PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[Phil Allison]

"Yaputya"

** AFAIK - Tilbrook parted company with Harrison and ETI prior to AEM
commencing.

Tilbrook used to be listed as ETI Technical Editor, his title seemed to
change to Associate
sometime in late 1983.

** The falling out I recall was in April or May of 1983 and coincided with
the publication of the ETI Series 5000 graphic equaliser. This project is
memorable as it was clearly published without the prototype ever being
completed or tested.

http://www.scribd.com/atukbaraza/d/63970015-Graphic-Equalizer-31-Band

The installation of 1kohm resistors in series with the supply pins of each
op-amp reduced the supply to those ICs to about +/- 4 volts - hence they
could barely work. The unit utterly failed to meet basic specs.

It proved impossible to get Tilbrook on the phone about this to have a
correction published and nobody else at the office could even see the
problem or gave a hoot.

I note that Altronics are STILL selling the high power speaker protector
kit that Tilbrook designed in 1982, which also does not work. I did speak
with him about this and got stone walled and fed a load of bullshit over the
phone - seems this was the guy's standard way of dealing with all criticism.



.... Phil

 

[John-Melb]

On May 19, 9:37 pm, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

No diagnosis required, you provided direct evidence.

You're really a advocate of the Trevor Tosspot school of discussion
and debate, all we need now is you to start chanting "Non-sequitur" to
anything you don't agree with and you're there. There really is little
to learn from you "long standing and highly respected" poster.

I'm glad you're still enjoying "annoying the crap" out of me, I find
persistent idiots very entertaining.

 

[John-Melb]

On May 20, 7:27 pm, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

On 20/05/2012 11:02 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 19, 9:37 pm, keithr<kei...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:

No diagnosis required, you provided direct evidence.

You're really a advocate of the Trevor Tosspot school of discussion
and debate, all we need now is you to start chanting "Non-sequitur" to
anything you don't agree with and you're there. There really is little
to learn from you "long standing and highly respected" poster.

TW can do as he wishes, I don't care either way. The problem is that,
after all this time, you still don't understand that my argument is with
the messenger not the message.

No, your problem is very definitely with the message, you'll remember
that you and a number of others had no issue with your "long standing
and highly respected" poster, posting his anti-gun and anti-gun owner
tirades on aus.electronics, but got very upset when any alternative
viewpoint appeared.

I'm glad you're still enjoying "annoying the crap" out of me, I find
persistent idiots very entertaining.

As do I John, thats why I argue with you.

Good to hear.

 

[Tom]

On May 21, 3:10 pm, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

On 20/05/2012 10:58 PM, John-Melb wrote:





On May 20, 7:27 pm, keithr<kei...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:
On 20/05/2012 11:02 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 19, 9:37 pm, keithr<kei...@nowhere.com.au>    wrote:

No diagnosis required, you provided direct evidence.

You're really a advocate of the Trevor Tosspot school of discussion
and debate, all we need now is you to start chanting "Non-sequitur" to
anything you don't agree with and you're there. There really is little
to learn from you "long standing and highly respected" poster.

TW can do as he wishes, I don't care either way. The problem is that,
after all this time, you still don't understand that my argument is with
the messenger not the message.

No, your problem is very definitely with the message, you'll remember
that you and a number of others had no issue with your "long standing
and highly respected" poster, posting his anti-gun and anti-gun owner
tirades on aus.electronics, but got very upset when any alternative
viewpoint appeared.

Good god John, are you going to carry that and every imagined slight
that you have ever got to the grave? Normal people get it out of their
system and move on. You apparently are not that normal.

"Imagined slight", your memory of those circumstances appears to

differ from others. John wasn't the only one pissed off about it
remember.

I'm glad you're still enjoying "annoying the crap" out of me, I find
persistent idiots very entertaining.

As do I John, thats why I argue with you.

Good to hear.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

 

[John-Melb]

On May 21, 3:10 pm, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Good god John, are you going to carry that and every imagined slight
that you have ever got to the grave? Normal people get it out of their
system and move on. You apparently are not that normal.

Diagnosing again I see.

Why should I "move on"?

