No Speaking Spanish in the USA

bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:BDPxE.262332$Dp5.155356@fx27.iad:

I didn't realize it was that old, no. How long has Phil Hobbs been
doing ASCII art for?

Use a bit of common sense. Do you actually think Phil wasted time
constructing that or is it more likely he saw it, kept it, and copy and
pasted it for the post he made?

I do not see Phil spending large amounts of time playing with ASCII
art.

Hell, losing hours to NetHack is a far better character based
endeavor to waste one's time on.

 

[bitrex]

On 4/30/19 12:41 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:jVPxE.264676$pJ4.206982@fx19.iad:

On 4/29/19 11:58 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
wrote:
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:BDPxE.262332$Dp5.155356@fx27.iad:

I didn't realize it was that old, no. How long has Phil Hobbs
been doing ASCII art for?


Use a bit of common sense. Do you actually think Phil wasted
time
constructing that or is it more likely he saw it, kept it, and
copy and pasted it for the post he made?

I do not see Phil spending large amounts of time playing with
ASCII
art.

Einstein played the violin, everyone needs a hobby. Even engineers
should probably have a hobby somewhat removed from engineering. I
like sex with women 10 years younger than I am, primarily, but for
the weekdays I prefer piano and gardening.

Hell, losing hours to NetHack is a far better character based
endeavor to waste one's time on.


https://www.darkestdungeon.com/


It is retarded IMNSHO. NOT 'character based'. You seem to
misread. character based means ASCII, which is what was being
discussed. Not a 'role character'.

you fight monsters in a series of randomly-generated dungeons and get stuffs

> I play alone. I do not "recruit, train, and lead a team".

It's a single-player game silly, you just have to manage four
adventurers (that you yourself control) instead of one, selected from a
pool of different types with different strengths and weaknesses. like
recruiting for a football team or something

I do not do cards. D&D and Magic are lame compared to NetHack.

Sigh it's not a card game either it's a modernized Nethack-like
experience, all the same elements are there just more elaborate

 

[bitrex]

On 4/30/19 2:54 AM, bitrex wrote:

   It is retarded IMNSHO.  NOT 'character based'.  You seem to
misread.  character based means ASCII, which is what was being
discussed. Not a 'role character'.

you fight monsters in a series of randomly-generated dungeons and get
stuffs

   I play alone.  I do not "recruit, train, and lead a team".

It's a single-player game silly, you just have to manage four
adventurers (that you yourself control) instead of one, selected from a
pool of different types with different strengths and weaknesses. like
recruiting for a football team or something

Actually you manage a whole stable full of adventurers, the number you
can keep in your pool is one of the many upgrade options you can
"unlock" as you progress through the game. I think the max is like 40.

Can only take four out at a time while the others rest up and get
treated for all the devastating afflictions and injuries that can be
suffered, dungeon-ing is dangerous business.

In addition to the dungeon-running you also have to plan and manage your
dungeon-ing business topside, that is.

 

[Jasen Betts]

On 2019-04-30, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 4/29/19 9:46 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:jBNxE.459698$P12.142189@fx08.iad:

On 4/29/19 9:25 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
wrote:
bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in news:4KMxE.652029$Y49.592074
@fx46.iad:

that's really nice did you draw that?????


Why is it that every time you post you act like you have never
been
in Usenet before?

Now you want us to believe that you have never seen ASCII art
before.

But to clarify I don't want you to believe nothin'. You believe
anything you like. Hell you believe whatever you like all night
till the cows come home!! That is your God-given right...as an
American!!!!!
^^^^^^^^

You spelled 'human' wrong.

The Romanian philosopher Emil Cioran wrote "Democracy, a marvel with
nothing to offer, is at once a nation's paradise, and its tomb."

aphorisms of that type are designed to provoke a knee-jerk emotional
response but also allow the possibility of deeper thought

And that particular tail piece has been around for ages.

Essentially I was surprised that you claimed to have not
previously seen it.


I didn't realize it was that old, no. How long has Phil Hobbs been doing
ASCII art for?

