Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:51:31 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 4/18/2020 12:47 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:24:55 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 9:27:07 AM UTC-4, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
--
Cheers
Clive
Seems reasonable. The shutdown was to prevent hospitals from being
overwhelmed. Not to prevent people from getting sick, but just to
make sure they don't all get sick at the same time.
Well, we've managed that -- hospitals are underwhelmed -- so why not
get back to work?
About 40,000 Americans die in car accidents every year. Lots more are
grievously injured. But we don't shut the country down over that. (Or
ban cars, for that matter. Instead, we bail car companies out.)
Cheers,
James Arthur
Two ways to save a lot of lives:
Outlaw cigarettes.
Set the speed governors on all cars to 50 MPH.
The cigarette industry struck a devil's bargain with the states. Let
us keep giving millions of people emphysema and cancer and you get
more tax revenue.
From wiki:
According to a 2014 review in the New England Journal of Medicine,
tobacco will, if current smoking patterns persist, kill about 1
billion people in the 21st century, half of them before the age of
70.[9]
Why is no-one panicked about that?
Nobody has found a good way to codify "The wealthy get to do whatever
they want and the poor get the State's gun up their ass and their every
move controlled" into a coherent and acceptable written legal framework,
yet, though the United States has made the most advances in this area.
How did you acquire your proctological fixation?
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 12:47:22 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:24:55 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 9:27:07 AM UTC-4, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
--
Cheers
Clive
Seems reasonable. The shutdown was to prevent hospitals from being
overwhelmed. Not to prevent people from getting sick, but just to
make sure they don't all get sick at the same time.
Well, we've managed that -- hospitals are underwhelmed -- so why not
get back to work?
About 40,000 Americans die in car accidents every year. Lots more are
grievously injured. But we don't shut the country down over that. (Or
ban cars, for that matter. Instead, we bail car companies out.)
Cheers,
James Arthur
Two ways to save a lot of lives:
Outlaw cigarettes.
Set the speed governors on all cars to 50 MPH.
The cigarette industry struck a devil's bargain with the states. Let
us keep giving millions of people emphysema and cancer and you get
more tax revenue.
From wiki:
According to a 2014 review in the New England Journal of Medicine,
tobacco will, if current smoking patterns persist, kill about 1
billion people in the 21st century, half of them before the age of
70.[9]
Why is no-one panicked about that?
Don't forget alcohol -- 88,000 annually.
https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/alcohol-use.htm
But there's a simple cure for this -- no need for a lock-down,
just eliminate food. Everyone succumbing to anything has, at
one point, eaten food. Eliminate food for a year or two, and
we eliminate all human disease, 100%.
Simple. What could possibly go wrong?
(And as a bonus, you eliminate income inequality at the same time.)
So let's continue preventing people from doing anything they'd do
to put food on their tables, and we'll save lives. It's for the
children.
Grins,
James
Chicago taxes cigarettes over $7 per pack. Many low-income smokers
spend over 20% of their income on cigarettes.
Who here has ever smoked? I'd like to know
Fatalities at 112ppm from a 1515ppm detection recorded
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
Science teaches us to doubt.
Claude Bernard
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 1:28:09 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 12:47:22 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:24:55 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 9:27:07 AM UTC-4, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
--
Cheers
Clive
Seems reasonable. The shutdown was to prevent hospitals from being
overwhelmed. Not to prevent people from getting sick, but just to
make sure they don't all get sick at the same time.
Well, we've managed that -- hospitals are underwhelmed -- so why not
get back to work?
About 40,000 Americans die in car accidents every year. Lots more are
grievously injured. But we don't shut the country down over that. (Or
ban cars, for that matter. Instead, we bail car companies out.)
Cheers,
James Arthur
Two ways to save a lot of lives:
Outlaw cigarettes.
Set the speed governors on all cars to 50 MPH.
The cigarette industry struck a devil's bargain with the states. Let
us keep giving millions of people emphysema and cancer and you get
more tax revenue.
From wiki:
According to a 2014 review in the New England Journal of Medicine,
tobacco will, if current smoking patterns persist, kill about 1
billion people in the 21st century, half of them before the age of
70.[9]
Why is no-one panicked about that?
Don't forget alcohol -- 88,000 annually.
https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/alcohol-use.htm
But there's a simple cure for this -- no need for a lock-down,
just eliminate food. Everyone succumbing to anything has, at
one point, eaten food. Eliminate food for a year or two, and
we eliminate all human disease, 100%.
Simple. What could possibly go wrong?
(And as a bonus, you eliminate income inequality at the same time.)
So let's continue preventing people from doing anything they'd do
to put food on their tables, and we'll save lives. It's for the
children.
