Petty White Nationalists

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:ff973111-0e5a-4cd7-
837f-e2f2e254d8a9@googlegroups.com:

> we should have done something draconian.

We should have done something draconian to your mother before she
shat you out.
 
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:7fd2b6e6-120d-4769-a3c0-19a92b726172@googlegroups.com:

On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 6:58:36 PM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:Ogm2F.173606$I%1.146823@fx08.iad:

On 8/6/19 4:30 PM, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:

A civil society will find a way to make peace with guns, and
an un-civil society will find a way to make war with knives.

The United States in aggregate tends to not be strongly one
thing or the other.

We made peace with guns even when fully automatic Tommy Guns
were legally available. All societies started making war with
whatever weapons they had access to as soon as they started
drugging up to feel better.



Prior to around WW2 the main "regulation" on firearms was cost,
a good-quality handgun like a Colt 1911 or something cost half
a months salary for a middle-class person in the 30 (and that's
assuming you had no other expenses, it would have taken longer
to actually save up for one.) it cost maybe $50 and you could
buy a new car for $600.

It was unlikely you could get one on credit from anyone other
than a loan shark, the banking system personal loan industry
was in its infancy and credit availability was determined on
"character evaluation" (are you wealthy and white? and not
Irish or Italian, please), not an objective "score" of any
kind.


Tommy guns and military-type weapons, fully automatic weapons
etc., were
more widely available than now but were priced at the modern
equivalent of 7 or 8 thousand dollars per and ammunition wasn't
that cheap, either. they were owned in significant quantity
only by law enforcement/military, gangsters, and the very
wealthy.

And drugs, not then or now, has never had anything to do with
their
mindset.

This dude watched reefer madness and is stupid enough to
believe
it. Throughou the millennia, it has never ever been about any
drugs or inebriants.

He probably thinks we never went to the moon, and that the
Earth is
flat.

That's clearly wrong too.

You are an idiot.

Many of the shooters have been on
drugs for mental illness.

Some are hopped up on drugs. It was not the drugs that did it, nor
was the drugs the cause.

That is like blaming the alcohol when some drunk, badly raised jock
fuck jackass beats on his wife. It ain't the alcohol, it is the jock
fuck jackass drunk. Straight, drunk or otherwise, he should go to
prison.
 
On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 10:22:08 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:7fd2b6e6-120d-4769-a3c0-19a92b726172@googlegroups.com:

On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 6:58:36 PM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:Ogm2F.173606$I%1.146823@fx08.iad:

On 8/6/19 4:30 PM, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:

A civil society will find a way to make peace with guns, and
an un-civil society will find a way to make war with knives.

The United States in aggregate tends to not be strongly one
thing or the other.

We made peace with guns even when fully automatic Tommy Guns
were legally available. All societies started making war with
whatever weapons they had access to as soon as they started
drugging up to feel better.



Prior to around WW2 the main "regulation" on firearms was cost,
a good-quality handgun like a Colt 1911 or something cost half
a months salary for a middle-class person in the 30 (and that's
assuming you had no other expenses, it would have taken longer
to actually save up for one.) it cost maybe $50 and you could
buy a new car for $600.

It was unlikely you could get one on credit from anyone other
than a loan shark, the banking system personal loan industry
was in its infancy and credit availability was determined on
"character evaluation" (are you wealthy and white? and not
Irish or Italian, please), not an objective "score" of any
kind.


Tommy guns and military-type weapons, fully automatic weapons
etc., were
more widely available than now but were priced at the modern
equivalent of 7 or 8 thousand dollars per and ammunition wasn't
that cheap, either. they were owned in significant quantity
only by law enforcement/military, gangsters, and the very
wealthy.

And drugs, not then or now, has never had anything to do with
their
mindset.

This dude watched reefer madness and is stupid enough to
believe
it. Throughou the millennia, it has never ever been about any
drugs or inebriants.

He probably thinks we never went to the moon, and that the
Earth is
flat.

That's clearly wrong too.


You are an idiot.

Many of the shooters have been on
drugs for mental illness.

Some are hopped up on drugs. It was not the drugs that did it, nor
was the drugs the cause.

Thank you for that professional opinion, Doctor DL. BTW, attempt at
changing the goal posts noted. No one said the drugs were the cause,
only that drugs, both legal and illegal, can be a contributing factor.



