Obama wants my help.

krw@attt.bizz wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:11:33 -0700, Charlie E. <edmondson@ieee.org
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:59:57 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:

Charlie E. wrote:
Bob,
Just out of curiousity, is that before or after the subsidy?


After.


Ok, so your actual premium probably went up big time, but the
government is 'making up' for the difference - i.e. stealing from the
taxpayer to make you feel like you got a bargain. What was the
difference in the pre-subsidy premium!

BobF is a socialist. He's all in favor of stealing. As long as he's
the recipient, take it all (the government can keep some for their
trouble - doesn't matter to him).
Click to expand...

As usual, know-it-all krw knows nothing, and makes up right wing fantasies about
everyone that doesn't "think" like him.

We should just outlaw insurance? Then the righties would be happy. Just let
everyone pay their responsibility if they get sick or injured. What exactly is
insurance - ever think about that?

How exactly is employer mandated insurance any different than government
mandated insurance. And what is wrong with the Republican concept of a mandate.
It worked for Romney. The Repubs pushed it for years before the Democrats
decided they could do it if the Repubs like it so.


I'm glad krw wants to live in a world where he's rich and everyone else is dog
poor. I'm sure the coming Republican ideal America will be a wonderful place for
him. It just sounds like such a wonderful place when they've eliminated the
middle class. Krw - have you hired your armed bodyguards yet?
 
On 10/25/13, 5:58 PM, Bob F wrote:
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:11:33 -0700, Charlie E. <edmondson@ieee.org
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:59:57 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:

Charlie E. wrote:
Bob,
Just out of curiousity, is that before or after the subsidy?


After.


Ok, so your actual premium probably went up big time, but the
government is 'making up' for the difference - i.e. stealing from the
taxpayer to make you feel like you got a bargain. What was the
difference in the pre-subsidy premium!

BobF is a socialist. He's all in favor of stealing. As long as he's
the recipient, take it all (the government can keep some for their
trouble - doesn't matter to him).

As usual, know-it-all krw knows nothing, and makes up right wing fantasies about
everyone that doesn't "think" like him.

We should just outlaw insurance? Then the righties would be happy. Just let
everyone pay their responsibility if they get sick or injured. What exactly is
insurance - ever think about that?

How exactly is employer mandated insurance any different than government
mandated insurance. And what is wrong with the Republican concept of a mandate.
It worked for Romney. The Repubs pushed it for years before the Democrats
decided they could do it if the Repubs like it so.


I'm glad krw wants to live in a world where he's rich and everyone else is dog
poor. I'm sure the coming Republican ideal America will be a wonderful place for
him. It just sounds like such a wonderful place when they've eliminated the
middle class. Krw - have you hired your armed bodyguards yet?
Click to expand...

My guess is that if we don't get some income equality back in this
country, and if the rich don't stop their looting at the expense of the
middle class and the poor, we're going to see Republican heads on pikes.
 
"Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:l4epi6$acp$1@dont-email.me...
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:11:33 -0700, Charlie E. <edmondson@ieee.org
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:59:57 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:

Charlie E. wrote:
Bob,
Just out of curiousity, is that before or after the subsidy?


After.


Ok, so your actual premium probably went up big time, but the
government is 'making up' for the difference - i.e. stealing from the
taxpayer to make you feel like you got a bargain. What was the
difference in the pre-subsidy premium!

BobF is a socialist. He's all in favor of stealing. As long as he's
the recipient, take it all (the government can keep some for their
trouble - doesn't matter to him).

As usual, know-it-all krw knows nothing, and makes up right wing fantasies
about everyone that doesn't "think" like him.

We should just outlaw insurance? Then the righties would be happy. Just
let everyone pay their responsibility if they get sick or injured. What
exactly is insurance - ever think about that?

How exactly is employer mandated insurance any different than government
mandated insurance. And what is wrong with the Republican concept of a
mandate. It worked for Romney. The Repubs pushed it for years before the
Democrats decided they could do it if the Repubs like it so.


I'm glad krw wants to live in a world where he's rich and everyone else is
dog poor. I'm sure the coming Republican ideal America will be a wonderful
place for him. It just sounds like such a wonderful place when they've
eliminated the middle class. Krw - have you hired your armed bodyguards
yet?
Click to expand...

Damn, can you be any more confused? No wonder oboma won, all the terminally
ignorant libtards voted for the free ride. The only good part is they will
suffer the most. Too bad.
 
