OT: Sanctions...

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 12:10:18 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:

\"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 06:50:55 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:38:40 PM UTC+11, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 03:32:48 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:15:51 PM UTC+11, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 02:51:29 +0100, <DecadentLinux...@decadence.org> wrote:
\"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote in newsp.1jyww...@ryzen.lan:

<snip>

You replied to my sentence \"That\'s my money paying for someone else, and is clearly theft for anyone with half a brain, now fuck off back to kindergarten.\"

Please read the manual for your newsreader Dr, Sloman.

His first gangbang...

John Doe doesn\'t seem to know what the word means. When some half-literate moron expresses the desire that I don\'t respond to his half-witted posts with text that includes the occasional four letter verb, it isn\'t exactly an invitation to indulge in group sex.

John Doe may feel the need to respond as if that was what was meant - a creep like him presumably can\'t afford to be all that discriminating - but the rest of us can be a bit pickier.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 03:35:21 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 12:10:18 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
\"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 06:50:55 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:38:40 PM UTC+11, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 03:32:48 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:15:51 PM UTC+11, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 02:51:29 +0100, <DecadentLinux...@decadence.org> wrote:
\"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote in newsp.1jyww...@ryzen.lan:

snip

You replied to my sentence \"That\'s my money paying for someone else, and is clearly theft for anyone with half a brain, now fuck off back to kindergarten.\"

Please read the manual for your newsreader Dr, Sloman.

His first gangbang...

John Doe doesn\'t seem to know what the word means. When some half-literate moron expresses the desire that I don\'t respond to his half-witted posts with text that includes the occasional four letter verb, it isn\'t exactly an invitation to indulge in group sex.

John Doe may feel the need to respond as if that was what was meant - a creep like him presumably can\'t afford to be all that discriminating - but the rest of us can be a bit pickier.

You can say creep, but you can\'t say fuck?

And again, you\'re replying to someone in the third person. You do know you just responded to John right? Did you take too much medication?

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 00:49:21 +0100, whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:53:53 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 06:50:55 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

Every kind of education is an investment. We don\'t kill off the useless dregs, so it makes sense to give them some kind of education to find out of they have a talent for anything, and take advantage of any talent they might have. You should be grateful.
No, they should pay to get that talent. Instead we try to educate the uneducatable and throw money down the drain. Those destined to work in McDonalds don\'t need school.

The \'they should pay\' means parents\' wealth determines education. That\'s bad policy.

Bullshit. If the kids are clever, it\'s because they got the clever genes from their parents, which means their parents will be rich too.

The \'uneducatable\' label is an arrogant dismissal of human beings, but lacks content otherwise.
Destiny was an idea that went away millennia ago, and doesn\'t deserve a return engagement.

Genetics took its place.

As for need, the need is for a modern society to have well-educated populace. Who will be
the movers/shapers/voters of tomorrow, if not those children? They are ALL lords and ladies
in training.

We only need some folk to be intelligent, most people are just doing routine mundane tasks. Making them intelligent means they get bored.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 1:24:40 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 00:49:21 +0100, whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:53:53 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 06:50:55 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

Every kind of education is an investment. We don\'t kill off the useless dregs, so it makes sense to give them some kind of education to find out of they have a talent for anything, and take advantage of any talent they might have. You should be grateful.
No, they should pay to get that talent. Instead we try to educate the uneducatable and throw money down the drain. Those destined to work in McDonalds don\'t need school.

The \'they should pay\' means parents\' wealth determines education. That\'s bad policy.

Bullshit. If the kids are clever, it\'s because they got the clever genes from their parents, which means their parents will be rich too.

It doesn\'t work that way. You might read \"Blueprint\" by Robert Plombin to get some idea of how it does work.

https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-How-DNA-Makes-Press/dp/0262039168

And being clever doesn\'t necessarily make you all that rich. More to the point, lots of clever kids are brighter than their parents, and it can take a lot of work to persuade people as dim as you to invest in the education of their own kids. let alone in the education of anybody else\'s kids.

The \'uneducatable\' label is an arrogant dismissal of human beings, but lacks content otherwise.
Destiny was an idea that went away millennia ago, and doesn\'t deserve a return engagement.

Genetics took its place.

It doesn\'t. Even less so if you have any idea how the inheritance of complex abilities actually works, with lots of genes (thousands) all having very small effects in a wide variety of very different ways.

As for need, the need is for a modern society to have well-educated populace. Who will be
the movers/shapers/voters of tomorrow, if not those children? They are ALL lords and ladies
in training.

We only need some folk to be intelligent, most people are just doing routine mundane tasks. Making them intelligent means they get bored.

