PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[Michael A. Terrell]

bassett wrote:

I've lived in the US, and Canada, and Alaskia, when I was a lot younger, and
let me tell you I'm far better of where I am now in OZ.

America is better off with you in OZ, as well. You are an illiterate
moron.


--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html

aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white
listed, or I will not see your messages.

If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm


There are two kinds of people on this earth:
The crazy, and the insane.
The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy.

 

[TT]

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:B4WdnbJWwLWV0SjVnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@earthlink.com...

bassett wrote:

I've lived in the US, and Canada, and Alaskia, when I was a lot younger,
and
let me tell you I'm far better of where I am now in OZ.


America is better off with you in OZ, as well. You are an illiterate
moron.

May I interject and remind you that the rest of the World believes they are

better off with you guys keeping Arny ;-) Oh and add to that George (Snr.
and Jnr.), both Bills (Gates and Clinton), Al Gore and ........ sigh........
I feel it could be a long list )

Although if anyone one out there wants our Philthy Allison we can work out a
deal I'm sure. Perhaps a swap for a Rosie O'Donnel or some nuclear waste?
;-) We are open to suggestions and will even throw in a cash incentive

Cheers TT

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

TT wrote:

"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:B4WdnbJWwLWV0SjVnZ2dnUVZ_sudnZ2d@earthlink.com...

bassett wrote:

I've lived in the US, and Canada, and Alaskia, when I was a lot younger,
and
let me tell you I'm far better of where I am now in OZ.


America is better off with you in OZ, as well. You are an illiterate
moron.

May I interject and remind you that the rest of the World believes they are
better off with you guys keeping Arny ;-) Oh and add to that George (Snr.
and Jnr.), both Bills (Gates and Clinton), Al Gore and ........ sigh........
I feel it could be a long list )

Although if anyone one out there wants our Philthy Allison we can work out a
deal I'm sure. Perhaps a swap for a Rosie O'Donnel or some nuclear waste?
;-) We are open to suggestions and will even throw in a cash incentive

Don't you remeber? They used Rosie & lots of nuclear waste to make
Phil, in the first place! Phil was from the second try. The first try
produced Eeyore. ;-)


--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html

aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white
listed, or I will not see your messages.

If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm


There are two kinds of people on this earth:
The crazy, and the insane.
The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy.

 

[Arny Krueger]

"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in message
news:48b4f7c8$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au

Arny Krueger wrote:

Europe is still the biggest collection of illogical
minds who should know better, around. The fact that
each European country still thinks it is a soveriegn
state, until lately had its own currency, until lately
guarded its borders and treated the people next door like
foreigners, and still can't figure out a common
language to speak. This is a real hoot except that it
is so sad. Heck, even the Canadians are
language-stoopid.

The european model is also a dam sight older, has
considerably more history, and tradition then the US,
and has got this by the old way of trial and error.

That's a defense or even an explanation?

It's mental paralysis!

Unlike the US who has no history, and can and has
benefited by other countries mistakes.

Yes, we benefitted from the mistakes that are still on-going in the old
country.

But like all anericans(sic), you
see things through rose coloured glasses.

Clearing away the crap from our eyes allows us to do that.

And simply can't except(sic) that others opinions might just be correct.

Umm, I guess we're too busy benefitting from, and correcting in our own
lives, the mistakes that are on-going in the old country.

Fact is in the US we have counties and cities that are
larger, richer, more
populous, more diverse, more cosmopolitan than some
European countries. The
only thing that keeps you apart is your egos.

Fact is there are two classes in the US, the very rish(sic)
and the dirt poor,

Absolute rubbish.

And while some of there cities might
be bigger by vertue (sic) of population, It's still a
relatively new country compared to Europe.

So what?

The US would
have to be the most un-cosmopolitan of any western
country.

Absolute rubbish.

Most large metro areas in the U.S. are very diverse, with large numbers of
first and second generation immigrants recreating large areas where their
old-country traditions and resources dominate.

populated by Spanish speaking, and English
speaking peoples who also diversify with the negro slave
cultures.

