Toshiba TV29C90 problem; Image fades to black...

[Phil Allison]

tabb...@gmail.com wrote:

----------------------------

Phil Allison wrote:

tabby wrote:


You fuckwit, lying POS.

no, just short on knowledge.

** Ian Field is a prize fuckwit, a congenital liar and a POS.

He makes facts up and uses false logic constantly.

He is clearly an autistic dim wit.

Just like thousands of other internet trolls.

That interpretation ...

** It ain't no "interpretation" - pal.

Field is a public menace on usenet and elsewhere too, I bet.

FYI:

I do not get angry, that is YOUR misinterpretation.

But I reserve the RIGHT to publicly out and thoroughly condemn
bullshit artists and trolls.

Seems YOU have trouble even identifying them.



..... Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

John-Delusional Fuckwit wrote:

---------------------------------

One more thing: if you look at a halogen lamp crosseyed the filament will
fail from the shock of your stare.. The filaments are not supported as
they are in a standard incandescent lamp so they must not be subject to
shock or vibration.



** See pics of 150W halogen tube lamps:

http://www.destinationlighting.com/images/products_zoom/549/13549~zoom.jpg


http://www.homedepot.com/catalog/productImages/1000/b7/b7e4d552-8a07-4441-a54c-0c250efeef67_1000.jpg

https://images.musicstore.de/images/1600/omnilux-halogen-lamp-bulb-g-6-35-150-watts-24-volts_1_LIG0000456-000.jpg

How about a 1000W one:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/6174-2HVwIL._SL1500_.jpg



http://www.gelighting.com/LightingWeb/apac/images/GE-Avoiding-Hot-Shock-Halogen-HIR_tcm281-33642.pdf

** You can see the links to several pics that I posted ?

All of them show halogen tube lamps with multiple filament supports.

They are real pics published by folk who make and sell the lamps.

You can see them ??



Wot a fucking MORON.


...... Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

Phil Allison wrote:

----------------------

John-Delusional wrote:

---------------------------



One more thing: if you look at a halogen lamp crosseyed the filament will
fail from the shock of your stare.. The filaments are not supported as
they are in a standard incandescent lamp so they must not be subject to
shock or vibration.



** See pics of 150W halogen tube lamps:

http://www.destinationlighting.com/images/products_zoom/549/13549~zoom.jpg


http://www.homedepot.com/catalog/productImages/1000/b7/b7e4d552-8a07-4441-a54c-0c250efeef67_1000.jpg

https://images.musicstore.de/images/1600/omnilux-halogen-lamp-bulb-g-6-35-150-watts-24-volts_1_LIG0000456-000.jpg

How about a 1000W one:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/6174-2HVwIL._SL1500_.jpg

** Here is a Sylvania 42W halogen replacement for a standard GLS bulb:

https://media.tradezone.com.au/images/still/650/650/18579/30.jpg

Note how the filament passes over a glass support bridge at the top of the small envelope. Most of the filament is coiled but the section over the bridge is not.


..... Phil

 

[John Robertson]

On 2017/06/28 6:58 PM, Phil Allison wrote:

John Robertson is a Google Monkey

-----------------------------------


So, perhaps theatre halogen bulbs are designed to be dimmed?


** Perhaps your fat arse is on fire ?

Ever think of that?

Not sure what that has to do with the question raised by your source
(wikipedia) where the point was raised that theatre lighting had their
own expectations about the use of halogen bulbs.

"Halogen lamps are designed to operate at very high temperatures to
ensure optimal performance. Dimming at above 60% of the rated volts can
be done. It is recommended to revert to full brightness for one minute
prior to switching the lamps off."


** Drivel, not real information.

Excuse me Phil, but I was quoting from YOUR wikipedia reference source,
not mine.

In other words do not run them above 60% of rated line voltage for
extended times without heating/running them at 100% for one minute prior
to turning off. I am SURE everyone will do that!


** The false warning is about running halogen BELOW 60% rated voltage.

Not the same thing, they are using the word above to mean above 60% of
rated voltage, not below 60% rated voltage. At least that was how I read
your source - the wikipedia article quoted by you in previous email.
Which I read.

60% equates to about 10 to 15% of normal light output which is very dim.


BTW:

Ever see or use a halogen down light?

Standard practice is to run them off dimmers at any level you like.

Of course, people will do whatever they like - that was not the
question. The original question was was it a good idea to run halogen
lights on dimmers and would it adversely affect their rated life span.

Googling finds you every piece of misinformation that ever existed.

