Driver to drive?

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> a écrit dans le message de
news:rFKPXpKdHFYBFwLk@jmwa.demon.co.uk...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <XgX7d.4836$x65.3149@trnddc06>) about 'Marketing blurb -
bullsh*t baffles etc', on Sun, 3 Oct 2004:

Heuristic neuroadaptive autoreparameterization algorithm.


Abbreviated to HNAA? Not good.

All you guys are going for descriptives, and that was apparently what
the OP asked for. But the Great Unwashed doesn't want descriptives, they
want the 'magic ingredient'. In toothpaste and detergents it can be
'magick-ium' but that form doesn't suit electronics. It has to be a
'-tron' or a 'tor', or perhaps a '-ser'.
and mix...

Autoadaptative nheuristron :))

Somewhat depressing...

--
Thanks,
Fred.
 
On Sun, 03 Oct 2004 18:40:49 GMT, Rich Grise <null@example.net> wrote:

Well, better thrown away on someone who has integrity than on one
of the interchangeable talking heads.
Better to change our system so that insincere voting 'goes away' and multiparty
candidates can have their truer support demonstrated by the voting process.
Actually, the same system works equally well in any case where there are more
than two alternatives and the real choice with the greater support should be
chosen.

Jon
 
In article <HQIUylHU4DYBFwPB@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
John Woodgate <noone@yuk.yuk> wrote:
I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <_pV7d.1621$1g5.837@trnddc07>) about '[OT]: The not-so-
democratic Democrats', on Sun, 3 Oct 2004:

But it's OK. God isn't going to allow thermonuclear fusion to be used to
kill anybody, especially Mother Earth Herself.

I would strongly advise you not to rely on that. Do you know the story
of the priest and the three helicopters? (No nun or actress, I'm
afraid.)
I thought it was 2 helicopters and a rowboat.

"God will help you over a ditch, if you jump hard enough"

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 
How about a small bilge pump for a boat 12 v or one for a live well
also a aireator to pump air will cause ice not to form too they make
them for minnow buckets to circulate water
 
On Sunday 03 October 2004 12:02 pm, Andrew James did deign to grace us with
the following:

hi...

i have a university design project to complete. the topic
given to me is optical transmitter receiver. can anyone give me some
tips or ideas for this design?
Well, they probably want you to come up with some kind of optical
transmitter, and some kind of optical receiver, and they probably
want you to couple them together.

What part is it you don't understand?

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Sunday 03 October 2004 12:20 pm, John Larkin did deign to grace us with
the following:

On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 09:50:58 +0100, John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Tim Wescott
tim@wescottnospamdesign.com> wrote (in <10lug3s5h4ff609@corp.supernews.
com>) about 'how to make a counter/timer circuit for 35GHz', on Sat, 2
Oct 2004:
If it's fairly narrowband the standard thing to do is to heterodyne it
down to something more reasonable and count that.

A narrow-band square wave I'd very much like to see. (;-)


A 35 GHz square wave is what I want to see!
What do they clock the Septimus-9 with? ;-)

Cheers!
Rich
 
On Sunday 03 October 2004 11:18 am, Roy McCammon did deign to grace us with
the following:

This is my own whimsy only.

I'd be one of the open range animals on the back lot;
not particularly dangerous or interesting. The visitors
would ask each other "what does he do?".

I feel like the wizened old bachelor chimp, who watches the other
animals play, and contemplates space flight.

Cheers!
Rich
 
On 3 Oct 2004 15:43:04 -0700, upintahoe999@yahoo.com (Paul S) wrote:

Can anyone comment on the reality (or lack thereof) of the "Energy
Sucking Radio Antenna" described here:

http://www.amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html


Thx,
Paul

This very group had an extended thread on this subject, started by Mr
Beaty as I recall. Nothing he says is remarkable: a short antenna can
be matched with a high-Q tuning network such that it radiates like a
longer antenna. And antannas are reciprocal devices. So a short
receive antenna can be tuned to radiate or gather as much energy as,
say, a half-wave dipole. It just takes a very high-Q matching network;
the smaller the antenna, the higher the Q.

The ball-lightning and stuff seems over the top, though.


John
 
On 3 Oct 2004 17:31:17 -0700, shoppa@trailing-edge.com (Tim Shoppa)
wrote:

What oscilliscope-type CRT's are still being manufactured and
widely available today? I need something with electrostatic
deflection, and preferably with a big screen. Tektronix used to
sell 8" or 10" square faced instruments which were perfect for this.
I'd be satisfied with a bare tube, but would be happy if someone could
point me towards a source of old Tektronix big-screen X-Y scopes.

Looking around, I see that new 3RP1A's are being imported from China, otherwise
all the scope tubes I see seem to be replacements for brand X model Y scope
or pulls from old scopes. There seems to be a minor market in used
ATC-style vectorscopes which are somehow magnetically deflected? Don't
understand what's inside them and unless they're easily turned into X-Y
instruments I don't care.

Tim.
Used Tek X-Y boxes show up on ebay fairly often; I've bought a couple.
But I've seen mostly smaller ones, not 8-10".

What are you making? Could you fake it with a computer monitor and
some ADCs?