Not to mention large areas where european, asian, and african immigrants
continue to recreate much of their old-country culture.

Where as the european countries are far more
cosmopolitan due to the vast mix of tounges and cultures.

Absolute rubbish. The US has long been the largest melting pot of the
world.

Even Australa is more cosmopolitan then the US, due to
it's immigration policies, which like Canada, has a mix
of many european ethnic diversities

Nonsense.

For my whole life, my parents life, and my grandparents
lives we've been able to go any place among the 50
states whenever we wanted to, no customs,
no formal border crossing, talk the same language,
spend the same money, and
if we met nominal residency requirements, vote in the
local elections.

Your so-called states are also very small in size
compaired (sic) to some places.

OK, Rhode Island is small compared to Antartica.

Alaska: : 656,425 square miles:

Texas: : 268,601 square miles:

France: 211,208 square miles

California: : 163,707 square miles:

Montana: : 147,046 square miles:

Germany 137,858 square miles

Norway 125,000 square miles

We in Australia have cattle
stations far bigger then Texas, and run by a couple of
people, Victiria River Downs being a prime example,
these proparties are measured in square miles

Grass is cheap.

Actualy most american states could well be run by a local
council, After all consider the Greater London Council,
popluation close to 25 million.

New York metro area population 18.8 million.

Los Angeles metro area population 17.8 million

As for your so-called freedoms with regard to the
seperation of states, Each of your states has a set of
statues, differant to it's neighbours, so there is a
complete jumble.

Except the jumble is minimal, and it all works.

There is no freedom between states, and
extrodision is required to return someone accross a stae
border. This is why you have an FBI service, together
with homeland security, Plus the state police, State
troopers, federial marshal service, the list goes on and
on.
Europe was fighting wars among itself and killing
millions of each other, on
several occasions since, when my grand parents came to
the US and enjoyed the same liberties I do, in the
1800s.

Had the US had been around as long as the European
countries , there would have been as many wars between
states.

Not likely. Case in point would be the 20th century. During the 20 th
century Europe had 2 major wars. The US had zero.

The big problem is most Americans don't have the
slightest consept of what other countries enjoy,

Wrong again. Despite the benefits of being in the US, many US citizens visit
other countries of the world. Curiosity, time on our hands due to our excess
wealth, need to visit subordinate enterprises, etc cause this sort of thing
to happen all the time. Furthermore, millions of people in the US are
relatively recent immigrants from those other countries. If those other
places are so great, why do their citizens come here? Finally, additional
millions come to the US to take advantage of our institutions of higher
learning. If education in the US is so bad, why are all those people
clamoring to get in here?

there
total brainwashed into thinking that "What's American,
must be bigger and better"

The relevant facts are easily obtainable by US citizens. Foriegn countries
can and do advertise their advantages in the US freely. U.S citizens are
free to travel the world.

where in fact the reverse is true.

Like I said, if the U.S. is such a bad place, why are all those people from
Europe living over here now?

I've lived in the US, and Canada, and Alaskia(sic),

Geography lesson for the poorly-informed: Alaska is a state of the United
States.

when
I was a lot younger, and let me tell you I'm far better
of where I am now in OZ.

Probably because you couldn't get a permanent visa to stay in the US... ;-)

The division in your country
between rich and poor is poles apart,

You are nuts. The middle class is alive and well in the U.S..

just consider the
actions of YOUR government with "Karenna (sic)"

That was Katrina. What did we do wrong? Properly-informed people in New
Orleans knew that they were and still are living in the middle of a natural
disaster waiting to happen (again). They got lots of freebies, despite the
dire risks they knowingly took.

And the long
delays , before your governments decided to act. Years
later people are still waiting for help, and are living on what's left of
the streets,

That's their choice - they were offered free housing elsewhere.

The Californian earthquakes are the same.

Simply not true. I've lived through a quake in the LA region, I simply know
better.

