PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[MC]

Rod Speed wrote:

zpk <zpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom.es.it.net
wrote in message news:408eb22a.789244@news1.eircom.net...
Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote

It was in the quoting you just carefully deleted, arsehole.

begorrah begorrah...

shure isnt dat wonderful language to be typing on this newsgroup ?

You get to like it or lump it, bog trotting arsehole.

what will all these YOUNG M3's think now?

That you're a terminal fuckwit most likely.

sigh.. another entry into my killfile.
(and of course Rod will reply with another predefined insult)

 

[Geoff]

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in news:c6mr30$dgbf5$1@ID-
69072.news.uni-berlin.de:

Geoff <geoff@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns94D888A4019BCgeoffmailnews@158.152.254.254...
Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote

More completely irrelevant waffle. Nothing to do with that stupid
claim you made about lifeguards still using semaphore. They dont.

Where did I say that?

Says he carefully deleting from the quoting what was said.

Another flagrantly dishonest arsehole.

What I said was "The signals they (the lifeguard equivalents)
use are called "landing signals". They differ somewhat from
semaphore, but the principal is the same."

Pity the principle is completely different. Landing signals DO
NOT spell out the message letter by letter. Semaphore does.

Thats not what you said initially, you flagrantly dishonest arsehole.

In that they are both waving arms/flags etc. about they are the
same, but the meaning of the movements are quite different.

So the 'principal' is nothing like the same. The ONLY similarly
is that arms and flags are normally used and flags arent usually
used with landing signals, normally just arms.

Particular arm positions in semaphore mean different
characters, unlike landing signals, where each
"arm position" means a different action should be taken.

What the fuck is the point in repeating what I already said, fuckwit ?

You were always just plain wrong with your original claim that there
is any 'principal' in common between semaphore and landing signals.

This is an excellent example of somebody who, when failing in debate,

resorts to the profane.

YG

 

[Geoff]

zpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom.es.it.net (zpk) wrote in
news:408eb0c8.434996@news1.eircom.net:

I SAY 12WPM FOR HF OR STAY ON VHF.

So? Who cares in the slightest what you say - although at least you do not
decend into profanity when your argument fails, unlike a certain "Mr
Speed".

YG

 

[Trevor Day]

In message <c6mn01$dgkad$1@ID-69072.news.uni-berlin.de>, Rod Speed
<rod_speed@yahoo.com> writes

Trevor Day <Trev@secornwall.removethis.com> wrote in
message news:eYMYzGY58sjAFwgY@secornwall.com...
see sea oh ecks at you aitch see dot comm
spammers@bugger.off.invalid> writes
Jock <afton370@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

I doubt that the _Royal_ Navy uses it
any more, but certainly other navies do.

Doubt it as much as you like; I'm sure that Commander Trev
DOES KNOW FOR SURE that the Andrew still use it.

Agreed, and ( some are definitely not going to like this

Fantasy. I just asked if semaphore was used anymore FOR FUN.
AND I clearly said that a few loons may well be doing that.

After all, some do some quite remarkably silly things
FOR FUN like train spotting, bird spotting, etc etc etc
and it wouldnt surprise me in the slightest if someone
is still foisting it on kids in the sea scouts etc even now.

semaphore is still used in the RN but largely between the RN and
RFA to pass personal messages between COs during refuelling.

Why instead of those light systems whatever they are called ?

This won't go on forever as semaphore is no longer a compulsory
part of the signallers trade (unlike Morse code) but, as long as there
are those who want to learn it, there will be an avenue for its use.

I am just telling you how it is. There is no particular reason for you
to believe me other than understanding that I would not post garbage
under my own name and email address. I will correct matters of fact
where I have personal expertise (when I can be bothered) similarly, I
will not post information unless I believe it factual.

What you do with the info I provide is entirely your problem but don't
expect me to waste time discussing it with you.

Trev
--
Trevor Day

 

[Binary Era]

Geoff wrote:

This is an excellent example of somebody who, when failing in debate,
resorts to the profane.

