PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[Gray Ghost]

John - Melb <mcnamara_john@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:72b88a42-6fae-4e1f-86b2-7f0e67f08b1a@u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com:

On Jul 9, 7:32 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Gray Ghost wrote:
keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote
innews:4a54952e$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au:

John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 8, 9:38 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Nah you have a thick skull and a thin skin
Thank you, I'm glad you've noticed.

Er, do you have anything relevant to add to the subject of this
thread?

No more than you have to add to aus.electronics - annoying isn't it
my paranoid little friend

You do know you're wasting more than his bandwidth, don't you you
inconsiderate bastard?

Oh dear, I am so sorry. Of course, if he hadn't stomped into
aus.electronics, I wouldn't be here.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hello Mr Ghost,

Tosspot's playing the same games over on aus.electronics that he
previosuly played on rec.audio.opinion and aus.hi-fi. He's been
spanked for telling porkies here, so he scurrries away to another
totally unrelated group, where he believes no-one knows enough about
the subject to challenge him, and began spreading his rants about guns
and gun owners.

Reproduced below is some of the stuff he's recently put on
aus.electronics.

The truely intereesting thing, is that no-one over there has a problem
with what Trevor has to say, but as soon as an alternative viewpoint
goes up, the start whingeing and ranting about off-topic posts.

A number of them have been quite busily teeling me to piss off, but
not one of them has challenged their "long standing" member about his
rants.

You'l note he's even brought out that old chestnut implying that a DGU
requires a dead body.

Oh, and we're all "psychopaths" who shouldn't be allowed to associate
with "normal humans"

What a pack of wankers.

Feel free to ask Trevor about his claims that US gun dealers are using
gun shows to avoid carrying out background checks so they can sell
guns to criminals. I've asked him, but in true Trevor Tosspot style,
he's provided no evidence to support that assertion
-------------------------------------------
On Jun 16, 3:21 pm, "Trevor Wilson"
tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
**Despite the fact that VASTLY more Americans carry guns around the
streets, legally, the US remains the most dangerous, deadly Western,
developed Democratic nations. Carrying guns achieves, at best, nothing.
At worst, it leads to more violence and death. In fact, the US homicide
rate is presently 3 times the Australian one.

------------------------------------------------------------

On Jun 18, 12:54 pm, "Trevor Wilson"
tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
**Yes. Easily. Across the US, each year, there are hundreds of 'gun
shows'. At these 'gun shows' dealers, posing as private citizens sell
thousands of guns to criminals. They can do so, because there are
virtually zero restrictions on the sale of 'second hand' guns. Even if
that gun has only been 'second hand' for a couple of minutes and has
never been fired. Here in Australia (and pretty much the rest of the
developed world) ALL gun sales must be recorded and tracked. Even
secondary sales. Such an action ensures that fewer guns end up in the
hands of criminals.
----------------------------------------------------
On Jun 18, 3:40 pm, "Trevor Wilson"
tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:
**Oh yeah: Two more things:
* If I was to crosspost (which I never do) I would never involve those
psychopaths in the talk.politics.guns group with normal humans.
-------------------------------------------------
On Jun 17, 9:40 am, "Trevor Wilson" <tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
wrote:

**The figures for people legitemately shooting alleged criminals (I say
alleged, because in places like Texas, it would seem that the authorites
are now prepared to accept the word of the 'last man standing', as to
the legitemacy of the shooting) are miniscule in the extreme. FBI
figures show that, in the US, something like 400-odd people are shot and
killed by police in so-called 'justifiable homicide' acts each year.
This figure needs to be examined in the same light as the number killed
by civilians in similar circumstances. The figure for civilians is
approximately 230 PA. That figure needs to be tempered by the
inadequacies of the laws in places like Texas, where lip service is paid
by LEOs under many circumstances. Additionally, one must bear in mind
that the number of civilians killed by gunshot each year in the US is
approximately 10,000. Clearly, carrying guns for self defence purposes
is a failed experiment. It is an experiment that many of the nutters in
the pro-gun lobby, here in Australia, wish to duplicate. These are the
same individuals who seem to feel that shooting native ducks and other
indigenous critters is, somehow, sporting. They seem to consider that
the indiscriminate spraying of lead shot into pristine environments,
whilst causing the needless suffering of wild animals is all in a good
cause.