John
 
Ah CAMCORDER! Now I understand the reluctance to modify.
You may have said that before, I've been rather under the weather this
weekend, I may have missed it.

--
KC6ETE Dave's Engineering Page, www.dvanhorn.org
Microcontroller Consultant, specializing in Atmel AVR
 
John Woodgate wrote:
I read in sci.electronics.design that Roy McCammon <barkupine-
news@yahoo.com> wrote (in <41604264.8010400@yahoo.com>) about 'Whmisy:
If This NG Were a Zoo, WHere Would ou Be?', on Sun, 3 Oct 2004:


Woodgate would be in the petting zoo.


I'll ask my attorney if that's a compliment. (;-)
the animals in the petting zoo can be trusted
not to bite, claw, rend, etc.
 
On Sunday 03 October 2004 11:57 am, John Woodgate did deign to grace us with
the following:

I read in sci.electronics.design that Rich Grise <null@example.net
wrote (in <3CX7d.4845$x65.3003@trnddc06>) about 'Marketing blurb -
bullsh*t baffles etc', on Sun, 3 Oct 2004:

Psychrotronic!

Imitation is said to be the sincerest form of flattery. But you don't
know what it means.
--
It means something?
 
In article <73cf625b.0410031443.641874d4@posting.google.com>,
Paul S <upintahoe999@yahoo.com> wrote:
Can anyone comment on the reality (or lack thereof) of the "Energy
Sucking Radio Antenna" described here:

http://www.amasci.com/tesla/tesceive.html
It sure reads like nonsense.


--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 
On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 02:16:35 GMT, Rich Grise <null@example.net> wrote:

Yeah, it's a nice vision. I'm afraid the old boys are pretty firmly
entrenched by now, though. It's going to take something pretty drastic
to make any significant change. I hope it's sooner than later.
I think it's something that we can push for -- but we need to push and ask.
It's not like we are changing the very purpose of voting -- in fact, we'd be
attempting to improve its quality.

I think this will have to first become an experimental deal in a smaller state,
where those with very high-dollar vested interests won't be quite so motivated
to fight it tooth-and-nail. I think Oregon might be a good test state,
actually. One the idea is "out there" and "working well," then it may be too
late to stop its spread in places where those moneyed interests might really
care a lot more.

Jon
 
Rich Grise wrote:
On Sunday 03 October 2004 11:18 am, Roy McCammon did deign to grace us with
the following:


This is my own whimsy only.

I'd be one of the open range animals on the back lot;
not particularly dangerous or interesting. The visitors
would ask each other "what does he do?".


I feel like the wizened old bachelor chimp, who watches the other
animals play, and contemplates space flight.

Cheers!
Rich
Wasn't he the one who bashed in the other ape's head with a gazelle leg-bone
in the movie?

Cheers,

Phil Hobbs
 
On 3 Oct 2004 17:31:17 -0700, shoppa@trailing-edge.com (Tim Shoppa) wrote:

I need something with electrostatic
deflection, and preferably with a big screen. Tektronix used to
sell 8" or 10" square faced instruments which were perfect for this.
I'd be satisfied with a bare tube, but would be happy if someone could
point me towards a source of old Tektronix big-screen X-Y scopes.
I may actually have a few "new" (meaning unused) round faced Tektronix ones in
boxes in the garage. I could look. But not the square ones, if I recall.

Jon
 
On 3 Oct 2004 19:14:34 -0700, kenkeeley@hotmail.com (Kenneth Keeley) wrote:

I am building a small 68000 computer from the ground up. I would
like to build a keyboard interface that would be able to use a pc
keyboard. Does anybody know of a simple circuit design that I could
use. I did find a design some time ago for an XT keyboard interface
using a serial to parallel convertor. Would this still work with an AT
keyboard. A link to a Circuit Diagram or at least a write up on a
circuit diagram would be great.
I have the IBM docs on the electrical and software on the AT keyboard and I
think there are a few pages on the web with this, also. Do I gather you don't
actually want to do the electrical interface design, though? (It's not hard.)

Have you already looked around on the web? If so, what have you found that does
NOT meet your needs but does seem to get kind of close?

Jon
 
"Robert Monsen" <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Ns_7d.408928$8_6.292810@attbi_s04...
John Woodgate wrote:
snip
Ah, is this that "Irony" thing I keep hearing about?

He has no clue!
 
From: soar2morrow@yahoo.com (Tom Seim)

Fred sees lies where
there is truth, truth were there is lies.
This whole thing is turing into personal attacks. Can't we stick to issues?

I've said that Bush is a total failure, when I've asked for something he has
done that is great, and I never get a response. So, I take it even the right
agrees that Bush is a failure, and that your supporting him because you love
failure?

Rocky
 
I have no idea what your application is, but you can still get used X-Y
monitors over in the vintage video arcade circles for under $500. If it
can
apply to you, go post in reg.games.video.arcade.collecting for further
details.
I've yet to see a video game that ran electrostatic deflection.

--
KC6ETE Dave's Engineering Page, www.dvanhorn.org
Microcontroller Consultant, specializing in Atmel AVR

..
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top