That is like blaming the alcohol when some drunk, badly raised jock
fuck jackass beats on his wife. It ain't the alcohol, it is the jock
fuck jackass drunk. Straight, drunk or otherwise, he should go to
prison.

As usual, another attempt to divert to the wilderness. The issue isn't
about whether anyone should or shouldn't be held responsible or
go to prison. The issue is what contributes to these mass shootings.
And here, it looks like you're denying that alcohol abuse is a factor
in domestic violence. Wrong again.
 
On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 2:20:44 PM UTC-7, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 2:12:28 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:

Shooters are often first-time criminals. Gangs kill rivals but don't
shoot up WalMarts for no reason.

Maybe we should look at what the El Paso guy actually said? He left
a white supremacy manifesto...

Why would his destructive (and self-destructive) actions be called 'reasoned'?
I'd discount his claim of principles, in favor of ... morbid fascination with
antipersonnel weapons.

Eric Rudolph, who bombed the Summer Olympics in 1996, also went after
an abortion clinic... he just had to bomb, no coherent reasoning required.
Any target will do for such a perpetrator.
 
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 15:42:43 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

Just when you thought that Islamic terrorists were about as stupid as
it gets with their suicide attacks, we now have white supremacists
and all other manner of TrumpTarded idiots out there doing suicide
shootings.

This country does not need gun control.

We need to put gang members both black and white (and hispanic) in
prison, and the assholes who antagonize them (Donald J. Trump) as
well.

We need more prisons so that the violent offenders we put there are
not being toothpaste squoze out the back door without serving due to
overcrowding.

Shooters are often first-time criminals. Gangs kill rivals but don't
shoot up WalMarts for no reason.

But there are a couple hundred murders in St Louis every year, and the
press doesn't care. Baltimore kills 45 in some months.


We need to bring back the death penalty and actually carry the
fucking penalties out. One year of appeals and you are done.
Period.

Certain crimes should mean that the offender never gets to step
foot on free soil ever again.

Superior? These stupid, society ruining fucks are not superior even
to a freshly laid turd. Donald J. Trump included.

Someone might look for a common factor among the shooters. Video
games, too much strong weed, some other prescription or street drugs,
vaping, whatever. Some things make some people paranoid and violent.

These faces seem fairly accurate of subjects of 2019 shooters.

https://www.snopes.com/tachyon/2019/08/1565040845735.jpg?resize=600,646

Greg
 
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:d31800e5-0d46-4cba-
b570-7ee90e3cbc0b@googlegroups.com:

it looks like you're denying that alcohol abuse is a factor
in domestic violence. Wrong again.

You do not get it. The person's ill raised mentality is the root
cause. The alcohol is merely yet more stupid decisions. Jocks get
mad when they almost grow up and find out they wont be getting a path
to jock hero superbowl stardom. Some of them 'move on' to become our
ill waistline cops. How quaint. Some of them are so poorly raised
they get mad when 'the ol lady' doesn't have dinner ready and waiting
when they get home from work.

Little white supremacists act the same way. They get mad when their
ideal world is not attained. After they spend their jail hours
talking about how they are superior and making lists of the reasons
why their uptopia has not been realized. Look at Trump. He tried
that manipulative crap with the mob and they pushed him right out of
NJ and the casino business. Half the stupid shit he pulls is because
he is mad and his hate filled world did not coalesce.
He is the most dangerous one in the nation. His word and actions
cost lives and more than anything Hanoi Jane ever said or did.

The problem with both is that they think it is OK to lay their
hands on people. That is the whole problem. Nobody out there knows
that rule apparently.
 
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:d31800e5-0d46-4cba-b570-7ee90e3cbc0b@googlegroups.com:

Thank you for that professional opinion, Doctor DL. BTW, attempt
at changing the goal posts noted. No one said the drugs were the
cause, only that drugs, both legal and illegal, can be a
contributing factor.

No. That is what you said in your post.

What you apparently did not do is actually read the thread and the
discussion, while you are clearly and merely still on your personal
mission to fuck with me. Your stupidity is a *still* contributing
factor to the noise in this group.

I want to return the favor. Post your name and address, pussy boy.
Have your family join you there. I'll come over and say "high".
I'll be sure to do a bunch of bad drugs first too. Where is a good
lye pit when you need one.

