nightmare

On 2019-09-10, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com <jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 22:52:00 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Monday, September 9, 2019 at 10:39:31 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:53:04 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:


Starting point for studying hurricanes: they spin counterclockwise in the US area.

Unless you are Al Gore.

So, your 'nightmare' prominently features a vice president from an earlier century?

Not Spiro Agnew or Dan Quayle !? That's just SO WEIRD!

https://www.hapblog.com/2009/11/al-gore-photoshopped-cover-of-new-book.html

Isn't there a proverb about that?

--
When I tried casting out nines I made a hash of it.
 
On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 at 3:31:02 PM UTC+10, tabb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, 9 September 2019 15:33:18 UTC+1, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 11:14:59 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in news:4429ea65-f1cf-
4238-8e8d-661381522ef5@googlegroups.com:

I guess AlwaysWrong isn't the only one who is wrong a lot.


Jackasses that use other jackass's jackassed monikers are wholly
wrong, jackass.

Non-jackasses/non-cowards use their real names.

some do, some don't.

And NT probably thinks that he isn't a jackass.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 at 10:45:59 AM UTC-4, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:19:35 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:qh6enehuvtnptqldcrnb3beda2bod6i7i2@4ax.com:

And it is not about cowardice either. Someone is not a coward
because they use a nym in Usenet.

Except that you are.

Someone that uses a nym in Usenet... yes, I am. A coward... no, I
am not. Nice try though, punk.

You going around calling me one, however, is like an invitation to
prove otherwise. You are the kind of guy deserving of a big nose
breaking head butt, were we to meet.

And though you claim to be other than a coward, you sure would
sport a pussy response to that. Pussy is different than coward, and
Larkin, you are a pussy.

For good reason.

And what would that be? To keep retarded fucks like you from
trying to cause problems for me with my employer, yada yada yada.
Fucktards like those in Usenet do not need to know who I am.

Fuck you, larkin. You are a pussy, boy

This group is for electonics design.

But you don't do electronic design.

The pattern is predictable: the nastiest, foulest, angriest, most
ranting and swearing people in SED are people who don't design
electronics.

Certainly you are the exception. You are clearly one of the angriest, ranting and nasty people here. You seem to be virtually obsessed with arguing with people like your friend above.

When do you actually find time to design anything? I guess you are a speed ranter...

--

Rick C.

---+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
---+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 at 2:35:00 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 at 3:52:06 PM UTC+10, whit3rd wrote:
On Monday, September 9, 2019 at 10:39:31 AM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:53:04 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:


Starting point for studying hurricanes: they spin counterclockwise in the US area.

Unless you are Al Gore.

So, your 'nightmare' prominently features a vice president from an earlier century?

Not Spiro Agnew or Dan Quayle !? That's just SO WEIRD!

There's nothing weird about it. Al Gore got part of a Nobel Peace prize for his work on popularising anthropogenic climate change.

John Larkin thinks that climate change isn't real, and that everything that Al Gore talks about is a scam designed to extract money from tax-payers - in other words John is a gullible sucker for climate change denial propaganda.

It's a very unrealistic view of Al Gore, but John Larkin has some deeply unrealistic ideas.

It really is amazing how people can fool themselves. Some of the data is just too hard to explain other than it being man made. So instead of trying to come up with a reasonable alternate explanation for *all* the data, they cherry pick and find little features that would seem to contradict the idea of AGW. In reality they can't actually find any real info, so they virtually put their fingers in their ears and babble so they can't hear anyone else talking. This gets easier as they get older and their hearing is not so good.

--

Rick C.

----+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
----+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top