OT: Al Franken

On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 14:01:23 -0700, Jim Thompson
<thegreatone@example.com> wrote:



So my "mush" recollection was correct?
---
If you recall it being called "mush", then you're probably thinking
about cornmeal mush or polenta.

--
John Fields
 
Who the hell is Al Farken? I'm guessing this topic is being directed to our
US audience..


"Jim Thompson" <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in message
news:cmar60dsb3cji0joufalrujd0cb8b4fktk@4ax.com...
I decided to be fair with the leftists and listen to Al Franken's new
talk show (I've found him funny on Leno, etc.).

Looks like he loses his humor capability when immersed into a talk
show environment.

Looks like "Liberal Talk Radio" will die a quick death.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
Al Franken is a hippy dippy US comedian from the 1970s.

Like most of the folks in the US entertainment industry, he
forgot that he wasn't an expert at anything, but rather just
played the role.

Al Franken is a hyper liberal so, he has decided to play the
part of "liberal talk show host" to counter all of the hyper
conservative talk show hosts in the us radio market.

-Chuck Harris

The Real Andy wrote:
Who the hell is Al Farken? I'm guessing this topic is being directed to our
US audience..
 
"The Real Andy" <i_luv_beer_especially_pilsners@yahoo.com.au> wrote in
message news:40724e3b@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
Who the hell is Al Farken? I'm guessing this topic is being directed to
our
US audience..
A leftist (or "liberal") US comedian and writer. My earliest recollection
of him was as a writer for the original Saturday Night Live US TV comedy
show. He also had some minor parts in skits on the show and did a 2-man
standup-comic act with another writer as Franken and Davis. He came again
into prominence when he wrote a rebuttal to Rush Limbaugh (a US
"conservative" radio comedian) a few years back entitled _Rush Limbaugh is a
Big Fat Idiot_. Last year he had another best-seller abour Fox TV and other
"conservative" news programming "Fair and Balanced". Fox bortively sued
over the book's title ("Fair and Balanced" is part of their advertising
slogan) and gave Franken the gift of pushing his book to the top of the
best-seller lists before it was released (which says something about
"best-seller" lists).
 
From: Chuck Harris
snip
Al Franken is a hyper liberal so, he has decided to play the
part of "liberal talk show host" to counter all of the hyper
conservative talk show hosts in the us radio market.
Al is not a hyper liberal, he is moderate, middle of the road American. He only
looks farther to the left because of the fascists that have taken over the name
conservative and the AM dial. No one that supported our war in Iraq or these
huge budget deficits is a conservative. Rush, Savage, Inghram, and Coulter are
not only preaching fascism, they are using the tried and true techniques
perfected by the Nazis!

Fascism: 1 : often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime
(as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the
individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a
dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible
suppression of opposition.
 
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:03:30 GMT, maxfoo
<maxfooHeadFromButt@punkass.com> wrote:

On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 02:04:08 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote:

Nope, you missed it, they get to stick around and make babies.
The thrill-seekers die young, if they die too young to breed,
then they don't get to. Instead it's a dominant/recessive gene
pair, like brown and blue eyes, so that even the timid can
have a few brave children.
Steve

This is not a dna thing, it's society that sets up the rules that lets the
cowards survive. In the jungle it's survival of the fittest.
Humans are social critters, even in the jungle. We are weak, naked,
slow, un-armed and un-armored, and we win by forming tribes who
include specialists. Warriors are a necessary minority of any tribe
that successfully combats its most deadly enemies, other tribes.

It *is* a DNA thing.

John
 
maxfoo <maxfooHeadFromButt@punkass.com> wrote in message news:<nas470hnfdppafdfra54p36irkhlj0gein@4ax.com>...
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 02:04:08 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote:

Nope, you missed it, they get to stick around and make babies.
The thrill-seekers die young, if they die too young to breed,
then they don't get to. Instead it's a dominant/recessive gene
pair, like brown and blue eyes, so that even the timid can
have a few brave children.
Steve

This is not a dna thing, it's society that sets up the rules that lets the
cowards survive. In the jungle it's survival of the fittest.
Fitness involves the capacity to work out whether a contemplated
action is brave or merely foolhardy, and the sense to work out whether
the rewards are worth the risk. The foolish and the foolhardy do tend
to describe the more perceptive as cowards, while the proper use of
the word should be confined to those who can't nerve themselves to
take even a small risk for a likely profit.

