Audio Precision System One Dual Domani Measuirement Systems

On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:38:46 -0800 (PST), rrusston@hotmail.com wrote:

On Jan 4, 5:27 am, Terry Casey <k.t...@example.invalid> wrote:
In article <cRmH5almZ5APF...@soft255.demon.co.uk>,
G6...@soft255.demon.co.uk says...



In message <slrnjg5qra.ref....@cable.mendelson.com>, Geoffrey S.
Mendelson <g...@mendelson.com> writes:

The UK used several systems, and a friend of mine who traveled to London
in the 1970's found that there were four different electrical systems in use
in various parts of the city. By that time they had been standardized to
240 volts 50Hz, but the older plugs and lightbulbs (different ones for
different systems) remained.

Your friend sounds confused. The 240/50 was standardised a long time
before 1970, and the various plugs and bulbs had been running on 240/50
for some decades by then.

I remember a major upgrade taking place in West Ham to upgrade the
distribution network from 215V AC to the standard 240V while I was at
school there in the late 50s.

Nearby Ilford still had 200V DC, a hangover from when Ilford town
council generated 600V DC for its tramways and obviously found it
convenient to stick to DC for domestic supplies.

When it was converted to 240V AC I do not know but there was no evidence
of anything remotely DC connected when I moved there in the early 70s.

In the US there were 25 Hz buildings and even houses as late as the
early 70s and a few DC apartment and office buildings in New York
later than that. I stayed at a swank highrise in Chicago in the early
70s that was AC by then but was originally DC and there was evidence
of it in the labels tacked in the fuse box.

We also had a little 50 Hz before the war.

I've always wanted to do a full study of DC and odd frequency power
historically in the US but the research is not helped by the
electrical utilities. I think they are ashamed of it.
Not exactly ashamed, but embarrassed by how easy adaptation used to be.

?-)
 
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:53:37 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
<G6JPG@soft255.demon.co.uk> wrote:

In message
b41ff64d-a853-480c-b096-286a8683b377@y10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
rrusston@hotmail.com writes:
[]
In Britain they will still refer to people, fat people especially as
being "so many stone". And they used a lot of units we never did in
daily matters.

Not just fat people - "seven stone weakling" is a not-unknown
expression.
We mix our units much more than that. Take temperatures - if it is
near freezing we use Centigrade, when it is hot we use Fahrenheit.

(excluding the US and Canada) and Japan, drive on the wrong side of
the road, AS COMPARED TO_EVERYWHERE_. Sorry, but THAT is weird. The

It's not the wrong side, it's the left side (-:.
UK, Australia, New Zealand, India. All left side (proper side)
drivers.

Irish would do well to switch. Boston is FAR more important to them
than London!

I was about to agree with you, then I remembered that they have a land
border with the UK, and not with Boston. And they're more likely to
bring their car to England, too.
There are more Irish living in London than in Dublin. For most Irish
people England is a second home - particularly since their economy
went belly-up. And of course most Irish people couldn't give a toss
about the IRA and their pathetic games.

d
 
Don Pearce wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:53:37 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
G6JPG@soft255.demon.co.uk> wrote:

In message
b41ff64d-a853-480c-b096-286a8683b377@y10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
rrusston@hotmail.com writes:
[]
In Britain they will still refer to people, fat people especially as
being "so many stone". And they used a lot of units we never did in
daily matters.
Not just fat people - "seven stone weakling" is a not-unknown
expression.

We mix our units much more than that. Take temperatures - if it is
near freezing we use Centigrade, when it is hot we use Fahrenheit.

(excluding the US and Canada) and Japan, drive on the wrong side of
the road, AS COMPARED TO_EVERYWHERE_. Sorry, but THAT is weird. The
It's not the wrong side, it's the left side (-:.


UK, Australia, New Zealand, India. All left side (proper side)
drivers.

Add Japan and most of Africa (Where the drivers don't just stick to the
ruts, which normally match the track of a Land Rover.

Currently, the split is about 50/50 in terms of the number of countries
which drive on which side.

--
Tciao for Now!

John.
 
John Williamson wrote:
Add Japan and most of Africa (Where the drivers don't just stick to
the ruts, which normally match the track of a Land Rover.
Not actually true - see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-_and_left-hand_traffic

In Africa, interestingly, some countries which used to drive on the left -
most notably Nigeria - switched to the right because they were surrounded by
other countries which drove on the right. In other parts of Africa, the
opposite happened.