If that was his work* at-least 1989 or so.

(*) I don't beleive that it is.

--
When I tried casting out nines I made a hash of it.

 

[Jeff Layman]

On 30/04/19 01:30, Phil Hobbs wrote:

__________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Please do |
/ O O\__ NOT |
/ \ feed the |
/ \ \ trolls |
/ _ \ \ ______________|
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ \ __||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | /| | --|
| | |// |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ // |
/ _ \\ _ // | /
* / \_ /- | - | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________

Phil Hobbs

I had no idea that The Moomins were popular in the US.

--

Jeff

 

bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in news:ziSxE.203587$2P1.45366
@fx10.iad:

It's a single-player game silly, you just have to manage four
adventurers (that you yourself control)

four is not one, silly.

 

bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in news:ziSxE.203587$2P1.45366
@fx10.iad:

Sigh it's not a card game either it's a modernized Nethack-like
experience, all the same elements are there just more elaborate

Oh... $24.95 elaborate... no thanks.

 

>"This sounds like a Trump speech to the NRA. Prepare for war! Prepare to kill all enemies of the state! "

How's that ? He never said any such fucking thing and you know it.

He has never called for violence, the democrats on the other hand "Harass them on the street, in restaurants, their homes...time NOT to be civil...".

Trump has enough faults that you don't have to make shit up.

 

[bitrex]

On 4/29/19 10:46 PM, John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:10:50 -0500, Unlisted <unlisted@nomail.com
wrote:

If you're an American citizen of the United States, you know that Mexico
is the enemy. We must build a wall to keep the enemy out of the USA. But
the enemy has already infiltrated the States, and they must be killed.
They are easy to identify, because they speak Spanish.

Anyone and everyone in the USA needs to be on guard. If you find any
spanish speaking gringos in the USA, you MUST shoot and kill them. This
is your duty as an American. The enemy must be destroyed. Our great
president, Donald Trump wants you to destroy the enemy. This is war. All
Mexicans must be destroyed.

Arm yourself, and join the Citizens Army against Mexico. United, we
shall destroy all Spanish speaking in our great country. The United
States of America.

Unlisted, unintelligent, un-clued.

You're probably no good with electronics either.

This sounds like a Trump speech to the NRA. Prepare for war! Prepare to
kill all enemies of the state!

 

[bitrex]

On 4/30/19 12:20 PM, jurb6006@gmail.com wrote:

"This sounds like a Trump speech to the NRA. Prepare for war! Prepare to kill all enemies of the state!"

How's that ? He never said any such fucking thing and you know it.

Well no. I said it "sounded like."

But the OP's post skirts the line between a politically-motivated
false-flag troll to make the opposition look bad, or a legitimate
terrorist threat. Impossible to say for sure in text though I would
guess the former.

In any case posting terrorist threats of any type even in jest is a
risky business, whatever the purpose. People go to prison for stuff like
that, as they should

He has never called for violence, the democrats on the other hand "Harass them on the street, in restaurants, their homes...time NOT to be civil...".

Trump has enough faults that you don't have to make shit up.

Damning with faint praise...

 

[John Robertson]

On 2019/04/30 9:20 a.m., jurb6006@gmail.com wrote:

"This sounds like a Trump speech to the NRA. Prepare for war! Prepare to kill all enemies of the state!"

How's that ? He never said any such fucking thing and you know it.

He has never called for violence, the democrats on the other hand "Harass them on the street, in restaurants, their homes...time NOT to be civil...".

Trump has enough faults that you don't have to make shit up.

Really? We don't have to make this shit up - he SAYS it - links to
videos showing what the POTUS actually said are here:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donald-trump-incitement-violence/

We see it accurately reported in Canada:

https://www.macleans.ca/politics/washington/the-ways-that-donald-trump-incites-violence/

You may not be listening, but we can't do anything about that.

Lately he has been saying (to the NRA) that the Democrats are trying to
stage a coup and how much General Lee was a hero - a man who was
actively trying to depose an elected sitting president (Lincoln) and
break the US Constitution...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SeUHKc01PA

Watch the video and tell me the he doesn't say these things.

