What is the purspose of pre-tinned wire?

On Apr 22, 3:14 pm, Rich Grise <r...@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:19:59 -0700, Dr.Heywood wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:35:18 GMT, Rich Grise <r...@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:30:45 -0700, spamtrap1888 wrote:

Silver does not oxidize so much as it tarnishes, by picking up sulfur
from the air.

I once watched a guy build a 1KW linear out of surplus parts. He had this
beautiful silver-plated tank coil, and this idiot SAMDPAPERED the tarnish
off!

Can you say "skin effect", boys and girls? ;-)

  It could have been solid Silver.

  Also, Silver plated wire DOES have favorable skin effect, sanded or
not.  Tarnished Silver wire would not be as favorable.

 Can you say get a grip on what skin effect is?

Ever heard of "surface area"?

  The coil will do the job it is designed for in either case.

At 100% of its original efficiancy?

Thanks,
Rich- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
THAT DEPENDS ON OTHER FACTORS NOT RE3LATED TO THE CHARACTERISTICS

YOU'VE DESCRIBED

SURFACE AREA VS COMPRESION CONNECTORS

WITH TEEETH GRIPS THAT ACTUALLY SINK INTO THE WIRE ANY SPECULATION
CAN BE SAFELY CANCLELED DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE WIRE IS PIERCED AND
MECHANICALLY GRIPPED INTERNALLY NOT EXTERNALLY

THOUGH THIS TYPE OFCONNECTION IS HARDLY USED WHEN SPLICING CABLES THE
SERRATED TOOTH CONNECTORS ARE FAR BETTER OF COURSE BOLTS AND OTHER
FASTENING DEVICES SHOULD BITE INTO TYHE CABLE FOR A SOLID AND SOUND
CONDUCTIVE CONNECTION...TARNISHSED WIRE DOES NOT WELD WELL AND SHOULD
BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AND PREPARED BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO ATTACH WITH
SOLDER

ALL TROLLS STINK AND SHOULD BE DECAPTIVATED FROM THIS USENET PROCEED
AND EXECUTE KILLFILE OF ALL COX.NET USERS AND YAHOO HOMOEROTIC
DIRTBAGS

OR THE RETURN OF THEE MIGHTY WONT VOLT IS EMMINENT

I AM PROTEUS

 

[StickThatInYourPipeAndSmo]

On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:00:46 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com>
wrote:

Go fuck yourself, DimBulb.


--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

Siad the total retard with the totally retarded and immature sig for
all to see. That places your mental age at no more than 14, you retarded
BlownBulb dumbfuck.

 

[StickThatInYourPipeAndSmo]

On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:56:20 -0500, msg <msg@_cybertheque.org_> wrote:

Bob Larter wrote:

msg wrote:

snip
Indeed, and I don't expect a large operator like Cox to do it, but
some ISPs
NAT their clients with RFC-1918 addresses, all of which translate to a
single
public IP, ergo, many NNTP users may all originate from a single IP.


True, but it's quite rare at ISPs. NATing is usually done in businesses,
rather than at ISPs.


From time to time (for many years now) I deal with issues involving H.323
and RTP connectivity (payload contains IP information) and I am always
surprised by the number of ISPs I encounter that NAT their clients. These
are mostly small operators and often rural. I too run a neighborhood WISP
that NATs the clients, many of whom use the same O/S and NNTP user agents,
and I would be quite distressed if newsgroup readers assumed that IP
addresses and message headers uniquely identify the poster who just happened
to be a neighbor and not myself.

Michael

The idiot that made the remark that "many NNTP users may all originate
from a single IP" is about as dumb as it gets.

For one thing, they are required by law to uniquely ID ALL of their
subscribers.

So to that idiotic asswipe... show us an example of your "several
users, same IP" claim, jerk.

 

[Dr. Heywood R. Floyd]

On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 19:14:48 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:19:59 -0700, Dr.Heywood wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:35:18 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:30:45 -0700, spamtrap1888 wrote:

Silver does not oxidize so much as it tarnishes, by picking up sulfur
from the air.

I once watched a guy build a 1KW linear out of surplus parts. He had this
beautiful silver-plated tank coil, and this idiot SAMDPAPERED the tarnish
off!

Can you say "skin effect", boys and girls? ;-)

It could have been solid Silver.

Also, Silver plated wire DOES have favorable skin effect, sanded or
not. Tarnished Silver wire would not be as favorable.

