PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8sddtvFpkmU1@mid.individual.net...
B J Foster wrote:

"In a new blow for the NBN Co,

Only in your pathetic little pig ignorant fantasyland.

Scientists at Stanford University in the USA have confirmed that they
have found a new low cost way of doubling the speed of Wi Fi networks.

Still doesnt get within a bulls roar of what FTTP can do.

The news comes only days after Telstra said that they are set to launch a
new 4G LTE wireless network which allows movies to be downloaded in
seconds to a home TV.

That last is a bare faced lie.
SHORT MOVIE......

The technology can send and receive information both ways at the same
time, currently Wi Fi works in a single direction".
http://www.channelnews.com.au/Hardware/Industry/U6B2J6M4

Just another pig ignorant steaming turd.
 
On 2011/02/21 09:03, SG1 wrote:
"Rod Speed"<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8sddtvFpkmU1@mid.individual.net...
B J Foster wrote:

"In a new blow for the NBN Co,

Only in your pathetic little pig ignorant fantasyland.

Scientists at Stanford University in the USA have confirmed that they
have found a new low cost way of doubling the speed of Wi Fi networks.

Still doesnt get within a bulls roar of what FTTP can do.

The news comes only days after Telstra said that they are set to launch a
new 4G LTE wireless network which allows movies to be downloaded in
seconds to a home TV.

That last is a bare faced lie.

SHORT MOVIE......


The technology can send and receive information both ways at the same
time, currently Wi Fi works in a single direction".
http://www.channelnews.com.au/Hardware/Industry/U6B2J6M4

Just another pig ignorant steaming turd.
In Seconds......
Just how many seconds is seconds

Even with 1 Gigabit Fibre Optic it would take 7 seconds for 700 Meg
Moofie. Like I can see John Doh getting a Gigabit Link to a House.

And a more respectable 100 megabit Fibre Optic would take 70 Seconds

And if you wanted DVD Quality then multiply these "Seconds" by 5
 
On Mar 11, 12:28 pm, paypal cash <magguri.ramula...@gmail.com> wrote:
 Bollywood star Aishwarya rai romantic videos with Abhishek,Angelina
joie holly wood sex videos,, Mallikasharawath enter in secret issue in
hollywood AThttp://150romanticvideos.co.cc

Due to high sex contest,I have hidden more details, click on right
side of my website do not tell
another person.


No one wants to see a SHITSKIN !
 
On 5/04/2011 7:24 PM, David L. Jones wrote:
For those who care about such things, the title says it all:
http://www.noodls.com/view/35AEF71FED0C4035C1F9EA872525988B2CCC323E

Dave.
From Taswegia to Sydney to Shanghai. I guess there's a limit to what you
can achieve locally. Considering moving there Dave?
 
On 6/04/2011 11:15 AM, David L. Jones wrote:
On Apr 6, 7:42 am, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSensel...@electrooptical.net
wrote:
David L. Jones wrote:
For those who care about such things, the title says it all:
http://www.noodls.com/view/35AEF71FED0C4035C1F9EA872525988B2CCC323E

Dave.

Dave, Commiserations.

How's your Shanghainese?

Luckily I don't have to worry about that.

Quote:
"The first stage of the move will involve a reorganization of the
Sydney office operations including
a significant reduction in staff."

Dave.
Ahhh, engineering your own redundancy. Good one.
 
"Rich Grise" <richg@example.net.invalid> wrote in message
news:innv5o$fbf$1@dont-email.me...
Well, you'd want to proofread it to the hilt, and go over it so that it
matches the company's style, that sort of thing. You wouldn't want somebody
blithely posting something like "Are product xyz is awsum dude!!!!!! I
never seen such a usefull part!!!!!!! Id recomend this for ne1 to use in
they're produx!!!!!!"

;-)
:)

Yeah, I wouldn't *want* that, although while reading something like that might
make me cringe, it wouldn't make unhappy with the employee who did it either.
:)

Dave Haynie's career was in no way hindered -- and possibly even bolstered --
after he videotaped the last day of Commodore's existence...