Currently, the split is about 50/50 in terms of the number of
countries which drive on which side.
Not actually true - see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-_and_left-hand_traffic

Driving on the left is a minority sport - but not so minority as many people
who drive on the right imagine. Three members of the E.U. drive on the left,
and one other made the switch from left to right within living memory.

André Coutanche
 
In article <52589936bfdave@davenoise.co.uk>, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
and it was still
pounds, shillings, pence and no one could make change

In the days of lsd, the average person could do rudimentary mental
arithmetic. These days most need a calculator, even although a base 10
system makes things simpler.
Yes, people used to be taught things like spelling and multiplication
tables in school. I used to get my pocket money in shillings and pence,
occasionally shops would give change that would include farthings, and I
don't recall having any problems with this.

It was a world in which spellcheckers and calculators hadn't been
invented yet, and in their spare time, brainrotting electronic gadgets
like MP3 players and video game consoles not having been invented yet,
people would sometimes read books. We grew up in it and got used to it.

Rod.
--
Virtual Access V6.3 free usenet/email software from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/virtual-access/
 
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5258b56bfadave@davenoise.co.uk...
: In article <jg159u$tg0$1@dont-email.me>,
: Jerry <mapson.scarts@btinternet.INVALID> wrote:
: > In a perfect world even "wire nuts" would be OK... But once
again
: > Plowman misses the point, one can't -without tampering with
the
: > panel and breakers- over load a radial circuit or appliance
lead,
: > the same is not true of spurs or appliance lead off a ring
: > circuits.
:
: Wire nuts were banned in the UK for very good reasons. Perhaps
you'd
: explain why that ban was/is wrong?

Did I say that, no. My point was and is that the world isn't
perfect, hence wire nuts are banned, hence why other mechanical
joints have to remain accessible, and why I consider ring
circuits a bodge at best.

:
: And you can very easily overload 'an appliance lead' on a
radial circuit,
: unless it is rated at the same as the radial protection. Which
it almost
: never will be.

Yes pet, a 15amp breaker has the same rating as 30amp breaker if
you say so... One is far more likely to have an appliance lead
that is rated at 15A, even for appliances that have internal 1amp
fuses, rather than such an appliance having a lead that one could
run a domestic -four ring, grill and oven- cooker off...

That is one great benefit of the UK final ring circuit -
: appliance leads are fused at the plug, and must be capable of
blowing that
: 13 amp fuse under fault conditions. Of course idiots who play
with
: electricity without understanding the basics can cause havoc.
You've
: proved that one.

The great advantage of radial circuits is that idiots find it a
little more difficult to bridge out the breaker in the panel,
unlike the silly fuse fitted in BS1363 plugs (which for some
silly reason is the same shape and diameter as many screws, bolts
and any other round bar) - again Plowman shows that whilst he can
read the regs and learnt by rope do doubt, rather than actually
understating the RISKS and therefore the whys and wherefores of
the regs. If regulations were not infallible we would never have
had wire nuts, but at one time they were allowed in the regs...

Indeed I have come across such "havoc", hence why I'm so critical
of ring circuits, they encourage such bodges. At worse a *radial
circuit*, protected at the panel by a 15A breaker is no worse
than someone like a table lamp (rated at 3amps) being fitted with
a new BS1363 plug and the default 13amp fused. At worse a /ring
circuit/ is like that same table lamp being hard wired into the
30A cooker connection...

:
: > : It's quite simple, Jerry. Those who don't understand how
things
: > work
: > : should leave well alone. And pay someone who does to do any
: > work needed.
:
: > Indeed, *you* should stick to twiddling your knob(s) Mr
Plowman
: > and pay someone to do any electrical work!
:
: But I understand the basics. And am capable of following the
regs. They
: can be bought in nice large print with coloured pictures for
those who
: have difficulty reading.
:

I'm glade they were a help to you pet, it's just a pity that you
chose to only follow them, rather than fully understand the
rational behind them! :~(
--
Regards, Jerry.
 
"Dave Plowman (News)" <dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote in message
news:5258b5bb27dave@davenoise.co.uk...
: In article <jg159u$tg0$1@dont-email.me>,
: Jerry <mapson.scarts@btinternet.INVALID> wrote:
: > Later Plowman had to admit that it is the hardware and *not
the
: > circuit design* that causes the problem, if the US used ring
: > circuits with the same hardware the self same problems with
: > regards to electrical fires would exists just the same.
:
: 'The same hardware' as used for radial circuits is not suitable
for final
: ring circuits. As I keep saying, you need to learn some
fundamentals
: instead of making a fool of yourself.
:

Hmm, if correct then every spur off a ring circuit is breaking
the regs!

