War on humanity

[Richard Henry]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B966B7.53A3@armory.com...

Rich Grise wrote:

"Richard Henry" <rphenry@home.com> wrote in message
newsS0uc.14926$mm1.915@fed1read06...

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B7F0F4.7736@armory.com...

Before the nobility enslaved them, the tribes were Leftist.
They shared as their highest aim.

Do you have a verifiable source for that claim?

He doesn't have a verifiable source for _any_ claim.
---------------
That's because I NEVER make claims that I NEED ANY argument for
OTHER than an OBVIOUS logical structural argument from the known,
and I do this IN ORDER to prevent morons like you from merely trying
to divert the argument by insipidly whining for "cites" when you
prove that you can't even THINK for yourself and that you have NO
deep reasons behind the shit in your head.

Trust me. When I have seen people ask your cites, it's because your
argument is NOT logical.

 

[Richard Henry]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B96771.7B21@armory.com...

Richard Henry wrote:

"Rich Grise" <null@example.net> wrote in message
news:Fucuc.9183$oh7.5111@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
"Richard Henry" <rphenry@home.com> wrote in message
newsS0uc.14926$mm1.915@fed1read06...

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B7F0F4.7736@armory.com...

Before the nobility enslaved them, the tribes were Leftist.
They shared as their highest aim.

Do you have a verifiable source for that claim?

He doesn't have a verifiable source for _any_ claim. I've called his
bluff, several times[0], and he either shuts up or switches to ad
hominem
name-calling.

Since he included "Dummy" in his last posting ro me, it looks like he
has
already surrendered.
-----------------------
Nonsense and lies, when you can't make rational sense and are losing
at argument, you demand cites and whine to divert attention from the
discussion because you can't reason logically. If you can't stay on
topic and argue from structure then you have no MIND!

QED.

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B964C9.3682@armory.com...
Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote:

Before the nobility enslaved them, the tribes were Leftist.
They shared as their highest aim.

Do you have a verifiable source for that claim?
--------------
We had to or we'd have starved, we weren't chief species back then.
All the tribal examples which survived well are that way!

Do you have a verifiable source for that claim?
---------------------
None are needed, read what I wrote and you'll know that.
And if you DON'T know from that, then you're mentally crippled!


Dummy!

Do you have a verifiable source for that claim?
-----------------
I don't need one, it's obvious, which is WHY you're a Dummy!

Rich Grise warned me about the ad-homs. Let'em roll if that's all you've
got.
--------------------

Is you being a Dummy the worst you've ever heard?
Hahahah!
Dummy, get back to the topic and quit whining like a baby.

Quit blurting "Do you have a verifiable source for that claim?"
like some smug little juvenile shit who is ONLY capable of mocking,
because you know nothing and haven't learned to think yet.

But you're so mockable.
----------------------

And that's makes you look so so stupid.
Why don't you try to reason and argue logically?
Are you unable?

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote:

He doesn't have a verifiable source for _any_ claim.
---------------
That's because I NEVER make claims that I NEED ANY argument for
OTHER than an OBVIOUS logical structural argument from the known,
and I do this IN ORDER to prevent morons like you from merely trying
to divert the argument by insipidly whining for "cites" when you
prove that you can't even THINK for yourself and that you have NO
deep reasons behind the shit in your head.

Trust me.
--------------------------

I don't need to trust a ninny who can't think logically.

When I have seen people ask your cites, it's because your
argument is NOT logical.
---------------------------

Nonsense. Alleged only by people with ulterior vicious political
and defective phiolosophical motives to lie. They KNOW they can't
out-reason me, and so they HAVE to resort to that.

But you, you can't do more than allege that, because you're so
stupid you don't even know how to argue the point on topic.

You claim I call names, but your kind of ignorant piece of crap
always do that first with your cowardly pretense of demanding
cites for logical structural truths that require no such thing.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B96771.7B21@armory.com...
Richard Henry wrote:

"Rich Grise" <null@example.net> wrote in message
news:Fucuc.9183$oh7.5111@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
"Richard Henry" <rphenry@home.com> wrote in message
newsS0uc.14926$mm1.915@fed1read06...

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B7F0F4.7736@armory.com...

Before the nobility enslaved them, the tribes were Leftist.
They shared as their highest aim.

Do you have a verifiable source for that claim?

He doesn't have a verifiable source for _any_ claim. I've called his
bluff, several times[0], and he either shuts up or switches to ad
hominem
name-calling.

Since he included "Dummy" in his last posting ro me, it looks like he
has
already surrendered.
-----------------------
Nonsense and lies, when you can't make rational sense and are losing
at argument, you demand cites and whine to divert attention from the
discussion because you can't reason logically. If you can't stay on
topic and argue from structure then you have no MIND!