Aus.electronics had no issue with Trevor Tosspot posting his anti-gun
and anti-gunowner diatribes, when alternative viewpoint appeared they
got very upset.

What they we're saying was your "long standing and highly respected"
poster was fine to post his diatribes, but I'm not allowed to give my
side of the debate.

What they were saying was my rights were less than his, he had rights
I did not. Concepts such as "freedom of speech" simply did not apply
to me because I owned guns.

Considering the vilification gun owners in this country have been
subject to since 1996, I'm not prepared to accept that.

You don't like my attitude? Bad luck.

 

[John-Melb]

Sorry, continued.

Tell me Keith, at what stage do you want me to accept or ignore
discrimination (because that's what it is)?

There is a very fine line between saying "you're not allowed to post
here because you're a gun owner" and saying "you're not allowed to
post here because you're black, or gay, or muslim, or jewish or vote
Liberal".

Where is the line to be drawn when facing discrimination of matters
such as freedom of speech?

 

[John-Melb]

On May 22, 2:40 pm, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:

On 22/05/12 12:53, John-Melb wrote:

Aus.electronics had no issue with Trevor Tosspot posting his anti-gun
and anti-gunowner diatribes,

We are mature and stable enough to ignore OT.

Except, that's not what happened, was it?

 

[John-Melb]

On May 22, 7:32 pm, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

On 22/05/2012 1:01 PM, John-Melb wrote:

Sorry, continued.

Tell me Keith, at what stage do you want me to accept or ignore
discrimination (because that's what it is)?

You have made your point multiple times, are you going to keep on
whining about it all the way to the grave?

When you lot accept that redneck gun owners, even those who are
cowards, arseholes and pooftas, have as much right to be heard as
"long standing and highly respected" anti-gun zealots, when you lot
accept that my rights are no less than your "long standing and highly
respected" poster, then I have made my point, not before.

There is a very fine line between saying "you're not allowed to post
here because you're a gun owner" and saying "you're not allowed to
post here because you're black, or gay, or muslim, or jewish or vote
Liberal".

Where is the line to be drawn when facing discrimination of matters
such as freedom of speech?

Nobody said "you're not allowed to post here because you're a gun
owner", they just told you to piss off because you were deliberately
being disruptive and posting off topic. trying to portray yourself as a
downtrodden minority is pathetic.

Then why were Trevor Tosspot's O/T posts not treated in exactly the
same way?

 

[John-Melb]

On May 23, 8:02 am, Trevor Wilson <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

**You are a fucking moron. I was asked by several aus.electronics
posters to cease posting off-topic (gun related) posts to the group. I
have respected those requests. You have been asked to cease posting
off-topic posts to aus.electronics. You have failed to do so.

Damn, someone let me out of Trevor Tosspot's kill-file, put me back in
there, it's such a lovely place filled with intelligent, reasonable
and articulate people, everything Trevor Tosspot cannot stand.

Don't bullshit, you were only asked to stop posting there because I
was posting there, whilst it was you posting your anti-gun diatribes
with no reply, no-one had a problem with it.

It has nothing to do with freedom of speech, but everything to do with
common courtesy. Something a thug like you cannot understand.

It has everything to do with freedom of speech.

I guess you describing me as a "thug" is an improvement on your
previous descriptions, hey everybody according to Trevor Tosspot, I've
evolved from "sub-human" to "thug".

 

[John-Melb]

On May 23, 12:36 pm, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:

On 23/05/12 09:27, John-Melb wrote:

It has everything to do with freedom of speech.

Lol, an impotent phallic symbol fondler fails to understand that without
responsibility, there is no right of anything. Hint freedom of speech
doesn't include the "right" to be in anyones face.

"impotent phallic symbol fondler" well that's a new one.

Tell me, why did you not have a problem when Trevor Tosspot was
posting his anti-gun bile on aus.electronics?

 

[John-Melb]

On May 23, 12:37 pm, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:

On 23/05/12 09:12, John-Melb wrote:

On May 22, 2:40 pm, terryc<newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au>  wrote:
On 22/05/12 12:53, John-Melb wrote:

Aus.electronics had no issue with Trevor Tosspot posting his anti-gun
and anti-gunowner diatribes,

We are mature and stable enough to ignore OT.

