Only one EV charger at home?!...

On Sat, 9 Sep 2023 15:36:13 +0100, Fredxx, the notorious, troll-feeding,
senile smartass, blathered again:


In much the same way many drivers here won\'t understand how to treat a
4-way stop.

More useless trollshit from the unwashed Scottish troll and his
corresponding troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE!
 
On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 01:10:57 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 00:28:14 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Mon, 07 Aug 2023 16:32:06 +0100, Smolley <s@home.net> wrote:

On Mon, 07 Aug 2023 14:52:54 +0100, Max Demian wrote:

On 07/08/2023 03:51, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 23:54:49 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:09:02 -0400, Paul wrote:

There aren\'t too many regulations on bicycles.

Maybe Renault could make bicycles ???

Peugeot did okay in the US for a while. For people of my generation
Renault is associated with the Dauphine, not a good pairing.

My second bicycle was a Peugeot, I didn\'t think it was the same
company. Why would a car company stoop to bicycles?

Why did Messerschmitt, the German aircraft company, \"stoop\" to making
bubble cars: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_KR200 ?

(Oh yes, WW2.)

The same reason Heinkel and BMW made bubble cars.


And that reason would be?

Because they were not allowed to make aircraft.

By whose order?
 
On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 04:48:35 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 02:50:49 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:


Why do the Americans not let you bring a Peugeot in?

Peugeot looked at the upcoming EPA and NHTSA regulations and decided the
market wasn\'t worth it. There was talk a year or two ago but they again
decided it wasn\'t worth it.

There is a loophole for cars less than 25 years old called \'Show and
Display\' but a run-of-the-mill Peugeot wouldn\'t be eligible.

It might be possible for a private citizen to bring a model up to the
standards and jump through all the hoops but it would be expensive and
painful.

It wasn\'t an effort to specifically keep French cars out but the sales in
the US were so dismal Peugeot, Renault, and Citroen didn\'t bother. Yugo
dropped out in \'92 even before Clinton bombed their plant. There are no
Dacias, but that is sort of a Renault. Some movie I watched recently,
maybe Midsomer Murders, had a Dacia.

Fiat came back with the 500 about 10 years ago. They\'re supposedly are
doing a EV 500. Personally, I briefly had a Spider back in the day. Never
again.

Why is America so fussy on standards?

Yet I\'m sure in a few states you don\'t even have an annual safety test.
 
In article <op.2bfjasekmvhs6z@ryzen>,
Commander Kinsey <CK1@nospam.com> wrote:
On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 01:10:57 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 00:28:14 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Mon, 07 Aug 2023 16:32:06 +0100, Smolley <s@home.net> wrote:

On Mon, 07 Aug 2023 14:52:54 +0100, Max Demian wrote:

On 07/08/2023 03:51, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 23:54:49 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com
wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:09:02 -0400, Paul wrote:

There aren\'t too many regulations on bicycles.

Maybe Renault could make bicycles ???

Peugeot did okay in the US for a while. For people of my generation
Renault is associated with the Dauphine, not a good pairing.

My second bicycle was a Peugeot, I didn\'t think it was the same
company. Why would a car company stoop to bicycles?

Why did Messerschmitt, the German aircraft company, \"stoop\" to making
bubble cars: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_KR200 ?

(Oh yes, WW2.)

The same reason Heinkel and BMW made bubble cars.


And that reason would be?

Because they were not allowed to make aircraft.

By whose order?

Presumablt \"The Occupying Powers\" (USA, USSR, UK & France)

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
\"I\'d rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom\" Thomas Carlyle
 
In article <op.2bfjb10vmvhs6z@ryzen>, CK1@nospam.com says...
Why is America so fussy on standards?

Yet I\'m sure in a few states you don\'t even have an annual safety test.

For many things seems like we live in a \'nanny state\'.

Just bought a band saw. The manual had many more warnings than how to
install the blade.
 
On Sun, 17 Sep 23 19:45:03 UTC, charles, another mentally deficient,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered:


By whose order?

Presumablt \"The Occupying Powers\" (USA, USSR, UK & France)

The troll asks, and the troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE delivers! Just HOW
senile are you all? LOL

--
More of Birdbrain Macaw\'s (now \"Commander Kinsey\" LOL) sociopathic \"wisdom\":
\"If you\'re going somewhere, it must be somewhere you need or want to go.\"
MID: <op.yeunq2rm86ebyl@red.lan>
 
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:21:22 -0400, Ralph Mowery, another brain dead,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blathered:


For many things seems like we live in a \'nanny state\'.

Just bought a band saw. The manual had many more warnings than how to
install the blade.

The US also has many more TROLL-FEEDING SENILE ASSHOLES than the PROVEN
clinically insane wanker and attention whore had ever hoped for, you
retarded troll-feeding senile piece of shit!