---Joel
 
On Apr 14, 10:01 am, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
Show us a code snippet from 1980s!

STA A2+1

There is no C=64 Assembler code with that instruction.

Not all assembler syntax is the same, even for the same CPU.

OK,
LDA is LOAD ACCUMULATOR (either direct byte value or from memory
address)
STA is STORE ACCUMULATOR (into memory address)


APPLE 6502 ASSEMBLER

13 A2 = $3E <<< compiler command
29 STA A2+1 <<< assember command

|
| COMPILED
v

STA $3F

^
|
| ASSEMBLED v or DISSASEMBLED ^
|
v

$F8 $3F

------------------

COMMODORE 6502 ASSEMBLER

STA $3F

^
|
| ASSEMBLED v or DISSASEMBLED ^
|
v

$F8 $3F
 
On Apr 17, 10:37 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
On 17/04/2011 7:19 PM, John-Melb wrote:





On Apr 17, 3:40 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:

We only have your word that I am an anti-gun and anti-gun owner zealot..
Actually I am only an anti John-Melb zealot.

How else would you describe it?

  "Trevor's "psychopath" remarks about TPG posters appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing

Trevor's "normal people" remarks about TPG posters appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing

Trevor's claims about gun dealers using gunshows to avoid compliance
with GCA-68 appeared on aus.electronics - you said nothing.

Trevor's totally irrelevant remarks about DGU's, for which he's been
shown a fool so many times on gun related groups, appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing.

As soon as "Trevor Tosspot's Porky List" appears, you begin
ranting about O/T posts.

Its not your message that is the problem its your personality. That
includes your obsession with Trevor Wilson If you simply ignored him, he
would be regarded as a harmless eccentric however, when you go stomping
around in your jackboots, you annoy the crap out of people and give
credence to his message.

That is why I decided to annoy the crap out of you.
It's nice to know that your only reason for being here is to annoy the
crap out of me.
 
On Apr 19, 11:03 am, keithr <kei...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
On 19/04/2011 6:28 AM, John-Melb wrote:





On Apr 17, 10:37 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:
On 17/04/2011 7:19 PM, John-Melb wrote:

On Apr 17, 3:40 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>    wrote:

We only have your word that I am an anti-gun and anti-gun owner zealot.
Actually I am only an anti John-Melb zealot.

How else would you describe it?

   "Trevor's "psychopath" remarks about TPG posters appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing

Trevor's "normal people" remarks about TPG posters appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing

Trevor's claims about gun dealers using gunshows to avoid compliance
with GCA-68 appeared on aus.electronics - you said nothing.

Trevor's totally irrelevant remarks about DGU's, for which he's been
shown a fool so many times on gun related groups, appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing.

As soon as "Trevor Tosspot's Porky List" appears, you begin
ranting about O/T posts.

Its not your message that is the problem its your personality. That
includes your obsession with Trevor Wilson If you simply ignored him, he
would be regarded as a harmless eccentric however, when you go stomping
around in your jackboots, you annoy the crap out of people and give
credence to his message.

That is why I decided to annoy the crap out of you.

It's nice to know that your only reason for being here is to annoy the
crap out of me.

Proving yourself to be a cross posting arsehole again John.
Keefy, am I "annoying the crap out of you", bugger hey,

"Trevor's "psychopath" remarks about TPG posters appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing

Trevor's "normal people" remarks about TPG posters appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing

Trevor's claims about gun dealers using gunshows to avoid compliance
with GCA-68 appeared on aus.electronics - you said nothing.

Trevor's totally irrelevant remarks about DGU's, for which he's been
shown a fool so many times on gun related groups, appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing.

As soon as "Trevor Tosspot's Porky List" appears, you begin
ranting about O/T posts.

Give my regards to Dorothy
 
On Apr 19, 9:42 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
On 19/04/2011 9:10 PM, John-Melb wrote:





On Apr 19, 11:03 am, keithr<kei...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:
On 19/04/2011 6:28 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On Apr 17, 10:37 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>    wrote:
On 17/04/2011 7:19 PM, John-Melb wrote:

On Apr 17, 3:40 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>      wrote:

We only have your word that I am an anti-gun and anti-gun owner zealot.
Actually I am only an anti John-Melb zealot.