On 10/25/13, 6:07 PM, tm wrote:
"Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:l4epi6$acp$1@dont-email.me...
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:11:33 -0700, Charlie E. <edmondson@ieee.org
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:59:57 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:

Charlie E. wrote:
Bob,
Just out of curiousity, is that before or after the subsidy?


After.


Ok, so your actual premium probably went up big time, but the
government is 'making up' for the difference - i.e. stealing from the
taxpayer to make you feel like you got a bargain. What was the
difference in the pre-subsidy premium!

BobF is a socialist. He's all in favor of stealing. As long as he's
the recipient, take it all (the government can keep some for their
trouble - doesn't matter to him).

As usual, know-it-all krw knows nothing, and makes up right wing
fantasies about everyone that doesn't "think" like him.

We should just outlaw insurance? Then the righties would be happy.
Just let everyone pay their responsibility if they get sick or
injured. What exactly is insurance - ever think about that?

How exactly is employer mandated insurance any different than
government mandated insurance. And what is wrong with the Republican
concept of a mandate. It worked for Romney. The Repubs pushed it for
years before the Democrats decided they could do it if the Repubs like
it so.


I'm glad krw wants to live in a world where he's rich and everyone
else is dog poor. I'm sure the coming Republican ideal America will be
a wonderful place for him. It just sounds like such a wonderful place
when they've eliminated the middle class. Krw - have you hired your
armed bodyguards yet?




Damn, can you be any more confused? No wonder oboma won, all the
terminally ignorant libtards voted for the free ride. The only good part
is they will suffer the most. Too bad.
Click to expand...

Ahh, another hate-fill Teabagger...just what rec.boats needs. :)
 
"F.O.A.D." <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
news:bd088bFdp2tU2@mid.individual.net...
On 10/25/13, 5:58 PM, Bob F wrote:
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:11:33 -0700, Charlie E. <edmondson@ieee.org
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:59:57 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:

Charlie E. wrote:
Bob,
Just out of curiousity, is that before or after the subsidy?


After.


Ok, so your actual premium probably went up big time, but the
government is 'making up' for the difference - i.e. stealing from the
taxpayer to make you feel like you got a bargain. What was the
difference in the pre-subsidy premium!

BobF is a socialist. He's all in favor of stealing. As long as he's
the recipient, take it all (the government can keep some for their
trouble - doesn't matter to him).

As usual, know-it-all krw knows nothing, and makes up right wing
fantasies about
everyone that doesn't "think" like him.

We should just outlaw insurance? Then the righties would be happy. Just
let
everyone pay their responsibility if they get sick or injured. What
exactly is
insurance - ever think about that?

How exactly is employer mandated insurance any different than government
mandated insurance. And what is wrong with the Republican concept of a
mandate.
It worked for Romney. The Repubs pushed it for years before the Democrats
decided they could do it if the Repubs like it so.


I'm glad krw wants to live in a world where he's rich and everyone else
is dog
poor. I'm sure the coming Republican ideal America will be a wonderful
place for
him. It just sounds like such a wonderful place when they've eliminated
the
middle class. Krw - have you hired your armed bodyguards yet?




My guess is that if we don't get some income equality back in this
country, and if the rich don't stop their looting at the expense of the
middle class and the poor, we're going to see Republican heads on pikes.
Click to expand...

Bring it on, fuckwad. We won't be using pikes on you.
 
On 10/25/13, 6:27 PM, tm wrote:
"F.O.A.D." <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
news:bd088bFdp2tU2@mid.individual.net...
On 10/25/13, 5:58 PM, Bob F wrote:
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:11:33 -0700, Charlie E. <edmondson@ieee.org
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:59:57 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:

Charlie E. wrote:
Bob,
Just out of curiousity, is that before or after the subsidy?


After.


Ok, so your actual premium probably went up big time, but the
government is 'making up' for the difference - i.e. stealing from the
taxpayer to make you feel like you got a bargain. What was the
difference in the pre-subsidy premium!

BobF is a socialist. He's all in favor of stealing. As long as he's
the recipient, take it all (the government can keep some for their
trouble - doesn't matter to him).

As usual, know-it-all krw knows nothing, and makes up right wing
fantasies about
everyone that doesn't "think" like him.

We should just outlaw insurance? Then the righties would be happy.
Just let
everyone pay their responsibility if they get sick or injured. What
exactly is
insurance - ever think about that?

How exactly is employer mandated insurance any different than government
mandated insurance. And what is wrong with the Republican concept of
a mandate.
It worked for Romney. The Repubs pushed it for years before the
Democrats
decided they could do it if the Repubs like it so.