And when profanity fails top work, he gives you.....more profanity!

--
Binary Era

 

[Rod Speed]

Some gutless fuckwit pom desperately cowering behind
Geoff <geoff@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns94D94CE7CD76Fgeoffmailnews@158.152.254.254...
just the shit you'd expect from a desperately cowering gutless fuckwit pom.

 

[Rod Speed]

Trevor Day <Trev@secornwall.removethis.com> wrote
in message news:uCJ0lfbt62jAFwH7@secornwall.com...

Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> writes
Trevor Day <Trev@secornwall.removethis.com> wrote
spammers@bugger.off.invalid> wrote
Jock <afton370@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

I doubt that the _Royal_ Navy uses it
any more, but certainly other navies do.

Doubt it as much as you like; I'm sure that Commander Trev
DOES KNOW FOR SURE that the Andrew still use it.

Agreed, and ( some are definitely not going to like this

Fantasy. I just asked if semaphore was used anymore FOR FUN.
AND I clearly said that a few loons may well be doing that.

After all, some do some quite remarkably silly things
FOR FUN like train spotting, bird spotting, etc etc etc
and it wouldnt surprise me in the slightest if someone
is still foisting it on kids in the sea scouts etc even now.

semaphore is still used in the RN but largely between the RN and
RFA to pass personal messages between COs during refuelling.

Why instead of those light systems whatever they are called ?

This won't go on forever as semaphore is no longer a compulsory
part of the signallers trade (unlike Morse code) but, as long as there
are those who want to learn it, there will be an avenue for its use.

I am just telling you how it is.

Crap, not on that stupid '( some are definitely not going to like this' claim.

There is no particular reason for you to believe me

I know that claim is stupid shit.

other than understanding that I would not post
garbage under my own name and email address.

No one has any way of knowing if that is invented or not
and plenty are stupid enough to make very spectacular
fools of themselves even when they do use their own name.

I will correct matters of fact where I have
personal expertise (when I can be bothered)

That particular stupid '( some are definitely not going to like this'
claim aint even a matter of fact. Its just your stupid claim.

similarly, I will not post information unless I believe it factual.

You're beliefs have always been and always will be, completely
and utterly irrelevant with that particular stupid claim.

What you do with the info I provide is entirely your problem

No problem for anyone except you, wanker.

but don't expect me to waste time discussing it with you.

How odd that you did, fuckwit.

 

[Rod Speed]

"Geoff" <geoff@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:Xns94D94B076F982geoffmailnews@158.152.254.254...

"Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote in news:c6mr30$dgbf5$1@ID-
69072.news.uni-berlin.de:


Geoff <geoff@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns94D888A4019BCgeoffmailnews@158.152.254.254...
Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote

More completely irrelevant waffle. Nothing to do with that stupid
claim you made about lifeguards still using semaphore. They dont.

Where did I say that?

Says he carefully deleting from the quoting what was said.

Another flagrantly dishonest arsehole.

What I said was "The signals they (the lifeguard equivalents)
use are called "landing signals". They differ somewhat from
semaphore, but the principal is the same."

Pity the principle is completely different. Landing signals DO
NOT spell out the message letter by letter. Semaphore does.

Thats not what you said initially, you flagrantly dishonest arsehole.

In that they are both waving arms/flags etc. about they are the
same, but the meaning of the movements are quite different.

So the 'principal' is nothing like the same. The ONLY similarly
is that arms and flags are normally used and flags arent usually
used with landing signals, normally just arms.

Particular arm positions in semaphore mean different
characters, unlike landing signals, where each
"arm position" means a different action should be taken.

What the fuck is the point in repeating what I already said, fuckwit ?

You were always just plain wrong with your original claim that there
is any 'principal' in common between semaphore and landing signals.

This is an excellent example of somebody who, when failing in debate,
resorts to the profane.

Even a stupid desperately wanking stupid pom should be able to
bullshit its way out of its predicament better than that pathetic effort.

