PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

On 28/11/2006 18:00 Don McKenzie wrote:
wombat@fancier.net wrote:

Can someone tell me whether Wombats live only in Australia,
or also on other continents?

according to google: "australian slang wombat"
Wombat - a simple minded person.

I thinketh you can find them anywhere.
A very informative bit of text about Australia in general and
Wombats in particular can be found at
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~bobpar/aust.txt
 
"Don McKenzie" <look@mysig.com> wrote in message
news:456bde71$0$16554$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
wombat@fancier.net wrote:

Can someone tell me whether Wombats live only in Australia,
or also on other continents?

according to google: "australian slang wombat"
Wombat - a simple minded person.

that eats, roots and leaves. (sorry)




I thinketh you can find them anywhere.


--
Don McKenzie
E-Mail Contact Page: http://www.dontronics.com/e-mail.html

Crystal clear, super bright OLED LCD (128x128) for your microcontroller.
Simple serial RX/TX interface. Many memory sizes.
http://www.dontronics-shop.com/product.php?productid=16460



:p



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 
Cheaper than 1/2 an hours labour unless you are making lots of them:

http://www.computronics.com.au/meanwell/mps-45/


"electro phil" <electrophil@netspace.net.au> wrote in message
news:1164965341.532429.138830@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
I have to build a 48v dc regulated supply for an upcoming project.
Can anyone suggest a circuit that will give me about 1 amp @ 48v with
good regulation and maybe over voltage/current protection.
Philip
 
The Real Andy wrote:
On 3 Dec 2006 23:22:40 -0800, "David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com
wrote:

Adam wrote:
Hi everyone,

Although I realise my question is not actually "electronics" related, I
thought I might ask the question here as its "electricity" related.

I'm looking at houses, and one of the areas in which I'm looking has quite a
few of the massive overhead power lines on the big metal towers.
No doubt you're aware that people fear the EMF generated by such lines, and
I wondered is it really worth worrying about, or are there any known facts
relating to what could possibly result in the potential for radiation
injuries and/or cancer, etc from continued exposure to the generated fields.

Any opinions or useful web sites on the subject would be greatly
appreciated.
Don't buy a house under or near big power lines.
Regardless of whether or not there is any real health risk, your resale
value will SUCK.

Dave :)

From energex website

http://www.energex.com.au/network/emf/community_emf_info.html

Dont ever use a hairdrier or electric blanket!!
I use some serious power on Hf ( radio operator) and once measured the
emf in the shack

frightened me till I remembered at least I know whats gonna finish me :)
 
David L. Jones wrote:
Adam wrote:
Hi everyone,

Although I realise my question is not actually "electronics" related, I
thought I might ask the question here as its "electricity" related.

I'm looking at houses, and one of the areas in which I'm looking has quite a
few of the massive overhead power lines on the big metal towers.
No doubt you're aware that people fear the EMF generated by such lines, and
I wondered is it really worth worrying about, or are there any known facts
relating to what could possibly result in the potential for radiation
injuries and/or cancer, etc from continued exposure to the generated fields.

Any opinions or useful web sites on the subject would be greatly
appreciated.

Don't buy a house under or near big power lines.
Regardless of whether or not there is any real health risk, your resale
value will SUCK.
Unless it's at the end of an airport runway ...

 
"David L. Jones" <altzone@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165216960.805410.300700@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
Don't buy a house under or near big power lines.
Regardless of whether or not there is any real health risk, your resale
value will SUCK.
Then obviously the current/previous owners resale value will suck and YOU
will get a bargain :)
The relative increase over time will almost certainly be similar to any
other house in the wider area.

MrT.
 
"Two Bob"

Although I realise my question is not actually "electronics" related, I
thought I might ask the question here as its "electricity" related.

I'm looking at houses, and one of the areas in which I'm looking has
quite a few of the massive overhead power lines on the big metal towers.
No doubt you're aware that people fear the EMF generated by such lines,
and I wondered is it really worth worrying about, or are there any known
facts relating to what could possibly result in the potential for
radiation injuries and/or cancer, etc from continued exposure to the
generated fields.

Any opinions or useful web sites on the subject would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks in anticipation,



** Just Google " power lines cancer " .

Take your paranoid, conspiracy theory TROLLING elsewhere.

For ages now I was wondering if you were a wanker or not.


** OTOH, I was never in any such doubt about YOU for a moment.


Now you have proven it to me. My most service calls have been due to
electronic equipment below, or near major power lines.

** ROTFL !!

What has that load of obvious bollocks got to do with rampant paranoia over
cancer - FUCKWIT ??

No need to reply - its was rhetorical ......



