Chip with simple program for Toy

On 3/14/10 10:31 AM, Magnetic wrote:
Here is not complete list of your potential killers: 2003 J.-P.
Blaizot, J. Iliopoulos, J. Madsen, G.G. Ross, P. Sonderegger, H.-J.
Specht. 2008 John Ellis, Gian Giudice, Michelangelo Mangano, Igor
Tkachev, and Urs Wiedemann. And of course, Rolf Heuer, director of
CERN, who neglects the opinion of physicists, saying about dangers of
LHC.
The crudest error, made by them, is equating of the consequences of
collider collisions with cosmo-atmospheric collisions. To see the
difference between these consequences look my model with two 10-kg
bottles with neutrons. You will see that the bottle, corresponding to
cosmic rays, will be safe. But the bottle, corresponding to LHC
collisions, will transform the town into Hiroshima.
Here are some CERN addresses. Write them and demand to stop the
Collider. Otherwise they kill us all with probability about several
dozens of percents.
rolf.heuer(at)cern.ch, cern.reception(at)cern.ch,
visits.service(at)cern.ch, press.office(at)cern.ch,
john.ellis(at)cern.ch, jean-pierre.koutchouk(at)cern.ch

rudiger.voss(at)cern.ch, patricia.mage(at)cern.ch,
felicitas.pauss(at)cern.ch, external.relations(at)cern.ch, council-
president(at)cern.ch, fc-chairman(at)cern.ch, spc-chairman(at)cern.ch,
scientific-secretary(at)cern.ch, council-secretariat(at)cern.ch

Here are some phones of your potential killers:

CERN CH-1211 Genčve 23 Switzerland. +41 22 76 761 11
Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire F-01631 CERN Cedex
France Telephone Switchboard: +41 22 76 761 11 Central Fax: +41 22 76
765 55
Visitors Reception. Telephone number:+41 22 76 766 49
Visits Service. Telephone number: +41 22 767 8484, Fax: +41 22 767
8710
Press Office. Telephone number: 41 22 767 3432 / 2141 Fax: +41 22 785
0247

Stop global suicide!
Click to expand...
You are obviously bluffing, otherwise you would be in Geneva!
 
Here is not complete list of your potential killers: 2003 J.-P.
Blaizot, J. Iliopoulos, J. Madsen, G.G. Ross, P. Sonderegger, H.-J.
Specht. 2008 John Ellis, Gian Giudice, Michelangelo Mangano, Igor
Tkachev, and Urs Wiedemann. And of course, Rolf Heuer, director of
CERN, who neglects the opinion of physicists, saying about dangers
of
LHC.
The crudest error, made by them, is equating of the consequences of
collider collisions with cosmo-atmospheric collisions. To see the
difference between these consequences look my model with two 10-kg
bottles with neutrons. You will see that the bottle, corresponding to
cosmic rays, will be safe. But the bottle, corresponding to LHC
collisions, will transform the town into Hiroshima.
Here are some CERN addresses. Write them and demand to stop the
Collider. Otherwise they kill us all with probability about several
dozens of percents.
rolf.heuer(at)cern.ch, cern.reception(at)cern.ch,
visits.service(at)cern.ch, press.office(at)cern.ch,
john.ellis(at)cern.ch, jean-pierre.koutchouk(at)cern.ch

rudiger.voss(at)cern.ch, patricia.mage(at)cern.ch,
felicitas.pauss(at)cern.ch, external.relations(at)cern.ch, council-
president(at)cern.ch, fc-chairman(at)cern.ch, spc-
chairman(at)cern.ch,
scientific-secretary(at)cern.ch, council-secretariat(at)cern.ch


Here are some phones of your potential killers:


CERN CH-1211 Genčve 23 Switzerland. +41 22 76 761 11
Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire F-01631 CERN
Cedex
France Telephone Switchboard: +41 22 76 761 11 Central Fax: +41 22 76
765 55
Visitors Reception. Telephone number:+41 22 76 766 49
Visits Service. Telephone number: +41 22 767 8484, Fax: +41 22 767
8710
Press Office. Telephone number: 41 22 767 3432 / 2141 Fax: +41 22 785
0247


Stop global suicide!
 
Look, we're doomed. We've always been doomed. Shall we count all the
things which can kill us?

*Asteroids (happened before)
*Super volcanoes (ditto)
*Nuclear conflict
*Biological Conflict
*Chemical Conflict (yay variety!)
*Death of the sun
*Comet strike
*Nano bots out of a bad sci-fi book.
*Plague (designer or natural)
*Vogons
*.... and fuck it, Global Warming for good measure.


