Driver to drive?

Kenneth Keeley wrote:
Hi,
I am building a small 68000 computer from the ground up. I would
like to build a keyboard interface that would be able to use a pc
keyboard. Does anybody know of a simple circuit design that I could
use. I did find a design some time ago for an XT keyboard interface
using a serial to parallel convertor. Would this still work with an AT
keyboard. A link to a Circuit Diagram or at least a write up on a
circuit diagram would be great.

Thanks
Kenneth
The AT keyboard is yesterday's news -- the new big thing is to use USB
for everything. But the AT keyboard is still less expensive and easier
to apply, and will probably be available for years to come.

So you have the option of complicating your life with a USB interface,
which will let you do lots more than stick on a keyboard, or you may
want to keep things simple with the AT.

--

Tim Wescott
Wescott Design Services
http://www.wescottdesign.com
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that ChrisGibboGibson
<chrisgibbogibson@aol.com> wrote (in <20041004133041.24216.00001478@mb-
m10.aol.com>) about 'Marketing blurb - bullsh*t baffles etc', on Mon, 4
Oct 2004:
Keith Wootten wrote:

Four-sprung pork technique.


It's not often this NG makes me laugh.

You have to laugh at 90% of it at present, otherwise you'd scream.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
A vote for Bush is a vote for stupidity, dishonesty and ignorance.

Bush wants to help us preserve these great American Virtues.

Rocky
 
Hi Steve,

Two AD603 could do this but I don't know about audio, always used it for
RF. Also, it is way above your power budget.

You should be able to do this with Gilbert multipliers. Check out chips
like the old 1496 or any successors. I don't know that market because I
never use Gilbert cells for dynamic range reasons but I remember people
building audio VGAs with these.

Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
John Woodgate wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that ChrisGibboGibson
chrisgibbogibson@aol.com> wrote (in <20041004133041.24216.00001478@mb-
m10.aol.com>) about 'Marketing blurb - bullsh*t baffles etc', on Mon, 4
Oct 2004:
Keith Wootten wrote:

Four-sprung pork technique.


It's not often this NG makes me laugh.

You have to laugh at 90% of it at present, otherwise you'd scream.
At present I have several threads on ignore. Clearly there is something very
wrong with me to be so completely uninterested in subjects that others find so
fascinating.

Gibbo
 
On Monday 04 October 2004 09:10 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us with
the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlog
DOTyou.knowwhat> wrote (in <80p2m0t31e59lh17crfq4621a8ao3amc5g@4ax.com>)
about 'The Rational Mind of Fred Bloggs', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:
The
technical information is unusually detailed for a newspaper article.

Oh, well, they were obviously fed it by Kerry supporters, then.

Is there ANYTHING that can't be represented as a conspiracy? (I believe
that in English law all you need is three people talking together. What
about is irrelevant.)
--
Well, who wants to volunteer to be King Pedant and look up the real
etymology? My informal definition is "kindred spirit", which isn't
necessarily a bad thing. Whenever two or more are gathered, and all
that....

Cheers!
Rich
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Robert Monsen
<rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote (in <ARg8d.200309$3l3.177519@attbi_s03>)
about 'The Rational Mind of Fred Bloggs', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

"Never ascribe to malice, that which can be explained by incompetence."
-- Napoleon Bonaparte
'You never know whether it's a cock-up or a carve-up.'
-- John Woodgate
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
I'm not going to attach a name to this description, but I had a mental
picture of a gorilla attacking a truck tire in its cage as an analogy
for some of the s.e.d. threads.

The gorilla starts out curious, but then suddenly flies into a rage,
beating the tire against the bars, twisting it, chewing on it, jumping
up and down on it, howling and generally frightening the spectators.

After a while, the gorilla is exhausted and leaves the tire (the issue
under discussion) lying there, unchanged. The gorilla goes off to take a
nap.

After a while, the whole display starts over again.

--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:paul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Bumper sticker: You're too close for missiles. Switching to guns.
 
On Monday 04 October 2004 10:30 am, ChrisGibboGibson did deign to grace us
with the following:

Keith Wootten wrote:

Four-sprung pork technique.


It's not often this NG makes me laugh.
Far-flung work critique.
 
On Monday 04 October 2004 04:59 am, Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com> did
deign to grace us with the following:

Rich Grise <null@example.net> says...

But according to this, I've received telepathic communication! I had
never heard the word before, in fact, I thought I made it up, when
clearly, I received it telepathically from the metaphysical quantum foam.

...for extremely low values of "clearly"... :)
ROFLLOL!

*(Au) 5!
 
On Monday 04 October 2004 09:31 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us with
the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Guy Macon <http@?.guymacon.com
wrote (in <10m2go2fv8iso54@news.supernews.com>) about 'Is this antenna
article serious?', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

Winfield Hill <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> says...

Indeed, a standard part of Poynting vector classical EM physics,

A.K.A. "The science most likely to be mangled by an editor's
spellchecker"...