Except, that's not what happened, was it?

Lol, I just love your anti-gun propaganda.
I'm glad you're enjoying it.

 

[John-Melb]

On May 23, 1:44 pm, Trevor Wilson <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

On 5/23/2012 9:27 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 23, 8:02 am, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**You are a fucking moron. I was asked by several aus.electronics
posters to cease posting off-topic (gun related) posts to the group. I
have respected those requests. You have been asked to cease posting
off-topic posts to aus.electronics. You have failed to do so.

Damn, someone let me out of Trevor Tosspot's kill-file, put me back in
there, it's such a lovely place filled with intelligent, reasonable
and articulate people, everything Trevor Tosspot cannot stand.

**Moron. You've never been in the kill-file. As I have patiently
explained to you before, there is more than one 'John' posting on the
USENET.

What other "John" was posting on the thread where you claimed to have
kill-filed me?

Don't bullshit, you were only asked to stop posting there because I
was posting there, whilst it was you posting your anti-gun diatribes
with no reply, no-one had a problem with it.

**_I_ was asked to cease posting off-topic crap. I did so.

Well, it's good to see we can agree on something, you often post crap.

You were only asked to cease posting when I started posting, while it
was Trevor Tosspot posting his anti-gun and anti-gun owner
"crap" (your words, not mine) on aus.electronics, no-one there had an
issue with it.

It has nothing to do with freedom of speech, but everything to do with
common courtesy. Something a thug like you cannot understand.

It has everything to do with freedom of speech.

**No, it does not. It's about courtesy and respecting others' wishes.
Something a thug like you has no ability to understand.

Your preaching to me about respecting others? that's good.

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart?

Will you respect my wishes?

I guess you describing me as a "thug" is an improvement on your
previous descriptions, hey everybody according to Trevor Tosspot, I've
evolved from "sub-human" to "thug".

**No, you have not. You're still an incredibly ignorant, sub-human thug.

If someone like you is classifying me as such, I must be doing
something right.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

 

[John-Melb]

On May 23, 6:48 pm, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

On 23/05/2012 9:19 AM, John-Melb wrote:









On May 22, 7:32 pm, keithr<kei...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:
On 22/05/2012 1:01 PM, John-Melb wrote:

Sorry, continued.

Tell me Keith, at what stage do you want me to accept or ignore
discrimination (because that's what it is)?

You have made your point multiple times, are you going to keep on
whining about it all the way to the grave?

When you lot accept that redneck gun owners, even those who are
cowards, arseholes and pooftas, have as much right to be heard as
"long standing and highly respected" anti-gun zealots, when you lot
accept that my rights are no less than your "long standing and highly
respected" poster, then I have made my point, not before.

You were given exactly the same hearing as he was, and then you were
both told to piss off. what part of that do you find hard to understand?

No, no-one told Trevor to take his anti-gun "crap" elsewhere until
after I started posting.

As it all happened over a year ago, why do you find it necessary to keep
on making an arsehole of yourself by continuing to post your word vomit
where it isn't wanted and in fact damages your cause?

"Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it"

Considering that no-one had an issue with Trevor's anti-gun "crap" but
got very upset when alternative viewpoint appeared, how am I damaging
anybody's cause, their minds were already well and truly made up. The
anti-gun "crap" was being posted by their "long standing and highly
respected" poster.

There is a very fine line between saying "you're not allowed to post
here because you're a gun owner" and saying "you're not allowed to
post here because you're black, or gay, or muslim, or jewish or vote
Liberal".

Where is the line to be drawn when facing discrimination of matters
such as freedom of speech?

Nobody said "you're not allowed to post here because you're a gun
owner", they just told you to piss off because you were deliberately
being disruptive and posting off topic. trying to portray yourself as a
downtrodden minority is pathetic.

Then why were Trevor Tosspot's O/T posts not treated in exactly the
same way?

He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to
shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He
was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut
up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was
told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up
too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told
to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too.
He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to
shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He
was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut
up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was
told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up
too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told
to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too.
He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to
shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He
was told to shut up too. He was told to shut up too. He was told to shut
up too. He was told to shut up too.