How else would you describe it?

    "Trevor's "psychopath" remarks about TPG posters appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing

Trevor's "normal people" remarks about TPG posters appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing

Trevor's claims about gun dealers using gunshows to avoid compliance
with GCA-68 appeared on aus.electronics - you said nothing.

Trevor's totally irrelevant remarks about DGU's, for which he's been
shown a fool so many times on gun related groups, appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing.

As soon as "Trevor Tosspot's Porky List" appears, you begin
ranting about O/T posts.

Its not your message that is the problem its your personality. That
includes your obsession with Trevor Wilson If you simply ignored him, he
would be regarded as a harmless eccentric however, when you go stomping
around in your jackboots, you annoy the crap out of people and give
credence to his message.

That is why I decided to annoy the crap out of you.

It's nice to know that your only reason for being here is to annoy the
crap out of me.

Proving yourself to be a cross posting arsehole again John.

Keefy, am I "annoying the crap out of you", bugger hey,

In that case you are just as much of a failure as you are with
everything else. I don't do annoyed.
You seemed rather annoyed at the thought of some redneck posting on
aus.electronics
"Trevor's "psychopath" remarks about TPG posters appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing

Trevor's "normal people" remarks about TPG posters appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing

Trevor's claims about gun dealers using gunshows to avoid compliance
with GCA-68 appeared on aus.electronics - you said nothing.

Trevor's totally irrelevant remarks about DGU's, for which he's been
shown a fool so many times on gun related groups, appeared on
aus.electronics - you said nothing.

As soon as "Trevor Tosspot's Porky List" appears, you begin
ranting about O/T posts.

Trevor did not start threads about those subject, you crossed the line
when you did.
Oh, so you're making the rules now, good luck with that.

Give my regards to Dorothy

For someone given to calling others wankers, you're awful sensitive
about suggestions about your own sexuality.
Well, you introduced her into our conversations, not me.
 
On Apr 17, 10:37 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Its not your message that is the problem its your personality. That
includes your obsession with Trevor Wilson If you simply ignored him, he
would be regarded as a harmless eccentric however, when you go stomping
around in your jackboots, you annoy the crap out of people and give
credence to his message.

That is why I decided to annoy the crap out of you
Hang on there Keefy, "harmless eccentric", I thought the correct title
was "one of aus.electronics long standing and highly respected
posters"? Please explain when TW's title changed?
 
On Apr 22, 9:05 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
On 22/04/2011 6:33 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On Apr 17, 10:37 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:

Its not your message that is the problem its your personality. That
includes your obsession with Trevor Wilson If you simply ignored him, he
would be regarded as a harmless eccentric however, when you go stomping
around in your jackboots, you annoy the crap out of people and give
credence to his message.

That is why I decided to annoy the crap out of you

Hang on there Keefy, "harmless eccentric", I thought the correct title
was "one of aus.electronics long standing and highly respected
posters"? Please explain when TW's title changed?

Please explain when I ever called TW "one of aus.electronics long
standing and highly respected posters"
Wasn't that how he was described by somone when Trevor Tosspot's Porky
List first went up on aus.electronics. I didn't say you used the
desription, what I said was this dickhead posting his anti-gun drivel
on aus.electronics was considered one of aus.electronics long standing
and highly respected posters, he was not considered a "harmless
eccentric" by those reading his posts there.

These people didn't ming in the least their long standing and highly
respected poster, putting his antigun and antigunowner drivel up, but
got very upset when alternative viewpoint appearred. Remember now?
 
On Apr 22, 9:08 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Just doing to you as you do unto others.
OK, so I'm someone special am I, let me remind you of something, I
treat others exactly as they deserve to be treated, if someone (or a
group of people) chooses to treat me with courtesy and respect, that
is exactly what they'll get back, similarly, if someone chooses to
respond with abuse and contempt, that's also what they'll get back.