The term 'Poynting vector' is a tautology; all vectors point.
--
Geez, now you've really spoiled it for me. The student has surpassed
the master. Have you recently been in a room filled with pot smokers?

Cheers!
Rich
 
On Monday 04 October 2004 09:29 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us with
the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <rKa8d.4134$eq1.3864@trnddc08>) about 'Is this antenna
article serious?', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

Right on the main page, about 5 screenscrolls down (maybe more if you
display fewer lines), under 'A "HOLE" IN PHYSICS', "Fig 1. Energy flux
lines for the nearfield region of a resonant absorber. The tiny absorber
acts like a large disk."

Looks kinda like a monopole, or very much like one of my metaphysical
magical mystical metaphenomena. I've never metaphenomenon I didn't like.

I thought you meant that there was a specific reference to a Bussard
ramjet.
Nah, just that it uses some imaginary construct to make a big scoop.

Sorry.
Rich
 
"Andrew James" <andrewjames@gawab.com> wrote in message
news:76946c48.0410031102.6e35753d@posting.google.com...
hi...

i have a university design project to complete. the topic
given to me is optical transmitter receiver. can anyone give me some
tips or ideas for this design?

andrew.
Mims and Campbell offer a tour-de-force in their book "Semiconductor Diode
Lasers" ISBN 0-572-00820-1.
They design a laser voice frequency system in there that's good for 3.5
miles. The book also covers modulators, power supplies, receivers, pin
photodiodes, optics etc etc. A really enjoyable read.
Printed in 1972, one wonders how many miles range would now be possible with
the use of modern kit?.
 
"Rich Grise" <null@example.net> wrote in message
news:0ra8d.4131$eq1.2802@trnddc08...
On Monday 04 October 2004 01:37 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us
with
the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that john jardine
john@jjdesigns.fsnet.co.uk> wrote (in <cjpvhv$34i$1@newsg2.svr.pol.co.u
k>) about 'Marketing blurb - bullsh*t baffles etc', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:
Indeed.
I love the '-dyne's.
Something like a 'Cyberdyne' or 'Neurodyne' sounds fabulously tekky.

How VERY 1920s. (;-)
--
Well, I've been holding my tongue, but "Cyberdyne" is spoken for. Think
"mimetic polyalloy."

Cheers!
Rich

And "T1000". Trust you to spot the reference :)
regards
john
 
On 4 Oct 2004 10:31:29 -0700, dianaroberto@virgilio.it (Roberto Diana) wrote:

Hi to all,
I would like to know if a suitable library, for AD8302 IC, is
available for Orcad 9.2 or Electronic workbench Multisim 2001.
Please, reply me as soon as possible!
Bye,

Roberto
Suitable library editor is available in both.


Regards,

Boris Mohar

Got Knock? - see:
Viatrack Printed Circuit Designs http://www3.sympatico.ca/borism/

void _-void-_ in the obvious place
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Spehro Pefhany <speffSNIP@interlog
DOTyou.knowwhat> wrote (in <uuc3m0lb3i0vd2f80ff8lbhiv899pfcr83@4ax.com>)
about 'Marketing blurb - bullsh*t baffles etc', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

A self-organizing stochadaptive nheuristron (now with thiotimoline-
enhanced predictor)
I'm gradually converting this NG from sci.electronics.design.USpolitics
to sci.electronics.design.20thcenturySF. (;-)
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
On 4 Oct 2004 13:38:48 -0700, Prasad wrote:

Hi,
In case of all other flip flops ,the names indicate something about their function.
R-S:Reset-Set
T:toggle
D-delay or data

then what does j-k in j-k flip flop indicate.
reply me if u know anything about this.
John Kerry!!!


Bob
 
Hi Prasad,

I believe that was in honor of Jack Kilby (J.K.) who invented the IC.

Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that john jardine
<john@jjdesigns.fsnet.co.uk> wrote (in <cjsat1$a8j$1@newsg3.svr.pol.co.u
k>) about 'optical transmitter receiver', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

Mims and Campbell offer a tour-de-force in their book "Semiconductor
Diode Lasers" ISBN 0-572-00820-1. They design a laser voice frequency
system in there that's good for 3.5 miles. The book also covers
modulators, power supplies, receivers, pin photodiodes, optics etc etc.
A really enjoyable read. Printed in 1972, one wonders how many miles
range would now be possible with the use of modern kit?.
First amateur phone contact Earth-International Space Station on 428
GHz?
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 
I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net>
wrote (in <3si8d.5102$r3.772@trnddc05>) about 'Is this antenna article
serious?', on Mon, 4 Oct 2004:

Nah, just that it uses some imaginary construct to make a big scoop.

Sorry.
De nada. But the pattern of field lines in the region of the tuned loop
or ferrite rod does look as if the energy is being 'sucked' through the
device. I'll chicken out of trying to do it in ASCII art, though.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only.
The good news is that nothing is compulsory.
The bad news is that everything is prohibited.
http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top