S
Sylvia Else
Guest
On 3/12/2010 3:21 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
Sylvia.
I narrowed it down some."Sylvia Else"<sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote in...
On 3/12/2010 3:03 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
"Sylvia Else"<sylvia@not.here.invalid<mailto:sylvia@not.here.invalid
wrote in ...
On 3/12/2010 2:28 PM, |-|ercules wrote:
"Sylvia Else"<sylvia@not.here.invalid
mailto:sylvia@not.here.invalid>> wrote ...
BTW, is there any good reason you can't post all these results to a
single thread, rather than starting a new thread for each of
them?
Sylvia.
If you can give a reason why that is preferred,
It's preferred because people who don't want to see this stuff, but
don't want to killfile you totally, could just kill the thread.
Sylvia.
And what sample of the population would actually do that nonsense?
Herc
Without conceding that it's nonsense, I can state that the answer lies between 1 (because I would do it) and 1 less than the total
number of readers (because I assume that you wouldn't), inclusive.
Sylvia.
So you just proved you have no idea.
Sylvia.