PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

Pretzl pig ignorantly lied
B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote

"NBN Co boss Mike Quigley has told a parliamentary
inquiry a final deal is likely to be several months away.

'Even once you've signed the definitive agreements, there's
shareholder approvals that need to be done ... (blah) (blah) (blah)"
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2011/05/16/3218170.htm

Meanwhile, Telstra continues to roll out 4G.

The NBN could bypass Telstra's delays and ducts completely with a
wireless local access network. How deeply are they committed to one
supplier? If they had an ounce of commonsense they'd be designing the
wireless access *right* *now*. How much does it cost to design a
wireless network? How much does it cost to *build* a wireless
network? Better make sure analogue TV spectrum is available eh?

You are a lying Tory Abbott clown

Due to Telstra not being able to keep most of it's aging copperwire repaired
That is a bare faced lie. Literally millions of DSL users use it fine every day.

(I'm in Sydney)
Literally millions of DSL users in Sydney use it fine every day.

broadband Internet via copperwire is just a lying joke.
You are a pig ignorant lying joke.

I have "4G" wireless called HSUPA.
HSUPA is 3G, not 4G
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSUPA

Seems to work as long as there is a tower in each short street
Works fine even without that.

each tower feed by optic fibre VERY dependant
on a limited amount of users accessing that tower.
Yep, that will always be the main downside with wireless.

At present when kids are home instead of school it becomes useless, intermittent.
Its nothing like as black and white as that here with nothing like that density of bases.

No way is wireless able to replace a GOOD landline connection.
Depends on what you call good.

It most certainly backs it up but COMPLETLY useless as only alternative.
Depends on what you want to do with it.

Removing the politics Australia's copperwire is crap,
That is a bare faced lie. Literally millions of DSL users use it fine every day.

only maintained where it's economic to do so.
Another bare faced pig ignorant lie.

For infrastructure reasons alone it needs replacing.
That is a bare faced lie. Literally millions of DSL users use it fine every day.

This will be done at a cost
No it wont, because the plug will be pulled on the gillard govt in a maximum
of 2.5 years and when that happens, thats the end of the NBN and any real
replacement of copper, if any replacement of copper ever makes it past the
approval of the Telstra shareholders and the ACCC anyway.

I don't know if this cost is recoverable
Corse it is.

but it needs to be done
That is a bare faced lie. Literally millions of DSL users use it fine every day.

and Testra is not going to do it or at least all of it
You did get that right, because it doesnt need to be replaced.

In most cases this is happening now where replacement
or new suburbs is being done already with optic fibre.
Another bare faced pig ignorant lie.

Copperwire has become old history.
Another bare faced pig ignorant lie.

Literally millions of DSL users use it fine every day.
 
12 v cfl are a waste of time , YOU WANT something you can get at the
corner shop. YOU WONT get 12 v cfls at the corner shop.


"Mickel" <mickel@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:4dd11714$0$2442$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
On 15/05/11 11:41 PM, no one wrote:
oatley electronics sell a cfl inverter that runs of 12 vdc and can
operate
up to 100w worth of 240 v cfl`s.

You can also get cfls that work direct off 12V. I have some in a shed on a
property and they are excellent. 3 x 25W units light the 6x6m shed very
nicely. Usually I just run the one light.

If you need to run it off 12v, like a battery or car type install,
looks like you would need to step
it up to the 32-36v required. Otherwise you will need to use a mains
supply to provide the voltage

That bit I figured out for myself :)

required. This would be a pain as power supplies with this output are
not commonplace.

That I'm not so sure about. Trevor said it would be easy tho :)
 
On 18/05/11 1:58 PM, no one wrote:
12 v cfl are a waste of time , YOU WANT something you can get at the
corner shop. YOU WONT get 12 v cfls at the corner shop.
My corner shop is online these days and these are plentiful there :) I
don't really see how the failing of local suppliers makes a product
better or worse. Although you can get them at bunnings so I guess
they're not that hard to come by, just a little pricey for bunnings.
Personally I think the 12V cfls are an excellent solution, it's very
simple to get lighting in a lot more places with them.

Michael
 
so you can get them from a online store " straight away ?" no.

buy or make a cfl driver / inverter for 240 v cfl`s then if your out campin
etc....you can buy them anywhere , heck even the corner shop and servo
sellem !.