Trevor often seems to enjoy chanting the same thing over and over
again too.

It doesn't matter how many times you chant your mantra, it doesn't
make it true.

No-one on aus.electronics had an issue with Trevor posting his anti-
gun "crap" there until I started posting alternative viewpoint. That's
the fact of the matter and your chanting is not going to change it.

Perhaps if it is repeated enough, perhaps it will seep into your thick
skull.

Perhaps if you chant you little rhetoric often enough someone might
believe you, I don't.

However, since you approve of chanting the same thing over and over
again, enjoy this
On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-
On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-
On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-
On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-
On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-On Sep 25 2009, 5:45 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Put it somewhere else trevor, otherwise you'll have your alter ego and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-
and
his little mates fromAPGswarming all over the place again.-

 

[John-Melb]

On May 24, 5:37 pm, Trevor Wilson <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

On 5/24/2012 11:37 AM, John-Melb wrote:









On May 23, 1:44 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/23/2012 9:27 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 23, 8:02 am, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**You are a fucking moron. I was asked by several aus.electronics
posters to cease posting off-topic (gun related) posts to the group. I
have respected those requests. You have been asked to cease posting
off-topic posts to aus.electronics. You have failed to do so.

Damn, someone let me out of Trevor Tosspot's kill-file, put me back in
there, it's such a lovely place filled with intelligent, reasonable
and articulate people, everything Trevor Tosspot cannot stand.

**Moron. You've never been in the kill-file. As I have patiently
explained to you before, there is more than one 'John' posting on the
USENET.

What other "John" was posting on the thread where you claimed to have
kill-filed me?

**Wrong question, idiot. I suggest you go read the thread CARFEFULLY.

Trevor, you don't get to make that call.
1. "What other "John" was posting on the thread where you claimed to
have kill-filed me?"
2. "You comments about kill-filing John were in response to another
poster asking you about something a John had posted, which John was
this?

Don't bullshit, you were only asked to stop posting there because I
was posting there, whilst it was you posting your anti-gun diatribes
with no reply, no-one had a problem with it.

**_I_ was asked to cease posting off-topic crap. I did so.

Well, it's good to see we can agree on something, you often post crap.

You were only asked to cease posting when I started posting, while it
was Trevor Tosspot posting his anti-gun and anti-gun owner
"crap" (your words, not mine) on aus.electronics, no-one there had an
issue with it.

**You STILL don't get it, do you? You are a moronic thug. Outside your
lapdog, Tom, no one gives a shit about your insane opinions. I'll say it
once more (pay attention):

_I_ was asked to stop posting off-topic crap. I did so. _YOU_ have been
asked to cease your continual cross-posting of your insane nonsense to
aus.electronics. It's now up to you to behave like a human being.

You want someone you have repeatedly described as sub-human to
suddenly start behaving like a human being because it suits your
purposes? That's funny.

It has nothing to do with freedom of speech, but everything to do with
common courtesy. Something a thug like you cannot understand.

It has everything to do with freedom of speech.

**No, it does not. It's about courtesy and respecting others' wishes.
Something a thug like you has no ability to understand.

Your preaching to me about respecting others? that's good.

**Clearly, someone needs to tell you.

Not you, you haven't earned that right.

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart?

Will you respect my wishes?

**Given you state of mind, no. You are a moronic thug. You don't deserve
any respect. If you start behaving like a reasonable human, I'll
reconsider.



I guess you describing me as a "thug" is an improvement on your
previous descriptions, hey everybody according to Trevor Tosspot, I've
evolved from "sub-human" to "thug".

**No, you have not. You're still an incredibly ignorant, sub-human thug.

If someone like you is classifying me as such, I must be doing
something right.

**I doubt that.

I don't

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart?

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

 

[John-Melb]

On May 24, 6:30 pm, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:

On 24/05/12 11:31, John-Melb wrote:> On May 23, 12:36 pm, terryc<newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au>  wrote:
On 23/05/12 09:27, John-Melb wrote:

It has everything to do with freedom of speech.