Grins,
James
Chicago taxes cigarettes over $7 per pack. Many low-income smokers
spend over 20% of their income on cigarettes.
Who here has ever smoked? I'd like to know
I smoked for a short period. Quit when I was in the Navy and was assigned to a ship in over haul. When at sea cigarettes were $ .85 a carton. ( eight and a half cents a pack ) So lots of sailors smoked and had run out of Sea Rats, so were bumming cigarettes.
I could afford cigarettes for myself ,but could not afford cigarettes for everyone. So quit smoking and took up drinking coffee.
Dan
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
On 4/18/2020 9:26 AM, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
The pictures are sometimes hilarious, like the guy who says "Covid-19 is
a LIE" but is wearing a mask and suit.
The woman (I think?) holding what looks to be a Bible with a patch on
their jacket that says "Natural Born Hellraiser." A true disciple of the
Lord I am sure.
gosh Trumpers really will do just about anything for their 15 minutes.
Chicago taxes cigarettes over $7 per pack. Many low-income smokers
spend over 20% of their income on cigarettes.
Who here has ever smoked? I'd like to know.
On 4/18/2020 10:58 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
Chicago taxes cigarettes over $7 per pack. Many low-income smokers
spend over 20% of their income on cigarettes.
Who here has ever smoked? I'd like to know.
I used to be a chain smoker. I was going through 50-60 cigarettes a day
before I quit in '91. My brand was one of the more expensive ones and
cost about US$0.20 for a pack of ten then. Now I believe it's about
$1.50. Adjusted for the difference in economy, that might be roughly
like $5 in the US.
On 4/18/2020 2:25 PM, bitrex wrote:
On 4/18/2020 9:26 AM, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
The pictures are sometimes hilarious, like the guy who says "Covid-19 is
a LIE" but is wearing a mask and suit.
The woman (I think?) holding what looks to be a Bible with a patch on
their jacket that says "Natural Born Hellraiser." A true disciple of the
Lord I am sure.
gosh Trumpers really will do just about anything for their 15 minutes.
Well, anything but put in an honest day's work, that is.
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 14:30:36 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 4/18/2020 2:25 PM, bitrex wrote:
On 4/18/2020 9:26 AM, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
The pictures are sometimes hilarious, like the guy who says "Covid-19 is
a LIE" but is wearing a mask and suit.
The woman (I think?) holding what looks to be a Bible with a patch on
their jacket that says "Natural Born Hellraiser." A true disciple of the
Lord I am sure.
gosh Trumpers really will do just about anything for their 15 minutes.
Well, anything but put in an honest day's work, that is.
Grow and truck your food, and supply you housing and energy, useless
stuff like that.
Who here has ever smoked? I'd like to know.
On 4/18/2020 1:25 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 12:51:31 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 4/18/2020 12:47 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:24:55 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 9:27:07 AM UTC-4, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
--
Cheers
Clive
Seems reasonable. The shutdown was to prevent hospitals from being
overwhelmed. Not to prevent people from getting sick, but just to
make sure they don't all get sick at the same time.
Well, we've managed that -- hospitals are underwhelmed -- so why not
get back to work?
About 40,000 Americans die in car accidents every year. Lots more are
grievously injured. But we don't shut the country down over that. (Or
ban cars, for that matter. Instead, we bail car companies out.)
Cheers,
James Arthur
Two ways to save a lot of lives:
Outlaw cigarettes.
Set the speed governors on all cars to 50 MPH.
The cigarette industry struck a devil's bargain with the states. Let
us keep giving millions of people emphysema and cancer and you get
more tax revenue.
From wiki:
According to a 2014 review in the New England Journal of Medicine,
tobacco will, if current smoking patterns persist, kill about 1
billion people in the 21st century, half of them before the age of
70.[9]
Why is no-one panicked about that?
Nobody has found a good way to codify "The wealthy get to do whatever
they want and the poor get the State's gun up their ass and their every
move controlled" into a coherent and acceptable written legal framework,
yet, though the United States has made the most advances in this area.
How did you acquire your proctological fixation?
I'll tell you my whole life story if you like you can read about it in
my upcoming anonymous autobiography.
On 4/18/2020 1:28 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 12:47:22 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:24:55 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 9:27:07 AM UTC-4, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
--
Cheers
Clive
Seems reasonable. The shutdown was to prevent hospitals from being
overwhelmed. Not to prevent people from getting sick, but just to
make sure they don't all get sick at the same time.
Well, we've managed that -- hospitals are underwhelmed -- so why not
get back to work?
About 40,000 Americans die in car accidents every year. Lots more are
grievously injured. But we don't shut the country down over that. (Or
ban cars, for that matter. Instead, we bail car companies out.)
