War on humanity

[Chaos Master]

Roger Gt(not@here.net) showed us the following results:

Gee that must have made it easy. There were no cool tools when I
studied Electronics back in the 50's.

Yes, this made things easier. Being able to understand what happens when you
change something is good.

The EWB stuff displays well for neophytes to understand the
readings!

IMHO, for neophytes EWB is a Good Thing (tm).

[]s
--
Chaos MasterŽ | "I'm going under,
Posting from Brazil! | drowning in you
Win 98 + BB4Win | I'm falling forever,
Slackware Linux | I've got to break through"
---------------------. -- Evanescence, "Going Under"

 

[SioL]

"Reg Edwards" <g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c9d0s5$n0b$1@hercules.btinternet.com...

Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists

======================

It's a matter of opnion. Depends on whether you are a leftist or a rightist.

I'm a leftist, definitely. Ask Mr. Dyson.

SioL

 

[Winfield Hill]

SioL wrote...

Reg Edwards wrote ...
Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists

It's a matter of opnion. Depends on whether you are a leftist
or a rightist.

I'm a leftist, definitely. Ask Mr. Dyson.

It seems most of here are to the left of Mr. Dyson, some
only a little perhaps, but most of us a lot I imagine.

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)

 

[YD]

On Sun, 30 May 2004 04:43:57 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com>
wrote:

Richard Henry wrote:

"Rich Grise" <null@example.net> wrote in message
news:Fucuc.9183$oh7.5111@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
"Richard Henry" <rphenry@home.com> wrote in message
newsS0uc.14926$mm1.915@fed1read06...

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40B7F0F4.7736@armory.com...

Before the nobility enslaved them, the tribes were Leftist.
They shared as their highest aim.

Do you have a verifiable source for that claim?

He doesn't have a verifiable source for _any_ claim. I've called his
bluff, several times[0], and he either shuts up or switches to ad hominem
name-calling.

Since he included "Dummy" in his last posting ro me, it looks like he has
already surrendered.
-----------------------
Nonsense and lies, when you can't make rational sense and are losing
at argument, you demand cites and whine to divert attention from the
discussion because you can't reason logically. If you can't stay on
topic and argue from structure then you have no MIND!

-Steve

Structure needs substance to hold it up. So how about backing up your
claims? Are you aware that you sound more and more like JSD? Are you
now going to call me a rightist?

- YD.

--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.

 

[YD]

On Sun, 30 May 2004 04:40:51 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com>
wrote:


<schnipperoo-DAH!>

-----------------
EVERYTHING that I say works, works. Or I don't SAY!

-Steve

You say but don't show. Those tribes surviving by sharing, there
should be enough antropological studies floating around that you could
come up with at least one little web page.

- YD.

--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.

 

[KR Williams]

In article <c9dugg010nv@drn.newsguy.com>,
Winfield_member@newsguy.com says...

SioL wrote...

Reg Edwards wrote ...
Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists

It's a matter of opnion. Depends on whether you are a leftist
or a rightist.

I'm a leftist, definitely. Ask Mr. Dyson.

It seems most of here are to the left of Mr. Dyson, some
only a little perhaps, but most of us a lot I imagine.

Nah! Some of us are more right than Dyson. ...right, too! ;-)


--
Keith

 

[KR Williams]

In article <c9e86k$63n$1@sparta.btinternet.com>,
g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com says...

The difference between right and wrong is a matter of opinion.

This is only true if you've utterly abandoned your own Will.

==========================

In my opnion there's no such thing as free will.

How can you say that!

--
Keith

 

[Reg Edwards]

The difference between right and wrong is a matter of opinion.

This is only true if you've utterly abandoned your own Will.

==========================

In my opnion there's no such thing as free will.

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote:

Nonsense and lies, when you can't make rational sense and are losing
at argument, you demand cites and whine to divert attention from the
discussion because you can't reason logically. If you can't stay on
topic and argue from structure then you have no MIND!

QED.
----------------
And you even allege THAT without reason or logical argument.
You can no more form a syllogism than you can piss upwind.

Summary of the proof:

RSW: <interesting statement
RPH: <request for reference
-----------------

None is required, it's was a logical assertion not needing proof
by any means. You can go ahead and debate that like an idiot, but
you know that IF YOU DO that you will rapidly evidence that you're
only being an idiot.