I'm glad krw wants to live in a world where he's rich and everyone
else is dog
poor. I'm sure the coming Republican ideal America will be a
wonderful place for
him. It just sounds like such a wonderful place when they've
eliminated the
middle class. Krw - have you hired your armed bodyguards yet?




My guess is that if we don't get some income equality back in this
country, and if the rich don't stop their looting at the expense of
the middle class and the poor, we're going to see Republican heads on
pikes.

Bring it on, fuckwad. We won't be using pikes on you.
Click to expand...

Oh, please. Save your projectile vomiting for your teabaggin' buddies.
 
Obamacare will save me $356/month, as I found out by spending 40
minutes signing
up, including time spend digging out my records. Of course, I live in
a liberal
state that created its own exchange as the bill intended, not one of
the 36
conservative states that opted out and dumped their responsibility on the
federal government site.
Click to expand...

Bob, I would like to compare your old with the new.
Would you fill in the missing info below.
Maybe some people really are saving money with Obamacare,
but I need the numbers to crunch.
Thanks, Mikek


I'm really curious if you're comparing apples to apples, regarding
your old and new policies.

How do the deductibles compare?
How do the copays compare?
How does the out of pocket compare?
Did you already have the things included in your premium that Obamacare
has forced on the the rest of us?
Such as, free yearly physical, free mammograms, free gynecological exam,
free colonoscopy and some others I can't quickly find.
The point, these aren't really free, the company has to charge a
higher premium to give these at no charge. That's why I wonder if you
had a high cost policy already.
Would you give me more details.
Thanks, Mikek
 
On 10/25/13, 6:36 PM, amdx wrote:
Obamacare will save me $356/month, as I found out by spending 40
minutes signing
up, including time spend digging out my records. Of course, I live in
a liberal
state that created its own exchange as the bill intended, not one of
the 36
conservative states that opted out and dumped their responsibility on
the
federal government site.



Bob, I would like to compare your old with the new.
Would you fill in the missing info below.
Maybe some people really are saving money with Obamacare,
but I need the numbers to crunch.
Thanks, Mikek


I'm really curious if you're comparing apples to apples, regarding
your old and new policies.

How do the deductibles compare?
How do the copays compare?
How does the out of pocket compare?
Did you already have the things included in your premium that Obamacare
has forced on the the rest of us?
Such as, free yearly physical, free mammograms, free gynecological exam,
free colonoscopy and some others I can't quickly find.
The point, these aren't really free, the company has to charge a
higher premium to give these at no charge. That's why I wonder if you
had a high cost policy already.
Would you give me more details.
Thanks, Mikek
Click to expand...

Too bad your governor, who didn't believe the ACA would come to pass,
didn't prepare your state for it, eh?
 
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:58:28 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com>
wrote:

krw@attt.bizz wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:11:33 -0700, Charlie E. <edmondson@ieee.org
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:59:57 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:

Charlie E. wrote:
Bob,
Just out of curiousity, is that before or after the subsidy?


After.


Ok, so your actual premium probably went up big time, but the
government is 'making up' for the difference - i.e. stealing from the
taxpayer to make you feel like you got a bargain. What was the
difference in the pre-subsidy premium!

BobF is a socialist. He's all in favor of stealing. As long as he's
the recipient, take it all (the government can keep some for their
trouble - doesn't matter to him).

As usual, know-it-all krw knows nothing, and makes up right wing fantasies about
everyone that doesn't "think" like him.
Click to expand...

You *are* a socialist. You *do* believe in stealing from one group of
people and giving it to others. IOW, you're lying. Again.
We should just outlaw insurance? Then the righties would be happy. Just let
everyone pay their responsibility if they get sick or injured. What exactly is
insurance - ever think about that?
Click to expand...

Insurance is voluntary, idiot.

How exactly is employer mandated insurance any different than government
mandated insurance. And what is wrong with the Republican concept of a mandate.
It worked for Romney. The Repubs pushed it for years before the Democrats
decided they could do it if the Repubs like it so.
Click to expand...

The keyword is "mandated", moron. If it's mandated, it's a tax. If
you're forcing one person to pay for another, it's theft.

I'm glad krw wants to live in a world where he's rich and everyone else is dog
poor. I'm sure the coming Republican ideal America will be a wonderful place for
him. It just sounds like such a wonderful place when they've eliminated the
middle class. Krw - have you hired your armed bodyguards yet?
Click to expand...

You're lying, again. ...but you know that. It's all you lefties can
do. BTW, I *am* my armed guard, dumbshit.
 