Your fat ass probably wouldn't even fit.
 
gregz <zekor@comcast.net> wrote in
news:767880070586948127.247830zekor-comcast.net@news.eternal-septembe
r.org:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 15:42:43 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

Just when you thought that Islamic terrorists were about as
stupid as it gets with their suicide attacks, we now have white
supremacists and all other manner of TrumpTarded idiots out
there doing suicide shootings.

This country does not need gun control.

We need to put gang members both black and white (and hispanic)
in
prison, and the assholes who antagonize them (Donald J. Trump)
as well.

We need more prisons so that the violent offenders we put there
are
not being toothpaste squoze out the back door without serving
due to overcrowding.

Shooters are often first-time criminals. Gangs kill rivals but
don't shoot up WalMarts for no reason.

But there are a couple hundred murders in St Louis every year,
and the press doesn't care. Baltimore kills 45 in some months.


We need to bring back the death penalty and actually carry the
fucking penalties out. One year of appeals and you are done.
Period.

Certain crimes should mean that the offender never gets to step
foot on free soil ever again.

Superior? These stupid, society ruining fucks are not superior
even
to a freshly laid turd. Donald J. Trump included.

Someone might look for a common factor among the shooters. Video
games, too much strong weed, some other prescription or street
drugs, vaping, whatever. Some things make some people paranoid
and violent.


These faces seem fairly accurate of subjects of 2019 shooters.

Except that is a white supremacist post. Look at the caption.

It is specifically meant to show that it is all but whites doing
these things. Cannot zoom in on what you put up. Just google "mass
shooters 2019" in google images to look at the higher res shot and
read the text.

I doubt seriously that is true (no 'white' shooters). There are
plenty of white idiots all over the country. We have one in our
highest office who got put there by a bunch just like him.

The idiot who murdered my aunt and cousin 32 years ago was white.

Everyone harps on about mass shootings, and yet we hear little
about individual events.
 
On 2019/08/08 2:09 a.m., gregz wrote:
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:
On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 15:42:43 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

Just when you thought that Islamic terrorists were about as stupid as
it gets with their suicide attacks, we now have white supremacists
and all other manner of TrumpTarded idiots out there doing suicide
shootings.

This country does not need gun control.

We need to put gang members both black and white (and hispanic) in
prison, and the assholes who antagonize them (Donald J. Trump) as
well.

We need more prisons so that the violent offenders we put there are
not being toothpaste squoze out the back door without serving due to
overcrowding.

Shooters are often first-time criminals. Gangs kill rivals but don't
shoot up WalMarts for no reason.

But there are a couple hundred murders in St Louis every year, and the
press doesn't care. Baltimore kills 45 in some months.


We need to bring back the death penalty and actually carry the
fucking penalties out. One year of appeals and you are done.
Period.

Certain crimes should mean that the offender never gets to step
foot on free soil ever again.

Superior? These stupid, society ruining fucks are not superior even
to a freshly laid turd. Donald J. Trump included.

Someone might look for a common factor among the shooters. Video
games, too much strong weed, some other prescription or street drugs,
vaping, whatever. Some things make some people paranoid and violent.


These faces seem fairly accurate of subjects of 2019 shooters.

https://www.snopes.com/tachyon/2019/08/1565040845735.jpg?resize=600,646

Greg

Read the background on that image for a reality check:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mass-shooter-shooting-mugshots/


John
 
On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 7:30:28 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence..org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:d31800e5-0d46-4cba-
b570-7ee90e3cbc0b@googlegroups.com:

it looks like you're denying that alcohol abuse is a factor
in domestic violence. Wrong again.

You do not get it. The person's ill raised mentality is the root
cause.

As if it was that simple. Many of these shooters, maybe most, have
been raised in what appear to be normal homes. The mother of the
El Paso shooter for example says:

"Patrick's actions were apparently influenced and informed by people we do not know, and from ideas and beliefs we do not accept or condone."
"He was raised in a family that taught love, kindness, respect, and tolerance — rejecting all forms of racism, prejudice, hatred, and violence.."




> The alcohol is merely yet more stupid decisions.

Maybe so, but it's still a factor and alcoholism isn't something easy
to overcome. And as I cited, many of these shooters have been on
prescription drugs for mental illness. Is that a stupid decision?