Lol, an impotent phallic symbol fondler fails to understand that without
responsibility, there is no right of anything. Hint freedom of speech
doesn't include the "right" to be in anyones face.

"impotent phallic symbol fondler" well that's a new one.

Thank you for confirming it.



Tell me, why did you not have a problem when Trevor Tosspot was
posting his anti-gun bile on aus.electronics?

Man, you really are a goldfish. Previously posted.

Really, where? I must have missed it, give me a cite or post it again.

 

[Trevor Wilson]

On 5/26/2012 8:31 PM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 26, 7:57 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/26/2012 11:38 AM, John-Melb wrote:









On May 24, 5:37 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/24/2012 11:37 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 23, 1:44 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/23/2012 9:27 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 23, 8:02 am, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**You are a fucking moron. I was asked by several aus.electronics
posters to cease posting off-topic (gun related) posts to the group. I
have respected those requests. You have been asked to cease posting
off-topic posts to aus.electronics. You have failed to do so.

Damn, someone let me out of Trevor Tosspot's kill-file, put me back in
there, it's such a lovely place filled with intelligent, reasonable
and articulate people, everything Trevor Tosspot cannot stand.

**Moron. You've never been in the kill-file. As I have patiently
explained to you before, there is more than one 'John' posting on the
USENET.

What other "John" was posting on the thread where you claimed to have
kill-filed me?

**Wrong question, idiot. I suggest you go read the thread CARFEFULLY.

Trevor, you don't get to make that call.
1. "What other "John" was posting on the thread where you claimed to
have kill-filed me?"

**Wrong question, idiot. Read the thread again. Perhaps you'll
understand. More likely you won't though.

Isn't it pathetic the way you rely on chanting when you don't want to
answer a question. The only "John" posting on the thread where you
claimed to have kill-filed a "John" was me.

**I have no other possible way to answer idiotic questions. Ask a sane
question.

2. "You comments about kill-filing John were in response to another
poster asking you about something a John had posted, which John was
this?

**Read the thread. Perhaps it will come to you. Or not.

I have read the thread, the "John" that you were asked about was me.

**Really? Cite the words that gave you that impression.

So it was me you previously claimed to have kill-file, despite your
denials?

**Asked and answered.

Honestly Trev, you couldn't lie straight in bed, what a sad pathetic
soul you are.

**LOL! Perhaps you'll wake up one day. Or not.

Don't bullshit, you were only asked to stop posting there because I
was posting there, whilst it was you posting your anti-gun diatribes
with no reply, no-one had a problem with it.

**_I_ was asked to cease posting off-topic crap. I did so.

Well, it's good to see we can agree on something, you often post crap.

You were only asked to cease posting when I started posting, while it
was Trevor Tosspot posting his anti-gun and anti-gun owner
"crap" (your words, not mine) on aus.electronics, no-one there had an
issue with it.

**You STILL don't get it, do you? You are a moronic thug. Outside your
lapdog, Tom, no one gives a shit about your insane opinions. I'll say it
once more (pay attention):

_I_ was asked to stop posting off-topic crap. I did so. _YOU_ have been
asked to cease your continual cross-posting of your insane nonsense to
aus.electronics. It's now up to you to behave like a human being.

You want someone you have repeatedly described as sub-human to
suddenly start behaving like a human being because it suits your
purposes? That's funny.

**Nah. It's just pathetic. You are a sad, pathetic excuse for a human.

You're now accepting that I'm human, that must really hurt your
prejudices

**A sad, pathetic human.

It has nothing to do with freedom of speech, but everything to do with
common courtesy. Something a thug like you cannot understand.

It has everything to do with freedom of speech.

**No, it does not. It's about courtesy and respecting others' wishes.
Something a thug like you has no ability to understand.

Your preaching to me about respecting others? that's good.

**Clearly, someone needs to tell you.

Not you, you haven't earned that right.

**Uh-huh.

I'm glad you agree.











Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart?

Will you respect my wishes?

**Given you state of mind, no. You are a moronic thug. You don't deserve
any respect. If you start behaving like a reasonable human, I'll
reconsider.

I guess you describing me as a "thug" is an improvement on your
previous descriptions, hey everybody according to Trevor Tosspot, I've
evolved from "sub-human" to "thug".