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:29:04 -0400, "F.O.A.D." <noway@jose.com> wrote:

On 10/25/13, 6:27 PM, tm wrote:

"F.O.A.D." <noway@jose.com> wrote in message
news:bd088bFdp2tU2@mid.individual.net...
On 10/25/13, 5:58 PM, Bob F wrote:
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:11:33 -0700, Charlie E. <edmondson@ieee.org
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:59:57 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:

Charlie E. wrote:
Bob,
Just out of curiousity, is that before or after the subsidy?


After.


Ok, so your actual premium probably went up big time, but the
government is 'making up' for the difference - i.e. stealing from the
taxpayer to make you feel like you got a bargain. What was the
difference in the pre-subsidy premium!

BobF is a socialist. He's all in favor of stealing. As long as he's
the recipient, take it all (the government can keep some for their
trouble - doesn't matter to him).

As usual, know-it-all krw knows nothing, and makes up right wing
fantasies about
everyone that doesn't "think" like him.

We should just outlaw insurance? Then the righties would be happy.
Just let
everyone pay their responsibility if they get sick or injured. What
exactly is
insurance - ever think about that?

How exactly is employer mandated insurance any different than government
mandated insurance. And what is wrong with the Republican concept of
a mandate.
It worked for Romney. The Repubs pushed it for years before the
Democrats
decided they could do it if the Repubs like it so.


I'm glad krw wants to live in a world where he's rich and everyone
else is dog
poor. I'm sure the coming Republican ideal America will be a
wonderful place for
him. It just sounds like such a wonderful place when they've
eliminated the
middle class. Krw - have you hired your armed bodyguards yet?




My guess is that if we don't get some income equality back in this
country, and if the rich don't stop their looting at the expense of
the middle class and the poor, we're going to see Republican heads on
pikes.

Bring it on, fuckwad. We won't be using pikes on you.


Oh, please. Save your projectile vomiting for your teabaggin' buddies.
Click to expand...

Your (zero) IQ is showing.
 
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:12:19 -0400, "F.O.A.D." <noway@jose.com> wrote:

On 10/25/13, 6:07 PM, tm wrote:

"Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:l4epi6$acp$1@dont-email.me...
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:11:33 -0700, Charlie E. <edmondson@ieee.org
wrote:

On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 13:59:57 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:

Charlie E. wrote:
Bob,
Just out of curiousity, is that before or after the subsidy?


After.


Ok, so your actual premium probably went up big time, but the
government is 'making up' for the difference - i.e. stealing from the
taxpayer to make you feel like you got a bargain. What was the
difference in the pre-subsidy premium!

BobF is a socialist. He's all in favor of stealing. As long as he's
the recipient, take it all (the government can keep some for their
trouble - doesn't matter to him).

As usual, know-it-all krw knows nothing, and makes up right wing
fantasies about everyone that doesn't "think" like him.

We should just outlaw insurance? Then the righties would be happy.
Just let everyone pay their responsibility if they get sick or
injured. What exactly is insurance - ever think about that?

How exactly is employer mandated insurance any different than
government mandated insurance. And what is wrong with the Republican
concept of a mandate. It worked for Romney. The Repubs pushed it for
years before the Democrats decided they could do it if the Repubs like
it so.


I'm glad krw wants to live in a world where he's rich and everyone
else is dog poor. I'm sure the coming Republican ideal America will be
a wonderful place for him. It just sounds like such a wonderful place
when they've eliminated the middle class. Krw - have you hired your
armed bodyguards yet?




Damn, can you be any more confused? No wonder oboma won, all the
terminally ignorant libtards voted for the free ride. The only good part
is they will suffer the most. Too bad.




Ahh, another hate-fill Teabagger...just what rec.boats needs. :)
Click to expand...

Ahh, another dumbshit lefty...just what SED neds. :(
 
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 18:40:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." <noway@jose.com> wrote:

On 10/25/13, 6:36 PM, amdx wrote:
Obamacare will save me $356/month, as I found out by spending 40
minutes signing
up, including time spend digging out my records. Of course, I live in
a liberal
state that created its own exchange as the bill intended, not one of
the 36
conservative states that opted out and dumped their responsibility on
the
federal government site.



Bob, I would like to compare your old with the new.
Would you fill in the missing info below.
Maybe some people really are saving money with Obamacare,
but I need the numbers to crunch.
Thanks, Mikek


I'm really curious if you're comparing apples to apples, regarding
your old and new policies.