Jocks get
mad when they almost grow up and find out they wont be getting a path
to jock hero superbowl stardom. Some of them 'move on' to become our
ill waistline cops. How quaint. Some of them are so poorly raised
they get mad when 'the ol lady' doesn't have dinner ready and waiting
when they get home from work.

Again with the jocks? Sounds like you have some experience and issues
there.




Little white supremacists act the same way. They get mad when their
ideal world is not attained. After they spend their jail hours
talking about how they are superior and making lists of the reasons
why their uptopia has not been realized. Look at Trump. He tried
that manipulative crap with the mob and they pushed him right out of
NJ and the casino business.

Wow, from jocks to white supremacists, to Trump?




Half the stupid shit he pulls is because
> he is mad and his hate filled world did not coalesce.

Sounds like you're describing yourself.



He is the most dangerous one in the nation. His word and actions
cost lives and more than anything Hanoi Jane ever said or did.

The problem with both is that they think it is OK to lay their
hands on people. That is the whole problem. Nobody out there knows
that rule apparently.

Who is it that you're alleging Trump laid his hands on? And ain't all
this special, coming from the only guy here who makes online threats?
If you wound up shooting up someplace, why people would be saying,
all the warning signs were there, why didn't someone do something?
 
On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 7:18:48 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:d31800e5-0d46-4cba-b570-7ee90e3cbc0b@googlegroups.com:


Thank you for that professional opinion, Doctor DL. BTW, attempt
at changing the goal posts noted. No one said the drugs were the
cause, only that drugs, both legal and illegal, can be a
contributing factor.

No. That is what you said in your post.

That's another lie, I never said any such thing. You posted:

And drugs, not then or now, has never had anything to do with their
mindset.

This dude watched reefer madness and is stupid enough to believe
it. Throughou the millennia, it has never ever been about any drugs
or inebriants.

And I replied with:

"That's clearly wrong too. Many of the shooters have been on
drugs for mental illness. Adam Lanza (Sandy Hook), and Cruz (Parkland School),
Dylan Roof (Charleston Church) for example. We know the Dayton shooter
suffered from bipoloar disorder, so he likely was taking drugs or should
have been."




What you apparently did not do is actually read the thread and the
discussion,

ROFL

That's a good one, coming from you. I frequently have to show you
what you actually posted, like I just did.






while you are clearly and merely still on your personal
mission to fuck with me. Your stupidity is a *still* contributing
factor to the noise in this group.

Ain't that special coming from the guy that created this thread,
"Petty White Nationalists". Nuff said.




I want to return the favor. Post your name and address, pussy boy.
Have your family join you there. I'll come over and say "high".
I'll be sure to do a bunch of bad drugs first too. Where is a good
lye pit when you need one.

Your fat ass probably wouldn't even fit.

I'll add that to the running file of your threats here. We're getting
close to where it's worthy of getting the police involved. And isn't it
ironic that you're here pontificating on mass shootings, violence,
the causes, when you're the only one here that ever makes threats of
violence and you do it frequently?
 
On Wednesday, August 7, 2019 at 10:22:08 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:7fd2b6e6-120d-4769-a3c0-19a92b726172@googlegroups.com:

On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 6:58:36 PM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:Ogm2F.173606$I%1.146823@fx08.iad:

On 8/6/19 4:30 PM, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:

A civil society will find a way to make peace with guns, and
an un-civil society will find a way to make war with knives.

The United States in aggregate tends to not be strongly one
thing or the other.

We made peace with guns even when fully automatic Tommy Guns
were legally available. All societies started making war with
whatever weapons they had access to as soon as they started
drugging up to feel better.



Prior to around WW2 the main "regulation" on firearms was cost,
a good-quality handgun like a Colt 1911 or something cost half
a months salary for a middle-class person in the 30 (and that's
assuming you had no other expenses, it would have taken longer
to actually save up for one.) it cost maybe $50 and you could
buy a new car for $600.

It was unlikely you could get one on credit from anyone other
than a loan shark, the banking system personal loan industry
was in its infancy and credit availability was determined on
"character evaluation" (are you wealthy and white? and not
Irish or Italian, please), not an objective "score" of any
kind.


Tommy guns and military-type weapons, fully automatic weapons
etc., were
more widely available than now but were priced at the modern
equivalent of 7 or 8 thousand dollars per and ammunition wasn't
that cheap, either. they were owned in significant quantity
only by law enforcement/military, gangsters, and the very
wealthy.