**No, you have not. You're still an incredibly ignorant, sub-human thug.

If someone like you is classifying me as such, I must be doing
something right.

**I doubt that.

I don't

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart?

Another question Trevor Tosspot doesn't want to answer.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

--
Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au

 

[John-Melb]

On May 26, 7:57 pm, Trevor Wilson <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

On 5/26/2012 11:38 AM, John-Melb wrote:









On May 24, 5:37 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/24/2012 11:37 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 23, 1:44 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/23/2012 9:27 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 23, 8:02 am, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**You are a fucking moron. I was asked by several aus.electronics
posters to cease posting off-topic (gun related) posts to the group. I
have respected those requests. You have been asked to cease posting
off-topic posts to aus.electronics. You have failed to do so.

Damn, someone let me out of Trevor Tosspot's kill-file, put me back in
there, it's such a lovely place filled with intelligent, reasonable
and articulate people, everything Trevor Tosspot cannot stand.

**Moron. You've never been in the kill-file. As I have patiently
explained to you before, there is more than one 'John' posting on the
USENET.

What other "John" was posting on the thread where you claimed to have
kill-filed me?

**Wrong question, idiot. I suggest you go read the thread CARFEFULLY.

Trevor, you don't get to make that call.
1. "What other "John" was posting on the thread where you claimed to
have kill-filed me?"

**Wrong question, idiot. Read the thread again. Perhaps you'll
understand. More likely you won't though.

Isn't it pathetic the way you rely on chanting when you don't want to
answer a question. The only "John" posting on the thread where you
claimed to have kill-filed a "John" was me.

2. "You comments about kill-filing John were in response to another
poster asking you about something a John had posted, which John was
this?

**Read the thread. Perhaps it will come to you. Or not.

I have read the thread, the "John" that you were asked about was me.

So it was me you previously claimed to have kill-file, despite your
denials?

Honestly Trev, you couldn't lie straight in bed, what a sad pathetic
soul you are.

Don't bullshit, you were only asked to stop posting there because I
was posting there, whilst it was you posting your anti-gun diatribes
with no reply, no-one had a problem with it.

**_I_ was asked to cease posting off-topic crap. I did so.

Well, it's good to see we can agree on something, you often post crap..

You were only asked to cease posting when I started posting, while it
was Trevor Tosspot posting his anti-gun and anti-gun owner
"crap" (your words, not mine) on aus.electronics, no-one there had an
issue with it.

**You STILL don't get it, do you? You are a moronic thug. Outside your
lapdog, Tom, no one gives a shit about your insane opinions. I'll say it
once more (pay attention):

_I_ was asked to stop posting off-topic crap. I did so. _YOU_ have been
asked to cease your continual cross-posting of your insane nonsense to
aus.electronics. It's now up to you to behave like a human being.

You want someone you have repeatedly described as sub-human to
suddenly start behaving like a human being because it suits your
purposes? That's funny.

**Nah. It's just pathetic. You are a sad, pathetic excuse for a human.

You're now accepting that I'm human, that must really hurt your
prejudices

It has nothing to do with freedom of speech, but everything to do with
common courtesy. Something a thug like you cannot understand.

It has everything to do with freedom of speech.

**No, it does not. It's about courtesy and respecting others' wishes..
Something a thug like you has no ability to understand.

Your preaching to me about respecting others? that's good.

**Clearly, someone needs to tell you.

Not you, you haven't earned that right.

**Uh-huh.

I'm glad you agree.

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart?

Will you respect my wishes?

**Given you state of mind, no. You are a moronic thug. You don't deserve
any respect. If you start behaving like a reasonable human, I'll
reconsider.

I guess you describing me as a "thug" is an improvement on your
previous descriptions, hey everybody according to Trevor Tosspot, I've
evolved from "sub-human" to "thug".

**No, you have not. You're still an incredibly ignorant, sub-human thug.

If someone like you is classifying me as such, I must be doing
something right.

**I doubt that.

I don't

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart?