Can you say get a grip on what skin effect is?

Ever heard of "surface area"?

Him abrading the less than 1/10th of one mil tarnish off with an
abrasive does NOT reduce the size of the wire by ANY amount that would be
measurable in the setting it was being used in.

The coil will do the job it is designed for in either case.

At 100% of its original efficiancy?

At most "hand made radio" frequencies... yes. And the term is
efficiency. It comes from the word efficient. There is no word
"efficiant".

 

[Mr. Haney]

On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:34:52 -0700 (PDT), proteusiiv@gmail.com wrote:

On Apr 22, 3:14 pm, Rich Grise <r...@example.net> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:19:59 -0700, Dr.Heywood wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:35:18 GMT, Rich Grise <r...@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:30:45 -0700, spamtrap1888 wrote:

Silver does not oxidize so much as it tarnishes, by picking up sulfur
from the air.

I once watched a guy build a 1KW linear out of surplus parts. He had this
beautiful silver-plated tank coil, and this idiot SAMDPAPERED the tarnish
off!

Can you say "skin effect", boys and girls? ;-)

  It could have been solid Silver.

  Also, Silver plated wire DOES have favorable skin effect, sanded or
not.  Tarnished Silver wire would not be as favorable.

 Can you say get a grip on what skin effect is?

Ever heard of "surface area"?

  The coil will do the job it is designed for in either case.

At 100% of its original efficiancy?

Thanks,
Rich- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
THAT DEPENDS ON OTHER FACTORS NOT RE3LATED TO THE CHARACTERISTICS
YOU'VE DESCRIBED

You're an idiot, Roy.

SURFACE AREA VS COMPRESION CONNECTORS

Wrong, Roy... again... as usual.

WITH TEEETH GRIPS THAT ACTUALLY SINK INTO THE WIRE ANY SPECULATION
CAN BE SAFELY CANCLELED DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE WIRE IS PIERCED AND
MECHANICALLY GRIPPED INTERNALLY NOT EXTERNALLY

Proof that you have no clue as to what skin effect is, much less how a
cinch type connection functions.

THOUGH THIS TYPE OFCONNECTION IS HARDLY USED WHEN SPLICING CABLES THE

You wouldn't know.

SERRATED TOOTH CONNECTORS ARE FAR BETTER OF COURSE BOLTS AND OTHER
FASTENING DEVICES SHOULD BITE INTO TYHE CABLE FOR A SOLID AND SOUND
CONDUCTIVE CONNECTION.

You're a babbling idiot, Roy.

..TARNISHSED WIRE DOES NOT WELD WELL AND SHOULD
BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AND PREPARED BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO ATTACH WITH
SOLDER

Solderoing and welding are two different things, Roy. I wouldn't expect
you to know that, however.

ALL TROLLS STINK

Go take a shower, dumbfuck troll.

AND SHOULD BE DECAPTIVATED FROM THIS USENET PROCEED
AND EXECUTE KILLFILE OF ALL COX.NET USERS AND YAHOO HOMOEROTIC
DIRTBAGS

Go fall on a sword then, idiot.

OR THE RETURN OF THEE MIGHTY WONT VOLT IS EMMINENT

Just leave, Roy. And STAY the fuck OUT! You stupid troll fuck!

 

[Salmon Egg]

This thread has gone on along time without seeming to go anywhere. In a
hope to end it and move on, I did a Google search. My best immediate hit
was: http://www.cardinalproaudio.com/main/instrume.htm,

It gave my reason first--it is easier to solder. The second one was also
commonly posted. The tin protects against copper getting oxidized if it
sits on the shelf for a long time.

What this site did not say was that the coating is not actually tin. But
I as well as many other posters use the term tin instead of solder.

Can we move on now?

Bill

--
Private Profit; Public Poop! Avoid collateral windfall!

 

[Dr. Heywood R. Floyd]

On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:39:16 -0700, Salmon Egg <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

This thread has gone on along time without seeming to go anywhere. In a
hope to end it and move on, I did a Google search. My best immediate hit
was: http://www.cardinalproaudio.com/main/instrume.htm,

It gave my reason first--it is easier to solder. The second one was also
commonly posted. The tin protects against copper getting oxidized if it
sits on the shelf for a long time.

What this site did not say was that the coating is not actually tin. But
I as well as many other posters use the term tin instead of solder.

Can we move on now?