John

 

[John Larkin]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 11:54:40 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 4/29/19 10:46 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:10:50 -0500, Unlisted <unlisted@nomail.com
wrote:

If you're an American citizen of the United States, you know that Mexico
is the enemy. We must build a wall to keep the enemy out of the USA. But
the enemy has already infiltrated the States, and they must be killed.
They are easy to identify, because they speak Spanish.

Anyone and everyone in the USA needs to be on guard. If you find any
spanish speaking gringos in the USA, you MUST shoot and kill them. This
is your duty as an American. The enemy must be destroyed. Our great
president, Donald Trump wants you to destroy the enemy. This is war. All
Mexicans must be destroyed.

Arm yourself, and join the Citizens Army against Mexico. United, we
shall destroy all Spanish speaking in our great country. The United
States of America.

Unlisted, unintelligent, un-clued.

You're probably no good with electronics either.



This sounds like a Trump speech to the NRA. Prepare for war! Prepare to
kill all enemies of the state!

You sound just like the OP. Either incompetant trolling or serious
derangement.

I have four Spanish-speaking enployees. Two young kids in engineering
are a girl from Mexico and a guy from Peru.

Hispanic Americans seem to fit into the US culture very well. Do you
have evidence that Trump wants to kill latinos? Most countries control
their borders. A big wall would save lives, not take them.




--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:53:50 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

Hispanic Americans seem to fit into the US culture very well. Do you
have evidence that Trump wants to kill latinos? Most countries control
their borders. A big wall would save lives, not take them.

IIRC., Mr. Trump did not want to exclude *all* Mexicans and south
Americans; just the "bad hombres" he referred to. And many of them are
very, very bad indeed. I don't see any problem with that. The only people
who could possibly object to such a common sense measure would be
anarchists and other nation-wreckers like Sloman and bitrex and AFAIC
they and their bedfellows can all go to hell for all I care.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

 

[bitrex]

On 4/30/19 3:57 PM, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:53:50 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

Hispanic Americans seem to fit into the US culture very well. Do you
have evidence that Trump wants to kill latinos? Most countries control
their borders. A big wall would save lives, not take them.

IIRC., Mr. Trump did not want to exclude *all* Mexicans and south
Americans; just the "bad hombres" he referred to. And many of them are
very, very bad indeed. I don't see any problem with that. The only people
who could possibly object to such a common sense measure would be
anarchists and other nation-wreckers like Sloman and bitrex and AFAIC
they and their bedfellows can all go to hell for all I care.

I pay my taxes and don't like to see them wasted on boondoggle scam
artist lowest-bidder crony projects. You live off the dole in England

 

jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in
news:eadb2c4b-a824-45fb-8250-5b0bffc4242a@googlegroups.com:

"This sounds like a Trump speech to the NRA. Prepare for war!
Prepare to kill all enemies of the state! "

How's that ? He never said any such fucking thing and you know it.

He has never called for violence, the democrats on the other hand
"Harass them on the street, in restaurants, their homes...time NOT
to be civil...".

Trump has enough faults that you don't have to make shit up.

He most certainly did make statements which incited violence.

He also used profanity, which he explicitly swore an oath not to
do. It is called the broadcaster's oath, and there is also a SAG
guild oath. The FCC should have fined the stupid bastard $2M for
each and every infraction, and STILL should go back and reference
each and do so.

 

[John Larkin]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 21:54:27 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in
news:eadb2c4b-a824-45fb-8250-5b0bffc4242a@googlegroups.com:

"This sounds like a Trump speech to the NRA. Prepare for war!
Prepare to kill all enemies of the state! "

How's that ? He never said any such fucking thing and you know it.

He has never called for violence, the democrats on the other hand
"Harass them on the street, in restaurants, their homes...time NOT
to be civil...".

Trump has enough faults that you don't have to make shit up.


He most certainly did make statements which incited violence.