"Mickel" <mickel@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:4dd3ae44$0$3033$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
On 18/05/11 1:58 PM, no one wrote:
12 v cfl are a waste of time , YOU WANT something you can get at the
corner shop. YOU WONT get 12 v cfls at the corner shop.

My corner shop is online these days and these are plentiful there :) I
don't really see how the failing of local suppliers makes a product better
or worse. Although you can get them at bunnings so I guess they're not
that hard to come by, just a little pricey for bunnings. Personally I
think the 12V cfls are an excellent solution, it's very simple to get
lighting in a lot more places with them.

Michael
 
On 19/05/11 6:47 PM, no one wrote:
so you can get them from a online store " straight away ?" no.
No, but as I said Bunnings sell them if I get desperate. As for online I
just have to buy a few extra. For my shed I bought a dozen

buy or make a cfl driver / inverter for 240 v cfl`s then if your out campin
etc....you can buy them anywhere , heck even the corner shop and servo
sellem !.
But doesn't that just transfer the problem to the driver? :)

Michael
 
Peter Webb wrote:

Be thankful you live in Melbourne.
No thanks, they have compulsory demand tariffs there.

Up here, the ALP promised to buy back domestic solar energy at 60c per kWh, which is (cough) almost five times the
maximum tariff.
That last is WAY out.

So, what happens? Its not just little Mum's and Dad's putting 1 kWh
units on their rooftops in Blacktown, lots of smart people realise
that being guaranteed a wholesale price five times that retail
Thats a lie.

was a no lose proposition,
There was always a potential to lose, even the labor scheme had a
time limit until it was reviewed.

so they stick $100k generators on the roofs of their five bedroomed houses.
Fuck all spend anything like that.

Now, the O'Farrell government has had to make the very brave decision to cut this back to 3 times the wholesale price,
Your multiplier is WAY out.

still making them a profit in the long term
Nope, the return on that capital isnt anything special.
You can get that in a bank deposit with a govt guarantee.

but not the massive profits created by the Labor incompetents simply to buy some cheap headlines.
They didnt do it to buy cheap headlines, they were actually stupid enough to think it made sense.

AND its a GROSS feed in tariff too, you get paid that even if you use the electricity generated yourself too.

Just plain barking mad and a large part of the reason we have seen our electricity bills hike so dramatically.


"B J Foster" <bjfoster@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:ir2op6$38a$1@bjf.motzarella.org...
On 19/05/2011 3:24 PM, DavidW wrote:
I'm sure everyone here has been very worried that the NBN might
stopped dead if
the coalition wins the next election, since it's their policy to do
that,

Rubbish.

but
you can all relax. The NBN is locked in, done and dusted.

That's the last reason in the world to relax.

With all sorts of
contracts signed by then it will just be too late for the coalition
to do anything about it.

Like the Melbourne desalination plant?

"EVERY Melbourne household will have to pay more than $11,000 in
water charges in the next 30 years *before* *turning* *on* *the*
*tap*. Premier Ted Baillieu said the contract signed by the former Labor
government for the 'white elephant' desalination plant couldn't be
broken and households would have the red ink on their bills for
years"
http://www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/article/2011/03/01/300691_latest-news.html

Brumby's Labor had NO MORAL or ETHICAL RIGHT to commit the next 7
governments to paying for this abortion.

Now *you* are crowing that *this* immoral/unethical Federal Labor
government wil do the same thing?

Typical Labor - no values, no principles, no ethics.

anything about it. No doubt this news will come as a huge relief to
all of you.
The NBN is here to stay.
http://www.theage.com.au/business/new-england-stretch-of-nbn-sure-to-entrench-the-project-politically-20110518-1et2r.html


Liar. It will stay but it will be built for one fifth of the cost.

Labor should *never* be permitted to manage public money
 
"Bruce Varley" <bv@NoSpam.com> wrote in message news:...
"StrandElectric" <Strand@dummyspit> wrote in message
news:4e004ab0$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Can anybody with a good inductance meter, please measure a 10 watt
wirewound resistor of 820oms and tell me the inductance. I am getting
wildly different figures from various sources.

Thanks all.
*if* it's a straight coil of wire with an air core, then Wheelers formula
gives a reasonable result for inductance.