The rich and influential get
all the help they ask for, and the common person who may
well be Black and on welfare payments get nothing.

Simply not true.

Poverty is rife in the US,

Simply not true.

Furhtermore, the impovrished in the US are living like kings compared to
most of the world's rich.

may-be not for the well paid,
but the life of the Mexician day labourer,

They come here to work, because their lot is worse in their native country.

or negro farm worker.

Simply not true.

But all this is covered up by the Americam
Dream of "All is well with the world, Due to American
money and might.

We have no such delusions. But, we note the millions clamoring to come here
and *suffer* with us!

Just consider the numbers of negro servicemen that died
[cannon fodder] in Vietnam and Iraq, complaired to there
white brothers.

Actually, about proportional compared to their fraction of the population.

America IS a very racist country,

Not perfect, but very good and improving. You can't BS me, my extended
family includes a number of African-Americans who are doing very well or
better, thank you.

not that your about to admit it. And as for your next Black
President, that's not about to be allowed to happen.

That remains to be seen.

Dispite what the man on the street might like to think. Just remember
Kennedy for evidence of that.

All that Kennedy's death showed is that one man who is sufficiently
motivated and is willing to sacrifice his own life can kill anybody he wants
to.

But you
won't of cause. Your sort only remember what you want to
remember, the rest gets forgotten and swept under the
carpit for another day.

Given the quality of your writing and its contents Basset, what sort of
mind-altering substance are you on right now?

 

[clanker]

Arny Krueger wrote:

"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in message

But you
won't of cause. Your sort only remember what you want to
remember, the rest gets forgotten and swept under the
carpit for another day.

*****snippedysnip

Given the quality of your writing and its contents Basset, what sort of
mind-altering substance are you on right now?

The "mind altering substance" is oxygen, stolen from real people....

.....unless bassett won some in a spelling contest.

 

[bassett]

"clanker" <flerp@dingdong.net> wrote in message
news:48B5BE89.10203@dingdong.net...

Arny Krueger wrote:
"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in message

But you
won't of cause. Your sort only remember what you want to
remember, the rest gets forgotten and swept under the
carpit for another day.

*****snippedysnip

Given the quality of your writing and its contents Basset, what sort of
mind-altering substance are you on right now?




The "mind altering substance" is oxygen, stolen from real people....

....unless bassett won some in a spelling contest.

Thank you for your eloquent contribution, You and Terrell, should get
together, you would make a perfect pair.
As for the spelling, WE speak and spell correctly, Unlike you Septics who
tend to corrupt everything you touch

bassett

 

[Keithr]

Arny Krueger wrote:

"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in message
news:48b4f7c8$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au
Arny Krueger wrote:

Your so-called states are also very small in size
compaired (sic) to some places.

OK, Rhode Island is small compared to Antartica.

Alaska: : 656,425 square miles:

Texas: : 268,601 square miles:

France: 211,208 square miles

California: : 163,707 square miles:

Montana: : 147,046 square miles:

Germany 137,858 square miles

Norway 125,000 square miles

Western Australia 1,021,478 square miles

Queensland 715,309 square miles

Northern Territory 502,902 square miles

South Australia 402,903 square miles

New South Wales 312,528 square miles

So there you have it - 2 states bigger than Alaska, 5 bigger than Texas.

but then, size isn't everything is it?

 

[TT]

"Keithr" <keithr@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:48b621fe$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

Arny Krueger wrote:
"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in
message
news:48b4f7c8$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au
Arny Krueger wrote:

Your so-called states are also very small in size
compaired (sic) to some places.

OK, Rhode Island is small compared to Antartica.

Alaska: : 656,425 square miles:

Texas: : 268,601 square miles:

France: 211,208 square miles

California: : 163,707 square miles:

Montana: : 147,046 square miles:

Germany 137,858 square miles

Norway 125,000 square miles

Western Australia 1,021,478 square miles

Queensland 715,309 square miles

Northern Territory 502,902 square miles

South Australia 402,903 square miles

New South Wales 312,528 square miles

So there you have it - 2 states bigger than Alaska, 5
bigger than Texas.

but then, size isn't everything is it?

