Petty White Nationalists

"Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote
in news:qihf7r$bi1$1@dont-email.me:

Whoey Louie wrote:
On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 4:30:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso
wrote:
bitrex wrote:

A civil society will find a way to make peace with guns, and an
un-civil society will find a way to make war with knives.

The United States in aggregate tends to not be strongly one
thing or the other.

We made peace with guns even when fully automatic Tommy Guns
were legally available. All societies started making war with
whatever weapons they had access to as soon as they started
drugging up to feel better.

BS. That's why gun control was passed in the 30s, it tightly
controlled fully automatic weapons.

Only because of the mafia, and they didn't shoot random people
either. Individuals did not do mass shootings with any kind of
weapon until recently. Nobody has explained why.

A bunch of ill raised pussies who decide they want to take out a
bunch of folks who had it better than they did before they get their
suicide by cop event.
 
On 8/8/19 9:10 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:TD33F.154157$jl6.142508@fx04.iad:

Self-reporting by the family after the fact isn't of much value I
don't think. Dysfunctional, abusive families can disguise
themselves quite well particularly if they have money to throw at
the problem.


Remember "tot mom"?

Yeah, nobody thought she was that great a person to begin with I don't
think. There'll be more of that for sure in those states where they want
to make abortion a crime though I don't suppose the people who think it
should be figure there's any difference.

Or like JonBenĂŠt Ramsey where the parents did it nearly as sure as the
sun rises.

Dressing 5 year girls up like adult beauty pageant models and shit and
having them parade around in front of pervs for $$$ there's an activity
that should be made illegal
 
On 8/8/19 9:44 AM, John Robertson wrote:

These faces seem fairly accurate of subjects of 2019 shooters.

https://www.snopes.com/tachyon/2019/08/1565040845735.jpg?resize=600,646

Greg


Read the background on that image for a reality check:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mass-shooter-shooting-mugshots/


John

Only the very gullible or very dishonest would take a look at the image
and not gander immediately that the criteria was designed to get as many
black people on there as possible, "four our more people shot" note they
didn't say killed, to include the dozens of dopey gang-banger incidents
that happen every year at private parties and in people's homes over the
usual things shootings have always occurred over: women, money, drugs.

My guess is if you looked into all those incidents that even "four or
more people shot" would contract to "maybe four people were _injured_ if
you include a ricochet or two and some people falling over each other
and getting bruised or bumping into something."

everyone knows what the context of a (terrorism-related) mass shooting
is and it's not that stuff.
 
On 8/8/19 3:38 AM, whit3rd wrote:
On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 2:20:44 PM UTC-7, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 2:12:28 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:

Shooters are often first-time criminals. Gangs kill rivals but don't
shoot up WalMarts for no reason.

Maybe we should look at what the El Paso guy actually said? He left
a white supremacy manifesto...

Why would his destructive (and self-destructive) actions be called 'reasoned'?
I'd discount his claim of principles, in favor of ... morbid fascination with
antipersonnel weapons.

Eric Rudolph, who bombed the Summer Olympics in 1996, also went after
an abortion clinic... he just had to bomb, no coherent reasoning required.
Any target will do for such a perpetrator.

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYLW8N921V4>
 
mpm <mpmillard@aol.com> wrote:
On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 4:28:07 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:

I agree John.
Some percentage of this is likely attributable to advances in modern medicine.
Instead of locking crazy people up, where they would have no access to
guns, we put them on meds and delude ourselves into thinking they will
always be safe, productive members of society.

While I'm sure that's true in most cases, it only takes a few whack-jobs,
or folks off their meds, to account for mass-murder. And perhaps, the
meds have side effects that are even worse than being crazy. All driven by profits.

They usually talk about folks being on Meds, but fail to mention if they
stopped taking them. I know for a fact that can trigger events, perhaps
worse than not taking any Meds at all.

Greg


And, as a gun-owner, it pisses me off every time someone suggests we need
more or better "gun control". No we don't.

If we did, we'd confiscate everyone's automobiles too, and for the same
false premise. Some idiot runs into a school bus full of children, and
somehow taking my car is going to help fix that? (Just substitute
vehicle for gun, while simultaneously realizing that driving is a
privilege while owning a firearm is a Constitutional right!)

Yes. It is sad when bad things happen.
Maybe there are just too many damn people?
(Twice as many as when I was born -- so maybe 2X the number of incidents?)
I'm just talking out loud.... No need to fact check it.

I'll say this:
Whenever I go to Walmart, I have a Glock-19 holstered IWB at 4:30, with
one in the chamber. Maybe if more shoppers carried, we see a lot less of this shit?
 
gregz <zekor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:437493189587029635.592772zekor-comcast.net@news.eternal-septembe
r.org:

They usually talk about folks being on Meds, but fail to mention
if they stopped taking them. I know for a fact that can trigger
events, perhaps worse than not taking any Meds at all.

Greg

Pretty sure that the Sandyhook shooter was a former ritalin
recipient. I think that was all though.
 
On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 9:03:52 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 8/8/19 10:22 AM, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 7:30:28 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:d31800e5-0d46-4cba-
b570-7ee90e3cbc0b@googlegroups.com:

it looks like you're denying that alcohol abuse is a factor
in domestic violence. Wrong again.