--
Sociopath Birdbrain Macaw (now \"Commander Kinsey\" LOL) about his use of the
pronoun \"its\":
\"I use \"it\'s\". The thing belongs to it. Giraffe\'s. Mr Smith\'s. The
car\'s. It\'s. Just because the it isn\'t specified absolutely, doesn\'t mean
there shouldn\'t be a possessive apostrophe. The English language is
evolving, get used to it.\"
MID: <op.y428bzwxjs98qf@red.lan>
 
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 04:48:35 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Sep 2023 02:50:49 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:


Why do the Americans not let you bring a Peugeot in?

Peugeot looked at the upcoming EPA and NHTSA regulations and decided the
market wasn\'t worth it. There was talk a year or two ago but they again
decided it wasn\'t worth it.

There is a loophole for cars less than 25 years old called \'Show and
Display\' but a run-of-the-mill Peugeot wouldn\'t be eligible.

It might be possible for a private citizen to bring a model up to the
standards and jump through all the hoops but it would be expensive and
painful.

It wasn\'t an effort to specifically keep French cars out but the sales in
the US were so dismal Peugeot, Renault, and Citroen didn\'t bother. Yugo
dropped out in \'92 even before Clinton bombed their plant. There are no
Dacias, but that is sort of a Renault. Some movie I watched recently,
maybe Midsomer Murders, had a Dacia.

Fiat came back with the 500 about 10 years ago. They\'re supposedly are
doing a EV 500. Personally, I briefly had a Spider back in the day. Never
again.

Why is America so fussy on standards?

Yet I\'m sure in a few states you don\'t even have an annual safety test.

FWIW, we don\'t test new clot shots.
 
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 20:05:51 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:

> Why is America so fussy on standards?

Government spawns bureaucrats and bureaucrats need something to do.


> Yet I\'m sure in a few states you don\'t even have an annual safety test.

There is no annual inspection in this state. You might get a ticket for
obvious flaws like burned out lights. There doesn\'t seem to be any more
rolling wrecks on the road than in states with a semi-annual inspection.

I don\'t know how many states are left that do not have mandatory insurance
but at one time the number of uninsured vehicles per capita did not differ
between states with or without the requirement. The fact there is an
\'uninsured motorist\' item on my insurance points to there still being
quite a few.
 
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 20:05:06 +0100, Commander Kinsey wrote:

Because they were not allowed to make aircraft.

By whose order?

Presumably by the occupying forces.
 
On 17 Sep 2023 22:30:46 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


By whose order?

Presumably by the occupying forces.

WTF? Fuck off to a ng for gossiping senile assholes like you, finally, you
mentally handicapped deranged senile bigmouth!

--
More of the pathological senile gossip\'s sick shit squeezed out of his sick
head:
\"Skunk probably tastes like chicken. I\'ve never gotten that comparison,
most famously with Chicken of the Sea. Tuna is a fish and tastes like a
fish. I will admit I\'ve had chicken that tasted like fish. I don\'t think I
want to know what they were feeding it.\"
MID: <k44t5lFl1k3U4@mid.individual.net>
 
On Sun, 17 Sep 23 22:11:29 UTC, Slevin, another mentally challenged,
troll-feeding senile Yankietard, babbled:

> FWIW, we don\'t test new clot shots.

Yeah, but you senile assholes certainly are the ones who consistently keep
feeding the trolling Scottish wanker! <BG>

--
Gay Wanker Birdbrain who already admitted that he watched gay porn flicks
\"accidentally\", also admitted this:
\"I once came across a webpage or a newsgroup or something which specialised
in \"pictures of flaccid cocks\".\"
Message-ID: <op.zfe8gefzjs98qf@red.lan>
 
On 17 Sep 2023 22:24:23 GMT, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> Government spawns bureaucrats and bureaucrats need something to do.

But WHO spawned you abnormal endlessly driveling grandiloquent senile
bigmouth, lowbrowwoman, you sick gossip? Aren\'t your relatives ashamed of
you?

--
Gossiping \"lowbrowwoman\" about herself:
\"Usenet is my blog... I don\'t give a damn if anyone ever reads my posts
but they are useful in marshaling [sic] my thoughts.\"
MID: <iteioiF60jmU1@mid.individual.net>
 
On 17/09/2023 21:21, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article <op.2bfjb10vmvhs6z@ryzen>, CK1@nospam.com says...

Why is America so fussy on standards?

Yet I\'m sure in a few states you don\'t even have an annual safety test.



For many things seems like we live in a \'nanny state\'.

Just bought a band saw. The manual had many more warnings than how to
install the blade.


The nanny state is California.

Elsewhere they just get on with life.

--
The lifetime of any political organisation is about three years before
its been subverted by the people it tried to warn you about.

Anon.
 
On 2023-09-17, Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <op.2bfjb10vmvhs6z@ryzen>, CK1@nospam.com says...

Why is America so fussy on standards?