Well it's nice to brag I have the big one ;-) Now tell Arny
that the population of WA is around 2,200,000. That's 2
people per square mile

Cheers TT

 

[bassett]

"clanker" <flerp@dingdong.net> wrote in message
news:48B639D1.3080707@dingdong.net...

bassett wrote:
"clanker" <flerp@dingdong.net> wrote in message
news:48B5BE89.10203@dingdong.net...
Arny Krueger wrote:
"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in message
But you
won't of cause. Your sort only remember what you want to
remember, the rest gets forgotten and swept under the
carpit for another day.
*****snippedysnip

Given the quality of your writing and its contents Basset, what sort of
mind-altering substance are you on right now?



The "mind altering substance" is oxygen, stolen from real people....

....unless bassett won some in a spelling contest.

Thank you for your eloquent contribution, You and Terrell, should get
together, you would make a perfect pair.
As for the spelling, WE speak and spell correctly, Unlike you Septics
who tend to corrupt everything you touch


bassett


Says an illiterate, mind-numbingly stupid "dog" with a pommy accent !

Congratulations on the spelling in your last post, let me guess - mummy
showed you how to use a spell-checker ?

Nice to see I'm once again correct and there's no argument from the minions,
Even if it has become rather boring attempting to communicate with "trailer
trash'' who
still look up to people like Jerry Springer for direction and guidence.

But I must say it's very perceivable of you, arriving at a judgement on my
accent, which
you gleaned from words of infinite wisdom. Pity your total wrong, Still
that's no surprise,
I doubt you have ever been correct about anything, in your sad little life.


bassett

 

[bassett]

"TT" <TTencerNoSpaM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:8smdnVy3H8wc3SvVRVnyggA@westnet.com.au...

"Keithr" <keithr@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:48b621fe$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Arny Krueger wrote:
"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in message
news:48b4f7c8$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au
Arny Krueger wrote:

Your so-called states are also very small in size
compaired (sic) to some places.

OK, Rhode Island is small compared to Antartica.

Alaska: : 656,425 square miles:

Texas: : 268,601 square miles:

France: 211,208 square miles

California: : 163,707 square miles:

Montana: : 147,046 square miles:

Germany 137,858 square miles

Norway 125,000 square miles

Western Australia 1,021,478 square miles

Queensland 715,309 square miles

Northern Territory 502,902 square miles

South Australia 402,903 square miles

New South Wales 312,528 square miles

So there you have it - 2 states bigger than Alaska, 5 bigger than Texas.

but then, size isn't everything is it?

Well it's nice to brag I have the big one ;-) Now tell Arny that the
population of WA is around 2,200,000. That's 2 people per square mile

Cheers TT
What more do you need to mow the Lawns and trim the edges.

 

[Mike Coatham]

bassett wrote:

"clanker" <flerp@dingdong.net> wrote in message
news:48B639D1.3080707@dingdong.net...
bassett wrote:
"clanker" <flerp@dingdong.net> wrote in message
news:48B5BE89.10203@dingdong.net...
Arny Krueger wrote:
"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in message
But you
won't of cause. Your sort only remember what you want to
remember, the rest gets forgotten and swept under the
carpit for another day.
*****snippedysnip

Given the quality of your writing and its contents Basset, what sort of
mind-altering substance are you on right now?



The "mind altering substance" is oxygen, stolen from real people....

....unless bassett won some in a spelling contest.
Thank you for your eloquent contribution, You and Terrell, should get
together, you would make a perfect pair.
As for the spelling, WE speak and spell correctly, Unlike you Septics
who tend to corrupt everything you touch


bassett

Says an illiterate, mind-numbingly stupid "dog" with a pommy accent !

Congratulations on the spelling in your last post, let me guess - mummy
showed you how to use a spell-checker ?