L (uH) = (r*r + n*n) / (9r + 10l)

Dimensions all in inches.
r = coil radius
n = no of turns
l = coil cylinder length


Sorry, correct equation:
L (uH) = (r*r*n*n) / (9r + 10l)
 
"Bruce Varley"

*if* it's a straight coil of wire with an air core, then Wheelers formula
gives a reasonable result for inductance.

** That formula is not gonna be accurate since it assumes the turns are
close packed - which they cannot be in a WW resistor.

So the number you get will be high by a factor of maybe 2 or 3.



..... Phil
 
"Joey.G"
I think I have a diffuclt request. I am looking for the nuts (14pcs)
that suit the Vishay (formerly International Rectifier) diode set.

Data sheet of diode set
http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/203cmq080.pdf

Picture of nuts can be seen here
https://picasaweb.google.com/jjoey.gold/203CMQ100Nuts?authuser=0&feat=directlink

hex of nut is 8mm total length including head is 14 mm .

Any pointers where I might get them would be appreciated.

** Have you tried a standard 1/4 inch UNC bolt ?

Chances are it will work fine.

Short thread ones are a bit rare - so a hacksaw might be handy ...

Use SS if nickel plated are hard to find.



..... Phil
 
On 11/07/2011 3:45 PM, Phil Allison wrote:
"Joey.G"

I think I have a diffuclt request. I am looking for the nuts (14pcs)
that suit the Vishay (formerly International Rectifier) diode set.

Data sheet of diode set
http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/203cmq080.pdf

Picture of nuts can be seen here
https://picasaweb.google.com/jjoey.gold/203CMQ100Nuts?authuser=0&feat=directlink

hex of nut is 8mm total length including head is 14 mm .

Any pointers where I might get them would be appreciated.


** Have you tried a standard 1/4 inch UNC bolt ?

Chances are it will work fine.

Short thread ones are a bit rare - so a hacksaw might be handy ...

Use SS if nickel plated are hard to find.



.... Phil

Like Phil says short bolts may be hard to find. If its not critical use
a longer bolt & run a nut down the thread.

Plain old gutter bolts sold by most hardwares are 1/4 UNC. Cut the
thread of some & screw them into the diode & then run nuts down the thread.
 
Dennis wrote:
On 11/07/2011 3:45 PM, Phil Allison wrote:
"Joey.G"

I think I have a diffuclt request. I am looking for the nuts (14pcs)
that suit the Vishay (formerly International Rectifier) diode set.

Data sheet of diode set
http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/203cmq080.pdf

Picture of nuts can be seen here
https://picasaweb.google.com/jjoey.gold/203CMQ100Nuts?authuser=0&feat=directlink


hex of nut is 8mm total length including head is 14 mm .

Any pointers where I might get them would be appreciated.


** Have you tried a standard 1/4 inch UNC bolt ?

Chances are it will work fine.

Short thread ones are a bit rare - so a hacksaw might be handy ...

Use SS if nickel plated are hard to find.



.... Phil






Like Phil says short bolts may be hard to find. If its not critical use
a longer bolt & run a nut down the thread.

Plain old gutter bolts sold by most hardwares are 1/4 UNC. Cut the
thread of some & screw them into the diode & then run nuts down the thread.

My plain old gutter bolts are 1/4' whitworth
 
On 11/07/2011 5:02 PM, F Murtz wrote:
Dennis wrote:
On 11/07/2011 3:45 PM, Phil Allison wrote:
"Joey.G"

I think I have a diffuclt request. I am looking for the nuts (14pcs)
that suit the Vishay (formerly International Rectifier) diode set.

Data sheet of diode set
http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/203cmq080.pdf

Picture of nuts can be seen here
https://picasaweb.google.com/jjoey.gold/203CMQ100Nuts?authuser=0&feat=directlink



hex of nut is 8mm total length including head is 14 mm .

Any pointers where I might get them would be appreciated.


** Have you tried a standard 1/4 inch UNC bolt ?

Chances are it will work fine.

Short thread ones are a bit rare - so a hacksaw might be handy ...

Use SS if nickel plated are hard to find.



.... Phil






Like Phil says short bolts may be hard to find. If its not critical use
a longer bolt & run a nut down the thread.

