N
N Cook
Guest
"Marty" <NOSPAM_vk2umj@yahoo.com.au_NOSPAM> wrote in message
news:c64f8i$jij$1@austar-news.austar.net.au...
because I was forever relaying model numbers etc via phone.
I did at one time regularly listen to GB2RS ,IIRC ,sunday mornings
and every week I would find it annoying ,
or at least dstracting, hearing S- for Sugar etc
electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on
http://homepages.tcp.co.uk/~diverse
news:c64f8i$jij$1@austar-news.austar.net.au...
I am not a radio amateur but I did learn the phonetic alphabet"Geoff" <geoff@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:Xns94D21CC8D1C6geoffmailnews@158.152.254.254...
"Marty" <NOSPAM_vk2umj@yahoo.com.au_NOSPAM> wrote in
news:c648h9$gm4$1@austar-news.austar.net.au:
At the end of the day, as long as the message gets through OK, who
cares if its Alpha or Apple?????
The real point is, that if the correct phoenetics are used, there is a
good
chance that somebody who does not speak English, even as a secondary
language, will understand. Using Able, Apple or Archemedies rather than
Alpha will only serve to confuse. That is one of the (few) advantages
when
using the Q codes with CW.
YG
Granted, but I presume that as I only speak english I will most likely not
be speaking to someone that doesn't speak english at all...... and if I
do,
it will probably be a rather one sided conversation and phonetics will
most
likely be the least of our translation problems!! ;-)
Still, I am always amazed at the amateur operators that go to the trouble
of
learning the phonetic alphabet to pass the test, only to toss it all away
afterward and use their own version. Just hearing the different versions
on
air can get rather annoying!!!
because I was forever relaying model numbers etc via phone.
I did at one time regularly listen to GB2RS ,IIRC ,sunday mornings
and every week I would find it annoying ,
or at least dstracting, hearing S- for Sugar etc
electronic hints and repair briefs , schematics/manuals list on
http://homepages.tcp.co.uk/~diverse