As for fools, yes Dave, getting mixed up between 13A (fused) flat
pin and 15A (un-fused) round pin plugs/sockets is a bit silly -
perhaps it is time for you to with hang up your neon screw-driver
for the last time...
 
"Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.co.uk> wrote in
message
news:nyyfbegfubjuvyypbz.lyjda42.pminews@srv1.howhill.co.uk...

<snip>
: Just counted up how many double 13A sockets we've just put into
the
: refurbished *half* of this place: 38. That makes for one
helluva fuse
: board if each was a radial... They are split over four rings as
it
: is.
:

You still can run more that three 3Kw electric fires off each
ring circuit, thus how many of these sockets are for power and
how many are basically going to be over spec floor/table lighting
points[1]? As for panel size, no one has said otherwise, but
probably not as large as you might be imagining.

[1] which, if so, are probably better feed off the lighting
circuits, which then allows for remote switching if more
convenient
 
In message <4f24f52a.5156238@news.eternal-september.org>, Don Pearce
<spam@spam.com> writes:
[]
We mix our units much more than that. Take temperatures - if it is
near freezing we use Centigrade, when it is hot we use Fahrenheit.
[]
I suspect that for a lot of us, it's only the media - in fact, only the
print media - who do this. I think in Celsius for both: thirtysomething
is too hot for me, much below twenty (unless there's absolutely no wind)
too cold. Our weather forecasts have been in C for some decades, albeit
with the forecaster giving the F equivalent verbally (but not visually).
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
-Arthur C Clarke, science fiction writer (1917- )
 
In message <VA.00000c10.0045bedc@escapetime.removethisbit.myzen.co.uk>,
Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.removethisbit.myzen.co.uk> writes:
In article <52589936bfdave@davenoise.co.uk>, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
and it was still
pounds, shillings, pence and no one could make change

In the days of lsd, the average person could do rudimentary mental
arithmetic. These days most need a calculator, even although a base 10
system makes things simpler.

Yes, people used to be taught things like spelling and multiplication
tables in school. I used to get my pocket money in shillings and pence,
occasionally shops would give change that would include farthings, and I
don't recall having any problems with this.

It was a world in which spellcheckers and calculators hadn't been
invented yet, and in their spare time, brainrotting electronic gadgets
like MP3 players and video game consoles not having been invented yet,
people would sometimes read books. We grew up in it and got used to it.

Rod.
Aw, c'mon, Rod - although there are _some_ advantages in having these
old skills, it is as unrealistic to consider them as essential now that
we have things which do them for us as the skill of making our own
clothes, copperplate handwriting, and so on. (_All_ of these are useful,
just not as essential as they once were.) As for mp3 players and video
consoles being brainrotting, I don't think they are any more so than
gramophones, playing cards, dominoes, rallies, ... (-:

As for books, there may be some evidence that the recent rise of the
kindle and its friends has _increased_ reading. (Whether of the sort of
books you'd approve of, of course ... but it was ever thus, even when
dead trees ruled the roost.)
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

The reason for the oil shortage: nobody remembered to check the oil levels. Our
oil is located in the North Sea but our dip-sticks are located in Westminster.
(or Texas and Washington etc. - adjust as necessary!)
 
In article <jg3h6t$a7g$1@dont-email.me>,
Jerry <mapson.scarts@btinternet.INVALID> wrote:
Yes pet, a 15amp breaker has the same rating as 30amp breaker if
you say so... One is far more likely to have an appliance lead
that is rated at 15A, even for appliances that have internal 1amp
fuses, rather than such an appliance having a lead that one could
run a domestic -four ring, grill and oven- cooker off...
Thanks for confirming we can add flex ratings to the things you know
nothing about.

--
*Save a tree, eat a beaver*

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
In article <jg3h6t$a7g$1@dont-email.me>,
Jerry <mapson.scarts@btinternet.INVALID> wrote:
The great advantage of radial circuits is that idiots find it a
little more difficult to bridge out the breaker in the panel,
unlike the silly fuse fitted in BS1363 plugs (which for some
silly reason is the same shape and diameter as many screws, bolts
and any other round bar)
Wonder how you know all this? Just who ever wants to draw more than 13
amps from a socket anyway?