..... Phil

You may be an excellent designer of electronics, but are you a halogen
lighting expert too? Or are you (like me) just putting forward opinion
based on personal research and/or anecdotal experiences? This is
supposed to be a learning tool for all concerned after all, is it not?

John

 

[Phil Allison]

John Robertson is a Moronic Google Monkey

-----------------------------------------

So, perhaps theatre halogen bulbs are designed to be dimmed?


** Perhaps your fat arse is on fire ?

Ever think of that?

Not sure what that has to do with the question raised by your source

** It was not my "source" - fool.

(wikipedia) where the point was raised that theatre lighting had their
own expectations about the use of halogen bulbs.

** Says nothing like that.

Quote, do not rephrase.

"Halogen lamps are designed to operate at very high temperatures to
ensure optimal performance. Dimming at above 60% of the rated volts can
be done. It is recommended to revert to full brightness for one minute
prior to switching the lamps off."


** Drivel, not real information.


Excuse me Phil,

** Never.

but I was quoting from YOUR wikipedia reference source,

** That is NOT from any Wiki.

Some industry crap YOU dragged up Google monkeying.

Do pay attention.

In other words do not run them above 60% of rated line voltage for
extended times without heating/running them at 100% for one minute prior
to turning off. I am SURE everyone will do that!


** The false warning is about running halogen BELOW 60% rated voltage.

Not the same thing,

** FFS - you are illiterate & stupid.

60% equates to about 10 to 15% of normal light output which is very dim.


BTW:

Ever see or use a halogen down light?

Standard practice is to run them off dimmers at any level you like.


Of course, people will do whatever they like - that was not the
question.

** But it is the answer to the question - you fool.

The original question was was it a good idea to run halogen
lights on dimmers and would it adversely affect their rated life span.

** And we have overwhelming proof there is no such problem from the MILLIONS of householders successfully doing it every day.

Are you blind by any chance?

Googling finds you every piece of misinformation that ever existed.

** Copy out the above line 1000 times before you go to bed.

You may be an excellent designer of electronics, but are you a halogen
lighting expert too?

** Yep, some of my customers own large lighting rigs using mainly 500W and 1000W halogen lamps. I get to service their dimmers and boards and see the lamps operating too.

Halogen lamps are used in slide projectors, bought one of them in 1976.

One of my workshop lamps uses is a 150W halogen tube, I get to replace it every once in a while. 12V down lights are all halogen.

The buggers are all around me so I take a strong interest.

Go away, fool.


....... Phil

 

[John-Del]

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 12:25:16 AM UTC-4, Phil Allison wrote:

Phil Allison wrote:

----------------------


John-Delusional wrote:

---------------------------



One more thing: if you look at a halogen lamp crosseyed the filament will
fail from the shock of your stare.. The filaments are not supported as
they are in a standard incandescent lamp so they must not be subject to
shock or vibration.



** See pics of 150W halogen tube lamps:

http://www.destinationlighting.com/images/products_zoom/549/13549~zoom.jpg


http://www.homedepot.com/catalog/productImages/1000/b7/b7e4d552-8a07-4441-a54c-0c250efeef67_1000.jpg

https://images.musicstore.de/images/1600/omnilux-halogen-lamp-bulb-g-6-35-150-watts-24-volts_1_LIG0000456-000.jpg

How about a 1000W one:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/6174-2HVwIL._SL1500_.jpg



** Here is a Sylvania 42W halogen replacement for a standard GLS bulb:

https://media.tradezone.com.au/images/still/650/650/18579/30.jpg

Note how the filament passes over a glass support bridge at the top of the small envelope. Most of the filament is coiled but the section over the bridge is not.


.... Phil

 

On Thursday, 29 June 2017 04:11:09 UTC+1, Phil Allison wrote:

tabby wrote:
Phil Allison wrote:
tabby wrote:


You fuckwit, lying POS.

no, just short on knowledge.

** Ian Field is a prize fuckwit, a congenital liar and a POS.

He makes facts up and uses false logic constantly.

He is clearly an autistic dim wit.

Just like thousands of other internet trolls.

That interpretation ...



** It ain't no "interpretation" - pal.

then nothing will change

 

[Phil Allison]

tabb...@gmail.com wrote:

Really N.Thornton.

----------------------------

** Ian Field is a prize fuckwit, a congenital liar and a POS.

He makes facts up and uses false logic constantly.

He is clearly an autistic dim wit.

Just like thousands of other internet trolls.

That interpretation ...



** It ain't no "interpretation" - pal.


then nothing will change

** The only clear thing is that YOU will not change.

Because you lack the capacity for any kind of self improvement.