And drugs, not then or now, has never had anything to do with
their
mindset.

This dude watched reefer madness and is stupid enough to
believe
it. Throughou the millennia, it has never ever been about any
drugs or inebriants.

He probably thinks we never went to the moon, and that the
Earth is
flat.

That's clearly wrong too.


You are an idiot.

Many of the shooters have been on
drugs for mental illness.

Some are hopped up on drugs. It was not the drugs that did it, nor
was the drugs the cause.

Do you ever look back at what you actually posted? Here it is:

"And drugs, not then or now, has never had anything to do with their
mindset. "

Now you want to try to spin it as drugs being the immediate cause or
the only cause. But that isn't what you posted and what I replied to.
Ultimately, it's impossible to determine exactly what did or did not
contribute to the shooting. But some of these shooters have been on
prescription drugs for mental problems, others may have been, it's not
clear that we always find out. Others used illegal drugs.





That is like blaming the alcohol when some drunk, badly raised jock
fuck jackass beats on his wife. It ain't the alcohol, it is the jock
fuck jackass drunk. Straight, drunk or otherwise, he should go to
prison.

Again, no one is blaming the alcohol. But only a fool would deny that
there is a link between alcohol abuse and domestic violence. And again
noted how you wander off into the wilderness, with the prison remarks.
Neither I nor anyone else here said anything about drugs or alcohol
being an excuse to avoid the consequences of the law.
 
Whoey Louie wrote:
On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 4:30:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:

A civil society will find a way to make peace with guns, and an
un-civil society will find a way to make war with knives.

The United States in aggregate tends to not be strongly one thing or
the other.

We made peace with guns even when fully automatic Tommy Guns were
legally available. All societies started making war with whatever
weapons they had access to as soon as they started drugging up to
feel better.

BS. That's why gun control was passed in the 30s, it tightly
controlled fully automatic weapons.

Only because of the mafia, and they didn't shoot random people either.
Individuals did not do mass shootings with any kind of weapon until
recently. Nobody has explained why.
 
torsdag den 8. august 2019 kl. 17.31.14 UTC+2 skrev Tom Del Rosso:
Whoey Louie wrote:
On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 4:30:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:

A civil society will find a way to make peace with guns, and an
un-civil society will find a way to make war with knives.

The United States in aggregate tends to not be strongly one thing or
the other.

We made peace with guns even when fully automatic Tommy Guns were
legally available. All societies started making war with whatever
weapons they had access to as soon as they started drugging up to
feel better.

BS. That's why gun control was passed in the 30s, it tightly
controlled fully automatic weapons.

Only because of the mafia, and they didn't shoot random people either.
Individuals did not do mass shootings with any kind of weapon until
recently. Nobody has explained why.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_postal
 
On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 11:31:14 AM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
Whoey Louie wrote:
On Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 4:30:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:

A civil society will find a way to make peace with guns, and an
un-civil society will find a way to make war with knives.

The United States in aggregate tends to not be strongly one thing or
the other.

We made peace with guns even when fully automatic Tommy Guns were
legally available. All societies started making war with whatever
weapons they had access to as soon as they started drugging up to
feel better.

BS. That's why gun control was passed in the 30s, it tightly
controlled fully automatic weapons.

Only because of the mafia,

It was a lot more than the mafia, Bonny and Clyde, Machine Gun Kelly,
Pretty Boy Floyd, Dillenger, for example. Those types were using
full autos too.



> and they didn't shoot random people either.

That's true, they didn't usually shoot random people intentionally at least.
Some were caught up in the crossfire though. That's similar to what goes
on in the bad inner cities, eg Chicago today. Most of that gun violence
it's gang bangers, drug dealers, etc going at each other, but many times
some innocent bystanders wind up dead too or instead.



Individuals did not do mass shootings with any kind of weapon until
recently. Nobody has explained why.

There has been mass murder going on even a hundred years ago, but it
was at much lower levels than what we're seeing now. There are probably
a lot of root causes, but my guess would be the internet has a lot to do
with it. Thirty years ago, if you were a little bit off, had some
bizarre dystopian views, what could you do? Subscribe to some wing nut
monthly newsletter? Now you can be instantly in contact with all kinds
of nuts, promoting all kinds of crazy, nasty ideologies, all kind of
conspiracy theories, that will encourage you, make you believe that what
you're thinking is right and normal. It's how they get people from
normal families in western countries to join ISIS. Not to hard to imagine
that it also inspires some into acts of violence. The question is,
what we can really do about it.
 