You can\'t make then intelligent, any more than you can make them talented. You can find out what their strengths are, and cultivate them, which much more a voyage of discovery than some kind of mining expedition. And of course the routine mundane tasks can and should be automated. Machines don\'t get bored and inattentive.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 1:26:50 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 03:35:21 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee..org> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 12:10:18 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
\"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 06:50:55 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:38:40 PM UTC+11, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 03:32:48 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill.....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:15:51 PM UTC+11, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 02:51:29 +0100, <DecadentLinux...@decadence..org> wrote:
\"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote in newsp.1jyww....@ryzen.lan:

snip

You replied to my sentence \"That\'s my money paying for someone else, and is clearly theft for anyone with half a brain, now fuck off back to kindergarten.\"

Please read the manual for your newsreader Dr, Sloman.

His first gangbang...

John Doe doesn\'t seem to know what the word means. When some half-literate moron expresses the desire that I don\'t respond to his half-witted posts with a text that includes the occasional four letter verb, he isn\'t exactly posting an invitation to indulge in group sex.

John Doe may feel the need to respond as if that was what was meant - a creep like him presumably can\'t afford to be all that discriminating - but the rest of us can be a bit pickier.

You can say creep, but you can\'t say fuck?

Creep isn\'t actually a taboo word.

> And again, you\'re replying to someone in the third person. You do know you just responded to John right? Did you take too much medication?

John Doe isn\'t a real person, any more than you are. He\'s merely another anonymous troll, and are remarkably unpleasant one, though you do seem to be trying to muscle into his territory. It\'s more that I\'m responding at him, having found a way to be tolerably unpleasant about it. It\'s all about shooting fish in a barrel.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[server]

\"Commander Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
newsp.1j0qjaaqmvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

> See, the NHS is shit.

Turd Commander Kinsey is what is shit.

That\'s all you are and all you\'ll ever be.
Maybe try some of the on topic posts, instead of invading the group
with your inane baby bullshit. Though I doubt seriously that you have
any grasp of electronics at all, much less electron theory or physics.
You stink, boy.

 

[server]

\"Commander Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
newsp.1j0426v3mvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

Bullshit. If the kids are clever, it\'s because they got the
clever genes from their parents, which means their parents will be
rich too.

You are an idiot and you sully the human gene pool. You and your
entire bloodline should be erased. Then, the world will be richer.

Clueless scumbags like you think you have it all figured out, but
fail when it comes to accounting for all of what those taxes did for
you and the improvement of your life.

It does not get any more clueless than a dope like you with the
ideology you have. There are BILLIONS of people on the planet. Some
come out of rich families. Many if not most do not. You lacking the
grasp of what the world is and has to be in that scenario is 100% why
you will likely never get it.

You would not know what the bigger picture was if it bit you in your
fat, never was a commander of anything but stupidity ass.

 

[server]

\"Commander Wannabe Kinsey\" <CK1@nospam.com> wrote in
newsp.1j0426v3mvhs6z@ryzen.lan:

We only need some folk to be intelligent, most people are just
doing routine mundane tasks. Making them intelligent means they
get bored.

You\'re an absolute total retard. You probably never worked a day in
your life and you want to declare what the world should be for everyone
else. You are as bad as Trump, if not worse. You are a bloody fucking
idiot, boy.

 

[server]

Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:1b3eb6f5-88b5-489f-8b3e-2f010a705fedn@googlegroups.com:

There\'s nothing pansy about wearing a mask. It\'s exactly as much
about looking after everybody else - protecting them about
getting infected by you even if you don\'t know you are infected -
as it is about protecting yourself from getting infected by
anybody else.

Jimmy Kimmel summed it up pretty darn good IMO.
He spells out exactly what is wrong with dopey people unwilling to
conform to know, proven science, all the while embracing the science of
other aspects of modern life, all the while wearing horse blinders and
the attitude of failed jr. high school football jock.

<https://youtu.be/4FkU9fF_NLY?t=489>

 

[StupidAs StupidGet]

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 5:58:37 AM UTC-7, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote in
news:1b3eb6f5-88b5-489f...@googlegroups.com:
There\'s nothing pansy about wearing a mask. It\'s exactly as much
about looking after everybody else - protecting them about
getting infected by you even if you don\'t know you are infected -
as it is about protecting yourself from getting infected by
anybody else.
Jimmy Kimmel summed it up pretty darn good IMO.
He spells out exactly what is wrong with dopey people unwilling to
conform to know, proven science, all the while embracing the science of
other aspects of modern life, all the while wearing horse blinders and
the attitude of failed jr. high school football jock.

https://youtu.be/4FkU9fF_NLY?t=489

Sound exactly like you FFF

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 07:47:19 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 5:19:22 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
Sick \'em

He probably meant \"sic \'em\".