You and your mates over at aus.electronics said nothing about TW's
anti-gun drivel going up there, but went feral when alternative
viewpoint appeared, including calling people childish names, you've
admitted that the only reason you're still posting on
aus.politics.guns is to "annoy the crap out of" me, and you're sooking
about my behaviour. You get back from me exactly what you deserve,
don't like it, tough.
 
On Apr 23, 8:54 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
On 23/04/2011 9:08 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On Apr 22, 9:08 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:

Just doing to you as you do unto others.

OK, so I'm someone special am I,

No you are just an ordinary Mk 1 standard arsehole
It's nice to know I've left an impression

let me remind you of something, I
treat others exactly as they deserve to be treated, if someone (or a
group of people) chooses to treat me with courtesy and respect, that
is exactly what they'll get back, similarly, if someone chooses to
respond with abuse and contempt, that's also what they'll get back.

When have you ever treated anybody whose views do not 100% align with
yours, with courtesy and respect?
Often, why do you ask, how is it relevant to our discussions?

You and your mates over at aus.electronics said nothing about TW's
anti-gun drivel going up there, but went feral when alternative
viewpoint appeared, including calling people childish names, you've
admitted that the only reason you're still posting on
aus.politics.guns is to "annoy the crap out of" me, and you're sooking
about my behaviour. You get back from me exactly what you deserve,
don't like it, tough.

You disrespect people and they treat you like an arsehole, fact of life.
Since you treat anybody that doesn't 100% agree with you like shit,
expect to be treated like shit yourself.
Well, I wasn't the one who started flinging insults, but suddenly it's
all my fault. As I said, you'll get back from me exactly what you
deserve, don't like it, tough.

I do notice the only time you haven't treated others like an arsehole
was when you wanted something, (information about deactivated antiques
if I remember rightly) and you got all upset when told fuck off and
find it yourself.
 
On Apr 24, 12:28 am, John-Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 23, 8:18 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:





On 23/04/2011 8:40 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On Apr 22, 9:05 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>  wrote:
On 22/04/2011 6:33 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On Apr 17, 10:37 pm, keithr<ke...@nowhere.com.au>    wrote:

Its not your message that is the problem its your personality. That
includes your obsession with Trevor Wilson If you simply ignored him, he
would be regarded as a harmless eccentric however, when you go stomping
around in your jackboots, you annoy the crap out of people and give
credence to his message.

That is why I decided to annoy the crap out of you

Hang on there Keefy, "harmless eccentric", I thought the correct title
was "one of aus.electronics long standing and highly respected
posters"? Please explain when TW's title changed?

Please explain when I ever called TW "one of aus.electronics long
standing and highly respected posters"

Wasn't that how he was described by somone when Trevor Tosspot's Porky
List first went up on aus.electronics. I didn't say you used the
desription, what I said was this dickhead posting his anti-gun drivel
on aus.electronics was considered one of aus.electronics long standing
and highly respected posters, he was not considered a "harmless
eccentric" by those reading his posts there.

So, lets get this clear, anybody expressing an opinion that contradicts
your own opinion is a a dickhead expressing anti-gun drivel thats a
mighty ego that you have there princess. you are always right and
anybody with a contrary opinion is a dickhead, who do you think you are
- the Pope?

You still here? for someone who's only purpose in life is to annoy the
crap out of me, you're awfully entertaining.





If TW isn't a harmless eccentric, please provide proof that he has
caused any sort of harm to gun owners.

These people didn't ming in the least their long standing and highly
respected poster, putting his antigun and antigunowner drivel up, but
got very upset when alternative viewpoint appearred. Remember now?

I am not sure whether they minged is or not, I don't know what minging is.

What is this obsession that you have with TW? Do you fancy him or something?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
 
On 28/04/2011 5:36 AM, Baron wrote:
Franc Zabkar Inscribed thus:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:03:33 +0100, "Ian Field"
gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> put finger to keyboard and composed:

http://www.oldradios.co.nz/downloads/

Thanks for that info.

BTW, can anyone gain access to the manuals?
http://www.oldradios.co.nz/data/manuals.htm

I just see an empty "NewFolder".