Nice to see I'm once again correct and there's no argument from the minions,
Even if it has become rather boring attempting to communicate with "trailer
trash'' who
still look up to people like Jerry Springer for direction and guidence.

But I must say it's very perceivable of you, arriving at a judgement on my
accent, which
you gleaned from words of infinite wisdom. Pity your total wrong, Still
that's no surprise,
I doubt you have ever been correct about anything, in your sad little life.


bassett

Bassett - you appear to have a problem - one second you are stating "WE
speak and spell correctly...." and in the next breath completely mangle
the English language. And I quote " Pity your total wrong....."
For goodness sake get it right. The correct statement is...... "Pity
you're ( short for YOU ARE) totally wrong".

 

[Keithr]

TT wrote:

"Keithr" <keithr@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:48b621fe$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Arny Krueger wrote:
"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in
message
news:48b4f7c8$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au
Arny Krueger wrote:

Your so-called states are also very small in size
compaired (sic) to some places.
OK, Rhode Island is small compared to Antartica.

Alaska: : 656,425 square miles:

Texas: : 268,601 square miles:

France: 211,208 square miles

California: : 163,707 square miles:

Montana: : 147,046 square miles:

Germany 137,858 square miles

Norway 125,000 square miles
Western Australia 1,021,478 square miles

Queensland 715,309 square miles

Northern Territory 502,902 square miles

South Australia 402,903 square miles

New South Wales 312,528 square miles

So there you have it - 2 states bigger than Alaska, 5
bigger than Texas.

but then, size isn't everything is it?

Well it's nice to brag I have the big one ;-) Now tell Arny
that the population of WA is around 2,200,000. That's 2
people per square mile

The question is whether that is an advantantage or a disadvantage. I
lived in Carnarvon in the 60s it was a long lonely drive to Perth. Then
again flying from LA to Boston, you pass over a lot of uninhabited
country. Like us, the yanks tend to cluster into the more desirable real
estate.


Keith

 

[Keithr]

Mike Coatham wrote:

bassett wrote:
"clanker" <flerp@dingdong.net> wrote in message
news:48B639D1.3080707@dingdong.net...
bassett wrote:
"clanker" <flerp@dingdong.net> wrote in message
news:48B5BE89.10203@dingdong.net...
Arny Krueger wrote:
"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in message
But you
won't of cause. Your sort only remember what you want to
remember, the rest gets forgotten and swept under the
carpit for another day.
*****snippedysnip

Given the quality of your writing and its contents Basset, what
sort of mind-altering substance are you on right now?



The "mind altering substance" is oxygen, stolen from real people....

....unless bassett won some in a spelling contest.
Thank you for your eloquent contribution, You and Terrell, should
get together, you would make a perfect pair.
As for the spelling, WE speak and spell correctly, Unlike you
Septics who tend to corrupt everything you touch


bassett

Says an illiterate, mind-numbingly stupid "dog" with a pommy accent !

Congratulations on the spelling in your last post, let me guess -
mummy showed you how to use a spell-checker ?

Nice to see I'm once again correct and there's no argument from the
minions,
Even if it has become rather boring attempting to communicate with
"trailer trash'' who
still look up to people like Jerry Springer for direction and
guidence.

But I must say it's very perceivable of you, arriving at a judgement
on my accent, which
you gleaned from words of infinite wisdom. Pity your total wrong,
Still that's no surprise,
I doubt you have ever been correct about anything, in your sad little
life.


bassett

Bassett - you appear to have a problem - one second you are stating "WE
speak and spell correctly...." and in the next breath completely mangle
the English language. And I quote " Pity your total wrong....."
For goodness sake get it right. The correct statement is...... "Pity
you're ( short for YOU ARE) totally wrong".

Unfortunately, due in large part to the influence of the internet, the
distinction between your and you're is rapidly disapearing

Keith

 

[TT]

"Keithr" <keithr@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:48b692d4$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

TT wrote:
"Keithr" <keithr@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:48b621fe$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Arny Krueger wrote:
"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in message
news:48b4f7c8$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au
Arny Krueger wrote:

Your so-called states are also very small in size
compaired (sic) to some places.
OK, Rhode Island is small compared to Antartica.