----------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
 
maxfoo <maxfooHeadFromButt@punkass.com> wrote:
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 09:48:31 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:
[cowardice]
Humans are social critters, even in the jungle. We are weak, naked,
slow, un-armed and un-armored, and we win by forming tribes who
include specialists. Warriors are a necessary minority of any tribe
that successfully combats its most deadly enemies, other tribes.

It *is* a DNA thing.

Civilization is a mere 3000 years old, compared to how long man has been in
existence iirc ~500,000 years, society hasn't been around long enough to have
any effect on dna, merely a wink. we are still influenced by our cave man needs.
So the pyramids predate civilization? Interesting point of view. And
civilization != society, look them up.


Tim
--
Love is a travelator.
 
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 22:24:48 GMT, maxfoo
<maxfooHeadFromButt@punkass.com> wrote:

On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:26:04 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:


Tribal organization far predated "civilization"; there's lots of
archealogical evidence for that. Even cavemen had social needs. Lions
hunt in packs, and elephants live and survive in herds. Chimps are
social creatures, and their reproductive success is dominated by
social dynamics.

Consider the worker bee, assigned to the role of soldier. She will
fight to the death to defend the hive, even though the probablity of
her ever breeding is essentially zero. The DNA she is defending isn't
even in her own body. Social creatures behave that way, even if
they're not "civilized."

John

John you're going off in a tangent dude.
Getting back to the brave vs coward, in the tribal organization you brought up
the braves would be cooking the cowards for dinner.
Cannibalism is very rare, almost unheard of, within species. Ever
rarer among families.

Now in our present society
these braves would be sent to prison for life...
Only if they're stupid, too. Cops, firemen, soldiers, sports heroes
get medals. Just *looking* brave, like that twerp Sylvester Stallone,
can make you rich.

In other word its todays social
structure that lets coward survival not the primitive civilization of long ago.
Tribes specialized into warriors, workers, farmers, wives. The
warriors protected the rest of the tribe, were honored for it, and got
first pick of the food and the women. But the guy who made arrows had
an important place, too.

It's not all that different now.

John
 
In article <4072ac49$0$1645$61fed72c@news.rcn.com>,
Chuck Harris <cfharris@erols.com> writes:
Al Franken is a hippy dippy US comedian from the 1970s.

Like most of the folks in the US entertainment industry, he
forgot that he wasn't an expert at anything, but rather just
played the role.

Al Franken is a hyper liberal so, he has decided to play the
part of "liberal talk show host" to counter all of the hyper
conservative talk show hosts in the us radio market.

The biggest problem with Franken isn't his being a truly hyper
liberal (which he really is), but that he is MUCH MORE BITTER
than even the most vehement mainstream conservative. Too
often, the hate speech from the left is a bigger turnoff than
their USUALLY insane ideas. (Some good stuff can come from the
left, but it is often distorted by their emotional immaturity.)

John
 
Tribes specialized into warriors, workers, farmers, wives. The
warriors protected the rest of the tribe, were honored for it, and got
first pick of the food and the women. But the guy who made arrows had
an important place, too.
Except that now your job isn't based on your abilities, it's based on some
moronic lefty deciding that everyone should be able to do every job and if
you didn't want to make arrows then you didn't have to, you can wear your
underpants on the outside if you want.
 
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote in message news:<cld6701he4b75v26ejn6kt9jf8pra38pea@4ax.com>...
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 22:24:48 GMT, maxfoo
maxfooHeadFromButt@punkass.com> wrote:

On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:26:04 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote:


Tribal organization far predated "civilization"; there's lots of
archealogical evidence for that. Even cavemen had social needs. Lions
hunt in packs, and elephants live and survive in herds. Chimps are
social creatures, and their reproductive success is dominated by
social dynamics.

