Trevor Tosspot admits he seeks a total ban on the private ow

J

John-Melb

Guest
On Apr 22, 4:33 am, Trevor Wilson <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

**No, we do not. Handguns are unnecessary in modern society (despite the
delusions that afflict your good wife). The sooner they are banned
completely and possession laws can then be stengthened, the better.
Naturally, semi-auto and auto handguns must be banned immediately.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au
With apologies to the Reverend Neimoller.

First they come for the semi-auto's, I didn't speak out, I didn't own
a semi-auto.
Then the come for the pump-actions, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
pump-action.
Then they come for the handguns, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
handgun.

I think we all know the rest.
 
On 4/22/2012 7:30 AM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 4:33 am, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**No, we do not. Handguns are unnecessary in modern society (despite the
delusions that afflict your good wife). The sooner they are banned
completely and possession laws can then be stengthened, the better.
Naturally, semi-auto and auto handguns must be banned immediately.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

With apologies to the Reverend Neimoller.

First they come for the semi-auto's, I didn't speak out, I didn't own
a semi-auto.
Then the come for the pump-actions, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
pump-action.
Then they come for the handguns, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
handgun.

I think we all know the rest.

Yeah, what a political knee jerk that one was. "I know, why don't we
take all the licensed weapons 'cause we can find those and give all the
crims a better advantage ??".
 
On 22/04/2012 10:01 AM, Rheilly Phoull wrote:
On 4/22/2012 7:30 AM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 4:33 am, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**No, we do not. Handguns are unnecessary in modern society (despite the
delusions that afflict your good wife). The sooner they are banned
completely and possession laws can then be stengthened, the better.
Naturally, semi-auto and auto handguns must be banned immediately.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

With apologies to the Reverend Neimoller.

First they come for the semi-auto's, I didn't speak out, I didn't own
a semi-auto.
Then the come for the pump-actions, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
pump-action.
Then they come for the handguns, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
handgun.

I think we all know the rest.


Yeah, what a political knee jerk that one was. "I know, why don't we
take all the licensed weapons 'cause we can find those and give all the
crims a better advantage ??".
Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?
 
On 22/04/2012 1:27 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, B J Foster<bjfos...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?

He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.
So their plan is to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens?

WHAT ON EARTH FOR???
 
On 4/22/2012 11:31 AM, B J Foster wrote:
On 22/04/2012 1:27 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, B J Foster<bjfos...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?

He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.


So their plan is to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens?

WHAT ON EARTH FOR???
The plan was implemented some time ago and some very nice semi-auto's
were destroyed so the governments of the day could be seen to be
taking stern and rapid action after a nutter shot up a city centre.
 
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, B J Foster <bjfos...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?
He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.
 
"Rheilly Phoull" <rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote in message
news:bPydnYXHCvDk1w7SnZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
On 4/22/2012 7:30 AM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 4:33 am, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**No, we do not. Handguns are unnecessary in modern society (despite the
delusions that afflict your good wife). The sooner they are banned
completely and possession laws can then be stengthened, the better.
Naturally, semi-auto and auto handguns must be banned immediately.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

With apologies to the Reverend Neimoller.

First they come for the semi-auto's, I didn't speak out, I didn't own
a semi-auto.
Then the come for the pump-actions, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
pump-action.
Then they come for the handguns, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
handgun.

I think we all know the rest.


Yeah, what a political knee jerk that one was. "I know, why don't we take
all the licensed weapons 'cause we can find those and give all the crims a
better advantage ??".
Guns in general are not licensed for self defense in Australia
 
"John-Melb" <mcnamara_john@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f53639e2-60a5-4778-97a6-fc07b10d065e@w6g2000pbp.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, B J Foster <bjfos...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?
He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.

Cite pleae :)
 
On 22/04/2012 1:44 PM, Rheilly Phoull wrote:
On 4/22/2012 11:31 AM, B J Foster wrote:
On 22/04/2012 1:27 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, B J Foster<bjfos...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?

He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.


So their plan is to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens?

WHAT ON EARTH FOR???

The plan was implemented some time ago and some very nice semi-auto's
were destroyed so the governments of the day could be seen to be
taking stern and rapid action after a nutter shot up a city centre.
Considering the murders scattered across the country this last month
implemented with illegally obtained weapons it's very obvious whoever
decided to take legal guns has no fcuking idea how to stop the crims
and personally I think they should fall on their sword immediately after
repealing these silly fcuking gun laws , The police have failed
miserably and need to lift their game instead of revenue raising at the
call of greedy unscrupulous state govco's on threat of fiscal penalties
for failure

--









X-No-Archive: Yes
 
"atec77" <"atec77 "@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn0cp9$hu7$1@dont-email.me...
On 22/04/2012 1:44 PM, Rheilly Phoull wrote:
On 4/22/2012 11:31 AM, B J Foster wrote:
On 22/04/2012 1:27 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, B J Foster<bjfos...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?

He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.


So their plan is to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens?

WHAT ON EARTH FOR???

The plan was implemented some time ago and some very nice semi-auto's
were destroyed so the governments of the day could be seen to be
taking stern and rapid action after a nutter shot up a city centre.

