T
Trevor Wilson
Guest
"paul packer" <packer@iprimus.com.au> wrote in message
news:439d032f.3346195@news.iprimus.com.au...
They
using the same technology they were using prior to the introduction of PE
topology. And further: The "Minor power boosting" was hardly minor. The NAD
2200 amplifier was capable of FOUR TIMES the power on transients.
The question is, if
Also, why has no one but you
NAD voted with their wallets.
And why do they continue to enjoy
comments about the large amount of transient power, vs. Dollars and
packaging size.
And why did the
question.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au
news:439d032f.3346195@news.iprimus.com.au...
**Not necessarily. GOOD technology remains.On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 04:28:00 GMT, "Trevor Wilson"
trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
I still don't buy it that NAD
went downhill during the 90s due to some obscure design flaw in their
products ("PE"). They did probably lose some ground with the
relatively uninspiring 302/304--312/314 amp line, but then quickly
made up for that with the 320/340 line, on up to the current 320BEE.
**And yet, they've ceased building PE technology into their products. If
it
was such a brilliant idea, they'd keep doing it.
I can think of several reasons why not. All technology moves on.
They
**NAD do not achieve the same end, using different technology. They are nowmay simply have found a better way of achieving the same end, or
decided such minor power boosting was superfluous.
using the same technology they were using prior to the introduction of PE
topology. And further: The "Minor power boosting" was hardly minor. The NAD
2200 amplifier was capable of FOUR TIMES the power on transients.
The question is, if
**Not necessarily. NAD just lost it's way. They forgot their roots.PE amps sounded so bad and NAD discovered this, why did they not
discover it during the design stages?
Also, why has no one but you
**I'm not the only one. The people who chose products like Rotel instead ofever suggested PE amps sound bad?
NAD voted with their wallets.
And why do they continue to enjoy
**See previous discussion about PERCEIVED quality. Also see my previoussuch a fine reputation with vintage gear enthusiasts who are usually
very knowing about these things (check Ebay prices).
comments about the large amount of transient power, vs. Dollars and
packaging size.
And why did the
**What speakers did you use?PE amp I had sound so good (pretty much on a par with the much later,
and much celebrated, Rotel 931 Mk11. I was able to directly compare
them over several weeks).
**After you tell me what speakers you used, I should be able to answer yourYou should know that there's a secret prize for answering these
questions satisfactorily.
question.
--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au