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sic

John Doe is an idiot troll, so it probably isn\'t a typo.

Why are you telling John Doe that John Doe is a troll? Perhaps you could have said \"You are an idiot troll\"?

 

[John Doe]

rubles gas

https://theprint.in/world/slovak-economy-minister-says-ready-to-pay-for-russian-gas-supplies-in-rubles/900847/

The first official submission AFAIK.

\"Slovakia cannot give up Russian gas and will pay for supplies in rubles
if needed, Slovak Economy Minister Richard Sulik said on Sunday.\"

The other hostile countries have until about the middle of this month.

They are acting like spoiled brats. They slap Russia, then they whine
about Russia \"not playing fair\". That\'s what they get for sucking on
big fat Russian oil pipes.



I wrote:

This looks like a BIG if not HUGE story the media is not focusing on.

Just search Google for...

allintext:Russia (gas OR oil) rubles

Russia says European countries who are arming its enemy (Ukraine) must pay
for Russian oil and gas in Rubles. Those countries are refusing to do so,
citing \"unfairness\" and \"breach of contract\".

I wonder how easy it is to turn off those pipes.

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 01:25:44 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 6:53:53 AM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 06:50:55 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:38:40 PM UTC+11, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 03:32:48 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:15:51 PM UTC+11, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 02:51:29 +0100, <DecadentLinux...@decadence.org> wrote:
\"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote in newsp.1jyww...@ryzen.lan:

It\'s my money, so anyone using it without my permission is a thief.

Once you pay a tax, the money you paid is no longer yours, you ignorant fucking retarded piece of shit.

Governments must love gullible people like you. I pay money for a gardener to do my garden, I pay money to fill my car with petrol. I do not want to pay money for someone else\'s kid to get educated.

Of course, if you want to hire somebody to look after your garden, you\'d want a trained gardener. Somebody has to pay to cover the cost of getting them trained.

Universal education trains up everybody to good at the sort of tasks for which they have a talent. It happens to be more sensible to use your money to educate everybody, rather than wait for you to decide what service you need to buy and train somebody to do that job.

The gardener (or his parents) should pay to get trained, because it\'s an investment for him.

Every kind of education is an investment. We don\'t kill off the useless dregs, so it makes sense to give them some kind of education to find out of they have a talent for anything, and take advantage of any talent they might have. You should be grateful.

No, they should pay to get that talent. Instead we try to educate the uneducatable and throw money down the drain. Those destined to work in McDonalds don\'t need school.
Not that a gardener needs training, I was doing that as a teenager.

Badly, and under supervision. You seem to be dumb enough not to realise quite how badly.

The guy I gardened for was very OCD and would not have accepted badly. It\'s not rocket science to dig.

There\'s more to gardening than digging, though you probably aren\'t aware of the higher level stuff.

Flower arranging? Really complicated that is.

That\'s my money paying for someone else, and is clearly theft for anyone with half a brain, now fuck off back to kindergarten.

Commander Kinsey does seem to have less than half the brain he needs, so he doesn\'t see the point of universal education. It would have been wasted on him but the education system does serve a function in labeling twits like him as ineducatable idiots, which he will have resented.

A commander is somebody who leads cannon-fodder, which is to say one more expendable idiot.

Talking to someone in the third person shows you\'re fucking drunk and have lost the plot.

I\'m not talking to you. You clearly haven\'t got the wit to follow what\'s being said.

You replied to my sentence \"That\'s my money paying for someone else, and is clearly theft for anyone with half a brain, now fuck off back to kindergarten.\"

I produced a response to your sentence. Anybody silly enough to produce a sentence like that isn\'t going to get a reply, but rather a response which points out how silly it is.

Please read the manual for your newsreader Dr. Sloman.

There isn\'t any manual that I\'m aware of. I have been posting here for more than twenty years now, and I do know what\'s expected which does include dumping on halfwits like you.

You need to learn the simple art of conversation. The person you respond to is the one you\'re replying to.

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:56:14 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 1:24:40 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 00:49:21 +0100, whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:53:53 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 06:50:55 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

Every kind of education is an investment. We don\'t kill off the useless dregs, so it makes sense to give them some kind of education to find out of they have a talent for anything, and take advantage of any talent they might have. You should be grateful.
No, they should pay to get that talent. Instead we try to educate the uneducatable and throw money down the drain. Those destined to work in McDonalds don\'t need school.

The \'they should pay\' means parents\' wealth determines education. That\'s bad policy.