How do the deductibles compare?
How do the copays compare?
How does the out of pocket compare?
Did you already have the things included in your premium that Obamacare
has forced on the the rest of us?
Such as, free yearly physical, free mammograms, free gynecological exam,
free colonoscopy and some others I can't quickly find.
The point, these aren't really free, the company has to charge a
higher premium to give these at no charge. That's why I wonder if you
had a high cost policy already.
Would you give me more details.
Thanks, Mikek


Too bad your governor, who didn't believe the ACA would come to pass,
didn't prepare your state for it, eh?
Click to expand...

Wrong again, dumbshit. His governor (and mine) didn't drink the
KoolAid, as yours obviously did.
 
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
Bring it on, fuckwad. We won't be using pikes on you.


Oh, please. Save your projectile vomiting for your teabaggin'
buddies.

Your (zero) IQ is showing.
Click to expand...

Pot calling the kettle black again.
 
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:15:26 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com>
wrote:

krw@attt.bizz wrote:
Bring it on, fuckwad. We won't be using pikes on you.


Oh, please. Save your projectile vomiting for your teabaggin'
buddies.

Your (zero) IQ is showing.

Pot calling the kettle black again.

You lefties would call people racist for saying the same that, lefty.
Click to expand...
 
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
How exactly is employer mandated insurance any different than
government mandated insurance. And what is wrong with the Republican
concept of a mandate. It worked for Romney. The Repubs pushed it for
years before the Democrats decided they could do it if the Repubs
like it so.

The keyword is "mandated", moron. If it's mandated, it's a tax. If
you're forcing one person to pay for another, it's theft.
Click to expand...

Why didn't you stop this Republican idea before the Democrats devided to go
along with it?
 
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
Too bad your governor, who didn't believe the ACA would come to pass,
didn't prepare your state for it, eh?

Wrong again, dumbshit. His governor (and mine) didn't drink the
KoolAid, as yours obviously did.
Click to expand...

I just heard on the news that 36 states are having real problems with the
federal site. Funny, but that's exactly how many states bagged out of their
chance to do it themselves. There go those silly Republicans again, creating a
problem, and then blaming it on anyone but themselves.
 
On 10/25/13, 8:20 PM, Bob F wrote:
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
Too bad your governor, who didn't believe the ACA would come to pass,
didn't prepare your state for it, eh?

Wrong again, dumbshit. His governor (and mine) didn't drink the
KoolAid, as yours obviously did.

I just heard on the news that 36 states are having real problems with the
federal site. Funny, but that's exactly how many states bagged out of their
chance to do it themselves. There go those silly Republicans again, creating a
problem, and then blaming it on anyone but themselves.
Click to expand...

What a coincidence! :)
 
On 10/25/2013 4:36 PM, amdx wrote:
> How does the out of pocket compare?

Can someone explain what the <!!> this means ?

The premium, copay, and deductibles are all out of MY pocket.

So what is this suppose to mean ?

hamilton
 
On 10/25/2013 5:40 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 10/25/13, 6:36 PM, amdx wrote:
Obamacare will save me $356/month, as I found out by spending 40
minutes signing
up, including time spend digging out my records. Of course, I live in
a liberal
state that created its own exchange as the bill intended, not one of
the 36
conservative states that opted out and dumped their responsibility on
the
federal government site.



Bob, I would like to compare your old with the new.
Would you fill in the missing info below.
Maybe some people really are saving money with Obamacare,
but I need the numbers to crunch.
Thanks, Mikek


I'm really curious if you're comparing apples to apples, regarding
your old and new policies.

How do the deductibles compare?
How do the copays compare?
How does the out of pocket compare?
Did you already have the things included in your premium that Obamacare
has forced on the the rest of us?
Such as, free yearly physical, free mammograms, free gynecological exam,
free colonoscopy and some others I can't quickly find.
The point, these aren't really free, the company has to charge a
higher premium to give these at no charge. That's why I wonder if you
had a high cost policy already.
Would you give me more details.
Thanks, Mikek


Too bad your governor, who didn't believe the ACA would come to pass,
didn't prepare your state for it, eh?
Click to expand...

I don't know what you mean, I'm happy with my insurance plan, just
not happy with the Obamacare caused increases.
Mikek
 
krw@attt.bizz wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:15:26 -0700, "Bob F" <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:

krw@attt.bizz wrote:
Bring it on, fuckwad. We won't be using pikes on you.


Oh, please. Save your projectile vomiting for your teabaggin'
buddies.

Your (zero) IQ is showing.

Pot calling the kettle black again.

You lefties would call people racist for saying the same that, lefty.
Click to expand...

LOL! Too bad you can't think.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top