Another question Trevor Tosspot doesn't want to answer.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

 

[John-Melb]

On May 26, 8:44 pm, Trevor Wilson <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

On 5/26/2012 8:31 PM, John-Melb wrote:









On May 26, 7:57 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/26/2012 11:38 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 24, 5:37 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/24/2012 11:37 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 23, 1:44 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/23/2012 9:27 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 23, 8:02 am, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**You are a fucking moron. I was asked by several aus.electronics
posters to cease posting off-topic (gun related) posts to the group. I
have respected those requests. You have been asked to cease posting
off-topic posts to aus.electronics. You have failed to do so.

Damn, someone let me out of Trevor Tosspot's kill-file, put me back in
there, it's such a lovely place filled with intelligent, reasonable
and articulate people, everything Trevor Tosspot cannot stand.

**Moron. You've never been in the kill-file. As I have patiently
explained to you before, there is more than one 'John' posting on the
USENET.

What other "John" was posting on the thread where you claimed to have
kill-filed me?

**Wrong question, idiot. I suggest you go read the thread CARFEFULLY..

Trevor, you don't get to make that call.
1. "What other "John" was posting on the thread where you claimed to
have kill-filed me?"

**Wrong question, idiot. Read the thread again. Perhaps you'll
understand. More likely you won't though.

Isn't it pathetic the way you rely on chanting when you don't want to
answer a question. The only "John" posting on the thread where you
claimed to have kill-filed a "John" was me.

**I have no other possible way to answer idiotic questions. Ask a sane
question.



2. "You comments about kill-filing John were in response to another
poster asking you about something a John had posted, which John was
this?

**Read the thread. Perhaps it will come to you. Or not.

I have read the thread, the "John" that you were asked about was me.

**Really? Cite the words that gave you that impression.
=========================================On Oct 16 2011, 1:48 pm, Trevor Wilson

<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

On 10/16/2011 12:20 PM, lindsay wrote:

And you choose to ignore a lot. John has asked you some interesting
questions, which you seem to refuse to answer.

**When John switched from reasonable discussion to insult, I kill-filed
him. If he has asked some good questions, then I didn't see them. In
general, however, I have found John to be quite intelligent, reasonable
and rational. Pity he chose to drag the conversation into the gutter.
You, OTOH, never left the gutter. So stop using John as your backup. Be
man and conduct your own argument.

1. I started the thread where your words appeared.
2. I am the only "John" posting on that thread.
3. The questions Lindsay was were referring to were questions I had
asked you.

You've been caught out fibbing again Trevor, you really are a sad
case.

===================================>

So it was me you previously claimed to have kill-file, despite your
denials?

**Asked and answered.



Honestly Trev, you couldn't lie straight in bed, what a sad pathetic
soul you are.

**LOL! Perhaps you'll wake up one day. Or not.











Don't bullshit, you were only asked to stop posting there because I
was posting there, whilst it was you posting your anti-gun diatribes
with no reply, no-one had a problem with it.

**_I_ was asked to cease posting off-topic crap. I did so.

Well, it's good to see we can agree on something, you often post crap.

You were only asked to cease posting when I started posting, while it
was Trevor Tosspot posting his anti-gun and anti-gun owner
"crap" (your words, not mine) on aus.electronics, no-one there had an
issue with it.

**You STILL don't get it, do you? You are a moronic thug. Outside your
lapdog, Tom, no one gives a shit about your insane opinions. I'll say it
once more (pay attention):

_I_ was asked to stop posting off-topic crap. I did so. _YOU_ have been
asked to cease your continual cross-posting of your insane nonsense to
aus.electronics. It's now up to you to behave like a human being.

You want someone you have repeatedly described as sub-human to
suddenly start behaving like a human being because it suits your
purposes? That's funny.

**Nah. It's just pathetic. You are a sad, pathetic excuse for a human.

You're now accepting that I'm human, that must really hurt your
prejudices

**A sad, pathetic human.











It has nothing to do with freedom of speech, but everything to do with
common courtesy. Something a thug like you cannot understand.

It has everything to do with freedom of speech.

**No, it does not. It's about courtesy and respecting others' wishes.
Something a thug like you has no ability to understand.

Your preaching to me about respecting others? that's good.