Cheers,
James Arthur
Two ways to save a lot of lives:
Outlaw cigarettes.
Set the speed governors on all cars to 50 MPH.
The cigarette industry struck a devil's bargain with the states. Let
us keep giving millions of people emphysema and cancer and you get
more tax revenue.
From wiki:
According to a 2014 review in the New England Journal of Medicine,
tobacco will, if current smoking patterns persist, kill about 1
billion people in the 21st century, half of them before the age of
70.[9]
Why is no-one panicked about that?
Don't forget alcohol -- 88,000 annually.
https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/alcohol-use.htm
But there's a simple cure for this -- no need for a lock-down,
just eliminate food. Everyone succumbing to anything has, at
one point, eaten food. Eliminate food for a year or two, and
we eliminate all human disease, 100%.
Simple. What could possibly go wrong?
(And as a bonus, you eliminate income inequality at the same time.)
So let's continue preventing people from doing anything they'd do
to put food on their tables, and we'll save lives. It's for the
children.
Grins,
James
Chicago taxes cigarettes over $7 per pack. Many low-income smokers
spend over 20% of their income on cigarettes.
Who here has ever smoked? I'd like to know.
Oh I expect, the right-winger who wants freedom for himself but wants to
know everyone else's medical history in detail.
On 2020-04-18 13:28, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 12:47:22 PM UTC-4,
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:24:55 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 9:27:07 AM UTC-4, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably
don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
--
Cheers
Clive
Seems reasonable. The shutdown was to prevent hospitals from being
overwhelmed. Not to prevent people from getting sick, but just to
make sure they don't all get sick at the same time.
Well, we've managed that -- hospitals are underwhelmed -- so why not
get back to work?
About 40,000 Americans die in car accidents every year. Lots more are
grievously injured. But we don't shut the country down over that. (Or
ban cars, for that matter. Instead, we bail car companies out.)
Cheers,
James Arthur
Two ways to save a lot of lives:
Outlaw cigarettes.
Set the speed governors on all cars to 50 MPH.
The cigarette industry struck a devil's bargain with the states. Let
us keep giving millions of people emphysema and cancer and you get
more tax revenue.
From wiki:
According to a 2014 review in the New England Journal of Medicine,
tobacco will, if current smoking patterns persist, kill about 1
billion people in the 21st century, half of them before the age of
70.[9]
Why is no-one panicked about that?
Don't forget alcohol -- 88,000 annually.
https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/alcohol-use.htm
But there's a simple cure for this -- no need for a lock-down,
just eliminate food. Everyone succumbing to anything has, at
one point, eaten food. Eliminate food for a year or two, and
we eliminate all human disease, 100%.
Simple. What could possibly go wrong?
(And as a bonus, you eliminate income inequality at the same time.)
So let's continue preventing people from doing anything they'd do
to put food on their tables, and we'll save lives. It's for the
children.
Grins,
James
Chicago taxes cigarettes over $7 per pack. Many low-income smokers
spend over 20% of their income on cigarettes.
Who here has ever smoked? I'd like to know.
I did for a couple of years in high school, but never since.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
Seems reasonable. The shutdown was to prevent hospitals from being
overwhelmed. Not to prevent people from getting sick, but just to
make sure they don't all get sick at the same time.
Well, we've managed that -- hospitals are underwhelmed -- so why not
get back to work?
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 14:30:36 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 4/18/2020 2:25 PM, bitrex wrote:
On 4/18/2020 9:26 AM, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
The pictures are sometimes hilarious, like the guy who says "Covid-19 is
a LIE" but is wearing a mask and suit.
The woman (I think?) holding what looks to be a Bible with a patch on
their jacket that says "Natural Born Hellraiser." A true disciple of the
Lord I am sure.
gosh Trumpers really will do just about anything for their 15 minutes.
Well, anything but put in an honest day's work, that is.
Grow and truck your food, and supply you housing and energy, useless
stuff like that.
Two ways to save a lot of lives:
Outlaw cigarettes.
Set the speed governors on all cars to 50 MPH.
Two ways to save a lot of lives:
Outlaw cigarettes.
Set the speed governors on all cars to 50 MPH.
On 4/18/2020 2:57 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 14:30:36 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 4/18/2020 2:25 PM, bitrex wrote:
On 4/18/2020 9:26 AM, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably
don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
The pictures are sometimes hilarious, like the guy who says
"Covid-19 is
a LIE" but is wearing a mask and suit.
The woman (I think?) holding what looks to be a Bible with a patch on
their jacket that says "Natural Born Hellraiser." A true disciple of
the
Lord I am sure.
gosh Trumpers really will do just about anything for their 15 minutes.