On Sun, 04 Aug 2019 11:12:19 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote:

On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 15:42:43 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

Just when you thought that Islamic terrorists were about as stupid as
it gets with their suicide attacks, we now have white supremacists
and all other manner of TrumpTarded idiots out there doing suicide
shootings.

This country does not need gun control.

We need to put gang members both black and white (and hispanic) in
prison, and the assholes who antagonize them (Donald J. Trump) as
well.

We need more prisons so that the violent offenders we put there are
not being toothpaste squoze out the back door without serving due to
overcrowding.

Shooters are often first-time criminals. Gangs kill rivals but don't
shoot up WalMarts for no reason.

But there are a couple hundred murders in St Louis every year, and the
press doesn't care. Baltimore kills 45 in some months.


We need to bring back the death penalty and actually carry the
fucking penalties out. One year of appeals and you are done.
Period.

Certain crimes should mean that the offender never gets to step
foot on free soil ever again.

Superior? These stupid, society ruining fucks are not superior even
to a freshly laid turd. Donald J. Trump included.

Someone might look for a common factor among the shooters. Video
games, too much strong weed, some other prescription or street drugs,
vaping, whatever. Some things make some people paranoid and violent.

https://nypost.com/2019/08/07/the-link-between-pot-and-mass-shootings-may-be-closer-than-we-think/

That makes sense. Marajuana is a lot more potent than it used to be,
and a lot of it is fortified with other stuff. That can make some
people paranoid and crazy.

The Dayton shooter was a leftie.

It wouldn't be unreasonable to outlaw large-magazine rapid-fire
weapons. Machine guns and bazookas and bombs are already illegal.
 
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:TD33F.154157$jl6.142508@fx04.iad:

Self-reporting by the family after the fact isn't of much value I
don't think. Dysfunctional, abusive families can disguise
themselves quite well particularly if they have money to throw at
the problem.

Remember "tot mom"?
 
John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
news:7ntokedrpd8apnj1mbig2jk1rpqdtbqmoq@4ax.com:

and a lot of it is fortified with other stuff. That can make some
people paranoid and crazy.

You are nuttier than a fruitcake.

You are shit, fortified with shit, spewing shit.

Your mother should be put in prison for failing to flush you.
 
John Larkin <jlarkin@highlandSNIPMEtechnology.com> wrote in
news:7ntokedrpd8apnj1mbig2jk1rpqdtbqmoq@4ax.com:

That makes sense. Marajuana is a lot more potent than it used to
be,

You are fucking retarded. Pot did nothing EVER. It has always
been the person doing bad things.

Stop blaming drugs, you stupid shit.

And the potency claim is a fucking lie too.

Columbian Pale would knock you on you ass and nobody was running
around back then performing ANY violent acts.

If anything, some would want to beat up the dealer because the shit
out there today is pretty lame sometimes despite being touted as some
super grade weed. Most times, actually, it does not measure up.

Before the coke train took over, south american weed was pretty
primo. Now, it doesn't even make it onto any train.
 
On 8/8/19 10:22 AM, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Thursday, August 8, 2019 at 7:30:28 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:d31800e5-0d46-4cba-
b570-7ee90e3cbc0b@googlegroups.com:

it looks like you're denying that alcohol abuse is a factor
in domestic violence. Wrong again.

You do not get it. The person's ill raised mentality is the root
cause.

As if it was that simple. Many of these shooters, maybe most, have
been raised in what appear to be normal homes. The mother of the
El Paso shooter for example says:

"Patrick's actions were apparently influenced and informed by people we do not know, and from ideas and beliefs we do not accept or condone."
"He was raised in a family that taught love, kindness, respect, and tolerance — rejecting all forms of racism, prejudice, hatred, and violence."

Well what else would the family say "he was abused constantly?"

Self-reporting by the family after the fact isn't of much value I don't
think. Dysfunctional, abusive families can disguise themselves quite
well particularly if they have money to throw at the problem.

I knew a number of guys who had pretty messed-up family life in primary
school but it only became apparent years later when they got themselves
into trouble or in happier cases they tell you at the 20 year reunion
they don't talk to their father anymore.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top