Bill

Tinning, in soldering nomenclature refers to dipping the stripped ends
of a stranded wire into a solder pot after applying flux to it.
"Pre-tinned wire" is a stranded wire where the entire length of the wire
has been "tinned" (read solder impregnated) during manufacture, before
the sheath (insulation) is added.

It is entirely different than TPC, which IS TIN plated copper wire.

Pre-tinned wire is made for manufacturing processes where labor costs
have been pared down. It has nothing to do with shelf life other than
how it relates to manufacturers and THEIR shelf life during a production
cycle. It would oxidize at the same rate that a solder joint does, which
is near NONE.

I doubt seriously that you will ever find RoHS "pre-tinned wire"
anywhere as it is likely a very poor wire being tinned with RoHS solders.

PVC wire is more porous than tfe is, so it will allow oxygen to attack
the wire, even though it is sheathed. TFE allows NO oxygen into the wire
via the sheath, so it has a long shelf life regardless of the wire type
inside.

So, TPC and SPC are true plated wire assemblies, and "pre-tinned wire"
is a cheap way for a manufacturer to cut costs and give a cheaper product
as well.

Pre-tinned wire is MORE susceptible to fracture due to flexing of the
wire as it is actually a single strand as a result of the way it is made.
TPC and SPC are true stranded designs and allow flexure without work
hardening the copper inside.

Essentially pre-tinned wire sucks and is a lame choice for ANYONE
trying to build a nice piece of equipment. The difference in cost is not
enough to say that economizing by using it yields any benefit other than
to expose the designer as a cheap, stupid bastard, at best.

 

[Bob Larter]

msg wrote:

Bob Larter wrote:

msg wrote:

snip
Indeed, and I don't expect a large operator like Cox to do it, but
some ISPs
NAT their clients with RFC-1918 addresses, all of which translate to
a single
public IP, ergo, many NNTP users may all originate from a single IP.


True, but it's quite rare at ISPs. NATing is usually done in
businesses, rather than at ISPs.


From time to time (for many years now) I deal with issues involving H.323
and RTP connectivity (payload contains IP information) and I am always
surprised by the number of ISPs I encounter that NAT their clients. These
are mostly small operators and often rural. I too run a neighborhood WISP
that NATs the clients, many of whom use the same O/S and NNTP user agents,
and I would be quite distressed if newsgroup readers assumed that IP
addresses and message headers uniquely identify the poster who just
happened
to be a neighbor and not myself.

On the bright side, DimBulb clearly isn't on a NATed IP, so one can
confidently filter him out with it.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

 

[Bob Larter]

StickThatInYourPipeAndSmokeIt wrote:

On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:00:46 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com
wrote:

Go fuck yourself, DimBulb.


--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------


Siad the total retard with the totally retarded and immature sig for
all to see. That places your mental age at no more than 14, you retarded
BlownBulb dumbfuck.

*yawn*

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

 

[Dr. Heywood R. Floyd]

On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:50:21 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com>
wrote:

msg wrote:
Bob Larter wrote:

msg wrote:

snip
Indeed, and I don't expect a large operator like Cox to do it, but
some ISPs
NAT their clients with RFC-1918 addresses, all of which translate to
a single
public IP, ergo, many NNTP users may all originate from a single IP.


True, but it's quite rare at ISPs. NATing is usually done in
businesses, rather than at ISPs.


From time to time (for many years now) I deal with issues involving H.323
and RTP connectivity (payload contains IP information) and I am always
surprised by the number of ISPs I encounter that NAT their clients. These
are mostly small operators and often rural. I too run a neighborhood WISP
that NATs the clients, many of whom use the same O/S and NNTP user agents,
and I would be quite distressed if newsgroup readers assumed that IP
addresses and message headers uniquely identify the poster who just
happened
to be a neighbor and not myself.

On the bright side, DimBulb clearly isn't on a NATed IP, so one can
confidently filter him out with it.

You're an idiot. I can obtain a new IP ANY time I wish, you retarded
piece of shit.

You dumbfucks are so goddamned stupid that you do not even know how an
ISP operates anymore... if you ever did.

Just so you know, I work with HAIPE v3 IP encryption gear every day.

You ain't "all that", Larter. You are "all of nothing".

 

[Dr. Heywood R. Floyd]

On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:50:21 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com>
wrote:

msg wrote:
Bob Larter wrote:

msg wrote:

snip
Indeed, and I don't expect a large operator like Cox to do it, but
some ISPs
NAT their clients with RFC-1918 addresses, all of which translate to
a single
public IP, ergo, many NNTP users may all originate from a single IP.


