OT: Sanctions...

On Fri, 08 Apr 2022 07:25:33 +0100, Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:

On 2022-04-07, Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 02:01:25 +0100, Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:52:34 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 01:44:36 +0100, Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:31:18 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:

I am just applying John Doe\'s logic
Your comrade cannot follow a conversation.

That\'s not even close to my logic. The United Kingdom is not acting like a
hostile neighbor to the European Union.

Ukraine was not hostile to Russia before invasion of Crimea. All they want is to get back their territory.

It is not inviting a powerful EU-hostile MILITARY organization onto its territory.

Ukraine wants NATO for protection, not to invade Russia. NATO would not invade Russia on behalf of Ukraine anyway.
What do you call sanctions that make the Russian innocent civilians pay three times as much for food? What NATO is doing is criminal.

Unfortunate victim of conflict. Even if they are paying three times for food, it\'s still a lot better than Ukrainians in Mariupol area who can\'t get food at all, or the dead Ukrainians who has no use for food.

Not a valid excuse. If we want to get involved in the war, we should shoot at Russian military, and do nothing else.

Not trading with Russia is \"doing nothing\".

OCD alert.
 
On Saturday, April 9, 2022 at 9:47:40 AM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2022 07:25:33 +0100, Jasen Betts <use...@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
On 2022-04-07, Commander Kinsey <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 02:01:25 +0100, Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:52:34 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2022 01:44:36 +0100, Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, April 6, 2022 at 5:31:18 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>

Not a valid excuse. If we want to get involved in the war, we should shoot at Russian military, and do nothing else.

Not trading with Russia is \"doing nothing\".

OCD alert.

Commander Kinsey seems to share Phil Allison\'s enthusiasm for using technical terms from phsycopathology - here obsessive-compulsive disorder [- which he doesn\'t actually understand, as terms of abuse.

It is something that wankers do. \"Wanker\" isn\'t a technical term.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 21:06:12 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 5:04:29 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:56:14 +0100, Anthony William Sloman
bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 1:24:40 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey
wrote:

Bullshit. If the kids are clever, it\'s because they got the
clever genes from their parents, which means their parents will
be rich too.

It doesn\'t work that way. You might read \"Blueprint\" by Robert
Plombin to get some idea of how it does work.

https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-How-DNA-Makes-Press/dp/0262039168
I know how it works from experience and how genetics works. You
pass on everything - intelligence, height, health, etc.

That\'s not knowledge, it\'s prejudice. Inheritance does NOT pass on
all the phenotype of parents to their offspring. Genetics wasn\'t
your strong subject, I suspect.

When a boy and a girl make a baby, lots of very complex genes get
shuffled and redealt. That\'s why siblings are different.

If a father and mother could have 2^46 + 1 children, would at least 2 be
identical?

On the topic of sanctions and war policy, this is an interview everyone
should watch. Better strategic analysis than anyone else has offered, by
far.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBARgW_vHVE

And Ward Carroll, former F14 pilot, is a better interviewer than anyone
on TV.

--
Defund the Thought Police
 
On 11/4/22 8:10 am, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 21:06:12 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 5:04:29 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:56:14 +0100, Anthony William Sloman
bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 1:24:40 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey
wrote:

Bullshit. If the kids are clever, it\'s because they got the
clever genes from their parents, which means their parents will
be rich too.

It doesn\'t work that way. You might read \"Blueprint\" by Robert
Plombin to get some idea of how it does work.

https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-How-DNA-Makes-Press/dp/0262039168
I know how it works from experience and how genetics works. You
pass on everything - intelligence, height, health, etc.

That\'s not knowledge, it\'s prejudice. Inheritance does NOT pass on
all the phenotype of parents to their offspring. Genetics wasn\'t
your strong subject, I suspect.

When a boy and a girl make a baby, lots of very complex genes get
shuffled and redealt. That\'s why siblings are different.

If a father and mother could have 2^46 + 1 children, would at least 2 be
identical?

No, because in the untangling and copying process, chromosome halves can
cross over and the broken halves can switch places. So you don\'t get an
entire half of each from each parent. Sometimes the broken lengths are
mis-matched, and you get missing or extra genes from the other half.

This is how we knew where along the chromosomes each of the individual
genes of Drosophila lie (the ones that produce recognisable phenotypes
anyhow) - because when part of a chromosome crosses over, all the genes
towards its end go with it. The collection of phenotypes that are
mis-matched can be used to detect how many genes crossed over, and the
correlations and frequencies with which that affects each phenotype used
to determine with genes are more towards the end and which toward the
middle of the c. An amazing amount of work went into this, as you can
imagine - all done before gene sequencing was possible. Manual
observation and counting of many millions individual fruit-flies bred in
controlled experiments.

CH
 
Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> wrote in
news:16e4b31ac6850f96$1$928382$eadde062@news.thecubenet.com:

On 11/4/22 8:10 am, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 21:06:12 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd
whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 5:04:29 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey
wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:56:14 +0100, Anthony William Sloman
bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 1:24:40 PM UTC+10, Commander
Kinsey wrote:

Bullshit. If the kids are clever, it\'s because they got the
clever genes from their parents, which means their parents
will be rich too.

It doesn\'t work that way. You might read \"Blueprint\" by
Robert Plombin to get some idea of how it does work.

https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-How-DNA-Makes-Press/dp/026203
9168
I know how it works from experience and how genetics works.
You pass on everything - intelligence, height, health, etc.

That\'s not knowledge, it\'s prejudice. Inheritance does NOT
pass on all the phenotype of parents to their offspring.
Genetics wasn\'t your strong subject, I suspect.

When a boy and a girl make a baby, lots of very complex genes
get shuffled and redealt. That\'s why siblings are different.

If a father and mother could have 2^46 + 1 children, would at
least 2 be identical?

No, because in the untangling and copying process, chromosome
halves can cross over and the broken halves can switch places. So
you don\'t get an entire half of each from each parent. Sometimes
the broken lengths are mis-matched, and you get missing or extra
genes from the other half.

This is how we knew where along the chromosomes each of the
individual genes of Drosophila lie (the ones that produce
recognisable phenotypes anyhow) - because when part of a
chromosome crosses over, all the genes towards its end go with it.
The collection of phenotypes that are mis-matched can be used to
detect how many genes crossed over, and the correlations and
frequencies with which that affects each phenotype used to
determine with genes are more towards the end and which toward the
middle of the c. An amazing amount of work went into this, as you
can imagine - all done before gene sequencing was possible. Manual
observation and counting of many millions individual fruit-flies
bred in controlled experiments.

CH

Nobody knows what it\'s like, to be the sad man, behind blue eyes.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top