BTW:

You never did explain why you tried to defend the criminal arseholes who were selling fake and useless Motorola power transistors ?

I accused you of involvement cos no other explanation seemed possible.

The you failed to explain your actual reason.

Were you involved ?

Or just being a total shithead, like now ?



...... Phil

 

On Thursday, 29 June 2017 12:22:20 UTC+1, Phil Allison wrote:

tabby:

Really N.Thornton.

----------------------------



** Ian Field is a prize fuckwit, a congenital liar and a POS.

He makes facts up and uses false logic constantly.

He is clearly an autistic dim wit.

Just like thousands of other internet trolls.

That interpretation ...



** It ain't no "interpretation" - pal.


then nothing will change




** The only clear thing is that YOU will not change.

Because you lack the capacity for any kind of self improvement.

this is supposed to make you look sane?

BTW:

You never did explain why you tried to defend the criminal arseholes who were selling fake and useless Motorola power transistors ?

I accused you of involvement cos no other explanation seemed possible.

The you failed to explain your actual reason.

Were you involved ?

Or just being a total shithead, like now ?

Sometimes you're just bizarre. In case you actually are that confused, which is hard to believe, I have never been involved in producing or selling fake transistors or any other fake parts.


NT

 

[Phil Allison]

tabb...@gmail.com wrote:

Really N.Thornton.

----------------------------

** Ian Field is a prize fuckwit, a congenital liar and a POS.

He makes facts up and uses false logic constantly.

He is clearly an autistic dim wit.

Just like thousands of other internet trolls.

That interpretation ...



** It ain't no "interpretation" - pal.


then nothing will change




** The only clear thing is that YOU will not change.

Because you lack the capacity for any kind of self improvement.



BTW:

You never did explain why you tried to defend the criminal arseholes
who were selling fake and useless Motorola power transistors ?

I accused you of involvement cos no other explanation seemed possible.

The you failed to explain your actual reason.

Were you involved ?

Or just being a total shithead, like now ?


Sometimes you're just bizarre.

** Mostly I make more good sense that you care or are able to acknowledge.

In case you actually are that confused, which is hard to believe,
I have never been involved in producing or selling fake transistors
or any other fake parts.

** Good, I believe you.

Then explain what made you think it was clever to defend those who did ?

It was done over several posts and you were smug as hell about it.

There is nothing the *iniest bit funny* about Asian and US based criminals ripping off keen electronics hobbyists and honest repair industry folk like me.

Over to you...........


..... Phil

 

[pfjw@aol.com]

.....honest repair industry folk like me.


In the case of Mr. I-am-never-wrong Allison, the above is a contradiction-in-terms.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

 

[Phil Allison]

pf...@aol.com wrote:

The Peter Wieck Ratbag Troll
------------------------------------

....honest repair industry folk like me.


In the case of Mr. I-am-never-wrong Allison,

** Unlike the trolling, never right Wieck troll.

the above is a contradiction-in-terms.

** That's low and very nasty.

You have no cause to infer dishonesty.

Wot a lying, fucking prick you are.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

** And he stinks the place right up.



..... Phil

 

[John-Del]

On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 11:24:19 PM UTC-4, Phil Allison wrote:

John-Delusional Fuckwit wrote:

---------------------------------




One more thing: if you look at a halogen lamp crosseyed the filament will
fail from the shock of your stare.. The filaments are not supported as
they are in a standard incandescent lamp so they must not be subject to
shock or vibration.



** See pics of 150W halogen tube lamps:

http://www.destinationlighting.com/images/products_zoom/549/13549~zoom.jpg


http://www.homedepot.com/catalog/productImages/1000/b7/b7e4d552-8a07-4441-a54c-0c250efeef67_1000.jpg

https://images.musicstore.de/images/1600/omnilux-halogen-lamp-bulb-g-6-35-150-watts-24-volts_1_LIG0000456-000.jpg

How about a 1000W one:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/6174-2HVwIL._SL1500_.jpg



http://www.gelighting.com/LightingWeb/apac/images/GE-Avoiding-Hot-Shock-Halogen-HIR_tcm281-33642.pdf

Phallus'n emanated the following from his bunghole:

They are real pics published by folk who make and sell the lamps.

General Electric is one of the largest manufacturers of all kinds of lighting on the planet. Strangely, most folks who are not confined to an insane asylum would believe technical information from General Electric over some two-bit self aggrandized "technician" such as yourself.