Well, anything but put in an honest day's work, that is.
Grow and truck your food, and supply you housing and energy, useless
stuff like that.
what percent of Trumpers do you think work in those industries like
about 2% perhaps?
All the ones I know around here roll Mercedes and their Moms bought it
for them
On 2020-04-18 13:28, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 12:47:22 PM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:24:55 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 9:27:07 AM UTC-4, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
--
Cheers
Clive
Seems reasonable. The shutdown was to prevent hospitals from being
overwhelmed. Not to prevent people from getting sick, but just to
make sure they don't all get sick at the same time.
Well, we've managed that -- hospitals are underwhelmed -- so why not
get back to work?
About 40,000 Americans die in car accidents every year. Lots more are
grievously injured. But we don't shut the country down over that. (Or
ban cars, for that matter. Instead, we bail car companies out.)
Cheers,
James Arthur
Two ways to save a lot of lives:
Outlaw cigarettes.
Set the speed governors on all cars to 50 MPH.
The cigarette industry struck a devil's bargain with the states. Let
us keep giving millions of people emphysema and cancer and you get
more tax revenue.
From wiki:
According to a 2014 review in the New England Journal of Medicine,
tobacco will, if current smoking patterns persist, kill about 1
billion people in the 21st century, half of them before the age of
70.[9]
Why is no-one panicked about that?
Don't forget alcohol -- 88,000 annually.
https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/alcohol-use.htm
But there's a simple cure for this -- no need for a lock-down,
just eliminate food. Everyone succumbing to anything has, at
one point, eaten food. Eliminate food for a year or two, and
we eliminate all human disease, 100%.
Simple. What could possibly go wrong?
(And as a bonus, you eliminate income inequality at the same time.)
So let's continue preventing people from doing anything they'd do
to put food on their tables, and we'll save lives. It's for the
children.
Grins,
James
Chicago taxes cigarettes over $7 per pack. Many low-income smokers
spend over 20% of their income on cigarettes.
Who here has ever smoked? I'd like to know.
I did for a couple of years in high school, but never since.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
On 2020-04-18 20:39, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-04-18 13:28, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 12:47:22 PM UTC-4,
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 18 Apr 2020 08:24:55 -0700 (PDT), dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 9:27:07 AM UTC-4, Clive Arthur wrote:
Not a normally reliable news source, but the pictures probably
don't lie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8232253/Americans-answer-Trumps-call-liberate-states-governors-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns.html
--
Cheers
Clive
Seems reasonable. The shutdown was to prevent hospitals from being
overwhelmed. Not to prevent people from getting sick, but just to
make sure they don't all get sick at the same time.
Well, we've managed that -- hospitals are underwhelmed -- so why not
get back to work?
About 40,000 Americans die in car accidents every year. Lots more are
grievously injured. But we don't shut the country down over that. (Or
ban cars, for that matter. Instead, we bail car companies out.)
Cheers,
James Arthur
Two ways to save a lot of lives:
Outlaw cigarettes.
Set the speed governors on all cars to 50 MPH.
The cigarette industry struck a devil's bargain with the states. Let
us keep giving millions of people emphysema and cancer and you get
more tax revenue.
From wiki:
According to a 2014 review in the New England Journal of Medicine,
tobacco will, if current smoking patterns persist, kill about 1
billion people in the 21st century, half of them before the age of
70.[9]
Why is no-one panicked about that?
Don't forget alcohol -- 88,000 annually.
https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/alcohol-use.htm
But there's a simple cure for this -- no need for a lock-down,
just eliminate food. Everyone succumbing to anything has, at
one point, eaten food. Eliminate food for a year or two, and
we eliminate all human disease, 100%.
Simple. What could possibly go wrong?
(And as a bonus, you eliminate income inequality at the same time.)
So let's continue preventing people from doing anything they'd do
to put food on their tables, and we'll save lives. It's for the
children.
Grins,
James
Chicago taxes cigarettes over $7 per pack. Many low-income smokers
spend over 20% of their income on cigarettes.
Who here has ever smoked? I'd like to know.
I did for a couple of years in high school, but never since.
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
I grew up in an environment of inveterate smokers. I vividly
remember family parties where the room was blue with smoke. I
never smoked myself. I've always found it disgusting. It was
so bad, in fact, that until my forties I hated the very smell
of oranges because my father used to eat one while smoking
after dinner. The association of cigarette smoke and oranges
had anchored itself in my mind so strongly that it took me
well over twentyfive years to free myself of it.
That's not the only weird olfactory recollection I have though.
Smells have a way of jogging my memory, amazingly selectively,
in both good and bad ways.
Jeroen Belleman