Alaska: : 656,425 square miles:

Texas: : 268,601 square miles:

France: 211,208 square miles

California: : 163,707 square miles:

Montana: : 147,046 square miles:

Germany 137,858 square miles

Norway 125,000 square miles
Western Australia 1,021,478 square miles

Queensland 715,309 square miles

Northern Territory 502,902 square miles

South Australia 402,903 square miles

New South Wales 312,528 square miles

So there you have it - 2 states bigger than Alaska, 5 bigger than Texas.

but then, size isn't everything is it?

Well it's nice to brag I have the big one ;-) Now tell Arny that the
population of WA is around 2,200,000. That's 2 people per square mile


The question is whether that is an advantantage or a disadvantage. I lived
in Carnarvon in the 60s it was a long lonely drive to Perth. Then again
flying from LA to Boston, you pass over a lot of uninhabited country. Like
us, the yanks tend to cluster into the more desirable real estate.


Keith

Perth has 1.5mil people in about 200ml*2 so there is another 700K in the
next million! So the trend is here as well ;-)

BTW I do sympathise with you being in Carnarvon in the sixties. So you were
either an Aboriginal field officer or a tech at the tracking station? I
would bet the later.

Cheers TT

 

[TT]

"Keithr" <keithr@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:48b6937e$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

Mike Coatham wrote:
bassett wrote:
"clanker" <flerp@dingdong.net> wrote in message
news:48B639D1.3080707@dingdong.net...
bassett wrote:
"clanker" <flerp@dingdong.net> wrote in message
news:48B5BE89.10203@dingdong.net...
Arny Krueger wrote:
"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in message
But you
won't of cause. Your sort only remember what you want to
remember, the rest gets forgotten and swept under the
carpit for another day.
*****snippedysnip

Given the quality of your writing and its contents Basset, what sort
of mind-altering substance are you on right now?



The "mind altering substance" is oxygen, stolen from real people....

....unless bassett won some in a spelling contest.
Thank you for your eloquent contribution, You and Terrell, should
get together, you would make a perfect pair.
As for the spelling, WE speak and spell correctly, Unlike you
Septics who tend to corrupt everything you touch


bassett

Says an illiterate, mind-numbingly stupid "dog" with a pommy accent !

Congratulations on the spelling in your last post, let me guess - mummy
showed you how to use a spell-checker ?

Nice to see I'm once again correct and there's no argument from the
minions,
Even if it has become rather boring attempting to communicate with
"trailer trash'' who
still look up to people like Jerry Springer for direction and
guidence.

But I must say it's very perceivable of you, arriving at a judgement on
my accent, which
you gleaned from words of infinite wisdom. Pity your total wrong,
Still that's no surprise,
I doubt you have ever been correct about anything, in your sad little
life.


bassett

Bassett - you appear to have a problem - one second you are stating "WE
speak and spell correctly...." and in the next breath completely mangle
the English language. And I quote " Pity your total wrong....."
For goodness sake get it right. The correct statement is...... "Pity
you're ( short for YOU ARE) totally wrong".


Unfortunately, due in large part to the influence of the internet, the
distinction between your and you're is rapidly disapearing

Keith

I can name one cretinous Yank from Detroit that does it all the time ;-)
But then that city does have 47% adult illiteracy to contend with.

Cheers TT

 

[TT]

"Mike Coatham" <coatham@es.co.nz> wrote in message
news:g9607t$mq$1@lust.ihug.co.nz...

bassett wrote:
"clanker" <flerp@dingdong.net> wrote in message
news:48B639D1.3080707@dingdong.net...
bassett wrote:
"clanker" <flerp@dingdong.net> wrote in message
news:48B5BE89.10203@dingdong.net...
Arny Krueger wrote:
"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in message
But you
won't of cause. Your sort only remember what you want to
remember, the rest gets forgotten and swept under the
carpit for another day.
*****snippedysnip

Given the quality of your writing and its contents Basset, what sort
of mind-altering substance are you on right now?