Bullshit. If the kids are clever, it\'s because they got the clever genes from their parents, which means their parents will be rich too.

It doesn\'t work that way. You might read \"Blueprint\" by Robert Plombin to get some idea of how it does work.

https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-How-DNA-Makes-Press/dp/0262039168

I know how it works from experience and how genetics works. You pass on everything - intelligence, height, health, etc.

> And being clever doesn\'t necessarily make you all that rich.

Of course it does, why do you think jobs requiring you to be clever pay more?

> More to the point, lots of clever kids are brighter than their parents, and it can take a lot of work to persuade people as dim as you to invest in the education of their own kids. let alone in the education of anybody else\'s kids.

Not much brighter, maybe a little less lazy.

As for need, the need is for a modern society to have well-educated populace. Who will be
the movers/shapers/voters of tomorrow, if not those children? They are ALL lords and ladies
in training.

We only need some folk to be intelligent, most people are just doing routine mundane tasks. Making them intelligent means they get bored.

You can\'t make then intelligent, any more than you can make them talented. You can find out what their strengths are, and cultivate them, which much more a voyage of discovery than some kind of mining expedition. And of course the routine mundane tasks can and should be automated. Machines don\'t get bored and inattentive.

Thanks for pointing out how useless educating everyone in everything actually is.

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 09:10:41 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 1:26:50 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 03:35:21 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 12:10:18 PM UTC+10, John Doe wrote:
\"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 06:50:55 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:38:40 PM UTC+11, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 03:32:48 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Saturday, April 2, 2022 at 1:15:51 PM UTC+11, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 02 Apr 2022 02:51:29 +0100, <DecadentLinux...@decadence.org> wrote:
\"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote in newsp.1jyww...@ryzen.lan:

snip

You replied to my sentence \"That\'s my money paying for someone else, and is clearly theft for anyone with half a brain, now fuck off back to kindergarten.\"

Please read the manual for your newsreader Dr, Sloman.

His first gangbang...

John Doe doesn\'t seem to know what the word means. When some half-literate moron expresses the desire that I don\'t respond to his half-witted posts with a text that includes the occasional four letter verb, he isn\'t exactly posting an invitation to indulge in group sex.

John Doe may feel the need to respond as if that was what was meant - a creep like him presumably can\'t afford to be all that discriminating - but the rest of us can be a bit pickier.

You can say creep, but you can\'t say fuck?

Creep isn\'t actually a taboo word.

No words are taboo to anyone with a modicum of intelligence you fuckwit.

And again, you\'re replying to someone in the third person. You do know you just responded to John right? Did you take too much medication?

John Doe isn\'t a real person, any more than you are.

We are both real people, albeit with different names on our birth certificates than on here.

> He\'s merely another anonymous troll,

I do not troll, I disagree in the strongest possible terms, often with a commonly held misbelief, like religion.

> and are remarkably unpleasant one, though you do seem to be trying to muscle into his territory. It\'s more that I\'m responding at him, having found a way to be tolerably unpleasant about it. It\'s all about shooting fish in a barrel.

Nobody ever replies to Mr Slow Man taking about \"Mr Slow Man\", in English we would say \"you pillock\" not \"Mr Slow Man is a pillock\".

 

[whit3rd]

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 5:04:29 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:56:14 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 1:24:40 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

Bullshit. If the kids are clever, it\'s because they got the clever genes from their parents, which means their parents will be rich too.

It doesn\'t work that way. You might read \"Blueprint\" by Robert Plombin to get some idea of how it does work.

https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-How-DNA-Makes-Press/dp/0262039168
I know how it works from experience and how genetics works. You pass on everything - intelligence, height, health, etc.

That\'s not knowledge, it\'s prejudice. Inheritance does NOT pass on all the phenotype of
parents to their offspring. Genetics wasn\'t your strong subject, I suspect.

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Tue, 05 Apr 2022 05:06:12 +0100, whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 5:04:29 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:56:14 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 1:24:40 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

Bullshit. If the kids are clever, it\'s because they got the clever genes from their parents, which means their parents will be rich too.

It doesn\'t work that way. You might read \"Blueprint\" by Robert Plombin to get some idea of how it does work.

https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-How-DNA-Makes-Press/dp/0262039168
I know how it works from experience and how genetics works. You pass on everything - intelligence, height, health, etc.

That\'s not knowledge, it\'s prejudice. Inheritance does NOT pass on all the phenotype of
parents to their offspring. Genetics wasn\'t your strong subject, I suspect.