See now, if I'm gonna die, I'd rather kick it in the name of science,
and trying to improve man's knowledge of the universe. Sure beats
dying in the name of some empty ism during a Nuclear, Biological, or
Chemical shoot out. Also better than being clocked by a rock from space.

Besides, think of the view!

--Ashton
 
Look, we're doomed. We've always been doomed. Shall we count all the
things which can kill us?
Click to expand...
No. I’ll write probability of total extermination in the period of
future month.

*Asteroids (happened before)
0. 000 000 000 001
Click to expand...

*Super volcanoes (ditto)
0. 000 000 000 1
Click to expand...

*Nuclear conflict
0. 000 000 001
Click to expand...


*Biological Conflict
0. 000 000 001
Click to expand...

*Chemical Conflict (yay variety!)
0. 000 000 0001
Click to expand...

*Death of the sun
0. 000 000 000 000 000 1
Click to expand...

*Comet strike
0. 000 000 000 001
Click to expand...


*Nano bots out of a bad sci-fi book.
0. 000 000 000 001
Click to expand...


*Plague (designer or natural)
Inside 0. 000 000 001
Click to expand...


*Vogons
Do not know, what is it.
Click to expand...


*.... and fuck it, Global Warming for good measure.
0. 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 1
Click to expand...

CERNs Experiment on Cllider
0.49 – the whole Earth will be exploded.
0.01 – only Europe will be ruined; earthquake all over the Earth;
atmosphere is overheated.
0.01 – only Geneva will be ruined.



--------------
Here is not complete list of your potential killers: 2003 J.-P.
Blaizot, J. Iliopoulos, J. Madsen, G.G. Ross, P. Sonderegger, H.-J.
Specht. 2008 John Ellis, Gian Giudice, Michelangelo Mangano, Igor
Tkachev, and Urs Wiedemann. And of course, Rolf Heuer, director of
CERN, who neglects the opinion of physicists, saying about dangers of
LHC.

Here are some CERN addresses. Write them and demand to stop the
Collider. Otherwise they kill us all with probability about several
dozens of percents.

rolf.heuer(at)cern.ch, cern.reception(at)cern.ch,
visits.service(at)cern.ch, press.office(at)cern.ch,
john.ellis(at)cern.ch, jean-pierre.koutchouk(at)cern.ch
rudiger.voss(at)cern.ch, patricia.mage(at)cern.ch,
felicitas.pauss(at)cern.ch, external.relations(at)cern.ch, council-
president(at)cern.ch, fc-chairman(at)cern.ch, spc-chairman(at)cern.ch,
scientific-secretary(at)cern.ch, council-secretariat(at)cern.ch

Here are some phones of your potential killers:

CERN CH-1211 Genčve 23 Switzerland. +41 22 76 761 11
Organisation Européenne pour la Recherche Nucléaire F-01631 CERN
Cedex
France Telephone Switchboard: +41 22 76 761 11 Central Fax: +41 22 76
765 55
Visitors Reception. Telephone number:+41 22 76 766 49
Visits Service. Telephone number: +41 22 767 8484, Fax: +41 22 767
8710
Press Office. Telephone number: 41 22 767 3432 / 2141 Fax: +41 22 785
0247


Stop global suicide!
 
Ashton K wrote:
Look, we're doomed. We've always been doomed. Shall we count all the
things which can kill us?
Click to expand...
Enviro-whinerism
Social activism
Compassion
Religion
Government
Unbridled reproduction
Professional management
Toyota drive-by-wire.

*Asteroids (happened before)
*Super volcanoes (ditto)
*Nuclear conflict
*Biological Conflict
*Chemical Conflict (yay variety!)
*Death of the sun
*Comet strike
*Nano bots out of a bad sci-fi book.
*Plague (designer or natural)
*Vogons
*.... and fuck it, Global Warming for good measure.
Click to expand...
Only through good harvest years then overpopulation. Canada is behind
it all. Canukistanis think that if Canada became Southern California
their healthcare system would work. The fools!

See now, if I'm gonna die, I'd rather kick it in the name of science,
and trying to improve man's knowledge of the universe. Sure beats
dying in the name of some empty ism during a Nuclear, Biological, or
Chemical shoot out. Also better than being clocked by a rock from space.

Besides, think of the view!
Click to expand...
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/drsteel3.jpg

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
 
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:57:02 -0800, Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net>
wrote:


Only through good harvest years then overpopulation. Canada is behind
it all. Canukistanis think that if Canada became Southern California
their healthcare system would work. The fools!
Click to expand...
I think your all whack jobs but being a Canadian I have no desire to
become a state regardless of health care so you Speak for yourself.