The "mind altering substance" is oxygen, stolen from real people....

....unless bassett won some in a spelling contest.
Thank you for your eloquent contribution, You and Terrell, should get
together, you would make a perfect pair.
As for the spelling, WE speak and spell correctly, Unlike you
Septics who tend to corrupt everything you touch


bassett

Says an illiterate, mind-numbingly stupid "dog" with a pommy accent !

Congratulations on the spelling in your last post, let me guess - mummy
showed you how to use a spell-checker ?

Nice to see I'm once again correct and there's no argument from the
minions,
Even if it has become rather boring attempting to communicate with
"trailer trash'' who
still look up to people like Jerry Springer for direction and
guidence.

But I must say it's very perceivable of you, arriving at a judgement on
my accent, which
you gleaned from words of infinite wisdom. Pity your total wrong, Still
that's no surprise,
I doubt you have ever been correct about anything, in your sad little
life.


bassett

Bassett - you appear to have a problem - one second you are stating "WE
speak and spell correctly...." and in the next breath completely mangle
the English language. And I quote " Pity your total wrong....."
For goodness sake get it right. The correct statement is...... "Pity
you're ( short for YOU ARE) totally wrong".

Hint: Consider the alterative, that a certain mutt just maybe putting on a

bit of an act ;-)

Cheers TT

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

TT wrote:

I can name one cretinous Yank from Detroit that does it all the time ;-)
But then that city does have 47% adult illiteracy to contend with.

What do you expect from a town owned by the UAW Union?


--
http://improve-usenet.org/index.html

aioe.org, Goggle Groups, and Web TV users must request to be white
listed, or I will not see your messages.

If you have broadband, your ISP may have a NNTP news server included in
your account: http://www.usenettools.net/ISP.htm


There are two kinds of people on this earth:
The crazy, and the insane.
The first sign of insanity is denying that you're crazy.

 

[Arny Krueger]

"TT" <TTencerNoSpaM@westnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:8smdnVy3H8wc3SvVRVnyggA@westnet.com.au

Well it's nice to brag I have the big one ;-) Now tell
Arny that the population of WA is around 2,200,000. That's 2 people per
square mile

Alaska: population 670,053, size 570,380 square miles. That's just a shade
over 1 person per square mile.

 

[Keithr]

Arny Krueger wrote:

"Keithr" <keithr@nowhere.com.au> wrote in message
news:48b621fe$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au
Arny Krueger wrote:
"bassett" <bassett@bassettskennel.com.au> wrote in
message news:48b4f7c8$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au
Arny Krueger wrote:

Your so-called states are also very small in size
compaired (sic) to some places.
OK, Rhode Island is small compared to Antartica.

Alaska: : 656,425 square miles:

Texas: : 268,601 square miles:

France: 211,208 square miles

California: : 163,707 square miles:

Montana: : 147,046 square miles:

Germany 137,858 square miles

Norway 125,000 square miles

Western Australia 1,021,478 square miles

Yeah, but it is all grass.

ROFL, obviously you have never been there

Queensland 715,309 square miles

Yeah, but it is all grass or desert.

You are showing your ignorance Arnie, do some research

Northern Territory 502,902 square miles

Yeah, but it is all grass or desert.

You are showing your ignorance Arnie, do some research

South Australia 402,903 square miles

Yeah, but it is all grass or desert.

You are showing your ignorance Arnie, do some research

New South Wales 312,528 square miles

Yeah, but it is all grass or desert.

You are showing your ignorance Arnie, do some research

So there you have it - 2 states bigger than Alaska, 5
bigger than Texas.