It passes on more than you think. It\'s even been shown you can pass on things you\'ve created after you were born. For example an athlete who trains a lot passes on that extra ability to his kids.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 2:17:35 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Tue, 05 Apr 2022 05:06:12 +0100, whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 5:04:29 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 03 Apr 2022 08:56:14 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:
On Sunday, April 3, 2022 at 1:24:40 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

Bullshit. If the kids are clever, it\'s because they got the clever genes from their parents, which means their parents will be rich too.

It doesn\'t work that way. You might read \"Blueprint\" by Robert Plombin to get some idea of how it does work.

https://www.amazon.com/Blueprint-How-DNA-Makes-Press/dp/0262039168
I know how it works from experience and how genetics works. You pass on everything - intelligence, height, health, etc.

That\'s not knowledge, it\'s prejudice. Inheritance does NOT pass on all the phenotype of parents to their offspring. Genetics wasn\'t your strong subject, I suspect.

It passes on more than you think. It\'s even been shown you can pass on things you\'ve created after you were born. For example an athlete who trains a lot passes on that extra ability to his kids.

That\'s epigenetics. It doesn\'t get passed on to the grand-kids. Intellectual effort may change methylation levels in particular genes in the brain - not that I\'ve ever seen any evidence suggesting that it might - but the brain is lot further from the gonads than the leg and hip muscles.

If you could think you might be aware of this.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[whit3rd]

On Monday, April 4, 2022 at 9:16:30 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:08:54 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

On Monday, April 4, 2022 at 4:16:33 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

So you admit that after you get symptoms you can pass it on, we\'re getting there. Now consider your vaccination is hiding those symptoms from you.

That\'s not an \'admission\' at all, just common knowledge.
Vaccinations are not concealments.

I\'ve explicitly considered it above. You do seem to be an idiot ty not to advertise the fact.

I see no evidence of this. I\'ll make it simple for you:
Mr Smith is not vaccinated, he gets covid, he goes to bed. He maybe met a few folk before he felt ill.
... so?
Mr Jones is vaccinated, he gets covid, he feels a little off, so meets more people before deciding to isolate.
.... and since he is representative of his local population., those people are probably vaccinated.

> Mr Foster is vaccinated and gets no symptoms, and meets hundred of people. He kills a shitload of them. The vaccine caused these deaths.

Vaccination that causes \'no symptoms\' also presumablly lessens the infectious period. So, vaccinated or not,
that can happen, and \'He kills\' is wrong because only a few will get the disease, most are (like Mr. Foster) vaccinated.
Vaccination in Foster implies probable vaccination of his cohort of neighbors.

There\'s a branching tree, with vaccination near the trunk, but that doesn\'t make it the cause of all the elements
on its fork. It does, however, change the number of fatalities, and the \'simple\' analysis does not allow any such
conclusions as \"The vaccine caused those deaths\", nor even that the vaccine caused any recoveries. It\'s
too simple, thus is inconclusive.

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Tue, 05 Apr 2022 07:56:20 +0100, whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Monday, April 4, 2022 at 9:16:30 PM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 04 Apr 2022 09:08:54 +0100, Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

On Monday, April 4, 2022 at 4:16:33 PM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

So you admit that after you get symptoms you can pass it on, we\'re getting there. Now consider your vaccination is hiding those symptoms from you.

That\'s not an \'admission\' at all, just common knowledge.
Vaccinations are not concealments.

Of course they are, they reduce symptoms, meaning you\'re less likely to know you\'re infectious, so give it to more people.

I\'ve explicitly considered it above. You do seem to be an idiot ty not to advertise the fact.

I see no evidence of this. I\'ll make it simple for you:
Mr Smith is not vaccinated, he gets covid, he goes to bed. He maybe met a few folk before he felt ill.
... so?
Mr Jones is vaccinated, he gets covid, he feels a little off, so meets more people before deciding to isolate.
... and since he is representative of his local population., those people are probably vaccinated.

Why would everyone in a local population have the same views?

Mr Foster is vaccinated and gets no symptoms, and meets hundred of people. He kills a shitload of them. The vaccine caused these deaths.

Vaccination that causes \'no symptoms\' also presumablly lessens the infectious period. So, vaccinated or not,
that can happen, and \'He kills\' is wrong because only a few will get the disease, most are (like Mr. Foster) vaccinated.
Vaccination in Foster implies probable vaccination of his cohort of neighbors.

There\'s a branching tree, with vaccination near the trunk, but that doesn\'t make it the cause of all the elements
on its fork. It does, however, change the number of fatalities, and the \'simple\' analysis does not allow any such
conclusions as \"The vaccine caused those deaths\", nor even that the vaccine caused any recoveries. It\'s
too simple, thus is inconclusive.

Drawing silly tree pictures doesn\'t negate simple facts.