QED.
----------------

And you even allege THAT without reason or logical argument.
You can no more form a syllogism than you can piss upwind.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[Richard Henry]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B979BC.32B6@armory.com...

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B96771.7B21@armory.com...
Richard Henry wrote:

"Rich Grise" <null@example.net> wrote in message
news:Fucuc.9183$oh7.5111@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
"Richard Henry" <rphenry@home.com> wrote in message
newsS0uc.14926$mm1.915@fed1read06...

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B7F0F4.7736@armory.com...

Before the nobility enslaved them, the tribes were Leftist.
They shared as their highest aim.

Do you have a verifiable source for that claim?

He doesn't have a verifiable source for _any_ claim. I've called
his
bluff, several times[0], and he either shuts up or switches to ad
hominem
name-calling.

Since he included "Dummy" in his last posting ro me, it looks like
he
has
already surrendered.
-----------------------
Nonsense and lies, when you can't make rational sense and are losing
at argument, you demand cites and whine to divert attention from the
discussion because you can't reason logically. If you can't stay on
topic and argue from structure then you have no MIND!

QED.
----------------
And you even allege THAT without reason or logical argument.
You can no more form a syllogism than you can piss upwind.

Summary of the proof:

RSW: <interesting statement>
RPH: <request for reference>
RSW: "Dummy"
RG: "When he has no logic to follow, watch out for the ad-homs"
RPH: "He has already started"
RSW: "you have no MIND"
RPH: "QED"

QED.

 

[Roger Gt]

X-No-Archive: yes
"Chaos Master" <chaos_master@ig.com.br> wrote in message
news:MPG.1b23563b2c40beca989a29@130.133.1.4...
: Roger Gt(not@here.net) showed us the following results:
:
: > Yep, that's the one!
:
: EWB is the most wimpy simulation program I've ever seen.


Opinion noted for reference only, not useful...

I also use Spice and several derivatives.
But the EWB instruments look good...

 

[SioL]

"Winfield Hill" <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:c979910197v@drn.newsguy.com...

SioL wrote...

If it weren't for the leftists we'd never even be on the moon.
Remember that.

Can you be more specific? Are you saying JFK was a "leftist"? I'll
confess I have a very unclear understanding of what John S. Dyson
means by "leftist" - - although he labels me one, as he describes it
I certainly am not. Neither would JFK be one, by Dyson's descriptions,
but JFK is generally thought of as a liberal, at any rate. Dyson has
repeatedly stated that John Fields is a leftist, further muddying the
water; does Dyson think anyone who disagrees with him is a leftist?

Thanks,
- Win

What I mean is that the landing on the moon was a product of the cold war.

SioL

 

[Winfield Hill]

SioL wrote...

Winfield Hill wrote ...
SioL wrote...

If it weren't for the leftists we'd never even be on the moon.
Remember that.

Can you be more specific? Are you saying JFK was a "leftist"?

What I mean is that the landing on the moon was a product of
the cold war.

Aha. And the cold war was the product of...?

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)

 

[SioL]

"Winfield Hill" <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:c9cge8029hr@drn.newsguy.com...

SioL wrote...

Winfield Hill wrote ...
SioL wrote...

If it weren't for the leftists we'd never even be on the moon.
Remember that.

Can you be more specific? Are you saying JFK was a "leftist"?

What I mean is that the landing on the moon was a product of
the cold war.

Aha. And the cold war was the product of...?

Thanks,
- Win

Leftists, of course

SioL

 

[SioL]

"Winfield Hill" <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:c9cge8029hr@drn.newsguy.com...

SioL wrote...

Winfield Hill wrote ...
SioL wrote...

If it weren't for the leftists we'd never even be on the moon.
Remember that.

Can you be more specific? Are you saying JFK was a "leftist"?

What I mean is that the landing on the moon was a product of
the cold war.

Aha. And the cold war was the product of...?

Thanks,
- Win

Leftists, of course. Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists

SioL

 

[Jan Panteltje]

On a sunny day (Sun, 30 May 2004 06:00:10 GMT) it happened "R. Steve Walz"
<rstevew@armory.com> wrote in <40B9794D.7562@armory.com>:

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote:

He doesn't have a verifiable source for _any_ claim.
---------------
That's because I NEVER make claims that I NEED ANY argument for
OTHER than an OBVIOUS logical structural argument from the known,
and I do this IN ORDER to prevent morons like you from merely trying
to divert the argument by insipidly whining for "cites" when you
prove that you can't even THINK for yourself and that you have NO
deep reasons behind the shit in your head.

Trust me.
--------------------------
I don't need to trust a ninny who can't think logically.


When I have seen people ask your cites, it's because your
argument is NOT logical.
---------------------------
Nonsense. Alleged only by people with ulterior vicious political
and defective phiolosophical motives to lie. They KNOW they can't
out-reason me, and so they HAVE to resort to that.
One cannot outreason a printed propaganda pamphlet either.