Yet I\'m sure in a few states you don\'t even have an annual safety test.



For many things seems like we live in a \'nanny state\'.

Just bought a band saw. The manual had many more warnings than how to
install the blade.

I\'m quite confident the bandsaw manufacturer\'s lawyers advised them to
put so many warnings in.

Why do you assume the government mandated it?

--
Cindy Hamilton
 
On 18/09/2023 19:21, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
On 2023-09-17, Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <op.2bfjb10vmvhs6z@ryzen>, CK1@nospam.com says...

Why is America so fussy on standards?

Yet I\'m sure in a few states you don\'t even have an annual safety test.



For many things seems like we live in a \'nanny state\'.

Just bought a band saw. The manual had many more warnings than how to
install the blade.

I\'m quite confident the bandsaw manufacturer\'s lawyers advised them to
put so many warnings in.

Why do you assume the government mandated it?
Why so you assume it needs a mandate, rather than a clear direction that
the safety of the consumer lies entirely with the manufacturer, under
\'law\'...

--
You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than you can with a
kind word alone.

Al Capone
 
In article <_y0OM.70219$CVBc.58327@fx16.iad>, hamilton@invalid.com
says...
For many things seems like we live in a \'nanny state\'.

Just bought a band saw. The manual had many more warnings than how to
install the blade.

I\'m quite confident the bandsaw manufacturer\'s lawyers advised them to
put so many warnings in.

Why do you assume the government mandated it?

I don\'t assume the government made them put all the warnings on it just
some of them. There is Even a warning from California that the nickel
in the blade is a hazard to health and causes cancer.

I look on it as the people on the juries and the court system is the
cause of it. For instance someone put up a ladder with one leg in a
frozen cow pile. Sun comes up and cow pile melts and ladder falls, case
sues and wins. Judge should have not even allowed that case.

I think all tools should have on the package \'to take a course in using
the tool or do not bother suing us when you do something stupid\'.
 
On 9/18/2023 12:57 PM, Ralph Mowery wrote:
In article <_y0OM.70219$CVBc.58327@fx16.iad>, hamilton@invalid.com
says...

For many things seems like we live in a \'nanny state\'.

Just bought a band saw. The manual had many more warnings than how to
install the blade.

I\'m quite confident the bandsaw manufacturer\'s lawyers advised them to
put so many warnings in.

Why do you assume the government mandated it?




I don\'t assume the government made them put all the warnings on it just
some of them. There is Even a warning from California that the nickel
in the blade is a hazard to health and causes cancer.

I look on it as the people on the juries and the court system is the
cause of it. For instance someone put up a ladder with one leg in a
frozen cow pile. Sun comes up and cow pile melts and ladder falls, case
sues and wins. Judge should have not even allowed that case.

I think all tools should have on the package \'to take a course in using
the tool or do not bother suing us when you do something stupid\'.

Whine, whine, whine.
 
On 2023-09-18, Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> wrote:
In article <_y0OM.70219$CVBc.58327@fx16.iad>, hamilton@invalid.com
says...

For many things seems like we live in a \'nanny state\'.

Just bought a band saw. The manual had many more warnings than how to
install the blade.

I\'m quite confident the bandsaw manufacturer\'s lawyers advised them to
put so many warnings in.

Why do you assume the government mandated it?




I don\'t assume the government made them put all the warnings on it just
some of them. There is Even a warning from California that the nickel
in the blade is a hazard to health and causes cancer.

I look on it as the people on the juries and the court system is the
cause of it. For instance someone put up a ladder with one leg in a
frozen cow pile. Sun comes up and cow pile melts and ladder falls, case
sues and wins. Judge should have not even allowed that case.

I think all tools should have on the package \'to take a course in using
the tool or do not bother suing us when you do something stupid\'.

Then it\'s not the \"nanny state\". It\'s people. Your fellow citizens
are responsible.

--
Cindy Hamilton
 
Ralph Mowery <rmowery42@charter.net> writes:
In article <_y0OM.70219$CVBc.58327@fx16.iad>, hamilton@invalid.com
says...

For many things seems like we live in a \'nanny state\'.

Just bought a band saw. The manual had many more warnings than how to
install the blade.

I\'m quite confident the bandsaw manufacturer\'s lawyers advised them to
put so many warnings in.

Why do you assume the government mandated it?




I don\'t assume the government made them put all the warnings on it just
some of them. There is Even a warning from California that the nickel
in the blade is a hazard to health and causes cancer.

Clearly it is important to inform the consumer of the possible
consequences of their purchase, no?

What problem do you have with stating that the product could
be damaging to your health?

Then there are the inherent risks in using large woodworking
machinery, and while a bandsaw is considered one of the safer
stationary tools, informing the end-user that improper use of
the tool can be hazardous seems warranted. Particularly with
the notable lack of industrial arts education in the primary
school system.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top