renee (Thompson) Calles

(Number 2 daughter ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even crap in the food.

Yes......

It's quite naive for her to allow LH to write that 'abstract',

It's quite branedead of you to crosspost it all over usenet.

DNA

EAGLE Netlist conversion

Rich Grise

Guest

Rich Grise

Guest

David

Guest

John S. Dyson

Guest

Clarence_A

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

John Larkin

Guest

Chuck Harris

Guest

Rich The Newsgropup Wacko

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Richard Henry

Guest

David

Guest

Clarence_A

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Tom Del Rosso

Guest

Watson A.Name - \"Watt Su

Guest

Jim Thompson

Guest

Terry Given

Guest

Genome

Guest

Log in

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor