PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[Damian]

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5593efe6$0$44802$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com...

Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:559231ab$0$57588$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5591163c$0$39614$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still
doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups
I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all
that html shit in "forums" - hey why get a 1.8K post when you can
get
it
in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks
were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a roaring
trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may increase
again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by george
brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks when
the
the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things.
while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse behind
true
libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up pair
of
balls from a
dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site
24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through
text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to grow your
cock
or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years ago
we
were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while
dodging the shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall,
hiding
his fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find
out
where he lives

Yeah?
Care to share u genius?
Are you two sharing the same thing?

, you can not visit many news groups if you think he is a dimwit,

Your words, not mine.

Probably knows much more on electronic and technical subjects than
you.

Irrelevant

he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

So, why isn't he to you?


I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it,

That's great. Lets disect this post, shall we?!

You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular opinion.

He is a mistake. His old man used to say that he was around.



Did not think you would be able.

Come again in English?


Are you dense? able to provide proof of your assertions

Of course. You!

 

[F Murtz]

Damian wrote:

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5593efe6$0$44802$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:559231ab$0$57588$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5591163c$0$39614$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still
doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups
I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all
that html shit in "forums" - hey why get a 1.8K post when you can
get
it
in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks
were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a roaring
trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may increase
again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by george
brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks when
the
the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things.
while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse behind
true
libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up pair
of
balls from a
dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site
24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through
text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to grow your
cock
or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years ago
we
were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while
dodging the shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall,
hiding
his fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find
out
where he lives

Yeah?
Care to share u genius?
Are you two sharing the same thing?

, you can not visit many news groups if you think he is a dimwit,

Your words, not mine.

Probably knows much more on electronic and technical subjects than
you.

Irrelevant

he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

So, why isn't he to you?


I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it,

That's great. Lets disect this post, shall we?!

You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular opinion.

He is a mistake. His old man used to say that he was around.



Did not think you would be able.

Come again in English?


Are you dense? able to provide proof of your assertions

Of course. You!

What absolute claptrap,how on earth would I be proof of whether a third
party spouts bullshit, I still challenge you to provide proof of that
bullshit.

 

[noel]

On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:56:11 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are still
doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all that html shit in "forums" -
hey why get a 1.8K post when you can get it in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when disks
were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a roaring
trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may increase
again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by george
brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks when the
the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things. while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse
behind true libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up pair of
balls from a dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner than
later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site 24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries through
text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to grow your
cock or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years ago we
were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while dodging the shit
thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall, hiding his fat
raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find out
where he lives , you can not visit many news groups if you think he is a
dimwit,Probably knows much more on electronic and technical subjects
than you. he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it, You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular
opinion.

you must be newbie, if you go back 20years you'll find fuck loads

 

[F Murtz]

noel wrote:

On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:56:11 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are still
doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all that html shit in "forums" -
hey why get a 1.8K post when you can get it in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when disks
were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a roaring
trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may increase
again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by george
brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks when the
the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things. while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse
behind true libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up pair of
balls from a dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner than
later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site 24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries through
text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to grow your
cock or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years ago we
were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while dodging the shit
thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall, hiding his fat
raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find out
where he lives , you can not visit many news groups if you think he is a
dimwit,Probably knows much more on electronic and technical subjects
than you. he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it, You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular
opinion.

you must be newbie,

You would be wrong, been at it for yonks

if you go back 20years you'll find fuck loads

He is not infallible but rarely spouts bull shit. so could you please
list instances of fuck loads from 20 years ago. (will wait expectantly)

 

[noel]

On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:20:15 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

noel wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:56:11 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all that html shit in "forums"
-
hey why get a 1.8K post when you can get it in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a
roaring trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may
increase again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by
george brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks
when the the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things. while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse
behind true libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up pair
of balls from a dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner
than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K Site
24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to
grow your cock or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years ago
we were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while dodging the
shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall, hiding his
fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find
out where he lives , you can not visit many news groups if you think
he is a dimwit,Probably knows much more on electronic and technical
subjects than you. he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it, You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular
opinion.

you must be newbie,


You would be wrong, been at it for yonks

if you go back 20years you'll find fuck loads




He is not infallible but rarely spouts bull shit. so could you please
list instances of fuck loads from 20 years ago. (will wait expectantly)

you dont have to wait dimwit, you can use a search function if you;ve
been around long enough, you know who, how and where to look, I certainly
aint gunna waste any more of my time for you on him, its your homework
since your the disbeleiver, I dont give a fuck either way

 

[F Murtz]

noel wrote:

On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:20:15 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

noel wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:56:11 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all that html shit in "forums"
-
hey why get a 1.8K post when you can get it in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a
roaring trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may
increase again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by
george brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks
when the the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things. while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse
behind true libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up pair
of balls from a dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner
than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K Site
24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to
grow your cock or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years ago
we were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while dodging the
shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall, hiding his
fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find
out where he lives , you can not visit many news groups if you think
he is a dimwit,Probably knows much more on electronic and technical
subjects than you. he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it, You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular
opinion.

you must be newbie,


You would be wrong, been at it for yonks

if you go back 20years you'll find fuck loads




He is not infallible but rarely spouts bull shit. so could you please
list instances of fuck loads from 20 years ago. (will wait expectantly)

you dont have to wait dimwit, you can use a search function if you;ve
been around long enough, you know who, how and where to look, I certainly
aint gunna waste any more of my time for you on him, its your homework
since your the disbeleiver, I dont give a fuck either way

Did not think you could, you are the one making the statements you prove
them.

 

[noel]

On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:11:20 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

noel wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:20:15 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

noel wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:56:11 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups I have never been into ever have died in the arse even
more comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all that html shit in
"forums"
-
hey why get a 1.8K post when you can get it in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the
usenet newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used
to be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a
roaring trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and
may increase again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte
arse by george brandis's hollywood act that will become law in
about 2 weeks when the the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things. while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse
behind true libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up
pair of balls from a dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens
sooner than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred
years overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site 24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12
96851k 23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to
grow your cock or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years
ago we were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used
to dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while dodging
the shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall,
hiding his fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find
out where he lives , you can not visit many news groups if you think
he is a dimwit,Probably knows much more on electronic and technical
subjects than you. he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it, You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular
opinion.

you must be newbie,


You would be wrong, been at it for yonks

if you go back 20years you'll find fuck loads




He is not infallible but rarely spouts bull shit. so could you please
list instances of fuck loads from 20 years ago. (will wait
expectantly)

you dont have to wait dimwit, you can use a search function if you;ve
been around long enough, you know who, how and where to look, I
certainly aint gunna waste any more of my time for you on him, its your
homework since your the disbeleiver, I dont give a fuck either way

Did not think you could, you are the one making the statements you prove
them.

i dont have to prove shit to some anaonymous goof on usenet, I have
history on my side thats all that counts, too bad for those who aint been
around long enough, it simply aint my problem, plenty others here know I
speak truth anyways, so you aint foolin anyone with your fanboi-isms

 

[F Murtz]

noel wrote:

On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:11:20 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

noel wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:20:15 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

noel wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:56:11 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups I have never been into ever have died in the arse even
more comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all that html shit in
"forums"
-
hey why get a 1.8K post when you can get it in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the
usenet newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used
to be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a
roaring trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and
may increase again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte
arse by george brandis's hollywood act that will become law in
about 2 weeks when the the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things. while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse
behind true libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up
pair of balls from a dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens
sooner than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred
years overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site 24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12
96851k 23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to
grow your cock or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years
ago we were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used
to dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while dodging
the shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall,
hiding his fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find
out where he lives , you can not visit many news groups if you think
he is a dimwit,Probably knows much more on electronic and technical
subjects than you. he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it, You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular
opinion.

you must be newbie,


You would be wrong, been at it for yonks

if you go back 20years you'll find fuck loads




He is not infallible but rarely spouts bull shit. so could you please
list instances of fuck loads from 20 years ago. (will wait
expectantly)

you dont have to wait dimwit, you can use a search function if you;ve
been around long enough, you know who, how and where to look, I
certainly aint gunna waste any more of my time for you on him, its your
homework since your the disbeleiver, I dont give a fuck either way

Did not think you could, you are the one making the statements you prove
them.

i dont have to prove shit to some anaonymous goof on usenet, I have
history on my side thats all that counts, too bad for those who aint been
around long enough, it simply aint my problem, plenty others here know I
speak truth anyways, so you aint foolin anyone with your fanboi-isms

Complete crap, I have been around long enough, before the WWW, it is all
too easy to cast aspersions just because you take an aversion to someone
without proof and until you come up with proof you will be looked on as
a cantankerous git.

Rod has his foibles and is not always right, like any of us, we all make
mistakes every so often but he is more right than wrong and just because
you do not like his manner does not give you the right so say that he is
full of bullshit.
I do not know why i am sticking up for him he does not need it, I just
get sick and tired of people casting aspersions with no basis in fact.

 

[Damian]

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5599f3f0$0$44134$c3e8da3$3a1a2348@news.astraweb.com...

noel wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:56:11 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are still
doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all that html shit in "forums" -
hey why get a 1.8K post when you can get it in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when disks
were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a roaring
trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may increase
again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by george
brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks when the
the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things. while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse
behind true libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up pair of
balls from a dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner than
later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site 24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries through
text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to grow your
cock or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years ago we
were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while dodging the shit
thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall, hiding his fat
raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find out
where he lives , you can not visit many news groups if you think he is a
dimwit,Probably knows much more on electronic and technical subjects
than you. he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it, You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular
opinion.

you must be newbie,


You would be wrong, been at it for yonks

Sure. Cow poop can't exist without a cow.

if you go back 20years you'll find fuck loads




He is not infallible but rarely spouts bull shit. so could you please list
instances of fuck loads from 20 years ago. (will wait expectantly)

Just watch yourself. There're plenty of bullshit for all you can eat.

 

[Damian]

"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:5599d872$1@news.ausics.net...

On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:56:11 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are still
doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all that html shit in "forums" -
hey why get a 1.8K post when you can get it in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when disks
were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a roaring
trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may increase
again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by george
brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks when the
the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things. while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse
behind true libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up pair of
balls from a dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner than
later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site 24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries through
text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to grow your
cock or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years ago we
were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while dodging the shit
thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall, hiding his fat
raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find out
where he lives , you can not visit many news groups if you think he is a
dimwit,Probably knows much more on electronic and technical subjects
than you. he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it, You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular
opinion.

you must be newbie, if you go back 20years you'll find fuck loads

A very closely, intimately related 'newbie' for sure.

 

[Damian]

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55952567$0$6730$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com...

Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5593efe6$0$44802$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:559231ab$0$57588$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5591163c$0$39614$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still
doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups
I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all
that html shit in "forums" - hey why get a 1.8K post when you can
get
it
in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the
usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used
to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks
were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a
roaring
trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may
increase
again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by george
brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks when
the
the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things.
while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse behind
true
libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up
pair
of
balls from a
dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred
years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site
24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through
text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to grow
your
cock
or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years
ago
we
were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used
to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while
dodging the shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick
firewall,
hiding
his fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find
out
where he lives

Yeah?
Care to share u genius?
Are you two sharing the same thing?

, you can not visit many news groups if you think he is a dimwit,

Your words, not mine.

Probably knows much more on electronic and technical subjects than
you.

Irrelevant

he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

So, why isn't he to you?


I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it,

That's great. Lets disect this post, shall we?!

You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular opinion.

He is a mistake. His old man used to say that he was around.



Did not think you would be able.

Come again in English?


Are you dense? able to provide proof of your assertions

Of course. You!


What absolute claptrap,how on earth would I be proof of whether a third
party spouts bullshit, I still challenge you to provide proof of that
bullshit.

You are that bullshit man. Just look at your fat ass in front of the mirror.
Proof is staring right back at you.

 

[Damian]

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:559c6aa8$0$56416$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com...

noel wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:20:15 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

noel wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:56:11 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all that html shit in "forums"
-
hey why get a 1.8K post when you can get it in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a
roaring trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may
increase again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by
george brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks
when the the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things. while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse
behind true libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up pair
of balls from a dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner
than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site
24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to
grow your cock or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years ago
we were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while dodging the
shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall, hiding his
fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find
out where he lives , you can not visit many news groups if you think
he is a dimwit,Probably knows much more on electronic and technical
subjects than you. he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it, You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular
opinion.

you must be newbie,


You would be wrong, been at it for yonks

if you go back 20years you'll find fuck loads




He is not infallible but rarely spouts bull shit. so could you please
list instances of fuck loads from 20 years ago. (will wait expectantly)

you dont have to wait dimwit, you can use a search function if you;ve
been around long enough, you know who, how and where to look, I certainly
aint gunna waste any more of my time for you on him, its your homework
since your the disbeleiver, I dont give a fuck either way

Did not think you could, you are the one making the statements you prove
them.

Oh poor thing. Why can't you bother to google all the history of crap and
find yourself. It's all out there for your grabs.

 

[F Murtz]

Damian wrote:

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55952567$0$6730$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5593efe6$0$44802$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:559231ab$0$57588$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5591163c$0$39614$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still
doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups
I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all
that html shit in "forums" - hey why get a 1.8K post when you can
get
it
in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the
usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used
to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks
were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a
roaring
trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may
increase
again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by george
brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks when
the
the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things.
while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse behind
true
libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up
pair
of
balls from a
dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred
years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site
24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through
text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to grow
your
cock
or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years
ago
we
were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used
to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while
dodging the shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick
firewall,
hiding
his fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find
out
where he lives

Yeah?
Care to share u genius?
Are you two sharing the same thing?

, you can not visit many news groups if you think he is a dimwit,

Your words, not mine.

Probably knows much more on electronic and technical subjects than
you.

Irrelevant

he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

So, why isn't he to you?


I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it,

That's great. Lets disect this post, shall we?!

You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular opinion.

He is a mistake. His old man used to say that he was around.



Did not think you would be able.

Come again in English?


Are you dense? able to provide proof of your assertions

Of course. You!


What absolute claptrap,how on earth would I be proof of whether a third
party spouts bullshit, I still challenge you to provide proof of that
bullshit.

You are that bullshit man. Just look at your fat ass in front of the mirror.
Proof is staring right back at you.


????

 

[F Murtz]

Damian wrote:

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:559c6aa8$0$56416$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com...
noel wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:20:15 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

noel wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:56:11 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all that html shit in "forums"
-
hey why get a 1.8K post when you can get it in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a
roaring trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may
increase again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by
george brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks
when the the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things. while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse
behind true libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up pair
of balls from a dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner
than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site
24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to
grow your cock or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years ago
we were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while dodging the
shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall, hiding his
fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find
out where he lives , you can not visit many news groups if you think
he is a dimwit,Probably knows much more on electronic and technical
subjects than you. he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it, You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular
opinion.

you must be newbie,


You would be wrong, been at it for yonks

if you go back 20years you'll find fuck loads




He is not infallible but rarely spouts bull shit. so could you please
list instances of fuck loads from 20 years ago. (will wait expectantly)

you dont have to wait dimwit, you can use a search function if you;ve
been around long enough, you know who, how and where to look, I certainly
aint gunna waste any more of my time for you on him, its your homework
since your the disbeleiver, I dont give a fuck either way

Did not think you could, you are the one making the statements you prove
them.

Oh poor thing. Why can't you bother to google all the history of crap and
find yourself. It's all out there for your grabs.

So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare or non
existing hearsay examples

 

[Frank Slootweg]

F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]

So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare or non
existing hearsay examples

In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone proves the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!", because you
have your eyes closed.

If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.

Or you can make it really simple and just search for his postings with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(

The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes some of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most of the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had your eyes
closed. Period.

OTOH, to be fair, Roddles has his spurious good moments, with good
discussion/contribution. One such episode was just recently in another
group (which I won't mention to protect its audience, and no, I wasn't
involved, just watching). So there you go.

 

[F Murtz]

Frank Slootweg wrote:

F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare or non
existing hearsay examples

In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone proves the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!", because you
have your eyes closed.

If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.

Or you can make it really simple and just search for his postings with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(

The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes some of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most of the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had your eyes
closed. Period.

Yes I have seen all that,but it does not make him wrong just because
someone disputes his statements.

OTOH, to be fair, Roddles has his spurious good moments, with good
discussion/contribution. One such episode was just recently in another
group (which I won't mention to protect its audience, and no, I wasn't
involved, just watching). So there you go.

 

[F Murtz]

Frank Slootweg wrote:

F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare or non
existing hearsay examples

In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone proves the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!", because you
have your eyes closed.

If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.

Or you can make it really simple and just search for his postings with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(

The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes some of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most of the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had your eyes
closed. Period.

OTOH, to be fair, Roddles has his spurious good moments, with good
discussion/contribution. One such episode was just recently in another
group (which I won't mention to protect its audience, and no, I wasn't
involved, just watching). So there you go.

And have you noticed that in the main the good discussions are with
sensible people?

 

[Damian]

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a0dac7$0$29848$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com...

Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55952567$0$6730$c3e8da3$460562f1@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5593efe6$0$44802$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:559231ab$0$57588$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5591163c$0$39614$c3e8da3$f017e9df@news.astraweb.com...
Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still
doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed
that
groups
I have never been into ever have died in the arse even more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all
that html shit in "forums" - hey why get a 1.8K post when you
can
get
it
in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the
usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it
used
to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks
were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a
roaring
trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and may
increase
again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse by
george
brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2 weeks
when
the
the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things.
while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse behind
true
libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up
pair
of
balls from a
dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred
years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s
K
Site
24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12
96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through
text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to grow
your
cock
or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years
ago
we
were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he
used
to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while
dodging the shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick
firewall,
hiding
his fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can
find
out
where he lives

Yeah?
Care to share u genius?
Are you two sharing the same thing?

, you can not visit many news groups if you think he is a dimwit,

Your words, not mine.

Probably knows much more on electronic and technical subjects than
you.

Irrelevant

he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

So, why isn't he to you?


I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we
can
dissect it,

That's great. Lets disect this post, shall we?!

You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular opinion.

He is a mistake. His old man used to say that he was around.



Did not think you would be able.

Come again in English?


Are you dense? able to provide proof of your assertions

Of course. You!


What absolute claptrap,how on earth would I be proof of whether a third
party spouts bullshit, I still challenge you to provide proof of that
bullshit.

You are that bullshit man. Just look at your fat ass in front of the
mirror.
Proof is staring right back at you.


????

Yeah, you!

 

[Damian]

"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:55a0db94$0$29848$c3e8da3$dbd57e7@news.astraweb.com...

Damian wrote:
"F Murtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:559c6aa8$0$56416$c3e8da3$38634283@news.astraweb.com...
noel wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:20:15 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

noel wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 19:56:11 +1000, F Murtz wrote:

Damian wrote:
"noel" <deletethis@invalin.lan> wrote in message
news:558e0cfa$1@news.ausics.net...
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:43:47 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Damian <damian_andrews75@yahoo.com.au> wrote
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote
.. it would be on life support!

Not all groups are as quiet as this one.

Yes, the groups reserved for medication dependant lunatics are
still doing ok.

More than those are still doing ok.

seems like usenet is on it's last legs

Has been for a long time now.

Makes your existence pretty doomed, doesn't it?

Nope.

I blame you for the demise of usenet.

Even a terminal fuckwit such as yourself should have noticed that
groups I have never been into ever have died in the arse even
more
comprehensively than the ones I have posted to.