Now you don't LIKE your options regarding that inevitable outcome,
so you posture the rest of your disingenuous garbage here in order
to distract from the truth, - below:

RSW: "Dummy"
RG: "When he has no logic to follow, watch out for the ad-homs"
--------------------

When you act like a dummy, you get called a dummy.

RPH: "He has already started"
RSW: "you have no MIND"
RPH: "QED"

QED.
---------------

Actually, you have NO mind: QED. You decline to use yours.

You CONTINUE EVEN NOW to avoid actually arguing with me
logically, precisely because you KNOW THAT YOUR ASSERTIONS
AREN'T LOGICAL!

And this is all merely your only possible defensive reaction.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

SioL wrote:

"Winfield Hill" <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:c9cge8029hr@drn.newsguy.com...
SioL wrote...

Winfield Hill wrote ...
SioL wrote...

If it weren't for the leftists we'd never even be on the moon.
Remember that.

Can you be more specific? Are you saying JFK was a "leftist"?

What I mean is that the landing on the moon was a product of
the cold war.

Aha. And the cold war was the product of...?

Thanks,
- Win

Leftists, of course

SioL
-------------------

Rigthists who staged it to distract the People from the realization
that they could vote the rich out of their wealth.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

SioL wrote:

"Winfield Hill" <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:c9cge8029hr@drn.newsguy.com...
SioL wrote...

Winfield Hill wrote ...
SioL wrote...

If it weren't for the leftists we'd never even be on the moon.
Remember that.

Can you be more specific? Are you saying JFK was a "leftist"?

What I mean is that the landing on the moon was a product of
the cold war.

Aha. And the cold war was the product of...?

Thanks,
- Win

Leftists, of course. Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists

SioL
-------------------

Merely Rightist lies to protect them from the People, who could vote
away their wealth and popwer if not kept afraid.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Reg Edwards wrote:

Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists

======================

It's a matter of opnion. Depends on whether you are a leftist or a rightist.
--------------

No, it depends on whether you're a Rightist liar, or a Leftist
telling the Truth.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[Roger Gt]

X-No-Archive: yes
"Reg Edwards" <g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c9e86k$63n$1@sparta.btinternet.com...
: > > The difference between right and wrong is a matter of
opinion.
: > >
: > This is only true if you've utterly abandoned your own Will.
: >
: ==========================
:
: In my opinion there's no such thing as free will.
:

Fortunately not many share that opinion!

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Reg Edwards wrote:

"Roger Gt" wrote in message

: Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists
:
: ======================
:
: It's a matter of opinion. Depends on whether you are a leftist
or a rightist.
=========================

Or whether you understand the difference between good and Bad,
right and wrong!

=========================

The difference between right and wrong is a matter of opinion.
--------------------

LIAR! No.
The Rich Rightists who rob you are obviously robbing you.
And Leftists are obviously opposing these thieves.

There are no absolute standards. All is relative : Albert Einstein.
-------------------

Liar. He never said such a thing. And Einstein was a Socialist.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Reg Edwards wrote:

The difference between right and wrong is a matter of opinion.

This is only true if you've utterly abandoned your own Will.

==========================

In my opnion there's no such thing as free will.
-----------------

There isn't, but there is the Truth. It's more obvious than falsehood.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Rich Grise wrote:

"Roger Gt" <not@here.net> wrote in message
newsvouc.61511$hv5.7225@newssvr29.news.prodigy.com...
X-No-Archive: yes
"Reg Edwards" wrote
: Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists
:
: ======================
:
: It's a matter of opinion. Depends on whether you are a leftist
or a rightist.

Or whether you understand the difference between good and Bad,
right and wrong!


That's simple. If you're an authoritarian of any stripe, then if
it feels good it's bad, and if it feels bad, it's good.

Cheers!
Rich
-----------

Then I'm not an authoritarian. Another Rightist lie put to death.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[R. Steve Walz]

KR Williams wrote:

In article <c9dugg010nv@drn.newsguy.com>,
Winfield_member@newsguy.com says...
SioL wrote...

Reg Edwards wrote ...
Most, if not all, of the bad things come from leftists

It's a matter of opnion. Depends on whether you are a leftist
or a rightist.

I'm a leftist, definitely. Ask Mr. Dyson.

It seems most of here are to the left of Mr. Dyson, some
only a little perhaps, but most of us a lot I imagine.