 

[Rod Speed]

Some gutless fuckwit desperately cowering behind
Binary Era <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
newsrru80pthpk2gdh55hrotf39sg7534mm75@4ax.com...
just what you'd exect from a desperately cowering gutless
fuckwit thats got done like a fucking dinner, as always.

 

[Slow Roddles]

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 06:22:31 +0000 (UTC), Geoff
<geoff@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:

This is an excellent example of somebody who, when failing in debate,
resorts to the profane.

YG

You're wasting your time complaining about Rod Speed he has a history
which goes back to the days of FIDO


http://www.picknowl.com.au/homepages/xaragmata/roddles.htm

 

[Matthew Haigh]

In article <Xns94DA9B4CFC3EBgeoffmailnews@158.152.254.254>, Geoff
<geoff@nospam.demon.co.uk> writes

Slow Roddles <v.vincent@mchsi.com> wrote in
news:35u190dhto7kmq3g9tlsi83f2knb4h5j15@4ax.com:

You're wasting your time complaining about Rod Speed he has a history
which goes back to the days of FIDO

I'm not complaining about him, I'm just using him as an example - and
killfiling him!

I've seen Rod around before - he does make u.r.a's resident troll seem
educated and eloquent by comparison

Matt
--
Matthew Haigh --$matthaigh{News06}$@haigh.org--
GCRSoft, providing SMS solutions since 1996...
http://www.gcrsoft.com http://www.moretext.com

 

[John Miller]

Rod Speed wrote to Trevor Day:
 

How odd that you did, fuckwit.

You really should put a carriage return between your closing and your
signature.  

--
John Miller

Children seldom misquote you.  In fact, they usually repeat word for
word what you shouldn't have said.

 

[Geoff]

Slow Roddles <v.vincent@mchsi.com> wrote in
news:35u190dhto7kmq3g9tlsi83f2knb4h5j15@4ax.com:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 06:22:31 +0000 (UTC), Geoff
geoff@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:


This is an excellent example of somebody who, when failing in debate,
resorts to the profane.

YG


You're wasting your time complaining about Rod Speed he has a history
which goes back to the days of FIDO

I'm not complaining about him, I'm just using him as an example - and

killfiling him!

Thanks for the info though.

YG

 

[Brian Reay]

"zpk" <zpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom.es.it.net> wrote in
message news:40916a76.476909@news1.eircom.net...

just longing for the retrun of a standard that DID keep the riff raff,
cb'ers and lazy B-licensees from turning 7mhz into 27mhz

But not an Irishman claiming to have a license from turning 7MHz into 7mhz
and 27MHz into 27mhz.

I'd expect and M3 to know the difference ;-)


--
73
Brian
G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk
www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk for FREE training material for all UK
amateur radio licences
www.phoenixradioclub.org.uk - a RADIO club specifically for those wishing
to learn more about amateur radio

 

[zpk]

On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 23:01:00 +0100, "Brian Reay"
<brian.reay@bigfoot.com> wrote:

"zpk" <zpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom.es.it.net> wrote in
message news:408eb0c8.434996@news1.eircom.net...
worrying about it. If he sees it as an 'issue' let him argue for its
removal.
REMOVAL !!!

NOT ON YOUR NELLY.

I SAY 12WPM FOR HF OR STAY ON VHF.

NONE OF THIS NAMBY PAMBY STUFF.

IF I CAN PASS 12WPM (THE SECOND TIME) THEN ANYONE WHO THINKS
THEYRE BETTER THAN ME CAN PASS IT (ON THE FIRST TIME??)


My, my. We are touchy tonight.

nahhh Brian...

just longing for the retrun of a standard that DID keep the riff raff,
cb'ers and lazy B-licensees from turning 7mhz into 27mhz



wahhhhhh ..the morse requirement is a nonsense.
look at these m3's getting more hf than we can wahhhhhhh

 

[zpk]

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 06:33:35 +0000 (UTC), Geoff
<geoff@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:

zpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom.es.it.net (zpk) wrote in
news:408eb0c8.434996@news1.eircom.net:

I SAY 12WPM FOR HF OR STAY ON VHF.