Considering the murders scattered across the country this last month
implemented with illegally obtained weapons it's very obvious whoever
decided to take legal guns has no fcuking idea how to stop the crims and
personally I think they should fall on their sword immediately after
repealing these silly fcuking gun laws , The police have failed miserably
and need to lift their game instead of revenue raising at the call of
greedy unscrupulous state govco's on threat of fiscal penalties for
failure
Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current violence?
 
dechucka wrote:
"atec77" <"atec77 "@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn0cp9$hu7$1@dont-email.me...
On 22/04/2012 1:44 PM, Rheilly Phoull wrote:
On 4/22/2012 11:31 AM, B J Foster wrote:
On 22/04/2012 1:27 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, B J Foster<bjfos...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?

He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.


So their plan is to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens?

WHAT ON EARTH FOR???

The plan was implemented some time ago and some very nice semi-auto's
were destroyed so the governments of the day could be seen to be
taking stern and rapid action after a nutter shot up a city centre.

Considering the murders scattered across the country this last month
implemented with illegally obtained weapons it's very obvious whoever
decided to take legal guns has no fcuking idea how to stop the crims
and personally I think they should fall on their sword immediately
after repealing these silly fcuking gun laws , The police have failed
miserably and need to lift their game instead of revenue raising at
the call of greedy unscrupulous state govco's on threat of fiscal
penalties for failure

Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current violence?

The current ones have not, so why were they changed?
 
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wkPkr.5983$v14.5710@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:

"atec77" <"atec77 "@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn0cp9$hu7$1@dont-email.me...
On 22/04/2012 1:44 PM, Rheilly Phoull wrote:
On 4/22/2012 11:31 AM, B J Foster wrote:
On 22/04/2012 1:27 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, B J Foster<bjfos...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?

He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.


So their plan is to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens?

WHAT ON EARTH FOR???

The plan was implemented some time ago and some very nice semi-auto's
were destroyed so the governments of the day could be seen to be
taking stern and rapid action after a nutter shot up a city centre.

Considering the murders scattered across the country this last month
implemented with illegally obtained weapons it's very obvious whoever
decided to take legal guns has no fcuking idea how to stop the crims
and personally I think they should fall on their sword immediately
after repealing these silly fcuking gun laws , The police have failed
miserably and need to lift their game instead of revenue raising at
the call of greedy unscrupulous state govco's on threat of fiscal
penalties for failure

Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current violence?


The current ones have not, so why were they changed?
You forgot to answer the question. Haven't seen any long arm massacres since
Port Arthur iirc
 
dechucka wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wkPkr.5983$v14.5710@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:

"atec77" <"atec77 "@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn0cp9$hu7$1@dont-email.me...
On 22/04/2012 1:44 PM, Rheilly Phoull wrote:
On 4/22/2012 11:31 AM, B J Foster wrote:
On 22/04/2012 1:27 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, B J Foster<bjfos...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?

He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't
have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.


So their plan is to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens?

WHAT ON EARTH FOR???

The plan was implemented some time ago and some very nice semi-auto's
were destroyed so the governments of the day could be seen to be
taking stern and rapid action after a nutter shot up a city centre.

Considering the murders scattered across the country this last month
implemented with illegally obtained weapons it's very obvious whoever
decided to take legal guns has no fcuking idea how to stop the crims
and personally I think they should fall on their sword immediately
after repealing these silly fcuking gun laws , The police have failed
miserably and need to lift their game instead of revenue raising at
the call of greedy unscrupulous state govco's on threat of fiscal
penalties for failure

Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current violence?


The current ones have not, so why were they changed?

You forgot to answer the question. Haven't seen any long arm massacres
since Port Arthur iirc

the total homicides are not decreasing by any appreciable amount.
 
On 4/22/2012 3:35 PM, dechucka wrote:
"Rheilly Phoull" <rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote in message
news:bPydnYXHCvDk1w7SnZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
On 4/22/2012 7:30 AM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 4:33 am, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**No, we do not. Handguns are unnecessary in modern society (despite
the
delusions that afflict your good wife). The sooner they are banned
completely and possession laws can then be stengthened, the better.
Naturally, semi-auto and auto handguns must be banned immediately.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

With apologies to the Reverend Neimoller.

First they come for the semi-auto's, I didn't speak out, I didn't own
a semi-auto.
Then the come for the pump-actions, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
pump-action.
Then they come for the handguns, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
handgun.

I think we all know the rest.


Yeah, what a political knee jerk that one was. "I know, why don't we
take all the licensed weapons 'cause we can find those and give all
the crims a better advantage ??".

Guns in general are not licensed for self defense in Australia
That's true and with the increase in armed invasions I reckon it should
be reconsidered.
 
On 23/04/2012 11:13 AM, F Murtz wrote:
dechucka wrote:

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wkPkr.5983$v14.5710@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:

"atec77" <"atec77 "@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn0cp9$hu7$1@dont-email.me...
On 22/04/2012 1:44 PM, Rheilly Phoull wrote:
On 4/22/2012 11:31 AM, B J Foster wrote:
On 22/04/2012 1:27 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, B J Foster<bjfos...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?

