Driver to drive?

(Paul S) wrote:

Can anyone comment on the reality (or lack thereof) of the "Energy
Sucking Radio Antenna" described here:

http://www.amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html
Click to expand...
Hint. Think magnetic field.... short range effect. Think electric field....
short range effect. When the two go together, ie an electromagnetic field....
very long range effect. Each one reinforces the other. That's the important
part
..
Therefore if you can manipulate one, you automatically manipulate the other.

And as I said, everyone seems to disagree on this "energy sucking" idea. So
when the flames start I will not respond.

Gibbo
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net>
wrote (in <nV58d.2435$r3.1139@trnddc05>) about 'Is this antenna article
serious?', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

He lost me at the imaginary Bussard ramscoop
Click to expand...
The Tnuctipun must have deleted that from the site, because I can't find
it.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Tim Shoppa <shoppa@trailing-
edge.com> wrote (in <bec993c8.0410031631.55979ae9@posting.google.com>)
about 'Good and large X-Y CRT?', on Sun, 3 Oct 2004:
I'd be satisfied with a
bare tube, but would be happy if someone could point me towards a source
of old Tektronix big-screen X-Y scopes.
Click to expand...
E-bay?
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
John Woodgate wrote:

You can
sue a bipolar or JFET
Click to expand...
Does this also apply to mosfets?

For breach of contract when they blow up?

Gibbo
 
On Monday 04 October 2004 01:32 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us with
the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <xa28d.3804$na.1297@trnddc04>) about 'Marketing blurb -
bullsh*t baffles etc', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

No, commietaters is what vodka is distilled from.

You've been infected by one of my memes, 'pun77', and Bill Sloman will
grumble at you.
--
Gruffly?
Click to expand...
 
On Monday 04 October 2004 01:37 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us with
the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that john jardine
john@jjdesigns.fsnet.co.uk> wrote (in <cjpvhv$34i$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.u
k>) about 'Marketing blurb - bullsh*t baffles etc', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:
Indeed.
I love the '-dyne's.
Something like a 'Cyberdyne' or 'Neurodyne' sounds fabulously tekky.

How VERY 1920s. (;-)
--
Well, I've been holding my tongue, but "Cyberdyne" is spoken for. Think
Click to expand...
"mimetic polyalloy."

Cheers!
Rich
 
On Monday 04 October 2004 01:35 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us with
the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Fred Bartoli <fred._canxxxel_this_
bartoli@RemoveThatAlso_free.fr_AndThisToo> wrote (in <41606ebd$0$24003$6
36a15ce@news.free.fr>) about 'Marketing blurb - bullsh*t baffles etc',
on Sun, 3 Oct 2004:

Autoadaptative nheuristron :))

Somewhat depressing...

Is the 'n' a typo or do we have to look for 'nheuris-' as a fun word in
some arcane language?
--
Click to expand...
Ah, grasshoopper - the mysterious insertion is the 'h'.

You will understand, if you desire.

Cheers! ;-)
Rich
 
On Monday 04 October 2004 02:59 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us with
the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <nV58d.2435$r3.1139@trnddc05>) about 'Is this antenna article
serious?', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

He lost me at the imaginary Bussard ramscoop

The Tnuctipun must have deleted that from the site, because I can't find
it.
--
Click to expand...
http://www.amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html
http://www.amasci.com/graphics/dp-absb2.gif

Right on the main page, about 5 screenscrolls down (maybe more if you
display fewer lines), under 'A "HOLE" IN PHYSICS', "Fig 1. Energy flux lines
for the nearfield region of a resonant absorber. The tiny absorber acts like
a large disk."

Looks kinda like a monopole, or very much like one of my metaphysical
magical mystical metaphenomena. I've never metaphenomenon I didn't like. ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
 
Rich Grise <null@example.net> says...