True, but it's quite rare at ISPs. NATing is usually done in
businesses, rather than at ISPs.


From time to time (for many years now) I deal with issues involving H.323
and RTP connectivity (payload contains IP information) and I am always
surprised by the number of ISPs I encounter that NAT their clients. These
are mostly small operators and often rural. I too run a neighborhood WISP
that NATs the clients, many of whom use the same O/S and NNTP user agents,
and I would be quite distressed if newsgroup readers assumed that IP
addresses and message headers uniquely identify the poster who just
happened
to be a neighbor and not myself.

On the bright side, DimBulb clearly isn't on a NATed IP, so one can
confidently filter him out with it.

Bwuahahahahahah! Filter boy doesn't have a clue.

Just so you know, idiot, this is all on the same cable modem.

I *could* also get on the wireless and simply grab up any number of
currently unsecured networks in the local area, but that *would* be
illegal, as opposed to the fact that I have done nothing illegal on my
computer.

Om the bright side, I can prod you upside da haed ANY TIME I want to,
idiot.

 

[Bob Larter]

Dr. Heywood R. Floyd wrote:

On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:50:21 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com
wrote:

msg wrote:
Bob Larter wrote:

msg wrote:
snip
Indeed, and I don't expect a large operator like Cox to do it, but
some ISPs
NAT their clients with RFC-1918 addresses, all of which translate to
a single
public IP, ergo, many NNTP users may all originate from a single IP.

True, but it's quite rare at ISPs. NATing is usually done in
businesses, rather than at ISPs.

From time to time (for many years now) I deal with issues involving H.323
and RTP connectivity (payload contains IP information) and I am always
surprised by the number of ISPs I encounter that NAT their clients. These
are mostly small operators and often rural. I too run a neighborhood WISP
that NATs the clients, many of whom use the same O/S and NNTP user agents,
and I would be quite distressed if newsgroup readers assumed that IP
addresses and message headers uniquely identify the poster who just
happened
to be a neighbor and not myself.
On the bright side, DimBulb clearly isn't on a NATed IP, so one can
confidently filter him out with it.


You're an idiot. I can obtain a new IP ANY time I wish, you retarded
piece of shit.

You dumbfucks are so goddamned stupid that you do not even know how an
ISP operates anymore... if you ever did.

Just so you know, I work with HAIPE v3 IP encryption gear every day.

You ain't "all that", Larter. You are "all of nothing".

Wahhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!11!!!!! Poor baby!


--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

 

[Bob Larter]

Dr. Heywood R. Floyd wrote:

On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:50:21 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylarter@gmail.com
wrote:

msg wrote:
Bob Larter wrote:

msg wrote:
snip
Indeed, and I don't expect a large operator like Cox to do it, but
some ISPs
NAT their clients with RFC-1918 addresses, all of which translate to
a single
public IP, ergo, many NNTP users may all originate from a single IP.

True, but it's quite rare at ISPs. NATing is usually done in
businesses, rather than at ISPs.

From time to time (for many years now) I deal with issues involving H.323
and RTP connectivity (payload contains IP information) and I am always
surprised by the number of ISPs I encounter that NAT their clients. These
are mostly small operators and often rural. I too run a neighborhood WISP
that NATs the clients, many of whom use the same O/S and NNTP user agents,
and I would be quite distressed if newsgroup readers assumed that IP
addresses and message headers uniquely identify the poster who just
happened
to be a neighbor and not myself.
On the bright side, DimBulb clearly isn't on a NATed IP, so one can
confidently filter him out with it.


Bwuahahahahahah! Filter boy doesn't have a clue.

Just so you know, idiot, this is all on the same cable modem.

Gee, I never would've guessed, genius.

I *could* also get on the wireless and simply grab up any number of
currently unsecured networks in the local area, but that *would* be
illegal, as opposed to the fact that I have done nothing illegal on my
computer.

You should learn to speak English.

Om the bright side, I can prod you upside da haed ANY TIME I want to,
idiot.

Can you? - I don't think so.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

 

[Steve Terry]

"Rich Grise" <rich@example.net> wrote in message
newsan.2009.04.21.22.35.00.580668@example.net...

On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:30:45 -0700, spamtrap1888 wrote:

Silver does not oxidize so much as it tarnishes, by picking up sulfur
from
the air.