Canadians are however snapping up real estate in the sunshine states
in record numbers. You can get a half decent condo for what it cost
for underground parking in Toronto. Read the Toronto star.

I also recall we still finance a small town in New Orleans area were
residents get to live free of charge. Why cant we have a nice
hurricane it would be nice not to have a mortgage payment and
municipal taxes for a couple of years.

But what with global warming and the Apocalypse coming I guess its all
moot anyway's.

You can resume standing on your nearest corner with your "the end is
near" placard and sporting your fashionable foil hat.

See now, if I'm gonna die, I'd rather kick it in the name of science,
and trying to improve man's knowledge of the universe. Sure beats
dying in the name of some empty ism during a Nuclear, Biological, or
Chemical shoot out. Also better than being clocked by a rock from space.

Besides, think of the view!

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/drsteel3.jpg
Click to expand...
 
On Mar 13, 8:55 am, Vladimir Vassilevsky <nos...@nowhere.com> wrote:
PD wrote:
On Mar 12, 1:14 pm, Vladimir Vassilevsky <nos...@nowhere.com> wrote:

PD wrote:

On Mar 12, 1:00 pm, Vladimir Vassilevsky <nos...@nowhere.com> wrote:

Tim Wescott wrote:

Magnetic wrote:

I’m scared, but can not do anything, - all ways lead to catastrophe.

http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html

No, not like this. LHC is a special kind of black hole which attracts
money. Just another monstrous project doomed to accomplish nothing.

That depends on what you mean by "accomplish nothing." Do you consider
fundamental research that is done purely for knowledge and without an
eye to application to be accomplishing nothing?

No new knowledge.

On the contrary, we KNOW the Standard Model of particle interactions
has to break down at the energy scale probed by the LHC. There are
many possibilities here, some of them more likely than others.
Whichever of these outcomes turns out to be right, or if something
else entirely shows itself, we are *guaranteed* a dramatic revision of
our understanding of nature. This is about as sure a bet as you can
have, in terms of new knowledge.

Or don't you consider new knowledge about fundamental particle
interactions new knowledge?

The results will be inconclusive as usual. There would be offered 10
explanations why, published 10000 papers, and, after passionate
discussions at symposiums, everyone will agree that the LHC design was
wrong and insufficient and yet larger colider has to be built. This time
it must be a break through, we know this for sure, etc. etc.

VLV
Click to expand...
next time it must be the size of the earth itself!
 
On Mar 13, 12:35 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:02:28 -0800 (PST), Magnetic



magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote:
On Mar 10, 7:50 pm, PD <thedraperfam...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mar 10, 7:11 am, Magnetic <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote:

I’m scared, but can not do anything, - all ways lead to catastrophe.

This line was your most honest and straightforward. Yes, it's obvious
you are scared out of your wits. Yes, it's good that you realize there
is nothing dramatic you should do.

You should get help for your mental state, to get rid of your panicky
anxiety, and to learn how to recognize when you are pinning your fears
irrationally on something that doesn't deserve it.

Thank you. I have a small hope that physicists of CERN would
understand that they can explode the Earth with probability of about
50%, and stop the LHC.

According to their plan, the first 2*3.5TeV collisions will be
performed the 30-th of March.

Look plan-link at the page:
http://lhc-commissioning.web.cern.ch/lhc-commissioning/news-2010/LHC-...

Best regards, Ivan.  http://darkenergy.narod.ru/ru.html

The energies that they can create are microscopic compared to a
healthy cosmic ray.

CERN : 3.5e12 ev per particle

GOD  : 3e20 ev per particle

That last number packs about 50 joules into what is probably *one*
proton.

John
Click to expand...
Good, so they are half way there!
 
Magnetic wrote:

Look, we're doomed. We've always been doomed. Shall we count all the
things which can kill us?

No. I?ll write probability of total extermination in the period of
future month.
Click to expand...
Be sure to compute the probability that you are correct.

[...]
 
On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:31:08 -0700 (PDT), Magnetic
<magnetic.trap@yandex.ua> wrote:


The crudest error, made by them, is equating of the consequences of
collider collisions with cosmo-atmospheric collisions. To see the
difference between these consequences look my model with two 10-kg
bottles with neutrons. You will see that the bottle, corresponding to
cosmic rays, will be safe. But the bottle, corresponding to LHC
collisions, will transform the town into Hiroshima.
Click to expand...
---
Pity, then everyone will have to learn Japanese...

JF
 
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:02:04 +0000 (UTC), Ashton K
<ashton@ashtonk.ath.cx> wrote:

Look, we're doomed. We've always been doomed. Shall we count all the
things which can kill us?

