OT:Sander's Staffer's Stalinist Mindset Revealed

[Cursitor Doom]

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:29:27 -0800 (PST), Michael Terrell
<terrell.michael.a@gmail.com> wrote:

>The Corbomite Maneuver

You got it! I only dimly recall it, but DLU's outburst just tripped
that old memory back to life.

--

No deal? No problem! :-D

 

>The Corbomite Maneuver

Used twice. Once they somehow got into the neutral zone, and I still don't understand why the can kill us for being there if it is "neutral" but they were surrounded by Romulan ships. That was when the senior staff of the crew was infected with that aging disease and a pencil pusher took command. He transmitted to Star Fleet in code 2 - knowing they had broken it that he was going to use the corbomite device which reflects energy destroying the attacker and all ships should be advised to stay out of the area or a solar year.

It first came out in the one with the ship from the "First Federation" threatening to kill them for trespass. He warned them about that and that it was not recorded in any records on the computer. Then the "enemy" ship fawned distress and they went ot se if they could help and find the dastardly looking alien was just a puppet and he real alien was like a child in body, but obviously not in mind. The whole plot was to find out about us and the alien said something to the effect that records can be forged. But the fact they showed up to help despite all the bullshit indicated that we were trustable etc.

Pretty decent writing actually, but there is much much better. pieces that explore moral issues like not possible without the fantasy.

Like one, Woman invents a time machine, OK. And she had been kidnapped and sexually abused. Barely got out with her life. She watched the news and when they were going to execute a serial rapist/killer she went back in time and killed them.

You want some motherfucking moral issues? Well she DID kill innocent people, just that they had not yet committed a crime.

That is some good fucking writing. In fact there is a quadrilogy I believe, two sequels and a prequel.

But I put it to you now, what is your judgement ? She certainly saved lives of innocent (or relatively so) people, trading the lives of those who had done nothing then. Deciding who is to live and who is to die.

And now that I brought this out I am quite curious to see what everyone (except the few you know whos) says about this, did she do right or wrong ?

And believe it or not I have seen even better than that. Star Trek came up with some good ones. Star Wars no, Babylon 5, all that, buncha shit. Sensationalism, no plot, no mindfucks.

The broad with the time machine was a character in the new (1995) Outer Limits called A Stitch In Time. The prequel was Final Exam. It was not as good but they liked them and it worked well for a plot.

You watch the fucking shit they got today it doesn't matter if you have an IQ of 191 or are brain dead, you get the same amount of nothing out of it. It is just flashing lights and special effects, showing off their super expensive MAC video production system.

AND SOME PEOPLE THINK IT IS REAL ! It is fiction eve if the issues it brings up are real.

But there is no reality for some. Their reality is putting their hands on some young girl and coping a feel like Bernie. Porn. Possibly snuff videos made by jews in Italy. (ten grand a copy) Or dogs fucking horses. Or horses fucking Women.

This is their reality and that is why they can never ever be allowed into any position of power. Anywhere.

These democrats, OK they got the house. Know what that means ? They got about 1/2400th of the power. Senators got 1/60th of the power. Supreme court has 1/18th of the power. The President has 1/3 of the power.

State governors have more power than any member of the lower house yet they think they can dictate to nuke gun owners who will not surrender them, demand 100% renewable energy in ten years, mandate a tax on beef just to discourage consumption because of cow farts, control how the senate does business now after their stupid ass futile inpeachment demands.

You want these fucking morons running the US ? No ? Then your other alternative is Trump. No true engineer could be a liberal. you have to generate a BOM, which means you have to know what things cost. Liberals have no concept of that and think money just comes form nowhere and when they steal it all they will just borrow more. In the real world the bean counters send back the design "Too expensive, cut cost". I am talking all engineering, not just electronics. No company is going to lose twenty bucks on something that is going to go for ten. Their stockholders would burn a cross in their front yard, WITH THEM NAILED TO IT.

Like if I want a garage I do not buy a kit. I DESIGN the fucking thing. I need X 2X4s, X sheets of T&G OSB, couple boxes of siding and X squares of shingles... Oh and the floor we call X Daygos with the big shoe making machine. Lay the cement, but leave it dug out for a couple days first in case anyone has to get rid of something, like Danny Green.

Reality they know not. It is not second nature to me, it is first nature. It has always been that way.

Sanders pussies are going to go after old people and anyone who looks vulnerable, and I hope those "vulnerable" have guns and know how to use them.

They wet to far in 2016 and they think they cna get away with even more. But you know them riots that turn into street wars ? Did you notice the cops just standing back and letting it happen ? They do you know. It they are not confident they have the fire power to stop it they will just bow out. It is in the manual.