You should limit your replies to your very basic experience in kiddy
hi-fi.

** May I very sincerely suggests you go straight back to perusing your
Downs Syndrome kiddie fucking web sites - as per usual.






....... Phil
 
"Two Bob" <dept9@iprimus.com.au>



** You are a dead set , CRIMINAL, know nothing CUNT - Bob.

Get the fuck off this NG .

May I very sincerely suggests you go straight back to perusing your

Downs Syndrome kiddie fucking web sites - as per usual.






.......... Phil
 
"pjk"
"Phil Allison"

If the sensor is a 512 element CCD then this would only be compatible
with the linear sensor hypothesis as put forward by Jansen


** Wiki I quoted says ( in part) :


" A CCD scanner in the projector picks up a scanned video image of this
area, and a processor correlates the image area and extracts the digital
data as an AC-3 bitstream. These data are finally decoded into a 5.1
channel
audio source. "


Pays one not to rely on fallible memory .......



I searche frepatents online for "dolby sound digital projector" and
found this patent which would seem to support your view that the CCD
was two dimensional. Also searching google 1992 and CCD confirms CCD
od the order of 512K pixel were readily available at that time which
is clearly sufficient.

** Hmmm - so someone used the old " drop of the K " trick to
bamboozle everyone ??




United States Patent 5710752
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5710752.html
Abstract: An apparatus recovers audio information from analog
and digital motion picture film soundtracks using a single optical
sensor that senses across the widths of both soundtracks. Symbols
representing audio information in the digital soundtrack are encoded
in two dimensions and are recovered by oversampling the symbols in two
dimensions. The two-dimensional encoding of digital information can be
used with a variety of recording media; however, in one embodiment,
the symbols are carried on motion picture film between the sprocket
holes.

** Hah - two dimensions IS better than one.

Flat Earthers, take heart.....




....... Phil
 
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 22:58:52 +1100, "Phil Allison"
<philallison@tpg.com.au> wrote:

pjk@removethis.bigpond.net.au


If the sensor is a 512 element CCD then this would only be compatible
with the linear sensor hypothesis as put forward by Jansen


** Wiki I quoted says ( in part) :


" A CCD scanner in the projector picks up a scanned video image of this
area, and a processor correlates the image area and extracts the digital
data as an AC-3 bitstream. These data are finally decoded into a 5.1 channel
audio source. "


Pays one not to rely on fallible memory .......




....... Phil



Phil
I searche frepatents online for "dolby sound digital projector" and
found this patent which would seem to support your view that the CCD
was two dimensional. Also searching google 1992 and CCD confirms CCD
od the order of 512K pixel were readily available at that time which
is clearly sufficient.

United States Patent 5710752
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5710752.html
Abstract: An apparatus recovers audio information from analog
and digital motion picture film soundtracks using a single optical
sensor that senses across the widths of both soundtracks. Symbols
representing audio information in the digital soundtrack are encoded
in two dimensions and are recovered by oversampling the symbols in two
dimensions. The two-dimensional encoding of digital information can be
used with a variety of recording media; however, in one embodiment,
the symbols are carried on motion picture film between the sprocket
holes.
 
On 4/12/2006 23:55 Phil Allison wrote:
** Hmmm - so someone used the old " drop of the K " trick to
bamboozle everyone ??

That would explain everything!

Bob
 
"Two Bob" <dept9@iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:4573f622$1_1@news.iprimus.com.au...
Although I realise my question is not actually "electronics" related, I
thought I might ask the question here as its "electricity" related.

I'm looking at houses, and one of the areas in which I'm looking has
quite a few of the massive overhead power lines on the big metal towers.
No doubt you're aware that people fear the EMF generated by such lines,
and I wondered is it really worth worrying about, or are there any known
facts relating to what could possibly result in the potential for
radiation injuries and/or cancer, etc from continued exposure to the
generated fields.

Any opinions or useful web sites on the subject would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks in anticipation,



** Just Google " power lines cancer " .

Take your paranoid, conspiracy theory TROLLING elsewhere.

For ages now I was wondering if you were a wanker or not. Now you have
proven it to me. My most service calls have been due to electronic
equipment below, or near major power lines. You should limit your replies
to your very basic experience in kiddy hi-fi. When you expand your
knowledge beyond kiddy doof doof, then you might be qualified to comment
on real world problems.
Oh no, shock horror shock - the Quad ESLs have turned into tarted up disco
speakers. doof doof doof....
 
