R
Robert Monsen
Guest
John S. Dyson wrote:
some non-partisan evidence for even ONE of the allegations you make
here, which are:
a) Clinton worked to weaken the CIA
b) Democrats are stealing/destroying information.
c) This alleged stealing is orchestrated by highest levels in the party.
d) Democrats tend not to pay attention to the news.
e) Kerry gave his personal go-ahead to steal information.
f) There were clear indications that Saddam wanted to attack the US
None of these statements are true, as far as I know. Please try to prove
ANY of them. I'm waiting.
--
Regards,
Robert Monsen
"Your Highness, I have no need of this hypothesis."
- Pierre Laplace (1749-1827), to Napoleon,
on why his works on celestial mechanics make no mention of God.
You don't know what you are talking about, as usual. I'd like to seeIn article <ckspf8$rbo$5@blue.rahul.net>,
kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) writes:
In article <8oicd.14564$nj.6932@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>,
Clarence <no@No.com> wrote:
"Robert Monsen" <rcsurname@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xzecd.376828$mD.361109@attbi_s02...
Jim Yanik wrote:
Saddam was NO THREAT to the United States, or anybody else.
Especially now, sitting in jail!
Actually now he is a bigger threat.
Remember: the intelligence agencies from ALL OVER THE WORLD were
giving input that Saddam was planning this, planning that, etc. We
really need a stronger, more effective CIA (fix the problems -- whatever
is needed), but alas, Clinton worked to weaken the CIA... The long,
horrible, disarming history since the middle 1970's is (partially) yet
another disgusting legacy item from left wing over-reaction against Nixon's
abuses. Geesh, stealing/destroying information from opposition political
headquarters is now a regular Democrat activity... Over the last few
weeks, there have been serious and obviously orchestrated abuses by
the Dems against anyone that they appear to hate. The organization
does show an 'Usama' type situation in the Democrat party, where there
is obviously some strategic planning happening at the highest levels,
but the individual implementations have been incompetent WRT public
relations. Too bad that the 'public' that the Dems appeal to do tend
NOT to be informed about these ongoing Democrat abuses. The organization
is too strong to be attributed to hooliganism, even though it is more
likely that the Dems be like that -- but it is clear that there have
been attacks that were orchestrated at the highest levels, including
even the go-ahead being given by Kerry himself.
Depending upon Putin and even the UK for intelligence info shows the
sad state of affairs in US intelligence. Even if there were a few
data items that might have claimed that Saddam wasn't a threat, the
whole problem is: "WHICH INTELLIGENCE ITEM IS CORRECT, WHICH INTELLIGENCE
ITEM IS INCORRECT." In hindsight, the decision is much easier.
In all cases, it is clear that both the GOPers and Dems believed that
Saddam was a threat (in one way or another), and given that -- there is
no really serious political fault EXCEPT for the longer term, strategic
weakening of the CIA (and other intelligence agencies.)
John
some non-partisan evidence for even ONE of the allegations you make
here, which are:
a) Clinton worked to weaken the CIA
b) Democrats are stealing/destroying information.
c) This alleged stealing is orchestrated by highest levels in the party.
d) Democrats tend not to pay attention to the news.
e) Kerry gave his personal go-ahead to steal information.
f) There were clear indications that Saddam wanted to attack the US
None of these statements are true, as far as I know. Please try to prove
ANY of them. I'm waiting.
--
Regards,
Robert Monsen
"Your Highness, I have no need of this hypothesis."
- Pierre Laplace (1749-1827), to Napoleon,
on why his works on celestial mechanics make no mention of God.