I've blocked Trevor for some time. I have little patience for fanatics and
liars.

--
Always remember:

Bull Connor was a Democrat!

 

[John - Melb]

On Jul 9, 11:26 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

And what would "The likes of me" be then, you know nothing about me
other than I don't like your bullying tactics, and hypocrisy. you don't
even know my views on the subject that your own group professes to be about.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Well let's see now.

I've worked out that you're comfortable with an anti-gun zealot
ranting about guns and gun owners on aus.electronics, but get all
upset when an alternative view is posted on the same forum.

I've worked out you're the sort of person who makes inane allegations
about a persons sexuality if you disagree with them on a political
issue.

I've worked out you're an advocate for the unnecessary use of drugs
such as Valium.

Have I missed anything?

 

[John - Melb]

On Jul 9, 12:43 pm, John - Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Jul 9, 11:55 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Nope just the folk who want to be left in peace to discuss electronics
without being pestered by fanatics like you.

Perhaps you're talking about the one's who make inane remarks about
another's sexuallity when they disagree with them on a politcal issue?

How is Dorothy, by the way?

 

[Thomas]

On Jul 9, 10:09 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Zombywoof wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:55:43 +1000, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au
wrote:

John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:23 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

well it wasn't dished out to you by the innocent bystanders on
aus.electronics so why take it out on them?-
You mean the folks who think that rants by an anti-gun zealot about
"psychopaths", "normal people", DGU's and criminal gun dealers are
fine on aus.electronics, but get all nasty when an alternative
viewpoint is posted?

Are they the innocent bystanders you're talking about?
Nope just the folk who want to be left in peace to discuss electronics
without being pestered by fanatics like you.

Then take your forum Moderated, or create a web space to do it.  All
your doing is bemoaning a "weakness" in Usenet design.

Nope, all it takes is for some of the posters here to give the same
consideration that they expect from others.

Consideration, I think you're having a pot-kettle-back moment.

You consider it just fine for some anti-gun zealot to post his off
topic comments on aus.electronics, but squeal like big girls when an
alternaive viewpoint appears

 

[Thomas]

On Jul 9, 10:47 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Yada yada yada don't you have anything new to add. I am getting sick of
having to repeat this, but, with repetition it may sink into your thick
skulls, trevor made a reply in a cross posted which probably nobody even
read. Your pro-gun zealot leader/mate/whatever john-melb took it on
himself to push a full blown thread on an other newsgroup apparently in
retaliation for some perceived slight. See the difference?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
Trevor posted

-------------------------------------------
On Jun 16, 3:21 pm, "Trevor Wilson"
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

**Despite the fact that VASTLY more Americans carry guns around the streets,
legally, the US remains the most dangerous, deadly Western, developed
Democratic nations. Carrying guns achieves, at best, nothing. At worst, it
leads to more violence and death. In fact, the US homicide rate is presently
3 times the Australian one.

------------------------------------------------------------

On Jun 18, 12:54 pm, "Trevor Wilson"


<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote:

**Yes. Easily. Across the US, each year, there are hundreds of 'gun shows'.
At these 'gun shows' dealers, posing as private citizens sell thousands of
guns to criminals. They can do so, because there are virtually zero
restrictions on the sale of 'second hand' guns. Even if that gun has only
been 'second hand' for a couple of minutes and has never been fired. Here in
Australia (and pretty much the rest of the developed world) ALL gun sales
must be recorded and tracked. Even secondary sales. Such an action ensures
that fewer guns end up in the hands of criminals.

----------------------------------------------------
On Jun 18, 3:40 pm, "Trevor Wilson"
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:

**Oh yeah: Two more things:
* If I was to crosspost (which I never do) I would never involve those
psychopaths in the talk.politics.guns group with normal humans.