Go ahead and start your fires in Milwaukee, they are not going to just sit there and watch their shit burn. They got fucking guns, many can shoot at least as good as me, try bagging you a deer someday.

They are going to LOSE. Bigtime.

 

[bitrex]

On 1/16/20 7:09 PM, jurb6006@gmail.com wrote:

<snip>

> You want these fucking morons running the US ? No ? Then your other alternative is Trump. No true engineer could be a liberal. you have to generate a BOM, which means you have to know what things cost. Liberals have no concept of that and think money just comes form nowhere and when they steal it all...

I think a lot of clients hire me because I can write a clear and concise
proposal about what I intend to do for them, approximately how long it
will take, and approximately what it's going to cost, and cover the
important bullet points and obvious questions they might have, with a
minimum amount of verbage. That is to say, I don't waste their time.

And they say liberal arts school isn't good for anything /shrug

<snip>

 

[bitrex]

On 1/15/20 7:24 PM, John Larkin wrote:

The Evangelical Right and their buddies want to strip rights from my
friends and family and turn America into their bonkers despotic
theocratic vision of what they think the Bible says and it doesn't even
say the things they believe it does, anywhere. And they think Trump is
their man to do it.

Do you personally know any evangelicals? I've known some, still do,
and they are very nice, gentle, generous people. Their only drawback
is an earnest desire to save my soul, probably a lost cause.



They can piss right off.

My New England ancestors were probably told by the British at some point
"we have different needs and political views" which mostly involved
fucking them over. They tossed their tea in the harbor and then shot
them up right down the street from me in Lexington. PISS OFF!

Being habitually annoyed that one doesn't have the right to fuck me or
someone else over because they don't run everything is not a "different
political theory."


You need to, and enjoy, hating. You make up people to hate, because
there aren't enough bad people immediately available.

<https://time.com/4904281/bigots-boosted-by-the-bully-pulpit-charlottesville/>

These guys (and gals!) seem real enough.

Millions of Americans appreciate and admire Adolf Hitler. He hasn't been
physically available to supplicate lately though, so they had to find a
poor-quality substitute.

 

[bitrex]

On 1/16/20 7:38 PM, bitrex wrote:

On 1/16/20 7:09 PM, jurb6006@gmail.com wrote:

snip

You want these fucking morons running the US ? No ? Then your other
alternative is Trump. No true engineer could be a liberal. you have to
generate a BOM, which means you have to know what things cost.
Liberals have no concept of that and think money just comes form
nowhere and when they steal it all...

I think a lot of clients hire me because I can write a clear and concise
proposal about what I intend to do for them, approximately how long it
will take, and approximately what it's going to cost, and cover the
important bullet points and obvious questions they might have, with a
minimum amount of verbage. That is to say, I don't waste their time.

And they say liberal arts school isn't good for anything /shrug

snip

PS: every administration since Bill Clinton's first term has been
spending like it's going out of style, as if anyone in the Republican
party is a financial genius any more than the Democrats.

Ross Perot might have been but his take on fiscal responsibility is 30
years out of date in popularity at this point, just like my Sony Walkman.

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:19:22 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 1/15/20 7:24 PM, John Larkin wrote:

The Evangelical Right and their buddies want to strip rights from my
friends and family and turn America into their bonkers despotic
theocratic vision of what they think the Bible says and it doesn't even
say the things they believe it does, anywhere. And they think Trump is
their man to do it.

Do you personally know any evangelicals? I've known some, still do,
and they are very nice, gentle, generous people. Their only drawback
is an earnest desire to save my soul, probably a lost cause.



They can piss right off.

My New England ancestors were probably told by the British at some point
"we have different needs and political views" which mostly involved
fucking them over. They tossed their tea in the harbor and then shot
them up right down the street from me in Lexington. PISS OFF!

Being habitually annoyed that one doesn't have the right to fuck me or
someone else over because they don't run everything is not a "different
political theory."


You need to, and enjoy, hating. You make up people to hate, because
there aren't enough bad people immediately available.



https://time.com/4904281/bigots-boosted-by-the-bully-pulpit-charlottesville/

These guys (and gals!) seem real enough.

There are over 300e6 people in the USA. If you search really hard, you
can find a few nut cases, and more who are yanking your chain to get
attention and to get you upset.

Time Magazine is pandering to your hatred too. That's how they make
money.

Millions of Americans appreciate and admire Adolf Hitler.

That's preposterous. I've never met one. Have you?