*Asteroids (happened before)
*Super volcanoes (ditto)
*Nuclear conflict
*Biological Conflict
*Chemical Conflict (yay variety!)
*Death of the sun
*Comet strike
*Nano bots out of a bad sci-fi book.
*Plague (designer or natural)
*Vogons
*.... and fuck it, Global Warming for good measure.


See now, if I'm gonna die, I'd rather kick it in the name of science,
and trying to improve man's knowledge of the universe. Sure beats
dying in the name of some empty ism during a Nuclear, Biological, or
Chemical shoot out. Also better than being clocked by a rock from space.

Besides, think of the view!
Click to expand...
Is it dark inside of a black hole? Or is it very, very bright? I can
never seem to remember.

John
 
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:56:56 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 14 Mar 2010 08:31:08 -0700 (PDT), Magnetic
magnetic.trap@yandex.ua> wrote:


The crudest error, made by them, is equating of the consequences of
collider collisions with cosmo-atmospheric collisions. To see the
difference between these consequences look my model with two 10-kg
bottles with neutrons. You will see that the bottle, corresponding to
cosmic rays, will be safe. But the bottle, corresponding to LHC
collisions, will transform the town into Hiroshima.

---
Pity, then everyone will have to learn Japanese...
Click to expand...
I've seen the movie. Don't worry, the beast dies and everything turns out OK.
 
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:08:36 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:02:04 +0000 (UTC), Ashton K
ashton@ashtonk.ath.cx> wrote:


Look, we're doomed. We've always been doomed. Shall we count all the
things which can kill us?

*Asteroids (happened before)
*Super volcanoes (ditto)
*Nuclear conflict
*Biological Conflict
*Chemical Conflict (yay variety!)
*Death of the sun
*Comet strike
*Nano bots out of a bad sci-fi book.
*Plague (designer or natural)
*Vogons
*.... and fuck it, Global Warming for good measure.


See now, if I'm gonna die, I'd rather kick it in the name of science,
and trying to improve man's knowledge of the universe. Sure beats
dying in the name of some empty ism during a Nuclear, Biological, or
Chemical shoot out. Also better than being clocked by a rock from space.

Besides, think of the view!

Is it dark inside of a black hole? Or is it very, very bright? I can
never seem to remember.
Click to expand...
---
If even light can't escape the event horizon, I think you have your
answer.

JF
 
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:28:23 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:08:36 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:02:04 +0000 (UTC), Ashton K
ashton@ashtonk.ath.cx> wrote:


Look, we're doomed. We've always been doomed. Shall we count all the
things which can kill us?

*Asteroids (happened before)
*Super volcanoes (ditto)
*Nuclear conflict
*Biological Conflict
*Chemical Conflict (yay variety!)
*Death of the sun
*Comet strike
*Nano bots out of a bad sci-fi book.
*Plague (designer or natural)
*Vogons
*.... and fuck it, Global Warming for good measure.


See now, if I'm gonna die, I'd rather kick it in the name of science,
and trying to improve man's knowledge of the universe. Sure beats
dying in the name of some empty ism during a Nuclear, Biological, or
Chemical shoot out. Also better than being clocked by a rock from space.

Besides, think of the view!

Is it dark inside of a black hole? Or is it very, very bright? I can
never seem to remember.

---
If even light can't escape the event horizon, I think you have your
answer.
Click to expand...
But *inside* the event horizon? I think the answer is that it's a stupid
question. ;-)
 