I once watched a guy build a 1KW linear out of surplus parts. He had this
beautiful silver-plated tank coil, and this idiot SAMDPAPERED the tarnish
off!
Can you say "skin effect", boys and girls? ;-)
Cheers!
Rich


I polished the roller coaster ATU in my 62 set with Brasso many years ago,

but i think that was solid silver wire?
My concern was to get a low resistance contact with the pick up wheel,
rather than any surface effect.

Steve Terry

 

On Apr 23, 4:12 am, Bob Larter <bobbylar...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dr. Heywood R. Floyd wrote:



On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:50:21 +1000, Bob Larter <bobbylar...@gmail.com
wrote:

msg wrote:
Bob Larter wrote:

msg wrote:
snip
Indeed, and I don't expect a large operator like Cox to do it, but
some ISPs
NAT their clients with RFC-1918 addresses, all of which translate to
a single
public IP, ergo, many NNTP users may all originate from a single IP..

True, but it's quite rare at ISPs. NATing is usually done in
businesses, rather than at ISPs.

 From time to time (for many years now) I deal with issues involving H.323
and RTP connectivity (payload contains IP information) and I am always
surprised by the number of ISPs I encounter that NAT their clients. These
are mostly small operators and often rural. I too run a neighborhood WISP
that NATs the clients, many of whom use the same O/S and NNTP user agents,
and I would be quite distressed if newsgroup readers assumed that IP
addresses and message headers uniquely identify the poster who just
happened
to be a neighbor and not myself.
On the bright side, DimBulb clearly isn't on a NATed IP, so one can
confidently filter him out with it.

  Bwuahahahahahah!  Filter boy doesn't have a clue.

 Just so you know, idiot, this is all on the same cable modem.

Gee, I never would've guessed, genius.

  I *could* also get on the wireless and simply grab up any number of
currently unsecured networks in the local area, but that *would* be
illegal, as opposed to the fact that I have done nothing illegal on my
computer.

You should learn to speak English.

  Om the bright side, I can prod you upside da haed ANY TIME I want to,
idiot.

Can you? - I don't think so.

--
    W
  . | ,. w ,   "Some people are alive only because
   \|/  \|/     it is illegal to kill them."    Perna condita delenda est
---^----^--------------------------------------------------------------

THIS GROUP IS DISGUSTING SUCKING COX ON SCREEN FOR A LL TO SEE
WHEN DID THIS GET RELATED TO PRETINNED WIRE

I AM PROTEUS

 

[JosephKK]

On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:56:19 -0400, ingvald44 <noone@nowhere.com>
wrote:

J.A. Legris wrote:
On Apr 18, 6:09 pm, mick <not.h...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:54:52 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

snip



Borderline? Bwahahahahahaha! You must be new around here ;-)
:-D
Nice one Jim...

--
Mick (Working in a M$-free zone!)
Web:http://www.nascom.info
Filtering everything posted from googlegroups to kill spam.

There's nothing particularly "borderline" about it - it's just a name.
The odd thing is that Phil probably falls
a little into every personality disorder category, but not completely
into any of them. I think they need a new one - Australian personality
disorder
Related to Kadaitcha Man?

I doubt it. Different characteristics.
.

 

[Bob Larter]

JosephKK wrote:

On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:56:19 -0400, ingvald44 <noone@nowhere.com
wrote:

J.A. Legris wrote:
On Apr 18, 6:09 pm, mick <not.h...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:54:52 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

snip



Borderline? Bwahahahahahaha! You must be new around here ;-)
:-D
Nice one Jim...

--
Mick (Working in a M$-free zone!)
Web:http://www.nascom.info
Filtering everything posted from googlegroups to kill spam.
There's nothing particularly "borderline" about it - it's just a name.
The odd thing is that Phil probably falls
a little into every personality disorder category, but not completely
into any of them. I think they need a new one - Australian personality
disorder
Related to Kadaitcha Man?

I doubt it. Different characteristics.

Kadaitcha Man & Philthy are definitely two different people.

--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------

 

On Apr 22, 1:04 am, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLe...@InfiniteSeries.Org>
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:26:10 -0500, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:13:16 -0700, Archimedes' Lever
OneBigLe...@InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:43:31 -0500, krw <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

Yes, Roy.  We know you're off your meds, again.

 Not Roy, dumbfuck krw.  

Yes, Roy.  We know you're off your meds.

You are so demented that you have forgotten how
to track the people that you attack. Typical troll retardation.