You make up people to hate because you need to hate.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[Michael Terrell]

On Thursday, January 16, 2020 at 7:09:18 PM UTC-5, jurb...@gmail.com wrote:

The Corbomite Maneuver

Used twice. Once they somehow got into the neutral zone, and I still don't understand why the can kill us for being there if it is "neutral" but they were surrounded by Romulan ships. That was when the senior staff of the crew was infected with that aging disease and a pencil pusher took command. He transmitted to Star Fleet in code 2 - knowing they had broken it that he was going to use the Corbomite device which reflects energy destroying the attacker and all ships should be advised to stay out of the area or a solar year.

A better description would have been a 'No Fly Zone' where both sides are prohibited from entering. You have to remember that Gene Roddenberry's background was writing Police dramas, not hard core Military Sci-Fi. It was pitched to Lucille Ball's studio as a 'Wagon Train to the stars'.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Friday, January 17, 2020 at 5:15:15 AM UTC+11, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
newsrp02f936t90l8qa63vtg9c8iu7bek5le2@4ax.com:

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:54:42 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:9drv1flrsntpmed2u8c2703l8shnl50p74@4ax.com:

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 03:09:46 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in
news:sd7v1f5djjfa3kflo942ajnik9hbns2odv@4ax.com:

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:29:20 -0800 (PST), Michael Terrell
terrell.michael.a@gmail.com> wrote:

How about 'Bill Sloman the second'?

Nope, that's bitrex.

I see a few children on the playground chuckling at
meaningless
stupid shit they got running around in their meaningless stupid
brains.

I'd kick your asses in pool. I'd kick your asses in a ring
too.
I'd kick your asses on bicycle endurance runs.

IF I hopped up a car, I'd kick your asses with that.

How about designing some electronics? It pays better.


Probably the first nice thing you have ever said to me.

Not so. I have been cheery and chatty many times. But you always
seem to get angry and start shrieking and swearing and insulting.

I suppose I should always ignore you.

Total bullshit. You have never ben "cheery and chatty" with me.
You have ALWAYS used your repsponses to me as an opportunity to make
a jab with a veiled or direct insult.

I do not shriek, jackass. If you call pointing out a stupid remark
you make in a post an insult, then I guess you should go see a doctor
about your Trumpesque mentality.

John Larkin would probably take that as a compliment. He does seem to something of an egomaniac, which is a least part of Trump's problem.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:064e94ae-0e5e-446e-bcf2-f5b7c989139c@googlegroups.com:

On Friday, January 17, 2020 at 12:36:07 PM UTC+11, John Larkin
wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:19:22 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net
wrote:

On 1/15/20 7:24 PM, John Larkin wrote:

snip

That's preposterous. I've never met one. Have you?

James Arthur comes across as a pretty good approximation.

He's smart enough to present his extreme-right-wing attitudes as
his devotion to his reading of the US constitution, which he seems
to think was written by a bunch of super-humanly intelligent,
perceptive and far-sighted people.

The fact that the he took part in the Tea Party astro-turfing of
the Republican Party is further evidence that he hasn't got much
grasp of reality.

The fact that John Larkin is blind to his character defects (as he
is to Donald Trump's) rather vitiates his claim to have "never met
one". He 's just admitting that he can't recognise them when he
does meet therm.

You make up people to hate because you need to hate.

The defects in John Larkin's perceptions do show up in other areas
too.

There are a number of ways to get onto Larkin's hate list(s).
The most common one for us is off topic posting, but then he
participates. He does not think it is hate, but he does not
understand what constitutes hate. Apparently.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Friday, January 17, 2020 at 12:36:07 PM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:19:22 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 1/15/20 7:24 PM, John Larkin wrote:

<snip>

> That's preposterous. I've never met one. Have you?

James Arthur comes across as a pretty good approximation.

He's smart enough to present his extreme-right-wing attitudes as his devotion to his reading of the US constitution, which he seems to think was written by a bunch of super-humanly intelligent, perceptive and far-sighted people.

The fact that the he took part in the Tea Party astro-turfing of the Republican Party is further evidence that he hasn't got much grasp of reality.

The fact that John Larkin is blind to his character defects (as he is to Donald Trump's) rather vitiates his claim to have "never met one". He 's just admitting that he can't recognise them when he does meet therm.

> You make up people to hate because you need to hate.

The defects in John Larkin's perceptions do show up in other areas too.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in
news:u6p12f95unvm5jbvotr1jv2b2a53bhamm8@4ax.com:

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:29:27 -0800 (PST), Michael Terrell
terrell.michael.a@gmail.com> wrote:

The Corbomite Maneuver

You got it! I only dimly recall it, but DLU's outburst just tripped
that old memory back to life.