- Franc Zabkar

Yes ! That is all I see here. I've tried it with both Linux and
Winblows...

Works fine here
quite a few folders in fact

--
X-No-Archive: Yes
 
On 28/04/2011 7:06 AM, atec77 wrote:
On 28/04/2011 5:36 AM, Baron wrote:
Franc Zabkar Inscribed thus:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:03:33 +0100, "Ian Field"
gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> put finger to keyboard and composed:

http://www.oldradios.co.nz/downloads/

Thanks for that info.

BTW, can anyone gain access to the manuals?
http://www.oldradios.co.nz/data/manuals.htm

I just see an empty "NewFolder".

- Franc Zabkar

Yes ! That is all I see here. I've tried it with both Linux and
Winblows...

Works fine here
quite a few folders in fact

Have you found any manuals? Plenty of folders pointing to same "New
Folder". I've tried logging in with FTP client and still just a "New Folder"

Tom
 
On 28-Apr-11 7:47 AM, Tom wrote:

Have you found any manuals? Plenty of folders pointing to same "New Folder". I've tried logging in with FTP client and
still just a "New Folder"

Tom
All the ones I tried are named new folder with no files.

Cheers Don...

===================


--
Don McKenzie

Dontronics Blog: http://www.GodzillaSeaMonkey.com
Dontronics Site Map: http://www.dontronics.com/sitemap
E-Mail Contact Page: http://www.dontronics.com/email
Web Camera Page: http://www.dontronics.com/webcam
No More Damn Spam: http://www.dontronics.com/spam

These products will reduce in price by 5% every month:
http://www.dontronics-shop.com/minus-5-every-month.html
http://www.dontronics-shop.com/ics.html

Bare Proto PCB for PIC or AVR projects?
"I'd buy that for a Dollar!".
 
On 28/04/2011 7:47 AM, Tom wrote:
On 28/04/2011 7:06 AM, atec77 wrote:
On 28/04/2011 5:36 AM, Baron wrote:
Franc Zabkar Inscribed thus:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:03:33 +0100, "Ian Field"
gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> put finger to keyboard and composed:

http://www.oldradios.co.nz/downloads/

Thanks for that info.

BTW, can anyone gain access to the manuals?
http://www.oldradios.co.nz/data/manuals.htm

I just see an empty "NewFolder".

- Franc Zabkar

Yes ! That is all I see here. I've tried it with both Linux and
Winblows...

Works fine here
quite a few folders in fact

Have you found any manuals? Plenty of folders pointing to same "New
Folder". I've tried logging in with FTP client and still just a "New
Folder"

Tom
Index of ftp://manuals@valveaudio.co.nz@valveaudio.co.nz/New Folder/
appears through most of them however it appears the manuals are
available elsewhere and access to the base files is blocked somehow
through permission alterations
Kinda odd

--
X-No-Archive: Yes
 
After serious thinking atec77 wrote :
On 28/04/2011 7:47 AM, Tom wrote:
On 28/04/2011 7:06 AM, atec77 wrote:
On 28/04/2011 5:36 AM, Baron wrote:
Franc Zabkar Inscribed thus:

On Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:03:33 +0100, "Ian Field"
gangprobing.alien@ntlworld.com> put finger to keyboard and composed:

http://www.oldradios.co.nz/downloads/

Thanks for that info.

BTW, can anyone gain access to the manuals?
http://www.oldradios.co.nz/data/manuals.htm

I just see an empty "NewFolder".

- Franc Zabkar

Yes ! That is all I see here. I've tried it with both Linux and
Winblows...

Works fine here
quite a few folders in fact

Have you found any manuals? Plenty of folders pointing to same "New
Folder". I've tried logging in with FTP client and still just a "New
Folder"

Tom
Index of ftp://manuals@valveaudio.co.nz@valveaudio.co.nz/New Folder/
appears through most of them however it appears the manuals are available
elsewhere and access to the base files is blocked somehow through permission
alterations
Kinda odd
It does however say in the middle of that page
(http://www.oldradios.co.nz/downloads/)
This facility is current OFFLINE
Wot does that mean I wonder?

--
John G
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top