He also used profanity, which he explicitly swore an oath not to
do. It is called the broadcaster's oath, and there is also a SAG
guild oath. The FCC should have fined the stupid bastard $2M for
each and every infraction, and STILL should go back and reference
each and do so.

My goodness, we certainly don't want any profanity!


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[John Larkin]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 19:57:29 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<curd@notformail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:53:50 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

Hispanic Americans seem to fit into the US culture very well. Do you
have evidence that Trump wants to kill latinos? Most countries control
their borders. A big wall would save lives, not take them.

IIRC., Mr. Trump did not want to exclude *all* Mexicans and south
Americans; just the "bad hombres" he referred to. And many of them are
very, very bad indeed. I don't see any problem with that. The only people
who could possibly object to such a common sense measure would be
anarchists and other nation-wreckers like Sloman and bitrex and AFAIC
they and their bedfellows can all go to hell for all I care.

And Democrats who assume that the illegal immigrants, good and bad,
will all vote Democrat.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[bitrex]

On 4/30/19 7:42 PM, John Larkin wrote:

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 19:57:29 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
curd@notformail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:53:50 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

Hispanic Americans seem to fit into the US culture very well. Do you
have evidence that Trump wants to kill latinos? Most countries control
their borders. A big wall would save lives, not take them.

IIRC., Mr. Trump did not want to exclude *all* Mexicans and south
Americans; just the "bad hombres" he referred to. And many of them are
very, very bad indeed. I don't see any problem with that. The only people
who could possibly object to such a common sense measure would be
anarchists and other nation-wreckers like Sloman and bitrex and AFAIC
they and their bedfellows can all go to hell for all I care.

And Democrats who assume that the illegal immigrants, good and bad,
will all vote Democrat.

paranoid, conspiracy-theory type ideas along the lines of nano-thermite
destroying the WTC and Podesta and Hillary running a child sex-dungeon
out of a pizza parlor.

The right never holds three branches of government for long it always
falls apart under the burden of its own paranoia. oh shit quick! there
might be an illegal under the bed! Watch out I saw a communist over
there! tilting at windmills and jumping at their own shadow

 

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> wrote in
news:15nhce1v8jm6aoaqv1dgppq99uek9omjga@4ax.com:

He most certainly did make statements which incited violence.

He also used profanity, which he explicitly swore an oath not to
do. It is called the broadcaster's oath, and there is also a SAG
guild oath. The FCC should have fined the stupid bastard $2M for
each and every infraction, and STILL should go back and reference
each and do so.


My goodness, we certainly don't want any profanity!

You can try to dumb down America's character, but the jackass you
voted for has already done that stupid move.

 

[bitrex]

On 4/30/19 7:52 PM, bitrex wrote:

On 4/30/19 7:42 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 19:57:29 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
curd@notformail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:53:50 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

Hispanic Americans seem to fit into the US culture very well. Do you
have evidence that Trump wants to kill latinos? Most countries control
their borders. A big wall would save lives, not take them.

IIRC., Mr. Trump did not want to exclude *all* Mexicans and south
Americans; just the "bad hombres" he referred to. And many of them are
very, very bad indeed. I don't see any problem with that. The only
people
who could possibly object to such a common sense measure would be
anarchists and other nation-wreckers like Sloman and bitrex and AFAIC
they and their bedfellows can all go to hell for all I care.

And Democrats who assume that the illegal immigrants, good and bad,
will all vote Democrat.



paranoid, conspiracy-theory type ideas along the lines of nano-thermite
destroying the WTC and Podesta and Hillary running a child sex-dungeon
out of a pizza parlor.

The right never holds three branches of government for long it always
falls apart under the burden of its own paranoia. oh shit quick! there
might be an illegal under the bed! Watch out I saw a communist over
there! tilting at windmills and jumping at their own shadow

Very good at utilizing Fox News to run corny propaganda to rile people
up enough to get power, I'll admit. pretty terrible on the follow-thru
don't know what to do with their time once they got it. Underdog-syndrome.