-------------------------------------------------
On Jun 17, 9:40 am, "Trevor Wilson"
<tre...@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au>
wrote:


- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

**The figures for people legitemately shooting alleged criminals (I say
alleged, because in places like Texas, it would seem that the authorites are
now prepared to accept the word of the 'last man standing', as to the
legitemacy of the shooting) are miniscule in the extreme. FBI figures show
that, in the US, something like 400-odd people are shot and killed by police
in so-called 'justifiable homicide' acts each year. This figure needs to be
examined in the same light as the number killed by civilians in similar
circumstances. The figure for civilians is approximately 230 PA. That figure
needs to be tempered by the inadequacies of the laws in places like Texas,
where lip service is paid by LEOs under many circumstances. Additionally,
one must bear in mind that the number of civilians killed by gunshot each
year in the US is approximately 10,000. Clearly, carrying guns for self
defence purposes is a failed experiment. It is an experiment that many of
the nutters in the pro-gun lobby, here in Australia, wish to duplicate.
These are the same individuals who seem to feel that shooting native ducks
and other indigenous critters is, somehow, sporting. They seem to consider
that the indiscriminate spraying of lead shot into pristine environments,
whilst causing the needless suffering of wild animals is all in a good
cause.

And you people said nothing,

John posted something pointing out that Wanker Wilson often posts
bullshit about the subject, and you lot went feral

See the difference?

 

[Thomas]

On Jul 9, 10:38 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

I have no idea, AFL is a strange Victorian ritual it which I have no
interest

Electronics is a strange ritual of which I have no interest.

People who have no problem with anti-gun rants being posts whilst
pilloring someone who posts a pro-gun response is something of which I
have great interest.

 

[Scout]

keithr wrote:

Scout wrote:


keithr wrote:
Gray Ghost wrote:
keithr <keith@nowhere.com.au> wrote in
news:4a54952e$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au:

John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 8, 9:38 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Nah you have a thick skull and a thin skin
Thank you, I'm glad you've noticed.

Er, do you have anything relevant to add to the subject of this
thread?
No more than you have to add to aus.electronics - annoying isn't it
my paranoid little friend

You do know you're wasting more than his bandwidth, don't you you
inconsiderate bastard?

Oh dear, I am so sorry. Of course, if he hadn't stomped into
aus.electronics, I wouldn't be here.

I see, so for all your holier than thou attitude, you're just as bad
as those you rant against.

Makes you a hypocrite, doesn't it?

Why am I not surprised?


Nope, just employing the same bully boy tactics as your beloved leader.

Thus exposing yourself as a hypocrite.

After all, kind of hard to take the moral high ground when you are doing
the very same thing he is.

Oh, and it does sort of prove his point about such discussions not
necessarily taking place on the newsgroup in which they belong.

 

[Scout]

keithr wrote:

John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 9, 10:07 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Scout wrote:

keithr wrote:
Gray Ghost wrote:
keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote in
news:4a54952e$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au:
John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 8, 9:38 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Nah you have a thick skull and a thin skin
Thank you, I'm glad you've noticed.
Er, do you have anything relevant to add to the subject of this
thread?
No more than you have to add to aus.electronics - annoying isn't it
my paranoid little friend
You do know you're wasting more than his bandwidth, don't you you
inconsiderate bastard?
Oh dear, I am so sorry. Of course, if he hadn't stomped into
aus.electronics, I wouldn't be here.
I see, so for all your holier than thou attitude, you're just as bad as
those you rant against.
Makes you a hypocrite, doesn't it?
Why am I not surprised?
Nope, just employing the same bully boy tactics as your beloved leader.
Seems like you guys can dish it out but squeal like little piggies when
you get the same treatment.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Leader? who the bloody hell died and left me in charge? ROFLMAO!

Maybe it's been dished out to us so much in the past, that some of us
have decided we ain't going to take it anymore?

well it wasn't dished out to you by the innocent bystanders on
aus.electronics so why take it out on them?