Consider the worker bee, assigned to the role of soldier. She will
fight to the death to defend the hive, even though the probablity of
her ever breeding is essentially zero. The DNA she is defending isn't
even in her own body. Social creatures behave that way, even if
they're not "civilized."

John

John you're going off in a tangent dude.
Getting back to the brave vs coward, in the tribal organization you brought up
the braves would be cooking the cowards for dinner.

Cannibalism is very rare, almost unheard of, within species. Ever
rarer among families.

Now in our present society
these braves would be sent to prison for life...

Only if they're stupid, too. Cops, firemen, soldiers, sports heroes
get medals. Just *looking* brave, like that twerp Sylvester Stallone,
can make you rich.

In other word its todays social
structure that lets coward survival not the primitive civilization of long > >ago.

Tribes specialized into warriors, workers, farmers, wives. The
warriors protected the rest of the tribe, were honored for it, and got
first pick of the food and the women. But the guy who made arrows had
an important place, too.

It's not all that different now.
It is also worth noting that if the tribe had one good arrow maker,
their chances of collective survival were increased if he or she was
not foolhardy.

Brave warriors are much less effetive if their arrows don't fly
straight.

------
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
 
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 03:31:58 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com>
wrote:

Mjolinor wrote:

Tribes specialized into warriors, workers, farmers, wives. The
warriors protected the rest of the tribe, were honored for it, and got
first pick of the food and the women. But the guy who made arrows had
an important place, too.
----------------------
Tribes didn't specialize so distinctly, there were craftsmen, but
they took it up with age and experience, and it was less formal.
Um, how do you know that?

John
 
John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 03:31:58 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com
wrote:

Mjolinor wrote:

Tribes specialized into warriors, workers, farmers, wives. The
warriors protected the rest of the tribe, were honored for it, and got
first pick of the food and the women. But the guy who made arrows had
an important place, too.
----------------------
Tribes didn't specialize so distinctly, there were craftsmen, but
they took it up with age and experience, and it was less formal.


Um, how do you know that?
John
--------------
I was there.
Steve
 
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message news:<40872FF8.4C8E@armory.com>...
Product developer wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message news:<40865B8F.62B7@armory.com>...
Product developer wrote:

Actually Clinton was a racist in Arkansas. He often used the "N" word
to identify persons of color. I talked to someone that worked for him
and he said both Bill and hill were "big time racists" further
supporting the hypocrite charge made by Dyson. This man and his wife
are opportunists in the extreme. Completely void of honor or any code
of ethics.
--------------
There are liars, damned liars, and then you, you fucking liar.

Sorry you have so much pain in your heart.
-----------------
Nope, hate for evil.


I was shocked too. Not
really.
--------------
Eat shit and die.
You use this a lot in your immature, uninformed, and bizzare posts. Is
eating excrement and having an issue with male genitalia something you
picked up in prison or did you have a problem with potty training that
led to this severe disorder? I also noticed that many of your posts in
other groups have to do with adolescent sex issues. In fact there
seems to be a sexual nature to many of your barbs. It's never too late
to get some help.
If the left wanted to know why people like myself could not lower
ourselves to accept these people it comes down to honesty. I was
brought up believe that good was good and bad was bad.

Liberalism, MTV, pop culture, and political correctness have changed
all the rules. Up is down, black is white, and there is no right or
wrong. Criminals were not wrong they were just misunderstood. Society
was to blame for homelessness and those who live generation to
generation on welfare.
-----------------
Rightist bigot hobbyhorse.

Right is right.
-------------------
Right is Wrong.


Conservatives were completely dumbfounded. Everything we believed in
was turned upside down. A man we would not hire to do our windows was
in charge of the U.S. Government and military.
--------------------
The first president with an IQ above 150 this century.