Oh yes - I remember. You used to work in a garage and probably did just
that since because it didn't have the correct wiring installed.

Not everyone is as stupid as you Jerry.

--
*Learn from your parents' mistakes - use birth control.

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
In article <jg3h6u$a7g$2@dont-email.me>,
Jerry <mapson.scarts@btinternet.INVALID> wrote:
: 'The same hardware' as used for radial circuits is not suitable
for final
: ring circuits. As I keep saying, you need to learn some
fundamentals
: instead of making a fool of yourself.
:

Hmm, if correct then every spur off a ring circuit is breaking
the regs!
You obviously haven't read them. And certainly don't understand the basics.

--
*I'm not being rude. You're just insignificant

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
In article <jg3h6u$a7g$3@dont-email.me>,
Jerry <mapson.scarts@btinternet.INVALID> wrote:
You still can run more that three 3Kw electric fires off each
ring circuit, thus how many of these sockets are for power and
how many are basically going to be over spec floor/table lighting
points[1]?
All you have in your place is electric fires and table lamps? Explains it
all.

--
Small asylum seeker wanted as mud flap, must be flexible and willing to travel

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
On 28/01/2012 11:05, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
But of you're so dismissive of a non decimal currency, why does the US
stick to imperial measurements for just about everything else?
.... except pints and gallons of course. The US "English" system has
never been used in England.

Andy
 
On 29/01/2012 16:28, Andy Champ wrote:
On 28/01/2012 11:05, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
But of you're so dismissive of a non decimal currency, why does the US
stick to imperial measurements for just about everything else?

... except pints and gallons of course. The US "English" system has never been
used in England.
Hah, everybody knows a gallon should be an 8th part of an amphora. If it was
good enough for the Romans it should be good enough for you goddam Yanks too.
 
On 1/29/2012 11:28 AM, Andy Champ wrote:
On 28/01/2012 11:05, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
But of you're so dismissive of a non decimal currency, why does the US
stick to imperial measurements for just about everything else?

... except pints and gallons of course. The US "English" system has
never been used in England.

And US fluid ounces are just a bit different, too.
 
In article <6q2dnUIu24UG7rjSnZ2dnUVZ7q-dnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk>,
Andy Champ <no.way@nospam.invalid> wrote:
On 28/01/2012 11:05, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
But of you're so dismissive of a non decimal currency, why does the US
stick to imperial measurements for just about everything else?

... except pints and gallons of course. The US "English" system has
never been used in England.
IIRC, it has. The UK one was changed sometime after US independence. They
stuck to the old units, understandably.

--
*If tennis elbow is painful, imagine suffering with tennis balls *

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
On 1/29/2012 1:45 PM, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
In article<6q2dnUIu24UG7rjSnZ2dnUVZ7q-dnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk>,
Andy Champ<no.way@nospam.invalid> wrote:
On 28/01/2012 11:05, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
But of you're so dismissive of a non decimal currency, why does the US
stick to imperial measurements for just about everything else?

... except pints and gallons of course. The US "English" system has
never been used in England.

IIRC, it has. The UK one was changed sometime after US independence. They
stuck to the old units, understandably.

Yup.
 
In message <52592d9133dave@davenoise.co.uk>, "Dave Plowman (News)"
<dave@davenoise.co.uk> writes:
In article <jg3h6t$a7g$1@dont-email.me>,
Jerry <mapson.scarts@btinternet.INVALID> wrote:
Yes pet, a 15amp breaker has the same rating as 30amp breaker if
you say so... One is far more likely to have an appliance lead
that is rated at 15A, even for appliances that have internal 1amp
fuses, rather than such an appliance having a lead that one could
run a domestic -four ring, grill and oven- cooker off...

Thanks for confirming we can add flex ratings to the things you know
nothing about.

Conductors rated at only 1A are very thin - sufficiently so that they do
not have great mechanical strength. Therefore Jerry's statement that
mains leads (in US: line cords) are likely to have a higher rating than
absolutely necessary is valid. Especially if they're of the sort that
has a connector at both ends: if there's a chance that they might be
used for an appliance that draws more, then it is unwise to use
low-current wire/cable for them.

(I am not on either side in the argument between Jerry and others: I
live in UK, but still find ring mains odd.)
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

If you bate your breath do you catch a lung fish? (Glynn Greenwood 1996-8-23.)
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top