This is what General Electric says about the subject:

"Unlike incandescent rough service or vibration service lamps, Halogen and HIR lamps are not equipped with filament supports because they would result in the de-rating of the life and lumens, and thusly defeat the purpose of providing extremely long life, energy savings and high lumen output. These features differentiate Halogen and HIR lamps from similar incandescent counterparts. However, these high performance lamps require more consideration and education when installing and aiming them."

Anyone who ever tried to use halogen lamps in portable clamp lights know they will be lucky to survive one minor bump, whereas even conventional incandescent lamps will survive several, and rough service incandescent lamps are extraordinarily tough.

GE says your wrong Phil. Everyone here *knows* you're a Wiki jockey. Do usenet a big favor and go back to fixing toasters and coffee makers and stop pretending to be playing with the big boys. Oh yeah, clean your trailer of roaches while you're at it...

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/sci.electronics.repair/YcNfjgMv6zw%5B1-25%5D

 

[pfjw@aol.com]

** That's low and very nasty.

You have no cause to infer dishonesty.

Sorry. That is entirely accurate, and I have every right to infer dishonesty.

You cannot admit to any level of 'wrongness'. If you cannot be honest with yourself, you cannot be honest with others. Full stop,

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

 

[Phil Allison]

John-Del is Delusional wrote:

-------------------------------

** See pics of 150W halogen tube lamps:

http://www.destinationlighting.com/images/products_zoom/549/13549~zoom.jpg


http://www.homedepot.com/catalog/productImages/1000/b7/b7e4d552-8a07-4441-a54c-0c250efeef67_1000.jpg

https://images.musicstore.de/images/1600/omnilux-halogen-lamp-bulb-g-6-35-150-watts-24-volts_1_LIG0000456-000.jpg

How about a 1000W one:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/6174-2HVwIL._SL1500_.jpg



http://www.gelighting.com/LightingWeb/apac/images/GE-Avoiding-Hot-Shock-Halogen-HIR_tcm281-33642.pdf




They are real pics published by folk who make and sell the lamps.



General Electric is one of the largest manufacturers of all kinds of lighting on the planet. Strangely, most folks who are not confined to an insane asylum would believe technical information from General Electric over some two-bit self aggrandized "technician" such as yourself.

** Fact id, I never posted a word on the topic - just a few pics that spoke for themselves.

Seems Mr Dell simply cannot see them.

Or prefers not to.

This is what General Electric says about the subject:

** Yep, and GE are speaking only of their own products.

Not any others.

GE says your wrong Phil.

** I never posted a word on the topic.

Just pics that cannot be denied.

Everyone here *knows* you're a Wiki jockey.

** That would appear to be what you are.

Another Google Monkey with no brains.


BTW:

This guy is on something illegal for sure.



..... Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

pf...@aol.com wrote:

The Peter Wieck Fuckwit Troll

----------------------------------

** That's low and very nasty.

You have no cause to infer dishonesty.


Sorry. That is entirely accurate, and I have every right to infer dishonesty.

** You have in fact none at all - fuckhead.

You cannot admit to any level of 'wrongness'.

** You have never shown me to be actually wrong.

OTOH, I have made you look like an idiot countless times.

A very easy thing to do.

If you cannot be honest with yourself,

** That is your major failing - Peter.

You are incapable of seeing your own foolishness.

Narcissistic, autistic geriatrics never can.

They just repeat the exact same errors till they drop dead.

I hope & expect that will not take too long with you.




...... Phil

 

[rickman]

John-Del wrote on 6/29/2017 10:01 AM:

On Wednesday, June 28, 2017 at 11:24:19 PM UTC-4, Phil Allison wrote:
John-Delusional Fuckwit wrote:

---------------------------------




One more thing: if you look at a halogen lamp crosseyed the filament will
fail from the shock of your stare.. The filaments are not supported as
they are in a standard incandescent lamp so they must not be subject to
shock or vibration.



** See pics of 150W halogen tube lamps:

http://www.destinationlighting.com/images/products_zoom/549/13549~zoom.jpg


http://www.homedepot.com/catalog/productImages/1000/b7/b7e4d552-8a07-4441-a54c-0c250efeef67_1000.jpg

https://images.musicstore.de/images/1600/omnilux-halogen-lamp-bulb-g-6-35-150-watts-24-volts_1_LIG0000456-000.jpg

How about a 1000W one:

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/6174-2HVwIL._SL1500_.jpg



http://www.gelighting.com/LightingWeb/apac/images/GE-Avoiding-Hot-Shock-Halogen-HIR_tcm281-33642.pdf




Phallus'n emanated the following from his bunghole:


They are real pics published by folk who make and sell the lamps.