What you don't seem to get is that Texas is a civilized, productive state
with a number of great cities and modern infrastructure. Texas, just one
state has a population of 23,507,783, while the whole of Australia has
same-year population of only 20,600,856. Texas, just one state has a GSP of
$771 billion dollars while all of Australia has same-year GNP $544 billion
dollars. Do the math - the average Texan is almost 50% more productive than
the average aussie, which is one reason why we have less wasteland.

If we accept you figures, which I don't have time to check, it would
imply that the average Texan produces $32,531 per year and the average
Australian $26,408 per year. I.e. the average Australian produces 81% of
a Texan - it looks like your numeracy skills are on a par with your
literacy ones.

Alaska is the only US state that compares to Australia for absence of
civilization. Unlike Australia we have 49 other states that are definitely
civilized. Well, 48 - Nevada is pretty sparse. ;-)

but then, size isn't everything is it?

Exactly. Unlike underdeveloped spaces like Australia that are mostly desert
and grazing land, the US has plenty of empty space, *and* lots of
well-developed land populated by a wealthy,highly productive people.

And extremely poor people living off the minimum wage with no health cover.

Like most Americans you confuse quantity with quality lets look at The
Economist's 2008 top 10 list of most livable cities

1 Vancouver Canada 98.8
2 Melbourne Australia 98.2
3 Vienna Austria 97.9
4 Perth Australia 97.3
5 Toronto Canada 97.0
6 Helsinki Finland 96.9
7 Adelaide Australia 96.6
- Calgary Canada 96.6
9 Geneva Switzerland 96.1
- Sydney Australia 96.1
- Zurich Switzerland 96.1

I see 4 Australian cities there but no US ones

Then there is Mercer's quality of living index survey 2008

1 Zurich Switzerland 108
2 Vienna Austria 107.9
- Geneva Switzerland 107.9
4 Vancouver Canada 107.6
5 Auckland New Zealand 107.3
6 Dusseldorf Germany 107.2
7 Munich Germany 107
- Frankfurt Germany 107
9 Bern Switzerland 106.5
10 Sydney Australia 106.3
11 Copenhagen Denmark 106.2
12 Wellington New Zealand 105.8
13 Amsterdam The Netherlands 105.7
14 Brussels Belgium 105.4
15 Toronto Canada 105.3
16 Berlin Germany 105
17 Melbourne Australia 104.8
- Luxembourg Luxembourg 104.8
19 Ottawa Canada 104.8
20 Stockholm Sweden 104.5
21 Perth Australia 104.3
22 Montreal Canada 104.2
23 Nurnberg Germany 104.1
24 Oslo Norway 103.7
25 Dublin Ireland 103.5
- Calgary Canada 103.5
27 Hamburg Germany 103.4
28 Honolulu US 103.1

Wow! there is an American city there at 28 behind 3 Australian ones. I
don't think that I would call Honolulu a typical American city though.

 

[Keithr]

Hey Arnie, I just found this:-

Morgan Quitno Press' 6th Annual Safest City Award

"MOST DANGEROUS" RANK ORDER

A Score of "0.00" would reflect an average crime rate at the national
rate in the six crimes reviewed. A positive score reflects an average
rate above the national rate.

Dangerous Order Safest Order City Score

1 315 Detroit, MI 354.71
2 314 Atlanta, GA 348.29
3 313 Camden, NJ 320.07
4 312 Baltimore, MD 307.57
5 311 St. Louis, MO 302.33
6 310 Gary, IN 286.37
7 309 Flint, MI 273.29
8 308 West Palm Beach, FL 267.61
9 307 Miami, FL 255.59
10 306 New Orleans, LA 249.15
11 305 Tampa, FL 238.68
12 304 Kansas City, MO 236.86
13 303 Jackson, MS 236.32
14 302 Richmond, VA 235.00
15 301 Youngstown, OH 231.89
16 300 Newark, NJ 230.94
17 299 Washington, DC 230.88
18 298 Compton, CA 216.77
19 297 Orlando, FL 210.33
20 296 Memphis, TN 206.64

So there you have it, the most dangerous of 315 cities in the US, it is
a pity they don't do an international one.