15 MO MAN 24 nQPS re-parameterization part 2/TECHNICAL STOP
16 TU MAN 24 nQPS re-parameterization part 2/TECHNICAL STOP
17 WE M 8 RECOVERY++
17 WE A 8 RECOVERY++
17 WE N 8 3.5 TeV ramp commissioning
18 THU M 8 3.5 TeV ramp commissioning
18 THU A 8 3.5 TeV ramp commissioning
18 THU N 8 2 beam, setup, 4 bunch checks - extraction checks,
collimators locked in position and gaps, beam dump, MPS tests
19 FRI M 8 450 GeV collisions
19 FRI A 8 450 GeV collisions
19 FRI N 8 450 GeV collisions
20 SA
20 SA
20 SA
21 SU M 8 MPS and beam dumping system - extracted pilot, b1: 0.45 -
3.5 TeV
21 SU A 8 Protection device and collimator setting-up - b1 ramp
21 SU N 8 SF
22 MO M 8 MPS and beam dumping system - extracted pilot, b2: 0.45- 3.5
TeV
22 MO A 8 Protection device and collimator setting-up - b2 ramp
22 MO N 8 SF
23 TU M 8 MPS and beam dumping system - extracted pilot, b1: 0.45 -
3.5 TeV
23 TU A 8 SF
23 TU N 8 Protection device and collimator setting-up - ramp
24 WE M 8 MPS and beam dumping system - extracted pilot: 0.45- 3.5 TeV
24 WE A 8
24 WE N 8 SF
25 TH M 8 Measurements at 3.5 TeV
25 TH A 8 MPS and beam dumping system - extracted pilot, - 3.5 TeV
25 TH N 8 SF
25 FR M 8 Measurements at 3.5 TeV
25 FR A 8 MPS and beam dumping system - extracted pilot, - 3.5 TeV
25 SA N 8 SF
26 SA M 8 Protection device and collimator setting-up - 3.5 TeV, b1
27 SA A 8 Protection device and collimator setting-up - 3.5TeV, b2
27 SU N 8 SF
28 SU M 8 Two Beam Operation setting-up - 3.5 TeV
28 SU A 8 Two Beam Operation setting-up - 3.5 TeV
MO SF
MO 3.5 TeV collision setting-up
MO 3.5 TeV collision setting-up
30 TU M 8 FIRST COLLISIONS AT 3.5 TeV (TBC)
------------
The most probable day of creation of Dangerous Dead Droplet is the 30-
th of March.
The most probable day of Earth Explosion is the 1-st of April.
--------------

http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
 
On 2010-03-15, John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:02:04 +0000 (UTC), Ashton K
ashton@ashtonk.ath.cx> wrote:

Is it dark inside of a black hole? Or is it very, very bright? I can
never seem to remember.
Click to expand...
I don't thint the concept of illumination makes sense in a singularity.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---
 
Magnetic wrote:

[...]

The most probable day of creation of Dangerous Dead Droplet is the 30-
th of March.
The most probable day of Earth Explosion is the 1-st of April.
--------------

http://darkenergy.narod.ru/
Click to expand...
Somehow I think Earth will fade it a few more times.

I can't wait to see what your already paranoid-schitzophrenic argument turns
into come May or June.
 
On Mar 15, 11:51 pm, Magnetic <magnetic.t...@yandex.ua> wrote:

(snip)

(by the way, turned off killfile on recommendation)

The most probable day of creation of Dangerous Dead Droplet is the 30-
th of March.
The most probable day of Earth Explosion is the 1-st of April.
Click to expand...
All that insane please-call-Al-Qaeda lead-in for THAT‽

You're fired.


Mark L. Fergerson
 
John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:02:04 +0000 (UTC), Ashton K
ashton@ashtonk.ath.cx> wrote:

Look, we're doomed. We've always been doomed. Shall we count all the
things which can kill us?

*Asteroids (happened before)
*Super volcanoes (ditto)
*Nuclear conflict
*Biological Conflict
*Chemical Conflict (yay variety!)
*Death of the sun
*Comet strike
*Nano bots out of a bad sci-fi book.
*Plague (designer or natural)
*Vogons
*.... and fuck it, Global Warming for good measure.


See now, if I'm gonna die, I'd rather kick it in the name of science,
and trying to improve man's knowledge of the universe. Sure beats
dying in the name of some empty ism during a Nuclear, Biological, or
Chemical shoot out. Also better than being clocked by a rock from space.

Besides, think of the view!

Is it dark inside of a black hole? Or is it very, very bright? I can
never seem to remember.
Click to expand...
No. Light and matter can enter the black hole but can never leave
(quantum Hawking radiation excepted). A bit like the Hotel California.

You don't notice anything special when you cross the event horizon of a
black hole provided that it is big enough. You can still see stars
distorted and red or blue shifted depending on direction but you can
never break free again. In finite time on your clock you will hit the
singularity.

Light cannot escape from inside the event horizon, but external light
can still fall in and then spiral around until it hits something or
reaches the singularity at the centre. There are no stable orbits inside
the event horizon so once inside you are truly doomed.

For small black holes spagettification by tidal forces will be rather
unpleasant and happen long before you reach the event horizon.

Tidal forces scale as 1/R^3 so for R big enough you don't get pulled
apart until after you enter. The really big galactic black holes of 10^4
solar masses or bigger you might be able to go inside the horizon
without coming to immediate harm provided it wasn't actively accreting
matter at the time. Real black holes tend to have some angular momentum
as well so the exact radii of last stable orbit can vary due to frame
dragging.

You might find the following "falling into a black hole" simulation
interesting (Schwarzchild metric). The movies are a bit dated now.

http://casa.colorado.edu/~ajsh/singularity.html

Regards,
Martin Brown
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top