Like for exampe the Bible.
The Universe was created 5000 years ago in 5 days (IIRC, but likely not),
and Waltz Communism is the only possible programming for billions of
neural networks each made of billons of neurons, some of these networks
having very different interests, so the WALTZ ONE FOR ALL solution always
works?
Never mind, on to other things....
JP

 

[Jan Panteltje]

On a sunny day (Sun, 30 May 2004 00:07:09 -0700) it happened "Richard Henry"
<rphenry@home.com> wrote in <zKfuc.28341$mm1.11096@fed1read06>:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B979BC.32B6@armory.com...
Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B96771.7B21@armory.com...
Richard Henry wrote:

"Rich Grise" <null@example.net> wrote in message
news:Fucuc.9183$oh7.5111@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
"Richard Henry" <rphenry@home.com> wrote in message
newsS0uc.14926$mm1.915@fed1read06...

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B7F0F4.7736@armory.com...

Before the nobility enslaved them, the tribes were Leftist.
They shared as their highest aim.

Do you have a verifiable source for that claim?

He doesn't have a verifiable source for _any_ claim. I've called
his
bluff, several times[0], and he either shuts up or switches to ad
hominem
name-calling.

Since he included "Dummy" in his last posting ro me, it looks like
he
has
already surrendered.
-----------------------
Nonsense and lies, when you can't make rational sense and are losing
at argument, you demand cites and whine to divert attention from the
discussion because you can't reason logically. If you can't stay on
topic and argue from structure then you have no MIND!

QED.
----------------
And you even allege THAT without reason or logical argument.
You can no more form a syllogism than you can piss upwind.

Summary of the proof:

RSW: <interesting statement
RPH: <request for reference
RSW: "Dummy"
RG: "When he has no logic to follow, watch out for the ad-homs"
RPH: "He has already started"
RSW: "you have no MIND"
RPH: "QED"

QED.
We can perhaps simplify this by leaving out the first 'R' in each line.

JP

 

[Chaos Master]

Roger Gt(not@here.net) showed us the following results:

Opinion noted for reference only, not useful...

I also use Spice and several derivatives.
But the EWB instruments look good...

OK, OK... I didn't want to offend.
The EWB instruments are useful - I've used them when I was a learning
electronics.

[]s
--
Chaos MasterŽ | "I'm going under,
Posting from Brazil! | drowning in you
Win 98 + BB4Win | I'm falling forever,
Slackware Linux | I've got to break through"
---------------------. -- Evanescence, "Going Under"

 

[Reg Edwards]

Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists

======================

It's a matter of opnion. Depends on whether you are a leftist or a rightist.

 

[Roger Gt]

X-No-Archive: yes
"Reg Edwards" wrote
: Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists
: >
: ======================
:
: It's a matter of opinion. Depends on whether you are a leftist
or a rightist.

Or whether you understand the difference between good and Bad,
right and wrong!

 

[Roger Gt]

X-No-Archive: yes
"Chaos Master" wrote
: Roger Gt wrote
:
: > Opinion noted for reference only, not useful...
: > I also use Spice and several derivatives.
: > But the EWB instruments look good...
:
: OK, OK... I didn't want to offend.
: The EWB instruments are useful - I've used them when I was a
learning
: electronics.
:
: []s : -- : Chaos MasterŽ

Gee that must have made it easy. There were no cool tools when I
studied Electronics back in the 50's.

The EWB stuff displays well for neophytes to understand the
readings!

 

[Reg Edwards]

"Roger Gt" wrote in message

: Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists
:
: ======================
:
: It's a matter of opinion. Depends on whether you are a leftist
or a rightist.
=========================

Or whether you understand the difference between good and Bad,
right and wrong!

=========================

The difference between right and wrong is a matter of opinion.

There are no absolute standards. All is relative : Albert Einstein.

 

[Rich Grise]

"Roger Gt" <not@here.net> wrote in message
newsvouc.61511$hv5.7225@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...

X-No-Archive: yes
"Reg Edwards" wrote
: Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists
:
: ======================
:
: It's a matter of opinion. Depends on whether you are a leftist
or a rightist.

Or whether you understand the difference between good and Bad,
right and wrong!


That's simple. If you're an authoritarian of any stripe, then if

it feels good it's bad, and if it feels bad, it's good.


Cheers!
Rich

 

[Rich Grise]

"Reg Edwards" <g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c9dc0h$i3f$1@sparta.btinternet.com...

"Roger Gt" wrote in message

: Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists
:
: ======================
:
: It's a matter of opinion. Depends on whether you are a leftist
or a rightist.
=========================

Or whether you understand the difference between good and Bad,
right and wrong!

=========================

The difference between right and wrong is a matter of opinion.

This is only true if you've utterly abandoned your own Will.

Cheers!
Rich