You do not get it. The person's ill raised mentality is the root
cause.

As if it was that simple. Many of these shooters, maybe most, have
been raised in what appear to be normal homes. The mother of the
El Paso shooter for example says:

"Patrick's actions were apparently influenced and informed by people we do not know, and from ideas and beliefs we do not accept or condone."
"He was raised in a family that taught love, kindness, respect, and tolerance — rejecting all forms of racism, prejudice, hatred, and violence."

Well what else would the family say "he was abused constantly?"

Sure, they could be lying. You have any evidence they are? With all
the reporters digging, you'd think some stories would be coming
out by now. I haven't heard anything. And there have been plenty
of other mass shooters where there was no indications that there was
any abuse.


Self-reporting by the family after the fact isn't of much value I don't
think. Dysfunctional, abusive families can disguise themselves quite
well particularly if they have money to throw at the problem.

I knew a number of guys who had pretty messed-up family life in primary
school but it only became apparent years later when they got themselves
into trouble or in happier cases they tell you at the 20 year reunion
they don't talk to their father anymore.

I don't deny that can be an important factor, just that it's apparently
not the only factor. And there are plenty of people who grow up in less
than ideal homes who don't become violent criminals too.
 
On 8/9/19 9:14 AM, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 9:03:52 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 8/8/19 10:22 AM, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 7:30:28 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:d31800e5-0d46-4cba-
b570-7ee90e3cbc0b@googlegroups.com:

it looks like you're denying that alcohol abuse is a factor
in domestic violence. Wrong again.

You do not get it. The person's ill raised mentality is the root
cause.

As if it was that simple. Many of these shooters, maybe most, have
been raised in what appear to be normal homes. The mother of the
El Paso shooter for example says:

"Patrick's actions were apparently influenced and informed by people we do not know, and from ideas and beliefs we do not accept or condone."
"He was raised in a family that taught love, kindness, respect, and tolerance — rejecting all forms of racism, prejudice, hatred, and violence."

Well what else would the family say "he was abused constantly?"

Sure, they could be lying. You have any evidence they are? With all
the reporters digging, you'd think some stories would be coming
out by now. I haven't heard anything. And there have been plenty
of other mass shooters where there was no indications that there was
any abuse.

"abuse" is an elusive thing to quantify it doesn't always involve your
stereotypical alcoholic parent who likes to beat the stepkids.

Pampering, doting, "special-snowflaking", helicopter-parenting, allowing
a child too much autonomy at too young an age, throwing money at the kid
and buying lots of gifts/being an unconditional provider, lack of
discipline or ever doing "tough love" and laying down consistent
punishments for misbehavior, not requiring the child from time to time
to face the consequences of their actions, etc. can also be considered a
form of abuse


Self-reporting by the family after the fact isn't of much value I don't
think. Dysfunctional, abusive families can disguise themselves quite
well particularly if they have money to throw at the problem.

I knew a number of guys who had pretty messed-up family life in primary
school but it only became apparent years later when they got themselves
into trouble or in happier cases they tell you at the 20 year reunion
they don't talk to their father anymore.

I don't deny that can be an important factor, just that it's apparently
not the only factor. And there are plenty of people who grow up in less
than ideal homes who don't become violent criminals too.

Yep. What actually causes the "criminal mindset" and why a "mindset" in
some cases progresses to terrible crimes and in others it never does,
how much of it is environment and how much of it is genetics/nature has
also been elusive since the times of Jack the Ripper and Arthur Conan
Doyle and before
 
On 8/9/19 9:14 AM, Whoey Louie wrote:

Self-reporting by the family after the fact isn't of much value I don't
think. Dysfunctional, abusive families can disguise themselves quite
well particularly if they have money to throw at the problem.

I knew a number of guys who had pretty messed-up family life in primary
school but it only became apparent years later when they got themselves
into trouble or in happier cases they tell you at the 20 year reunion
they don't talk to their father anymore.

I don't deny that can be an important factor, just that it's apparently
not the only factor. And there are plenty of people who grow up in less
than ideal homes who don't become violent criminals too.

my parents divorced when I was 14 and my home life was much much less
than ideal, it never lead me to violence though as a young man I was
certainly angry about the situation quite a bit. As I got older and had
other more positive experiences that anger faded and I took it less
personal. my experience was not unique sadly it happens to many many
other young men, I did nothing to deserve it, it was just bad luck.

If anything it's possibly part of why I got interested in engineering,
for the same reason other guys I know who come from similar situation
work on tuning cars and engines, provides a center of control and sanity
in otherwise uncontrollable circumstances
 
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 01:07:50 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
news:7ntokedrpd8apnj1mbig2jk1rpqdtbqmoq@4ax.com:

That makes sense. Marajuana is a lot more potent than it used to
be,

You are fucking retarded. Pot did nothing EVER. It has always
been the person doing bad things.

Stop blaming drugs, you stupid shit.

And the potency claim is a fucking lie too.

Wow, what have you been smoking today?

I bet vaping makes some people crazy too.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top