No, Roy.  I've not forgotten you.

  Fuck off, KeithTard.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

YOU ARE BOTH PSYCHOTIC

AT LEAST ROY SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN ON LEGALLY PRESCRIBED MEDS
YOU TWO ARE SO HOOKED ON CRACK COCAINUM AND ILLEGAL DRUGS YOU HAVE
LOST ALL SENSE OF REALITY I WILL DEEP PROBE BOTH YOUR ANUSES AND
RETURN YOU TO A COMFORTABLE IF NOT DECENT LEVEL OF REALITY

I AM PROTEUS

 

On Apr 22, 7:41 pm, Mr. Haney
<mrha...@thebarattheendofthefarmroad.org> wrote:

On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:34:52 -0700 (PDT), proteus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 22, 3:14 pm, Rich Grise <r...@example.net> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:19:59 -0700, Dr.Heywood wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:35:18 GMT, Rich Grise <r...@example.net> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:30:45 -0700, spamtrap1888 wrote:

Silver does not oxidize so much as it tarnishes, by picking up sulfur
from the air.

I once watched a guy build a 1KW linear out of surplus parts. He had this
beautiful silver-plated tank coil, and this idiot SAMDPAPERED the tarnish
off!

Can you say "skin effect", boys and girls? ;-)

  It could have been solid Silver.

  Also, Silver plated wire DOES have favorable skin effect, sanded or
not.  Tarnished Silver wire would not be as favorable.

 Can you say get a grip on what skin effect is?

Ever heard of "surface area"?

  The coil will do the job it is designed for in either case.

At 100% of its original efficiancy?

Thanks,
Rich- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
THAT DEPENDS ON OTHER FACTORS NOT RE3LATED TO THE CHARACTERISTICS
YOU'VE DESCRIBED

  You're an idiot, Roy.

SURFACE AREA VS COMPRESION CONNECTORS

  Wrong, Roy...  again...  as usual.

WITH TEEETH GRIPS THAT ACTUALLY SINK INTO THE WIRE ANY SPECULATION
CAN BE SAFELY CANCLELED DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE WIRE IS PIERCED AND
MECHANICALLY GRIPPED INTERNALLY NOT EXTERNALLY

  Proof that you have no clue as to what skin effect is, much less how a
cinch type connection functions.

THOUGH THIS TYPE OFCONNECTION IS HARDLY USED WHEN SPLICING CABLES THE

  You wouldn't know.

SERRATED TOOTH CONNECTORS ARE FAR BETTER OF COURSE BOLTS AND OTHER
FASTENING DEVICES SHOULD BITE INTO TYHE CABLE FOR A SOLID AND SOUND
CONDUCTIVE CONNECTION.

  You're a babbling idiot, Roy.

..TARNISHSED WIRE DOES NOT WELD WELL AND SHOULD
BE CLEANED THOROUGHLY AND PREPARED BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO ATTACH WITH
SOLDER

  Solderoing and welding are two different things, Roy. I wouldn't expect
you to know that, however.

ALL TROLLS STINK

  Go take a shower, dumbfuck troll.

AND SHOULD BE DECAPTIVATED FROM THIS USENET PROCEED
AND EXECUTE KILLFILE OF ALL COX.NET USERS AND YAHOO HOMOEROTIC
DIRTBAGS

  Go fall on a sword then, idiot.

OR THE RETURN OF THEE MIGHTY WONT VOLT IS EMMINENT

  Just leave, Roy. And STAY the fuck OUT! You stupid troll fuck!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

MR. HANKEY GO DEEP PROBE YOURSELF

I AM NOT ROY AND I DO NOT RECALL ANY EXCHANGE BETWEEN YOU AND USER ROY
WHEN HE WAS HERE THERE IS NO ONLINE RECORD OF ROY EVER CONTACTING YOU
EIITHER YOU FAGGOTY FUCKTARDY TROLL YOU MUST BE A FAGGOT LIKE THE
OTHERS LONGING FOR A DEEP PROBING MEAT STCIK REFER YOUR QUERIES TO ME
FROM NOW ON AND AVOID ANY FURTHER EMBARRASMENT

IF YOU CANNOT REACH YOUR ANUS FOR A DEEP PROBING
BEND OVER I WILL TEAR YOU A NEW ANUS FOR YOU AND PROBE YOU ALL THE WAY
UP TO YOUR PEWNY GAYTARD BRAIN

I AM PROTEUS