I'm DLUNU. Welcome aboard. Have a drink.

As if ANY of you chumps had the honor character and integrity of any
of the crew of the Starship Enterprise. They would have towed your POS
ship to a large black hole so you could get sucked away into oblivion.

 

[bitrex]

On 1/16/20 8:35 PM, John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:19:22 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 1/15/20 7:24 PM, John Larkin wrote:

The Evangelical Right and their buddies want to strip rights from my
friends and family and turn America into their bonkers despotic
theocratic vision of what they think the Bible says and it doesn't even
say the things they believe it does, anywhere. And they think Trump is
their man to do it.

Do you personally know any evangelicals? I've known some, still do,
and they are very nice, gentle, generous people. Their only drawback
is an earnest desire to save my soul, probably a lost cause.



They can piss right off.

My New England ancestors were probably told by the British at some point
"we have different needs and political views" which mostly involved
fucking them over. They tossed their tea in the harbor and then shot
them up right down the street from me in Lexington. PISS OFF!

Being habitually annoyed that one doesn't have the right to fuck me or
someone else over because they don't run everything is not a "different
political theory."


You need to, and enjoy, hating. You make up people to hate, because
there aren't enough bad people immediately available.



https://time.com/4904281/bigots-boosted-by-the-bully-pulpit-charlottesville/

These guys (and gals!) seem real enough.

There are over 300e6 people in the USA. If you search really hard, you
can find a few nut cases, and more who are yanking your chain to get
attention and to get you upset.

Time Magazine is pandering to your hatred too. That's how they make
money.


Millions of Americans appreciate and admire Adolf Hitler.

That's preposterous. I've never met one. Have you?

You make up people to hate because you need to hate.

To clarify I don't mean they have a shrine to him in their bedroom or
something. I mean they have ideas about things that very closely align.
I'm not confident everyone under say 30 knows much about him, in the way
that World War 2 has been largely forgotten in that demographic outside
of what is seen in films and documentaries that focus on the military
hardware, and battles.

You came of age in an America also rather different than the one I did
and I think maybe I've seen different places, uglier places perhaps,
than you have. Part of that was my own fault but we all make mistakes in
life. Growing up in the 1980s and 90s was a lot different than the 50s
and 60s, though. Have I met people who absolutely detest Jews and are
pretty free about their feelings about the fact they'd like them gone?
Sure, absolutely I have. It's not common, but it's not rare.

Maybe the nasty pieces of work in the generations I'm most familiar with
tend to be a little more free with their feelings.

You can find them in both the highest and lowest socioeconomic segments
of society and I've spent time around both. You can find them among the
faculty of the most liberal universities in the Northeast and down on
the streets of Charlottesville toting torches.

 

[bitrex]

On 1/16/20 9:12 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Friday, January 17, 2020 at 12:36:07 PM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:19:22 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 1/15/20 7:24 PM, John Larkin wrote:

snip

That's preposterous. I've never met one. Have you?

James Arthur comes across as a pretty good approximation.

He's smart enough to present his extreme-right-wing attitudes as his devotion to his reading of the US constitution, which he seems to think was written by a bunch of super-humanly intelligent, perceptive and far-sighted people.

The fact that the he took part in the Tea Party astro-turfing of the Republican Party is further evidence that he hasn't got much grasp of reality.

The fact that John Larkin is blind to his character defects (as he is to Donald Trump's) rather vitiates his claim to have "never met one". He 's just admitting that he can't recognise them when he does meet therm.

You make up people to hate because you need to hate.

The defects in John Larkin's perceptions do show up in other areas too.

I think Larkin's spent less time in places where you can readily see the
ugly parts of American life. Lucky him. I didn't entirely have a choice
in the matter, my parent's standard-of-living went down over their
lifetime, not up.

 

[bitrex]

On 1/16/20 2:56 AM, John Robertson wrote:

On 2020/01/14 4:10 p.m., Cursitor Doom wrote:
Gulags await right-wingers if Trump re-elected, he reckons:


https://tinyurl.com/ue4nfz6


Looks like Russian propaganda to me. They are starting early this time.

John

You hardly need to produce a video to get the readership of ZeroHedge to
believe there's a left-wing conspiracy to send them all to the gulag.

Hopefully in the future bandwidth can be conserved by just labeling
conspiracies with numerical designations and then you don't have to even
post anything for a story you can just post the numerical designation in
bold font. And then the comments section can be the usual outraged
wingnut responses everyone's seen before and they can have numerical
designations, too.

Save a lot of time, that way.