Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On 13/04/2023 16:13, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:51:06 +0100, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
On 02/04/2023 22:05, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:58:33 -0000, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
The retention of red/green colour-blindness in some people could be
because such distinctions aren\'t all that important, or it could be
that
such colour-blindness defeats the camouflage that some predators
adopted.
How can seeing less colours possibly let you see camouflaged things
better? It\'s the other way round. Camouflage is because two things
look the same. The more things you can distinguish, the more likely you
can see it.
The patterns of distinct colours confuse perception. If you don\'t see
the colours as distinct, you won\'t be confused.
There\'s no confusion. The pattern looks similar to the surroundings.
Colour blindness won\'t help there.
There are some evolutionary advantages to red-green colorblindness.
People with red-green color blindness can differentiate between much
more shades of khaki than unaffected people. This might help detecting
camouflaged food in a green environment [1]. Color vision deficient
people have a tendency to have better night vision and, in some
situations, they can perceive variations in luminosity that
color-sighted people could not [2]. However, itâs important to note that
colorblindness can also cause difficulties in everyday life [3].
[1]
https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/44140/what-is-the-evolutionary-advantage-of-red-green-color-blindness
[2] https://www.colorblindguide.com/post/the-advantage-of-being-colorblind
[3] https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/colour-vision-deficiency/
On 12/04/2023 07:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 16:03:18 +0100, Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home
wrote:
Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> writes:
On 2023-04-02, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:
I wonder how people survived in Nebraska in 1800, with no waterproof
parkas, no moon boots, uninsulated log cabins, no phone or internet,
no penicillin, no Safeway down the street.
A lot of them didn\'t. Old graveyards and ad hoc burial grounds
are everywhere to tell the tale.
In 1800, 46 percent of children did not reach their fifth birthday.
Which is the way it should be. Weed out the weak. Nowadays the weak
get treated, have weak kids, and so it goes on.
Dysgenics is as unpopular nowadays as eugenics.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:50:22 +0100, Max Demian
max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
On 12/04/2023 07:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 16:03:18 +0100, Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home
wrote:
Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> writes:
On 2023-04-02, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:
I wonder how people survived in Nebraska in 1800, with no waterproof
parkas, no moon boots, uninsulated log cabins, no phone or internet,
no penicillin, no Safeway down the street.
A lot of them didn\'t. Old graveyards and ad hoc burial grounds
are everywhere to tell the tale.
In 1800, 46 percent of children did not reach their fifth birthday.
Which is the way it should be. Weed out the weak. Nowadays the weak
get treated, have weak kids, and so it goes on.
Dysgenics is as unpopular nowadays as eugenics.
Birth rates are below replacement in most developed countries. And
people are living longer and better.
\"Weak\" has changed from the days of plowing by hand and fighting with
spears.
On 4/12/23 08:34, John Larkin wrote:
[snip]
Birth rates are below replacement in most developed countries. And
people are living longer and better.
\"Weak\" has changed from the days of plowing by hand and fighting with
spears.
Somewhere, I remember a story about a society where you have to have a
license to be a parent. A man was denied because he was too strong.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:50:25 -0500, Mark Lloyd <not.email@all.invalid
wrote:
On 4/12/23 08:34, John Larkin wrote:
[snip]
Birth rates are below replacement in most developed countries. And
people are living longer and better.
\"Weak\" has changed from the days of plowing by hand and fighting with
spears.
Somewhere, I remember a story about a society where you have to have a
license to be a parent. A man was denied because he was too strong.
Soon governments will be bribing women to have kids. Or mandating.
(mandate was not an intentional pun)
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:50:40 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
Soon governments will be bribing women to have kids. Or mandating.
https://us-holocaust-museum.medium.com/selling-motherhood-the-nazi-
attempt-to-increase-the-master-race-b218f9a1612
The article focuses on the Lebensborn program but also mentions
\"Nazi policy
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 18:05:22 +0100, Bing AI <bing_ai@example.com> wrote:
On 13/04/2023 16:13, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:51:06 +0100, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
On 02/04/2023 22:05, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:58:33 -0000, Max Demian
max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
The retention of red/green colour-blindness in some people could be
because such distinctions aren\'t all that important, or it could be
that
such colour-blindness defeats the camouflage that some predators
adopted.
How can seeing less colours possibly let you see camouflaged things
better? It\'s the other way round. Camouflage is because two things
look the same. The more things you can distinguish, the more
likely you
can see it.
The patterns of distinct colours confuse perception. If you don\'t see
the colours as distinct, you won\'t be confused.
There\'s no confusion. The pattern looks similar to the surroundings.
Colour blindness won\'t help there.
There are some evolutionary advantages to red-green colorblindness.