"Phil Allison" <philallison@tpg.com.au> wrote:

"Adam" = brainless TROLL

** Just Google " power lines cancer " .

Take your paranoid, conspiracy theory TROLLING elsewhere.
I don't think you understand what trolling is. This may help
<http://www.faqs.org/faqs/cultures/irish-faq/part01/section-6.html>.
You will find the last sentence particularly illuminating so I'll
repeat it here "It's perhaps worth mentioning that not everything you
personally find offensive is necessarily a troll."
 
Adam wrote:
Hi everyone,

Although I realise my question is not actually "electronics" related,
I thought I might ask the question here as its "electricity" related.

I'm looking at houses, and one of the areas in which I'm looking has
quite a few of the massive overhead power lines on the big metal
towers. No doubt you're aware that people fear the EMF generated by such
lines, and I wondered is it really worth worrying about, or are there
any known facts relating to what could possibly result in the
potential for radiation injuries and/or cancer, etc from continued
exposure to the generated fields.
Any opinions or useful web sites on the subject would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks in anticipation,
The effects are well known and quantified. There is some debate as to safe
living distances. You can be confident that Swedish standards are pretty
safe. Google it.

geoff
 
"David Segall"
"Phil Allison"

"Adam" = brainless TROLL

** Just Google " power lines cancer " .

Take your paranoid, conspiracy theory TROLLING elsewhere.


I don't think you understand what trolling is.

** No it is YOU that does not have a clue what TROLLING is.


This may help
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/cultures/irish-faq/part01/section-6.html>.

** Nope - cos it is a completely inadequate definition.

There are many far better and more complete defs of trolling to be found.

Ones that include posts that are way off topic on somebody's hobby horse.





........ Phil
 
Although I realise my question is not actually "electronics" related, I
thought I might ask the question here as its "electricity" related.

I'm looking at houses, and one of the areas in which I'm looking has
quite a few of the massive overhead power lines on the big metal towers.
No doubt you're aware that people fear the EMF generated by such lines,
and I wondered is it really worth worrying about, or are there any known
facts relating to what could possibly result in the potential for
radiation injuries and/or cancer, etc from continued exposure to the
generated fields.

Any opinions or useful web sites on the subject would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks in anticipation,



** Just Google " power lines cancer " .

Take your paranoid, conspiracy theory TROLLING elsewhere.
For ages now I was wondering if you were a wanker or not. Now you have
proven it to me. My most service calls have been due to electronic equipment
below, or near major power lines. You should limit your replies to your very
basic experience in kiddy hi-fi. When you expand your knowledge beyond kiddy
doof doof, then you might be qualified to comment on real world problems.
 
"Brian Goldsmith." <brian.goldsmith@NOSPAMMecho1.com.au> wrote in message
news:MZSch.2407$HU.69@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Two Bob" <dept@iprimus.com.au> wrote

For ages now I was wondering if you were a wanker or not. Now you have
proven it to me. My most service calls have been due to electronic
equipment
below, or near major power lines.


***** Pot,kettle,black,wotta lame brained wanker!!!!!!!!!!

Brian g.
Ditto
 
** You are a dead set , CRIMINAL, know nothing CUNT - Bob.

Get the fuck off this NG .

May I very sincerely suggests you go straight back to perusing your

Downs Syndrome kiddie fucking web sites - as per usual.
Are you sure yor name isn't Rod Speed?
 
OK, well, its good to see that my GENUINE question has prompted some
discussion, and also allowed certain members of the newsgroup to vent some
anger in the direction of other individuals. This has abviously been
building up for some time, so in that regard, I'm glad I have helped.

To the people who ACTUALLY made an attempts to relay wisdom relating to the
question I asked (basically the second half of the comments that I have seen
so far) I say thank you. I will have a look at the site/s you have shown
me.
I appreciate your time.

To the rest of you, OK, now back to abusing and yelling at each other...

Adam


"Geoff" <geoff@nospam-paf.co.nz> wrote in message
news:GpKdnWrKZ5VBEenYnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@giganews.com...
Adam wrote:
Hi everyone,

Although I realise my question is not actually "electronics" related,
I thought I might ask the question here as its "electricity" related.

I'm looking at houses, and one of the areas in which I'm looking has
quite a few of the massive overhead power lines on the big metal
towers. No doubt you're aware that people fear the EMF generated by such
lines, and I wondered is it really worth worrying about, or are there
any known facts relating to what could possibly result in the
potential for radiation injuries and/or cancer, etc from continued
exposure to the generated fields.
Any opinions or useful web sites on the subject would be greatly
appreciated.

Thanks in anticipation,

The effects are well known and quantified. There is some debate as to safe
living distances. You can be confident that Swedish standards are pretty
safe. Google it.

geoff
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top