Text groups are dying off a bit

dying at an alarming rate.

coz fuckwits prefer the prettyness of all that html shit in
"forums"
-
hey why get a 1.8K post when you can get it in 300K

Volume wise, it has died off big time I reckon.
forums have it's place, where terminal viruses that infect the
usenet
newsgroups can't exist.
I think we call it "Rod Speed" factor?!
Html capability is pretty handy on many subjects.
usenet still has it's place without any weirdo mods as in some
forums.



Though usenet is hardly dead, its definately nothing like it used
to
be

*text groups only* (I stopped binaries many years ago back when
disks were not cheap as chips, though the likes of giganews does a
roaring trade so must be a high demand for binaries still - and
may
increase again soon with less chance of being fucked up hte arse
by
george brandis's hollywood act that will become law in about 2
weeks
when the the Gov'nr accents it)

That is a one stupid retard who talks about a liberal approach to
things. while hiding his fat bald useless conservative rotten arse
behind true libs.
True libs in libs got their testicles cut off few years ago.
It will take some time for them to grow it back or to stitch up
pair
of balls from a dead bull kangaroo. Lets hope that happens sooner
than later.
Need for a separate conservative and lib party has been hundred
years
overdue.


Sites that have sent us articles since the last expire:
Posts Rejects Dup Total Articles/S Kbytes/s K
Site
24174 8046 0 32220 0.37 1.12 96851k
23.74%

(99.999% those rejects are dumb arses trying to post binaries
through text groups, the remainder are like how big do you want to
grow your cock or you need a new watch or sunnies etc etc etc)

So 24K text groups a day is pretty average today, but ten years
ago
we were doing more than that every *hour*

Yes, those were good old days for the old troll Rod, where he used
to
dominate and kick the living shit out everybody while dodging the
shit thrown at him from distance behind a thick firewall, hiding
his
fat raggedy arse.


What a load of crap Hides behind nothing, any one who wants can find
out where he lives , you can not visit many news groups if you think
he is a dimwit,Probably knows much more on electronic and technical
subjects than you. he can be abrasive to fools and dimwits.

I challenge you to enumerate where he has spouted bullshit so we can
dissect it, You wont find many provable mistakes,contrary to popular
opinion.

you must be newbie,


You would be wrong, been at it for yonks

if you go back 20years you'll find fuck loads




He is not infallible but rarely spouts bull shit. so could you please
list instances of fuck loads from 20 years ago. (will wait
expectantly)

you dont have to wait dimwit, you can use a search function if you;ve
been around long enough, you know who, how and where to look, I
certainly
aint gunna waste any more of my time for you on him, its your homework
since your the disbeleiver, I dont give a fuck either way

Did not think you could, you are the one making the statements you prove
them.

Oh poor thing. Why can't you bother to google all the history of crap and
find yourself. It's all out there for your grabs.


So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the ones to
prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare or non
existing hearsay examples

Yes you do. You're the one holding the bucket for Rod under his rear end.

 

[Damian]

"Frank Slootweg" <this@ddress.is.invalid> wrote in message
news:d0da7fFg6nrU1@mid.individual.net...

F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
So you say,you two are the ones casting aspersions so you are the ones
to prove it, I do not need to waste time searching for the rare or non
existing hearsay examples

In a normal case, you would be correct to ask that someone proves the
claim they make. But this case isn't a normal case. It's a case where
someone says "The sky is blue!" and you say "No, it's not!", because you
have your eyes closed.

If you want proof, please feel free to search aus.* on my exchanges
with Roddles, that should give you some ideas.

Or you can make it really simple and just search for his postings with
"You could never bullshit" or/and "out of a wet paper bag". That should
give you a few thousand hits! :-(

The main problem cases are if someone corrects/disputes some of
Roddles' statements/claims/<whatever>. When then happens, most of the
time Roddles goes ballistic and into foot-stamping and insulting mode.
If you haven't seen that, you haven't been here (aus.*) or had your eyes
closed. Period.

OTOH, to be fair, Roddles has his spurious good moments, with good
discussion/contribution. One such episode was just recently in another
group (which I won't mention to protect its audience, and no, I wasn't
involved, just watching). So there you go.

)
Actually Rod and the F.Murf is closely related.
I think F.Murf was pooped out by Rod. ;-)