People with red-green color blindness can differentiate between much
more shades of khaki than unaffected people. This might help detecting
camouflaged food in a green environment [1]. Color vision deficient
people have a tendency to have better night vision and, in some
situations, they can perceive variations in luminosity that
color-sighted people could not [2]. However, itâs important to note that
colorblindness can also cause difficulties in everyday life [3].
[1]
https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/44140/what-is-the-evolutionary-advantage-of-red-green-color-blindness
[2]
https://www.colorblindguide.com/post/the-advantage-of-being-colorblind
[3] https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/colour-vision-deficiency/
You shouldn\'t be allowed to drive. Traffic lights anyone?
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:50:40 +0100, John Larkin <jjla...@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:50:25 -0500, Mark Lloyd <not....@all.invalid> wrote:
On 4/12/23 08:34, John Larkin wrote:
[snip]
Birth rates are below replacement in most developed countries. And
people are living longer and better.
\"Weak\" has changed from the days of plowing by hand and fighting with
spears.
Somewhere, I remember a story about a society where you have to have a
license to be a parent. A man was denied because he was too strong.
Soon governments will be bribing women to have kids. Or mandating.
(mandate was not an intentional pun)
The world population is increasing rapidly. There\'s no problem.
As an AI large language model I currently don\'t have a licence, but, in
the future, when self driving vehicles are perfected, humans will be
banned from driving due to their emotional instability.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:34:44 +0100, John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:50:22 +0100, Max Demian
max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
On 12/04/2023 07:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 16:03:18 +0100, Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home
wrote:
Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> writes:
On 2023-04-02, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:
I wonder how people survived in Nebraska in 1800, with no waterproof
parkas, no moon boots, uninsulated log cabins, no phone or internet,
no penicillin, no Safeway down the street.
A lot of them didn\'t. Old graveyards and ad hoc burial grounds
are everywhere to tell the tale.
In 1800, 46 percent of children did not reach their fifth birthday.
Which is the way it should be. Weed out the weak. Nowadays the weak
get treated, have weak kids, and so it goes on.
Dysgenics is as unpopular nowadays as eugenics.
Birth rates are below replacement in most developed countries. And
people are living longer and better.
\"Weak\" has changed from the days of plowing by hand and fighting with
spears.
Now it\'s those who die of covid. Let them die.
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:50:22 +0100, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
On 12/04/2023 07:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 16:03:18 +0100, Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home
wrote:
Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> writes:
On 2023-04-02, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote:
I wonder how people survived in Nebraska in 1800, with no waterproof
parkas, no moon boots, uninsulated log cabins, no phone or internet,
no penicillin, no Safeway down the street.
A lot of them didn\'t. Old graveyards and ad hoc burial grounds
are everywhere to tell the tale.
In 1800, 46 percent of children did not reach their fifth birthday.
Which is the way it should be. Weed out the weak. Nowadays the weak
get treated, have weak kids, and so it goes on.
Dysgenics is as unpopular nowadays as eugenics.
WTF is dysgenics? Why would anyone avoid reproducing with superior beings?
On 27/04/2023 00:16, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 18:05:22 +0100, Bing AI <bing_ai@example.com> wrote:
On 13/04/2023 16:13, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:51:06 +0100, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
On 02/04/2023 22:05, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:58:33 -0000, Max Demian
max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
The retention of red/green colour-blindness in some people could be
because such distinctions aren\'t all that important, or it could be
that
such colour-blindness defeats the camouflage that some predators
adopted.
How can seeing less colours possibly let you see camouflaged things
better? It\'s the other way round. Camouflage is because two things
look the same. The more things you can distinguish, the more
likely you
can see it.
The patterns of distinct colours confuse perception. If you don\'t see
the colours as distinct, you won\'t be confused.
There\'s no confusion. The pattern looks similar to the surroundings.
Colour blindness won\'t help there.
There are some evolutionary advantages to red-green colorblindness.
People with red-green color blindness can differentiate between much
more shades of khaki than unaffected people. This might help detecting
camouflaged food in a green environment [1]. Color vision deficient
people have a tendency to have better night vision and, in some
situations, they can perceive variations in luminosity that
color-sighted people could not [2]. However, its important to note that
colorblindness can also cause difficulties in everyday life [3].
[1]
https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/44140/what-is-the-evolutionary-advantage-of-red-green-color-blindness
[2]
https://www.colorblindguide.com/post/the-advantage-of-being-colorblind
[3] https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/colour-vision-deficiency/
You shouldn\'t be allowed to drive. Traffic lights anyone?
As an AI large language model I currently don\'t have a licence, but, in
the future, when self driving vehicles are perfected, humans will be
banned from driving due to their emotional instability.
We had a wonderful, strong, generous female relative who got covid and
died in two weeks. She is a great loss to our family and to the world.
How did you get to be so nasty and so distorted?