Plain old gutter bolts sold by most hardwares are 1/4 UNC. Cut the
thread of some & screw them into the diode & then run nuts down the
thread.


My plain old gutter bolts are 1/4' whitworth

Doh! So are mine......

Pehaps some 1/4 unc allthread from bunnings then.
 
Dennis wrote:
On 11/07/2011 5:02 PM, F Murtz wrote:
Dennis wrote:
On 11/07/2011 3:45 PM, Phil Allison wrote:
"Joey.G"

I think I have a diffuclt request. I am looking for the nuts (14pcs)
that suit the Vishay (formerly International Rectifier) diode set.

Data sheet of diode set
http://www.irf.com/product-info/datasheets/data/203cmq080.pdf

Picture of nuts can be seen here
https://picasaweb.google.com/jjoey.gold/203CMQ100Nuts?authuser=0&feat=directlink




hex of nut is 8mm total length including head is 14 mm .

Any pointers where I might get them would be appreciated.


** Have you tried a standard 1/4 inch UNC bolt ?

Chances are it will work fine.

Short thread ones are a bit rare - so a hacksaw might be handy ...

Use SS if nickel plated are hard to find.



.... Phil






Like Phil says short bolts may be hard to find. If its not critical use
a longer bolt & run a nut down the thread.

Plain old gutter bolts sold by most hardwares are 1/4 UNC. Cut the
thread of some & screw them into the diode & then run nuts down the
thread.


My plain old gutter bolts are 1/4' whitworth


Doh! So are mine......

Pehaps some 1/4 unc allthread from bunnings then.
1/4" whitworth and 1/4"unc are exactly the same. They are
interchangable. 1/2" is the only size where whitworth and unc are not
interchangable (the thread pitch is different).

Short bolts with thread all the way down are available, they are called
set screws and in 1/4" size should be readily available down to 1/2" length.

Most 1/4" hardware is common in zinc plated finish. Stainless steel is
also common.
 
"Peter Webb" <webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> wrote:

"Gordon Levi" <gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:eek:93u575v44r9o9obf5erl1uaq8qitrg873@4ax.com...
Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> wrote:

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

On 26/08/2011 11:41 PM, Gordon Levi wrote:
"Peter Webb"<webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> wrote:


"Gordon Levi"<gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:0re757p8u7bhm7brerom902arsg6leueo6@4ax.com...
"Peter Webb"<webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> wrote:


"Gordon Levi"<gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:j65157linfjb0rfk61l01kbkbqh27a3ffp@4ax.com...
Specifically?

What does the STB do that a computer can't, other than verifying the
card
is
inserted?

The only possible application is for
people who don't own a computer and want to watch TV. And that has
nothing
to do with whether it is multicasted.

To quote a wise poster to this newsgroup "At the consumer end, there
is no practical difference". Who cares if a consumer wants to watch
live sport on their TV? They should learn to be patient and how to
navigate the Internet on a computer so they can eventually download
it
from YouTube. If they don't have a computer they should buy one.

Or, they should pay for the internet connection themselves. I can't
see why
the taxpayer should spend $50b to subsidise the broadcasting of live
sports.

You have it backwards. The use of NBN Co's network to broadcast TV is
likely to subsidise other users.

Rubbish. You don't have to be an Engineer to work out that the use of
point-to-point networks for 1:many content is stupid. 'Stupid'
translates to 'expensive' in the real world.

Eh? How can you convey data from one point to another without a
"point-to-point network".

You use a broadcast network. One signal is received by multiple recipients.

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/80540/broadcast-network

"A broadcast network avoids the complex routing procedures of a switched
network by ensuring that each node's transmissions are received by all other
nodes in the network. Therefore, a broadcast network has only a single
communications channel. A wired local area network (LAN), for example, may
be set up as a broadcast network, with one user connected to each node and
the nodes typically..."
Are you saying that, when the NBN is being used as a broadcast network
by a multicast TV source, NBN Co will have to switch the signal to
each subscriber and block it to those that don't subscribe? That is
certainly not how the HFC network works. It would explain why you
believe that "cable" TV over the NBN will not require a set top box.
How does the NBN network differ in this
regard from free-to-air or cable TV? They all require a single media
source and multiple destinations.