Hope you are not referencing the bogus "Lovenstein Institute report"
that turned out to be a fraudulant study used by liberal pinheads to
prop Bubba up.
You surely are not inferring this on his so called Rhodes Scholar
program from which he failed to regularly attend and eventually
dropped out.
-----------------------------------
None of what you said here is accurate.
However well-crafted your shit is.
The above is established and accepted fact but facts are like wolf
bane to libs and commies. You guys prefer to "feel" not think. Bill
dropped out of the program and was never a Rhodes Scholar but that
never kept the press from misrepresenting that fact.
A man who loathed the
military and authority was now in charge. To me this was like Charles
Manson being paroled and assigned head of the DEA. How could a country
come so far and produce a populace so ignorant and complacent that it
could put a guy like this in office?
----------------------------
More of your typical republican penis envy.

How do you associate your own problems with your little Willie with an
ignorant populace?
-------------------------
You're obviously the populace who's ignorant of my Willy.
Another sexual reference. Are you wearing a dress and pumps right now?
Actually Bill had Perones disease and his long
fellow, which from some victim accounts was actually quite small, had
a severe bend in it. Hardly a penis to envious of.
--------------------------
Peyronie isn't found with small penises, it only afflicts large ones.
Again you misspeak.
You at least looked up the word, but again you are short on facts.
There is no coorelation between this affliction and size. More wishful
thinking on your part.
Your reference to the male part must be an internalization or you just
might be a typical liberal dick head.
-----------------------------
You're reaching, don't touch it.
I have a feeling you have to reach real far to touch it and that
explains all the sexual references in your posts.
Please pay the receptionist on the way out and take all your
medications.
 
R. Steve Walz wrote:

Gosh Steve, I thought you were a Communist. What a dissapointment to
find that you are merely a Democrat.

John

---------
Same thing. Communism is the ultimate outcome of Democracy.

-Steve
Fortunately here in the US we have a constitutional republic rather
than a democracy. Our founding fathers rightfully feared a "mobocracy".

-Chuck
 
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:30:30 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com>
wrote:

Gosh Steve, I thought you were a Communist. What a dissapointment to
find that you are merely a Democrat.

John
---------
Same thing. Communism is the ultimate outcome of Democracy.

-Steve

Despotism is the only outcome of Communism.

John
 
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highSNIPlandTHIStechPLEASEnology.com> wrote in message
news:a8uf80915u7uhpncj798dsdnrmni4clu80@4ax.com...
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:30:30 GMT, "R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com
wrote:


Gosh Steve, I thought you were a Communist. What a dissapointment to
find that you are merely a Democrat.

John
---------
Same thing. Communism is the ultimate outcome of Democracy.

-Steve


Despotism is the only outcome of Communism.

John
`
I don't agree with that. Russia is a good counter example - i.e. Communism
will probably in the long run fall apart as an economic system. As is China.
They do have one party rule, but not one person. Both the courts and the
marketplace have some power.

BTW does it worry you that China now owns about $400 billion of our national
debt? (Because of the debt and the trade imbalance, they have the money to buy
our bonds.) Just by putting these on the market they could throw our economy
in to chaos - suddenly there are a massive amount of bonds on the market and
our interest rates go sky high. Thus they have a serious lever over us in any
negotiation.

Bill
 
"Bill" <xxx@yy.zz> wrote in
message news:MyThc.733$J93.723@newssvr15.news.prodigy.com...
I don't agree with that. Russia is a good counter example - i.e.
Communism
will probably in the long run fall apart as an economic system. As is
China.
They do have one party rule, but not one person. Both the courts and
the
marketplace have some power.
If the person with power is not you, then it makes no difference how
many people it is. The idea of separation of powers is to have no group
with all the power. A group with all the power is a dictator, no matter
how many people it is.

Dictatorship does not imply one person.