And yet you have no problem dishing it out to all the innocent
bystanders of aus.politics.guns and talk.politics.guns.

After all, if YOU really were concerned about holding your discussion in
the proper newgroup you would have long ago shifted this whole thing
over to alt.arguments

So please explain why anyone should consider you better than those you
rant against?

 

[Scout]

keithr wrote:

John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 9, 8:46 am, Scout <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net
wrote:
keithr wrote:
Gray Ghost wrote:
keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote
innews:4a54952e$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au:
John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 8, 9:38 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Nah you have a thick skull and a thin skin
Thank you, I'm glad you've noticed.
Er, do you have anything relevant to add to the subject of this
thread?
No more than you have to add to aus.electronics - annoying isn't it
my paranoid little friend
You do know you're wasting more than his bandwidth, don't you you
inconsiderate bastard?
Oh dear, I am so sorry. Of course, if he hadn't stomped into
aus.electronics, I wouldn't be here.
I see, so for all your holier than thou attitude, you're just as bad as
those you rant against.

Makes you a hypocrite, doesn't it?

Why am I not surprised

Seems to be a lot of that going on over at aus.electronics

You really are precious about criticism aren''t you johny baby, have to
cross post it to try and discourage it.

Which is all he has done, and you are ranting despite doing the exact
same thing.

There is a word for that. It's hypocrite. You are one.

 

[Scout]

keithr wrote:

John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:23 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

well it wasn't dished out to you by the innocent bystanders on
aus.electronics so why take it out on them?-

You mean the folks who think that rants by an anti-gun zealot about
"psychopaths", "normal people", DGU's and criminal gun dealers are
fine on aus.electronics, but get all nasty when an alternative
viewpoint is posted?

Are they the innocent bystanders you're talking about?

Nope just the folk who want to be left in peace to discuss electronics
without being pestered by fanatics like you.

Meanwhile, your discussion with him has what to do with the newsgroups
YOU post to?

 

[Scout]

Gray Ghost wrote:

keithr <keith@nowhere.com.au> wrote in news:4a55107c@dnews.tpgi.com.au:

Gray Ghost wrote:
keithr <keith@nowhere.com.au> wrote in news:4a54952e$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au:

John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 8, 9:38 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Nah you have a thick skull and a thin skin
Thank you, I'm glad you've noticed.

Er, do you have anything relevant to add to the subject of this thread?

No more than you have to add to aus.electronics - annoying isn't it my
paranoid little friend
You do know you're wasting more than his bandwidth, don't you you
inconsiderate bastard?
Oh dear, I am so sorry. Of course, if he hadn't stomped into
aus.electronics, I wouldn't be here.



Since we didn't all cause it why don't you fucking grow up?

Because he is a hypocrite.

 

[Scout]

keithr wrote:

Zombywoof wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:55:43 +1000, keithr <keith@nowhere.com.au
wrote:

John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:23 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

well it wasn't dished out to you by the innocent bystanders on
aus.electronics so why take it out on them?-
You mean the folks who think that rants by an anti-gun zealot about
"psychopaths", "normal people", DGU's and criminal gun dealers are
fine on aus.electronics, but get all nasty when an alternative
viewpoint is posted?

Are they the innocent bystanders you're talking about?
Nope just the folk who want to be left in peace to discuss
electronics without being pestered by fanatics like you.

Then take your forum Moderated, or create a web space to do it. All
your doing is bemoaning a "weakness" in Usenet design.

Nope, all it takes is for some of the posters here to give the same
consideration that they expect from others.

Well that leaves you out since you have yet to show any consideration
for other posters.

 

[Scout]

keithr wrote:

Thomas wrote:
On Jul 9, 10:09 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Zombywoof wrote:
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:55:43 +1000, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au
wrote:
John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:23 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
well it wasn't dished out to you by the innocent bystanders on
aus.electronics so why take it out on them?-
You mean the folks who think that rants by an anti-gun zealot about
"psychopaths", "normal people", DGU's and criminal gun dealers are
fine on aus.electronics, but get all nasty when an alternative
viewpoint is posted?
Are they the innocent bystanders you're talking about?
Nope just the folk who want to be left in peace to discuss electronics
without being pestered by fanatics like you.
Then take your forum Moderated, or create a web space to do it. All
your doing is bemoaning a "weakness" in Usenet design.
Nope, all it takes is for some of the posters here to give the same
consideration that they expect from others.