General Electric is one of the largest manufacturers of all kinds of lighting on the planet. Strangely, most folks who are not confined to an insane asylum would believe technical information from General Electric over some two-bit self aggrandized "technician" such as yourself.

This is what General Electric says about the subject:

"Unlike incandescent rough service or vibration service lamps, Halogen and HIR lamps are not equipped with filament supports because they would result in the de-rating of the life and lumens, and thusly defeat the purpose of providing extremely long life, energy savings and high lumen output. These features differentiate Halogen and HIR lamps from similar incandescent counterparts. However, these high performance lamps require more consideration and education when installing and aiming them."

Anyone who ever tried to use halogen lamps in portable clamp lights know they will be lucky to survive one minor bump, whereas even conventional incandescent lamps will survive several, and rough service incandescent lamps are extraordinarily tough.

GE says your wrong Phil. Everyone here *knows* you're a Wiki jockey. Do usenet a big favor and go back to fixing toasters and coffee makers and stop pretending to be playing with the big boys. Oh yeah, clean your trailer of roaches while you're at it...

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/sci.electronics.repair/YcNfjgMv6zw%5B1-25%5D

Interesting link. Not only does he have roaches, he seems to be a serial
WD-40 abuser. He likely started with isopropyl alcohol as a gateway cleaner
and worked his way up through commercial contact cleaners and pencil eraser
tips before using the "hard" stuff. Where's Jack Webb when you need him?

--

Rick C

 

[John-Del]

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 10:21:54 AM UTC-4, Phallus'n belched:

** You have never shown me to be actually wrong.

We don't need to go to far, you're wrong on this thread.

** That is your major failing - Peter.

There are so few humans alive with your bouquet of human failures Phil, not the least the ability to recognize yourself in your accusations of others.


**You are incapable of seeing your own foolishness.


Pot; meet Kettle...

You are incapable of not only seeing your own foolishness, but any of your many other human failings including (but certainly not limited to) your hateful vile demeanor. You've infested many NGs with your stench and you don't realize it's coming from you. Every newsgroup you pollute becomes something less for your involvement.

You're the only one here who doesn't see that Peter is a gentleman and quality human being. Everyone else sees you as a piece of shit who clearly has been abusing WD40 propellant. Don't you have a toaster to rewire?

 

[rickman]

John-Del wrote on 6/29/2017 11:49 AM:

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 10:21:54 AM UTC-4, Phallus'n belched:


** You have never shown me to be actually wrong.


We don't need to go to far, you're wrong on this thread.


** That is your major failing - Peter.


There are so few humans alive with your bouquet of human failures Phil, not the least the ability to recognize yourself in your accusations of others.


**You are incapable of seeing your own foolishness.


Pot; meet Kettle...

You are incapable of not only seeing your own foolishness, but any of your many other human failings including (but certainly not limited to) your hateful vile demeanor. You've infested many NGs with your stench and you don't realize it's coming from you. Every newsgroup you pollute becomes something less for your involvement.

You're the only one here who doesn't see that Peter is a gentleman and quality human being. Everyone else sees you as a piece of shit who clearly has been abusing WD40 propellant. Don't you have a toaster to rewire?

Do you also make fun of homeless people on the street and other mentally ill
people? Why pick on Phil. It's not like he has any control over his posts.
Clearly he is ill and needs our support, not reproach.

--

Rick C

 

[John-Del]

On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 12:16:33 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:

John-Del wrote on 6/29/2017 11:49 AM:
On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 10:21:54 AM UTC-4, Phallus'n belched:


** You have never shown me to be actually wrong.


We don't need to go to far, you're wrong on this thread.


** That is your major failing - Peter.


There are so few humans alive with your bouquet of human failures Phil, not the least the ability to recognize yourself in your accusations of others.


**You are incapable of seeing your own foolishness.


Pot; meet Kettle...

You are incapable of not only seeing your own foolishness, but any of your many other human failings including (but certainly not limited to) your hateful vile demeanor. You've infested many NGs with your stench and you don't realize it's coming from you. Every newsgroup you pollute becomes something less for your involvement.

You're the only one here who doesn't see that Peter is a gentleman and quality human being. Everyone else sees you as a piece of shit who clearly has been abusing WD40 propellant. Don't you have a toaster to rewire?

Do you also make fun of homeless people on the street and other mentally ill
people? Why pick on Phil. It's not like he has any control over his posts.
Clearly he is ill and needs our support, not reproach.

--

Rick C

Admonitions understood. I am ashamed. Thanks for that slap in the face Rick!