A broadcast network only requires a single circuit to reach multiple
recipients.
_Every_ network requires a circuit from the source to each desired
destination. I suppose that a ring topology might be regarded as a
"single circuit" but that is not the network model being implemented
by NBN Co.
Or did you think they broadcast Free to Air TV just for you?
On the contrary. There is a circuit from the transmitter to my TV
aerial and a circuit to every other aerial in range. If you happen to
be confined to a Faraday cage there will be no circuit and you will
not receive FTA TV.
 
Gordon Levi wrote:

Are you saying that, when the NBN is being used as a broadcast network
by a multicast TV source, NBN Co will have to switch the signal to
each subscriber and block it to those that don't subscribe?
No, the NBN has absolutely nothing to do with it. Managed by the ISP
that gives you access to the multicast channels.You don't have access to
the NBN, but just a VPn back to your ISP, like now.
 
"Gordon Levi" <gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:kv4v57hhhbmg7aap52iei7clafrtj5e6o5@4ax.com...
"Peter Webb" <webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> wrote:


"Gordon Levi" <gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:eek:93u575v44r9o9obf5erl1uaq8qitrg873@4ax.com...
Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> wrote:

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

On 26/08/2011 11:41 PM, Gordon Levi wrote:
"Peter Webb"<webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> wrote:


"Gordon Levi"<gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:0re757p8u7bhm7brerom902arsg6leueo6@4ax.com...
"Peter Webb"<webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> wrote:


"Gordon Levi"<gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:j65157linfjb0rfk61l01kbkbqh27a3ffp@4ax.com...
Specifically?

What does the STB do that a computer can't, other than verifying
the
card
is
inserted?

The only possible application is for
people who don't own a computer and want to watch TV. And that
has
nothing
to do with whether it is multicasted.

To quote a wise poster to this newsgroup "At the consumer end,
there
is no practical difference". Who cares if a consumer wants to watch
live sport on their TV? They should learn to be patient and how to
navigate the Internet on a computer so they can eventually download
it
from YouTube. If they don't have a computer they should buy one.

Or, they should pay for the internet connection themselves. I can't
see why
the taxpayer should spend $50b to subsidise the broadcasting of live
sports.

You have it backwards. The use of NBN Co's network to broadcast TV is
likely to subsidise other users.

Rubbish. You don't have to be an Engineer to work out that the use of
point-to-point networks for 1:many content is stupid. 'Stupid'
translates to 'expensive' in the real world.

Eh? How can you convey data from one point to another without a
"point-to-point network".

You use a broadcast network. One signal is received by multiple
recipients.

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/80540/broadcast-network

"A broadcast network avoids the complex routing procedures of a switched
network by ensuring that each node's transmissions are received by all
other
nodes in the network. Therefore, a broadcast network has only a single
communications channel. A wired local area network (LAN), for example, may
be set up as a broadcast network, with one user connected to each node and
the nodes typically..."


Are you saying that, when the NBN is being used as a broadcast network
by a multicast TV source, NBN Co will have to switch the signal to
each subscriber and block it to those that don't subscribe?
*I* didn't say anything. That is from the Encyclopedia Brittania. If you
still don't know the difference between point-to-point and broadcast
networks, I suggest you Google for yourself at this point.


That is
certainly not how the HFC network works. It would explain why you
believe that "cable" TV over the NBN will not require a set top box.
How does the NBN network differ in this
regard from free-to-air or cable TV? They all require a single media
source and multiple destinations.

A broadcast network only requires a single circuit to reach multiple
recipients.

_Every_ network requires a circuit from the source to each desired
destination. I suppose that a ring topology might be regarded as a
"single circuit" but that is not the network model being implemented
by NBN Co.
FM radio is "broadcast". Walkie Talkie's are "point-to-point".

Normal TV is "broadcast". Fibre is "point-to-point".


Or did you think they broadcast Free to Air TV just for you?

On the contrary. There is a circuit from the transmitter to my TV
aerial and a circuit to every other aerial in range.
One, single circuit for every user. Unlike point-to-point media like fibre.


If you happen to
be confined to a Faraday cage there will be no circuit and you will
not receive FTA TV.
 