But according to this, I've received telepathic communication! I had
never heard the word before, in fact, I thought I made it up, when clearly,
I received it telepathically from the metaphysical quantum foam.
Click to expand...
....for extremely low values of "clearly"... :)
 
Roy McCammon wrote...
Winfield would be a star attraction, performing all sorts
of clever animal tricks.
Click to expand...
And for my next trick, ... OK, to save time I'll refer to my
last one, in the thread, "Is this antenna article serious?"
concerned with "Energy Sucking Radio Antenna" :>)


--
Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dotties-org for now)
 
On 3 Oct 2004 18:36:25 -0700, in sci.electronics.design you wrote:

Anybody out there work on Audio circuits?

I'm

Is there anyway to use microphone sound density input to generate a
isolated variable resistance output, to work as an automatic volume
control for varying ambient noise levels? Are there other ways to do
this?

Thanks in advance for any design hints…
LB
Detroit, Michigan

Cross posted to:
sci.electronics.design
rec.audio.tech
sci.electronics.basics
Analog Devices AD2165
Click to expand...




martin

Serious error.
All shortcuts have disappeared.
Screen. Mind. Both are blank.
 
Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> says...

Indeed, a standard part of Poynting vector classical EM physics,
Click to expand...
A.K.A. "The science most likely to be mangled by an editor's spellchecker"...
 
"ChrisGibboGibson" <chrisgibbogibson@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041002175124.11054.00001310@mb-m14.aol.com...
Suggestions ?

Gibbo

The last 2 products were just improved versions of competitors
products. This
is something totally new. I *know* they'll sell it. But a buzz
phrase for the
way it works would be nice.

Gibbo
Click to expand...
"Adaptron"?

Regards
Ian
 
I've yet to see a video game that ran electrostatic deflection.

What? You didn't do PONG on your scope when you were a kid?

;-P
Rich
Click to expand...
Yes, but that's the other way around.

--
KC6ETE Dave's Engineering Page, www.dvanhorn.org
Microcontroller Consultant, specializing in Atmel AVR
 
You won't find it in a magnetic deflection system.

even the vector type games used magnetic deflection, and the specs just
don't make it.

--
KC6ETE Dave's Engineering Page, www.dvanhorn.org
Microcontroller Consultant, specializing in Atmel AVR
 
On 4 Oct 2004 03:23:48 -0700, shoppa@trailing-edge.com (Tim Shoppa)
wrote:

2. Every sixtieth of a second, "age" all the pixels to simulate
phosphor persistence by going over every pixel and multiplying
its brightness by 0.95.
Click to expand...
My favorite persistance algorithm is to, at some rate, just compute a
random X-Y coordinate and zap that pixel. It makes a cool
fading-scintillating effect, and uses very little compute power and no
program memory. I could post an example (it would be an .exe file) to
a.b.s.e. if anybody would like to see it. I think Tek uses this in
their low-end digital scopes to fake persistance.

John
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlog
DOTyou.knowwhat> wrote (in <80p2m0t31e59lh17crfq4621a8ao3amc5g@4ax.com>)
about 'The Rational Mind of Fred Bloggs', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:
The
technical information is unusually detailed for a newspaper article.
Click to expand...
Oh, well, they were obviously fed it by Kerry supporters, then.

Is there ANYTHING that can't be represented as a conspiracy? (I believe
that in English law all you need is three people talking together. What
about is irrelevant.)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Guy Macon <http@?.guymacon.com>
wrote (in <10m2go2fv8iso54@news.supernews.com>) about 'Is this antenna
article serious?', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:
Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> says...

Indeed, a standard part of Poynting vector classical EM physics,

A.K.A. "The science most likely to be mangled by an editor's spellchecker"...


The term 'Poynting vector' is a tautology; all vectors point.
Click to expand...
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
In message <20041002150752.11054.00001292@mb-m14.aol.com>,
ChrisGibboGibson <chrisgibbogibson@aol.com> writes

<snipped>

We have another product being laucnched in about 2 months time.

I think they want a buzz phrase. I'm sure the same idea has been called some
great names in the past.

Suggestions ?

Gibbo
Click to expand...
Function morphing technology. Four-sprung pork technique.

Cheers
--
Keith Wootten
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top