**Clearly, someone needs to tell you.

Not you, you haven't earned that right.

**Uh-huh.

I'm glad you agree.

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart?

Will you respect my wishes?

**Given you state of mind, no. You are a moronic thug. You don't deserve
any respect. If you start behaving like a reasonable human, I'll
reconsider.

I guess you describing me as a "thug" is an improvement on your
previous descriptions, hey everybody according to Trevor Tosspot, I've
evolved from "sub-human" to "thug".

**No, you have not. You're still an incredibly ignorant, sub-human thug.

If someone like you is classifying me as such, I must be doing
something right.

**I doubt that.

I don't

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart?

Another question Trevor Tosspot doesn't want to answer.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

 

[John-Melb]

On May 27, 8:22 am, Trevor Wilson <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

On 5/26/2012 9:30 PM, John-Melb wrote:









On May 26, 8:44 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/26/2012 8:31 PM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 26, 7:57 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/26/2012 11:38 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 24, 5:37 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/24/2012 11:37 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 23, 1:44 pm, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:
On 5/23/2012 9:27 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On May 23, 8:02 am, Trevor Wilson<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com..au
wrote:

**You are a fucking moron. I was asked by several aus.electronics
posters to cease posting off-topic (gun related) posts to the group. I
have respected those requests. You have been asked to cease posting
off-topic posts to aus.electronics. You have failed to do so.

Damn, someone let me out of Trevor Tosspot's kill-file, put me back in
there, it's such a lovely place filled with intelligent, reasonable
and articulate people, everything Trevor Tosspot cannot stand.

**Moron. You've never been in the kill-file. As I have patiently
explained to you before, there is more than one 'John' posting on the
USENET.

What other "John" was posting on the thread where you claimed to have
kill-filed me?

**Wrong question, idiot. I suggest you go read the thread CARFEFULLY.

Trevor, you don't get to make that call.
1. "What other "John" was posting on the thread where you claimed to
have kill-filed me?"

**Wrong question, idiot. Read the thread again. Perhaps you'll
understand. More likely you won't though.

Isn't it pathetic the way you rely on chanting when you don't want to
answer a question. The only "John" posting on the thread where you
claimed to have kill-filed a "John" was me.

**I have no other possible way to answer idiotic questions. Ask a sane
question.

2. "You comments about kill-filing John were in response to another
poster asking you about something a John had posted, which John was
this?

**Read the thread. Perhaps it will come to you. Or not.

I have read the thread, the "John" that you were asked about was me.

**Really? Cite the words that gave you that impression.
=========================================> > On Oct 16 2011, 1:48 pm, Trevor Wilson
tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>  wrote:
On 10/16/2011 12:20 PM, lindsay wrote:

And you choose to ignore a lot. John has asked you some interesting
questions, which you seem to refuse to answer.

**When John switched from reasonable discussion to insult, I kill-filed
him. If he has asked some good questions, then I didn't see them. In
general, however, I have found John to be quite intelligent, reasonable
and rational. Pity he chose to drag the conversation into the gutter.
You, OTOH, never left the gutter. So stop using John as your backup. Be
man and conduct your own argument.

1. I started the thread where your words appeared.
2. I am the only "John" posting on that thread.
3. The questions Lindsay was were referring to were questions I had
asked you.

You've been caught out fibbing again Trevor, you really are a  sad
case.

**Try some CONTEXT, moron. You've carefully managed to excise the
comment made prior to my response. Applying a little context will shed
light on your insanity.

Naturally, you will decline to publish the context that my comments were
made, since they prove just how dumb you are.

--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

Here you go
http://groups.google.com/group/aus.politics/browse_thread/thread/ff33ec5b53943382/e0dee3c87878b3a7?hl=en&q=kill-file&lnk=ol&

ER, you were saying?

 

[atec77]

On 1/06/2012 9:11 AM, somebody wrote:

Is there anyway to salvage the toaster and repair it? I moved the
dial a few times and it doesn't matter anymore; it never pops up
anymore. In the past, I just have bought a new toaster but I liked my
toaster and don't want to spend money on a new one.
Google " Phill Alison (toaster boy)"

--









X-No-Archive: Yes