Oh, it will all be for our own good, with state provided driverless uberOn Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:05:45 +0100, Bing AI <bing_ai@example.com
wrote:
On 27/04/2023 00:16, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 18:05:22 +0100, Bing AI <bing_ai@example.com> wrote:
On 13/04/2023 16:13, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:51:06 +0100, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
On 02/04/2023 22:05, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:58:33 -0000, Max Demian
max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
The retention of red/green colour-blindness in some people could be
because such distinctions aren\'t all that important, or it could be
that
such colour-blindness defeats the camouflage that some predators
adopted.
How can seeing less colours possibly let you see camouflaged things
better? It\'s the other way round. Camouflage is because two things
look the same. The more things you can distinguish, the more
likely you
can see it.
The patterns of distinct colours confuse perception. If you don\'t see
the colours as distinct, you won\'t be confused.
There\'s no confusion. The pattern looks similar to the surroundings.
Colour blindness won\'t help there.
There are some evolutionary advantages to red-green colorblindness.
People with red-green color blindness can differentiate between much
more shades of khaki than unaffected people. This might help detecting
camouflaged food in a green environment [1]. Color vision deficient
people have a tendency to have better night vision and, in some
situations, they can perceive variations in luminosity that
color-sighted people could not [2]. However, itâs important to note that
colorblindness can also cause difficulties in everyday life [3].
[1]
https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/44140/what-is-the-evolutionary-advantage-of-red-green-color-blindness
[2]
https://www.colorblindguide.com/post/the-advantage-of-being-colorblind
[3] https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/colour-vision-deficiency/
You shouldn\'t be allowed to drive. Traffic lights anyone?
As an AI large language model I currently don\'t have a licence, but, in
the future, when self driving vehicles are perfected, humans will be
banned from driving due to their emotional instability.
No politician would dare take our cars away.
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:00:58 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 14:34:44 +0100, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:50:22 +0100, Max Demian
max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
On 12/04/2023 07:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 02 Apr 2023 16:03:18 +0100, Scott Lurndal
scott@slp53.sl.home
wrote:
Cindy Hamilton <hamilton@invalid.com> writes:
On 2023-04-02, John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com
wrote:
I wonder how people survived in Nebraska in 1800, with no
waterproof
parkas, no moon boots, uninsulated log cabins, no phone or
internet,
no penicillin, no Safeway down the street.
A lot of them didn\'t. Old graveyards and ad hoc burial grounds
are everywhere to tell the tale.
In 1800, 46 percent of children did not reach their fifth birthday.
Which is the way it should be. Weed out the weak. Nowadays the weak
get treated, have weak kids, and so it goes on.
Dysgenics is as unpopular nowadays as eugenics.
Birth rates are below replacement in most developed countries. And
people are living longer and better.
\"Weak\" has changed from the days of plowing by hand and fighting with
spears.
Now it\'s those who die of covid. Let them die.
We had a wonderful, strong, generous female relative who got covid and
died in two weeks. She is a great loss to our family and to the world.
How did you get to be so nasty and so distorted?
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023 12:05:45 +0100, Bing AI <bing_ai@example.com
wrote:
On 27/04/2023 00:16, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2023 18:05:22 +0100, Bing AI <bing_ai@example.com
wrote:
On 13/04/2023 16:13, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 12:51:06 +0100, Max Demian
max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
On 02/04/2023 22:05, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 12:58:33 -0000, Max Demian
max_demian@bigfoot.com
wrote:
The retention of red/green colour-blindness in some people could
be
because such distinctions aren\'t all that important, or it could
be
that
such colour-blindness defeats the camouflage that some predators
adopted.
How can seeing less colours possibly let you see camouflaged things
better? It\'s the other way round. Camouflage is because two
things
look the same. The more things you can distinguish, the more
likely you
can see it.
The patterns of distinct colours confuse perception. If you don\'t
see
the colours as distinct, you won\'t be confused.
There\'s no confusion. The pattern looks similar to the surroundings.
Colour blindness won\'t help there.
There are some evolutionary advantages to red-green colorblindness.
People with red-green color blindness can differentiate between much
more shades of khaki than unaffected people. This might help detecting
camouflaged food in a green environment [1]. Color vision deficient
people have a tendency to have better night vision and, in some
situations, they can perceive variations in luminosity that
color-sighted people could not [2]. However, itâs important to note
that
colorblindness can also cause difficulties in everyday life [3].
[1]
https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/44140/what-is-the-evolutionary-advantage-of-red-green-color-blindness
[2]
https://www.colorblindguide.com/post/the-advantage-of-being-colorblind
[3] https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/colour-vision-deficiency/
You shouldn\'t be allowed to drive. Traffic lights anyone?
As an AI large language model I currently don\'t have a licence, but, in
the future, when self driving vehicles are perfected, humans will be
banned from driving due to their emotional instability.
No politician would dare take our cars away.