He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't
have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.


So their plan is to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens?

WHAT ON EARTH FOR???

The plan was implemented some time ago and some very nice semi-auto's
were destroyed so the governments of the day could be seen to be
taking stern and rapid action after a nutter shot up a city centre.

Considering the murders scattered across the country this last month
implemented with illegally obtained weapons it's very obvious whoever
decided to take legal guns has no fcuking idea how to stop the crims
and personally I think they should fall on their sword immediately
after repealing these silly fcuking gun laws , The police have failed
miserably and need to lift their game instead of revenue raising at
the call of greedy unscrupulous state govco's on threat of fiscal
penalties for failure

Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current violence?


The current ones have not, so why were they changed?

You forgot to answer the question. Haven't seen any long arm massacres
since Port Arthur iirc


the total homicides are not decreasing by any appreciable amount.
include police murders and the figures go waaaayy up

--









X-No-Archive: Yes
 
On Apr 23, 5:43 pm, atec77 <"atec77 "@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 23/04/2012 11:13 AM, F Murtz wrote:







dechucka wrote:

"F Murtz" <hagg...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:wkPkr.5983$v14.5710@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:

"atec77" <"atec77 "@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jn0cp9$hu7$1@dont-email.me...
On 22/04/2012 1:44 PM, Rheilly Phoull wrote:
On 4/22/2012 11:31 AM, B J Foster wrote:
On 22/04/2012 1:27 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 12:31 pm, B J Foster<bjfos...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

Hey Twevor,
What's your plan for taking the weapons away from the crims?

He doesn't, anti-gun zealots have previously admitted they don't
have
a problem with criminals owning guns illegally.

So their plan is to confiscate guns from law-abiding citizens?

WHAT ON EARTH FOR???

The plan was implemented some time ago and some very nice semi-auto's
were destroyed so the governments of the day could be seen to be
taking stern and rapid action after a nutter shot up a city centre..

Considering the murders scattered across the country this last month
implemented with illegally obtained weapons it's very obvious whoever
decided to take legal guns has no fcuking idea how to stop the crims
and personally I think they should fall on their sword immediately
after repealing these silly fcuking gun laws , The police have failed
miserably and need to lift their game instead of revenue raising at
the call of greedy unscrupulous state govco's on threat of fiscal
penalties for failure

Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current violence?

The current ones have not, so why were they changed?

You forgot to answer the question. Haven't seen any long arm massacres
since Port Arthur iirc

the total homicides are not decreasing by any appreciable amount.

include police murders and the figures go waaaayy up

--

X-No-Archive: Yes

Strange, we had this discussion at work today, and the comment "if you
have to disarm anyone,
then it needs to be government, they are historically responsible for
many more deaths than all
crime ever has been."
 
Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current violence?


The current ones have not, so why were they changed?

You forgot to answer the question. Haven't seen any long arm massacres
since Port Arthur iirc


the total homicides are not decreasing by any appreciable amount.
keep squirming
 
"Rheilly Phoull" <rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote in message
news:xI-dna1zJveMJQnSnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
On 4/22/2012 3:35 PM, dechucka wrote:

"Rheilly Phoull" <rheilly@bigslong.com> wrote in message
news:bPydnYXHCvDk1w7SnZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
On 4/22/2012 7:30 AM, John-Melb wrote:
On Apr 22, 4:33 am, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**No, we do not. Handguns are unnecessary in modern society (despite
the
delusions that afflict your good wife). The sooner they are banned
completely and possession laws can then be stengthened, the better.
Naturally, semi-auto and auto handguns must be banned immediately.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

With apologies to the Reverend Neimoller.

First they come for the semi-auto's, I didn't speak out, I didn't own
a semi-auto.
Then the come for the pump-actions, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
pump-action.
Then they come for the handguns, I didn't speak out, I didn't own a
handgun.

I think we all know the rest.


Yeah, what a political knee jerk that one was. "I know, why don't we
take all the licensed weapons 'cause we can find those and give all
the crims a better advantage ??".

Guns in general are not licensed for self defense in Australia

That's true and with the increase in armed invasions I reckon it should be
reconsidered.
You really want to walk around in your home all the time with a loaded gun?
Should it be compulsory?
 
dechucka wrote:
Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current violence?


The current ones have not, so why were they changed?

You forgot to answer the question. Haven't seen any long arm massacres
since Port Arthur iirc


the total homicides are not decreasing by any appreciable amount.

keep squirming

Don't need to, statistics beats phobic paranoid rhetoric.
 
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:SVmlr.6034$v14.1894@viwinnwfe02.internal.bigpond.com...
dechucka wrote:
Would pre Howard gun laws done anything to stop the current violence?


The current ones have not, so why were they changed?

You forgot to answer the question. Haven't seen any long arm massacres
since Port Arthur iirc


the total homicides are not decreasing by any appreciable amount.

keep squirming


Don't need to, statistics beats phobic paranoid rhetoric.
dechuklehead is a stupid and ignorant troll
It's only use is for you to use it as a foil, to show how stupid some
posters actually are, and also as a means to educate the lurkers
Otherwise, it's wise to just ignore it.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top