Nah! Some of us are more right than Dyson. ...right, too! ;-)

--
Keith
----------

You mean "righter", as in more "Right", and thus wrong.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[Richard Henry]

"Reg Edwards" <g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote in message
news:c9e86k$63n$1@sparta.btinternet.com...

The difference between right and wrong is a matter of opinion.

This is only true if you've utterly abandoned your own Will.

==========================

In my opnion there's no such thing as free will.

You are free to have that opinion.

 

[R. Steve Walz]

Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Sun, 30 May 2004 06:00:10 GMT) it happened "R. Steve Walz"
rstevew@armory.com> wrote in <40B9794D.7562@armory.com>:

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote:

He doesn't have a verifiable source for _any_ claim.
---------------
That's because I NEVER make claims that I NEED ANY argument for
OTHER than an OBVIOUS logical structural argument from the known,
and I do this IN ORDER to prevent morons like you from merely trying
to divert the argument by insipidly whining for "cites" when you
prove that you can't even THINK for yourself and that you have NO
deep reasons behind the shit in your head.

Trust me.
--------------------------
I don't need to trust a ninny who can't think logically.


When I have seen people ask your cites, it's because your
argument is NOT logical.
---------------------------
Nonsense. Alleged only by people with ulterior vicious political
and defective phiolosophical motives to lie. They KNOW they can't
out-reason me, and so they HAVE to resort to that.

One cannot outreason a printed propaganda pamphlet either.
-----------------

Of course they can, if it's wrong.

Like for exampe the Bible.
The Universe was created 5000 years ago in 5 days (IIRC, but likely not),
----------------------

Since everyone knows that mountains don't disappear or form in a few
days, that is obviously ridiculous. And since everyone knows no one
was actually around to see it, such an assertion as the bible is even
more ridiculous!! There are an enormous number of reasons why such a
book must be regarded as a fairy tale, if only because we have no good
reason to believe that any human now alive can be trusted to have
conveyed a supposed "true account" to the present without having been
tempted to screw with it along the way in order to deceive people to
acquire power and manipulate others.

and Waltz Communism is the only possible programming for billions of
neural networks each made of billons of neurons, some of these networks
having very different interests, so the WALTZ ONE FOR ALL solution always
works?
-------------------

Of course it does, they operate due to the same basic genome.
The differences between people are quite tiny, otherwise we
wouldn't even be able to communicate with each other.

Never mind, on to other things....
JP
-------------------------

People thinking they differ that much is merely erroneous, and any
such belief in such differences, other than the emotional disorders
caused by abuse and greed which must be eliminated, are simply
brainwashing.

We obviously lived in communistic tribes for 100,000 years, and
evolved to live that way for far longer. We could not have defeated
predators and the elements with the weak body we have, compared to
the predators upon us, without an evolved ethic in our real human
nature of either of extreme group cooperation, or extinction as the
only alternatives.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public

 

[Richard Henry]

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message
news:40BAA9D6.57E0@armory.com...

Richard Henry wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote:

Nonsense and lies, when you can't make rational sense and are
losing
at argument, you demand cites and whine to divert attention from
the
discussion because you can't reason logically. If you can't stay
on
topic and argue from structure then you have no MIND!

QED.
----------------
And you even allege THAT without reason or logical argument.
You can no more form a syllogism than you can piss upwind.

Summary of the proof:

RSW: <interesting statement
RPH: <request for reference
-----------------
None is required, it's was a logical assertion not needing proof
by any means. You can go ahead and debate that like an idiot, but
you know that IF YOU DO that you will rapidly evidence that you're
only being an idiot.

Now you don't LIKE your options regarding that inevitable outcome,
so you posture the rest of your disingenuous garbage here in order
to distract from the truth, - below:


RSW: "Dummy"
RG: "When he has no logic to follow, watch out for the ad-homs"
--------------------
When you act like a dummy, you get called a dummy.


RPH: "He has already started"
RSW: "you have no MIND"
RPH: "QED"

QED.
---------------
Actually, you have NO mind: QED. You decline to use yours.

You CONTINUE EVEN NOW to avoid actually arguing with me
logically, precisely because you KNOW THAT YOUR ASSERTIONS
AREN'T LOGICAL!

And this is all merely your only possible defensive reaction.

Confucius say: when you cut a big fart, making a lot of noise doesn't cover
it up.