So? Who cares in the slightest what you say - although at least you do not
decend into profanity when your argument fails, unlike a certain "Mr

who says my argument falls ?

the facts are in front of you.

uk.r.a = over 260 posts in the 24hrs
uk.cb = 11 in the 24hrs

m3 licences issued to b-licensees in one year = over 2500

the rest made up of real beginners and cb'ers.


ten-four roger-d gud-buddy breaker qsk
its all on 40m to listen to.
even mr reay has admitted to hearing his disciples using cb-terms



and of course....





---

I prefer to consider myself an advanced CBer with an Amateur Licence.

neverchecked2468@yahoo.co.uk
14 Jul 2003

 

[zpk]

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 19:40:40 +1000, "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Some gutless XXXXXXX pom desperately cowering behind
Geoff <geoff@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns94D94CE7CD76Fgeoffmailnews@158.152.254.254...
just the XXXX you'd expect from a desperately cowering gutless XXXXXXX pom.

RSGB PSE NOTE.

THIS IS THE KIND OF RUBBISH ON THIS NEWSGROUP.

IN A LIITLE WHILE LONGER THIS IS WHAT WILL BE ON 40M.


WHEN YOU DONT EARN YOUR LICENCE YOU DONT VALUE IT.
IF YOU DONT VALUE YOUR LICENCE YOU DONT CARE.
IF YOU DONT CARE YOU WILL LOWER STANDARDS.


MULTI-BAND CB IS HERE.

 

[zpk]

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:25:44 +1000, "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com>
wrote:

And you dont need to be able to read morse at anything like
6wpm to do that, and dont need to be able to read it at all when
the NDB receiver decodes it itself and displays it in text format.
oh does it ?

on every aircraft does it ?

tell me now....wheres the ndb receiver in a boeing 767 ?

fact:
cpl and higher pilots are required
to pass a six words a minute morse *test*

XXXXXXXX.
hmmmmm.

the INCENTIVE to pass the morse test is
IF YOU WANNA YOUR PILOTS LICENCE - YOU PASSA DA TEST.

Wrong again.
incentive: if you wanna your pilots licence - you passa da air law.

but of course, a very similar incentive
was not acceptable to over 2500 people

There is no morse test for cpl anymore
in any of the main first world countrys.
hmmmmmm

i'm tempted but i wont.

 

[Brian Reay]

"zpk" <zpk_pkearn_class_a@multi_band_cb_is_here.eircom.es.it.net> wrote in
message news:40916c9c.1027244@news1.eircom.net...

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:25:44 +1000, "Rod Speed" <rod_speed@yahoo.com
wrote:

And you dont need to be able to read morse at anything like
6wpm to do that, and dont need to be able to read it at all when
the NDB receiver decodes it itself and displays it in text format.
oh does it ?

on every aircraft does it ?

tell me now....wheres the ndb receiver in a boeing 767 ?

When you have to have an amateur radio licence to fly a 767 this may be
relevant.

Get used to the idea. The ITU have decided that Morse is no longer required.
The IARU agree. Increasing number of national licensing authorities are
agreeing- rather rapidly (as predicted- it was all rubber stamped).

The change is long over due and if you plan on bleating until it changes
'back' you will still be bleating at your wake.

--
73
Brian
G8OSN
www.g8osn.org.uk
www.amateurradiotraining.org.uk for FREE training material for all UK
amateur radio licences
www.phoenixradioclub.org.uk - a RADIO club specifically for those wishing
to learn more about amateur radio

 

[zpk]

On Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:55:19 +1000, MC <MC@nonexistant.place> wrote:

sigh.. another entry into my killfile.
(and of course Rod will reply with another predefined insult)

seems to be a person of southern hemisphere origins ????????/