Consideration, I think you're having a pot-kettle-back moment.

You consider it just fine for some anti-gun zealot to post his off
topic comments on aus.electronics, but squeal like big girls when an
alternaive viewpoint appears

Yada yada yada don't you have anything new to add. I am getting sick of
having to repeat this, but, with repetition it may sink into your thick
skulls, trevor made a reply in a cross posted which probably nobody even
read. Your pro-gun zealot leader/mate/whatever john-melb took it on
himself to push a full blown thread on an other newsgroup apparently in
retaliation for some perceived slight. See the difference?

Odd, you seem to be doing the very same thing........

 

[John - Melb]

On Jul 9, 11:38 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Thomas wrote:
On Jul 9, 10:52 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
Thomas wrote:
On Jul 9, 4:50 pm, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
John - Melb wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:26 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:
And what would "The likes of me" be then, you know nothing about me
other than I don't like your bullying tactics, and hypocrisy. you don't
even know my views on the subject that your own group professes to be about.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Well let's see now.
I've worked out that you're comfortable with an anti-gun zealot
ranting about guns and gun owners on aus.electronics, but get all
upset when an alternative view is posted on the same forum.
I am comfortable with all points of view, yours included, I am not
comfortable with ill mannered pricks who cross post their crap where it
isn't wanted. So much for your working out.
Obviously, Trevor's rants on guns and gun owners on aus.electronics
are something you don't have a problem with, I don't see you ranting
at him?
I've worked out you're the sort of person who makes inane allegations
about a persons sexuality if you disagree with them on a political
issue.
You have no idea what my political persuasions are, and whether I
disagree with yours.
You are very touchy about your sexuality, it is because you have
feelings that you are ashamed of or are you just homophobic?
I've worked out you're an advocate for the unnecessary use of drugs
such as Valium.
I've worked out that you part of the gun lobby's problem rather than
it's solution
Have I missed anything?
Yes, the whole point.
The point being that you unilaterally invaded another unrelated groups
space because you think that they should act as topic nazis when views
contrary to yours are expressed. You could have just replied to the
posts in the original thread, moved the thread to your own group and
carried it on there or even better just let it lie when nobody would
even have bothered reading trevor's posts. Unfortunately, for you and
your friends as well as us, you are so obsessed with trevor that you had
to go in boots and all to cause maximum annoyance. So don't squeal like
a little piggy when it is done to you, just stop cross posting and
everybody can go about their business in peace.
Who's squealing about cross-posting?
You guys squeal pretty loud when your space gets invaded. Its just not
being done by cross posting.

I thought the squealing was because people on aus.electronics were
quite comfortable with rabid anti-gun posts, but got all upset when an
alternative view was posted.
How many times does this have to be repeated? People are complaining
about whole threads being cross posted not about the odd off-topic
reply. See the difference?

People are complaining about a pro-gun opinion being posted, but not
complaining about anti-gun opinion (even demonstrably false
assertions) being posted. See the difference?

Meantime, you guys are busy shooting yourselves in the foot making
people who may have been at least neutral in your debate make up their
minds against you. Pathetic public relations for your cause.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Neutral? bullshit, no complaints about Trevor's rants, plenty of
sooking about ours,

A complete lie - see below.

you bastards had made your minds up on this issue
well before the first post appeared

I see that you keep an open mind on things about which you have no
knowledge.

Now lets look at the situation logically, that should be a first for
you. The complaint as far as I can make out, is that trevor made
comments that upset you in a thread called "A Quesion for Sylvia Else
(stun guns)". This thread started on aus.tv not aus.electronics but was
later cross posted there as well as to aus.legal. It would appear that
trevor actually posted his remarks on aus.tv, but as the thread was
cross posted it also appeared on aus.electronics. I note that you guys
have not tried to bully either of the other groups concerned, could it
be that you saw aus.electronics as a soft target and were scared by the
reception that you would get from the loonies that inhabit those other
groups?

I replied on aus.electronics because that's where I found it.

I read on aus.electronics that talk.politics guns is inhabited by
psychopaths, this thread also went up there. If I'm ot worried about
the psychopaths at T.P.G. I'm hardly likely to be worried about the
loonies at aus.tv or aus.legal

Then there is the matter of john-melb's replies in this thread. Nobody
objected to them so you can hardly complain that the treatment was
anything other than even handed. Basically nobody in aus.electronics
cases in the least about you and trevor's little hissy fights.

No, you just get upset when something that offends your prejudices
appears.

I don't know whether you guys are too lazy or too stupid to do your own
research, but it only took about 10 minutes on google. If you can't work
google, your local library may be able to help you.

"ask a nine year old to explain it to you" now where have I heard
that before?

Is that all clear enough for you? Read it several times if you find it
complicated. An apology would be nice but just clearing off
aus.electronics would be enough

I make it my business to never apologise to people displaying their
prejudice.

 

[John - Melb]

On Jul 10, 7:34 am, Zombywoof <Zomby-W...@cox.net> wrote:

On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 19:43:43 -0700 (PDT), John - Melb

mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 9, 11:55 am, keithr <ke...@nowhere.com.au> wrote:

Nope just the folk who want to be left in peace to discuss electronics
without being pestered by fanatics like you.

Perhaps you're talking about the one's who make inane remarks about
another's sexuallity when they disagree with them on a politcal issue?

How is Dorothy, by the way?

She isn't in Kansas anymore.
--
"Everything in excess! To enjoy the flavor of life, take big bites.
Moderation is for monks."

I know, Keith told me......

 

[Greatest Mining Pioneer o]

http://www.google.fr/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_en-USFR294FR303&aq=f&sourceid...

Very positive voyage & field trip as well...

The little farm where Marie-Julie Jahenny lived all her live to near
100 is a moving site, with its white washed walls.
She spent the last years in permanent fast, with only a host once a
week to sustain her, which communion was brought up to her the Parish
Priest of Blain ( approx 30 Km North of Nantes) .

Upon that visit and inspired by the permanent sacrifices endured by
Sainte Marie-Julie Jahenny, I have decided to share a system I have
developed which cures Flu in less than 12 hours, in fact overnight....
It has been experimented over the years with some people here &
recently imparted charitably with some ill people in China... always
with the same amazing success.

I have decided to call it the "Turcaud Boots to cure Flu in 12 hours
flat" system as a service indeed to Suffering Humanity. It can cure
indeed & near immediately any Flu attack any chemical drugs, bed
mannered quacks advices, & further is a mild but quicker approach for
return to Health with simpler procedure than in the now famous
"Turcaud Bath"

Of course the "Turcaud Bath" being without ties of any kind, the
"Turcaud Boots" Flu cure system is likewise .... and I thank indeed
Sainte Marie-Julie Jahenny to have inspired me, to share that little
discovery for the benefit of people in Australia & New Zealand ! It
will be of course the object of a special private communication to
Australia & New Zealand under the said title.... and even Antipodean
Mining & Political Criminals are allowed to use it without
restriction as this is the way I want it ( and without gratitude &
recognition in return as usual)


Just for the interest of a few, I have to add that that voyage was
doubled of a field trip to the tip of Brittany, with al lot of photos
taken illustrating the Surrection of the Crozon peninsula by
underlying Hydraulic forces resulting from counter reaction to Cosmic
Impact. This to be included in the coming book on the True Geology.
**Note**:
....of course such model of Surrection is in complete contradiction
with the ludicrous & ridiculous present Official Gogology theories of
Plates collisions ... Gogology being the sci000nce of Gogos (aka
Univesities mind programme suckers) ... a long way from the True
Geology superior understanding indeed

With kind regards.

Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer

 

[the man from havana]

On Jul 15, 3:42 pm, Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times
<australia.mining-pion...@neuf.fr> wrote:

http://www.google.fr/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_en-USFR294FR303&aq=f&sourceid....

Very positive voyage & field trip as well...

I have decided to call it the "Turcaud Boots to cure Flu in 12 hours
flat" system  as a service indeed to Suffering Humanity. It can cure
indeed & near immediately any Flu attack any chemical drugs, bed
mannered quacks advices, & further is a mild but quicker approach for
return to Health with simpler procedure than in the now famous
"Turcaud Bath"

HEY TURD , HEAL THY SELF IMBECILE !

With kind regards.

Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Australia Mining Pioneer

 

[john smith]

"globular" <self@there.invalid> wrote in message
news:h3m02u$o24$1@news.eternal-september.org...

Just recently, I click on 'check mail' on Yahoo using Firefox
and this massive memory bloat occurs on my computer.
It almost froze it last night and today the memory usage went to maximum
for a short time, that is, from about 600 mb to over 1 gb.
I had to kill Firefox last night.

Which version of firefox are you using?
If its the latest (v3.5?) although I haven't used it, it may have a bug?

The other thing is yahoo mail has recently implemented messaging within
e-mail, the scripts for this may have something to do with the problem.

 

[globular]

john smith wrote:

"globular" <self@there.invalid> wrote in message
news:h3m02u$o24$1@news.eternal-september.org...
Just recently, I click on 'check mail' on Yahoo using Firefox
and this massive memory bloat occurs on my computer.
It almost froze it last night and today the memory usage went to maximum
for a short time, that is, from about 600 mb to over 1 gb.
I had to kill Firefox last night.

Which version of firefox are you using?
If its the latest (v3.5?) although I haven't used it, it may have a bug?

The other thing is yahoo mail has recently implemented messaging within
e-mail, the scripts for this may have something to do with the problem.



Firefox 3.0.10

I think it's over it a bit now.
The first email page does look different, I thought they might have been
doing something, but with the memory use I was getting I was wondering
if they were activating a server on my end or something.

 

[Colin]

The problem is that the display is not an LED display. It simply an LCD
display which has LED backlighting. Otherwise it is no different to any
other LCD TV.

Only I'm not so sure it is <just> an LED back light.

The contrast figures have jumped suddenly for these new LCDs, so I
suspect they might be dividing the back light into regions, and
modulating it, to enhance the darker picture areas, making the contrast
figures better. Controlling the back lights would give dismally poor
resolution, but it would enhance the contrast, particularly with night
time scenes.

If they are doing this, it verges on trickery, as the added contrast
really isn't normal res TV, but it might be enough to fudge better
looking contrast figures.

I've yet to see an LCD TV that doesn't change faces into play dough. The
RF interference kicked out by plasmas annoy nearby radio amateurs badly,
and their power usage is high, but the pictures are still CRT like in
characteristics and easy to watch. I'll admit that LCDs have improved in
the last few years, but they still annoy me to watch. The dough face
problem, plus poor turf rendering seems to be insurmountable.

LCDs seem a fair compromise for computer monitor usage, but not TV
viewing. Looking at movies on my LCD screens is a poor compromise at
best. Occasionally useful, but pretty annoying to watch. The lack of
available contrast range is dismal. You have to keep adjusting the
brightness, so you can check the details in shadows, then turning it back
down so there is some shadow in the picture - just really annoying.
There's no way you could use an LCD display for professional photo
editing. You just can't get set gamma properly, the contrast range is so
poor.

Most average viewers seem unaware of how rotten their home TV pictures
are, but that's nothing new. TV servicing many years ago (I even go back
to just before colour), I used to be amazed at how many average viewers
set up their TVs, chocolate box colours, orange faces, wishy washy
contrast, horrible geometric distortions, you name it, they just watched
it. It's no surprise then that LCD TVs are saleable, just not to me...

Cheers, Colin