"Peter Webb" <webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> wrote in message
news:4e5fabf8$0$22470$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
"Gordon Levi" <gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:kv4v57hhhbmg7aap52iei7clafrtj5e6o5@4ax.com...
"Peter Webb" <webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> wrote:


"Gordon Levi" <gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:eek:93u575v44r9o9obf5erl1uaq8qitrg873@4ax.com...
Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> wrote:

B J Foster <bjfoster@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

On 26/08/2011 11:41 PM, Gordon Levi wrote:
"Peter Webb"<webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> wrote:


"Gordon Levi"<gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:0re757p8u7bhm7brerom902arsg6leueo6@4ax.com...
"Peter Webb"<webbfamily@optusnetDIESPAMDIE.com.au> wrote:


"Gordon Levi"<gordon@address.invalid> wrote in message
news:j65157linfjb0rfk61l01kbkbqh27a3ffp@4ax.com...
Specifically?

What does the STB do that a computer can't, other than verifying
the
card
is
inserted?

The only possible application is for
people who don't own a computer and want to watch TV. And that
has
nothing
to do with whether it is multicasted.

To quote a wise poster to this newsgroup "At the consumer end,
there
is no practical difference". Who cares if a consumer wants to
watch
live sport on their TV? They should learn to be patient and how to
navigate the Internet on a computer so they can eventually
download
it
from YouTube. If they don't have a computer they should buy one.

Or, they should pay for the internet connection themselves. I can't
see why
the taxpayer should spend $50b to subsidise the broadcasting of
live
sports.

You have it backwards. The use of NBN Co's network to broadcast TV
is
likely to subsidise other users.

Rubbish. You don't have to be an Engineer to work out that the use of
point-to-point networks for 1:many content is stupid. 'Stupid'
translates to 'expensive' in the real world.

Eh? How can you convey data from one point to another without a
"point-to-point network".

You use a broadcast network. One signal is received by multiple
recipients.

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/80540/broadcast-network

"A broadcast network avoids the complex routing procedures of a switched
network by ensuring that each node's transmissions are received by all
other
nodes in the network. Therefore, a broadcast network has only a single
communications channel. A wired local area network (LAN), for example,
may
be set up as a broadcast network, with one user connected to each node
and
the nodes typically..."


Are you saying that, when the NBN is being used as a broadcast network
by a multicast TV source, NBN Co will have to switch the signal to
each subscriber and block it to those that don't subscribe?

*I* didn't say anything. That is from the Encyclopedia Brittania. If you
still don't know the difference between point-to-point and broadcast
networks, I suggest you Google for yourself at this point.


That is
certainly not how the HFC network works. It would explain why you
believe that "cable" TV over the NBN will not require a set top box.
How does the NBN network differ in this
regard from free-to-air or cable TV? They all require a single media
source and multiple destinations.

A broadcast network only requires a single circuit to reach multiple
recipients.

_Every_ network requires a circuit from the source to each desired
destination. I suppose that a ring topology might be regarded as a
"single circuit" but that is not the network model being implemented
by NBN Co.

FM radio is "broadcast". Walkie Talkie's are "point-to-point".
Walkie-talkies are not point to point they are broadcast as anyone on that
frequency in range can pick up that signal
Normal TV is "broadcast". Fibre is "point-to-point".



Or did you think they broadcast Free to Air TV just for you?

On the contrary. There is a circuit from the transmitter to my TV
aerial and a circuit to every other aerial in range.

One, single circuit for every user. Unlike point-to-point media like
fibre.
It makes no difference that fiber or cable can be used for TV
If you happen to
be confined to a Faraday cage there will be no circuit and you will
not receive FTA TV.
 
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 01:28:43 +1000, terryc
<newsninespam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote:

Gordon Levi wrote:

Are you saying that, when the NBN is being used as a broadcast network
by a multicast TV source, NBN Co will have to switch the signal to
each subscriber and block it to those that don't subscribe?

No, the NBN has absolutely nothing to do with it. Managed by the ISP
that gives you access to the multicast channels.You don't have access to
the NBN, but just a VPn back to your ISP, like now.
NBN is indeed a TV broadcaster, transmitting on Channel 3 and digital
channel 8.
 
Barry OGrady wrote:

NBN is indeed a TV broadcaster, transmitting on Channel 3 and digital
channel 8.
Can you explain that since it doesn't seem to be listed anywhere?

Apart from the fact that it wasn't what was being discussed.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top