--
-Reply in group, but if emailing add 2 more zeros-
-and remove the obvious-
 
Product developer wrote:
"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message news:<40872FF8.4C8E@armory.com>...
Product developer wrote:

"R. Steve Walz" <rstevew@armory.com> wrote in message news:<40865B8F.62B7@armory.com>...
Product developer wrote:

Actually Clinton was a racist in Arkansas. He often used the "N" word
to identify persons of color. I talked to someone that worked for him
and he said both Bill and hill were "big time racists" further
supporting the hypocrite charge made by Dyson. This man and his wife
are opportunists in the extreme. Completely void of honor or any code
of ethics.
--------------
There are liars, damned liars, and then you, you fucking liar.

Sorry you have so much pain in your heart.
-----------------
Nope, hate for evil.


I was shocked too. Not
really.
--------------
Eat shit and die.

You use this a lot in your immature, uninformed, and bizzare posts. Is
eating excrement and having an issue with male genitalia something you
picked up in prison or did you have a problem with potty training that
led to this severe disorder?
------------------------
Nope.


I also noticed that many of your posts in
other groups have to do with adolescent sex issues.
----------------------------
Nope, they are adult sex issues, yours must be adolescent.


In fact there
seems to be a sexual nature to many of your barbs. It's never too late
to get some help.
-------------------
You have a problem with sex? Then YOU get some.


If the left wanted to know why people like myself could not lower
ourselves to accept these people it comes down to honesty. I was
brought up believe that good was good and bad was bad.

Liberalism, MTV, pop culture, and political correctness have changed
all the rules. Up is down, black is white, and there is no right or
wrong. Criminals were not wrong they were just misunderstood. Society
was to blame for homelessness and those who live generation to
generation on welfare.
-----------------
Rightist bigot hobbyhorse.

Right is right.
-------------------
Right is Wrong.


Conservatives were completely dumbfounded. Everything we believed in
was turned upside down. A man we would not hire to do our windows was
in charge of the U.S. Government and military.
--------------------
The first president with an IQ above 150 this century.

Hope you are not referencing the bogus "Lovenstein Institute report"
that turned out to be a fraudulant study used by liberal pinheads to
prop Bubba up.
You surely are not inferring this on his so called Rhodes Scholar
program from which he failed to regularly attend and eventually
dropped out.
-----------------------------------
None of what you said here is accurate.
However well-crafted your shit is.

The above is established and accepted fact but facts are like wolf
bane to libs and commies. You guys prefer to "feel" not think. Bill
dropped out of the program and was never a Rhodes Scholar but that
never kept the press from misrepresenting that fact.
---------------------------------------
Your useless propaganda. Irrelevant.


A man who loathed the
military and authority was now in charge. To me this was like Charles
Manson being paroled and assigned head of the DEA. How could a country
come so far and produce a populace so ignorant and complacent that it
could put a guy like this in office?
----------------------------
More of your typical republican penis envy.

How do you associate your own problems with your little Willie with an
ignorant populace?
-------------------------
You're obviously the populace who's ignorant of my Willy.

Another sexual reference. Are you wearing a dress and pumps right now?
----------------------------
No, are you?


Actually Bill had Perones disease and his long
fellow, which from some victim accounts was actually quite small, had
a severe bend in it. Hardly a penis to envious of.
--------------------------
Peyronie isn't found with small penises, it only afflicts large ones.
Again you misspeak.

You at least looked up the word, but again you are short on facts.
There is no coorelation between this affliction and size. More wishful
thinking on your part.
-----------------------------
Yup, there sure is.


Your reference to the male part must be an internalization or you just
might be a typical liberal dick head.
-----------------------------
You're reaching, don't touch it.

I have a feeling you have to reach real far to touch it and that
explains all the sexual references in your posts.
----------------------------------
Your feeling is about yourself and YOUR past.


-Steve

Please pay the receptionist on the way out and take all your
medications.
--------------
Eat shit and die.

-Steve
--
-Steve Walz rstevew@armory.com ftp://ftp.armory.com/pub/user/rstevew
Electronics Site!! 1000's of Files and Dirs!! With Schematics Galore!!
http://www.armory.com/~rstevew or http://www.armory.com/~rstevew/Public
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top