Jihad needs scientists

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4525B62C.133D69C6@hotmail.com...

MathFreak NoMore wrote:

you Jews drink alcohol and are fond of it too. Well,
you cannot do that openly among Moslems when drinking
alcohol in their presence is a grave insult to them.

And some US Southern Baptists and some Mormons are similarly offended about
being around people consuming alcohol in any quantities. So what?

Strange. No Moslem I've met has complained and indeed a few of them join
in too

Agreed. It's probably only the more conservative sects that would find it
offensive. I've bent the elbows with a few Muslims as well.

Eric Lucas

 

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4525B6C1.2CAFDD5B@hotmail.com...

Homer J Simpson wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

Your American Love of Violence is once again nnoted.

Do you think that violence is the only way to 'win an argument' ?

Isn't it the message of almost all US made movies?

Don't even get me started on US movies !!! What's the emoticon for steam
coming out of your ears ?

Were those also more tolerable during the Clinton administration, or was it
just our foreign policy?

Eric Lucas

 

[Eeyore]

lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Homer J Simpson wrote:
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

Your American Love of Violence is once again nnoted.

Do you think that violence is the only way to 'win an argument' ?

Isn't it the message of almost all US made movies?

Don't even get me started on US movies !!! What's the emoticon for steam
coming out of your ears ?

Were those also more tolerable during the Clinton administration, or was it
just our foreign policy?

Maybe under Clinton they seemed more amusing ?

Graham

 

[Daniel Mandic]

<lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:FbOdnVmGg9Q_E7jYnZ2dnUVZ8qudnZ2d@pipex.net...

"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
newsNfVg.51683$E67.16735@clgrps13...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:OMydnTZT299zHLjYnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@pipex.net...

Before Hitler - no holocaust.

After Hitler - no holocaust.

Wow. Before [Insert anyone who lived between 1930 - 1945] no
holocaust. After [same person] no holocaust.

So you see no connection between Hitler and the holocaust.

I see a connection but the same connection can be said about many
people. Your example was meant to imply that Hitler was the sole
driving force for the Holocaust. This is not the case.

Sure, there were other forces. Yes, there was plenty of anti-Jewish
sentiment in Germany around then. The economy was still in the
toilet from the Great Depression, but it's not clear to me that the
average German blamed the Jews--even if so, I suspect not anywhere
near the way Hitler did. However, don't you think it really required
a charming (in a Germanic sort of way) misanthropic psychopath with a
serious chip on his shoulder about the Jews, to whip everybody into a
"the Jews caused all of your problems" frenzy so they could put aside
their personal revulsion at eventually killing millions of their
fellow human beings? I guess there could have been another person
that combined that level of insanity, misanthropy, megalomania,
cunning, opportunity and charm, but I'd be really surprised.

Eric Lucas

Hey man, that's Na.. Right tactic.... blame 'em before and you will not
be guilty at last. You could say: "They (Na...) just tried to get an
order in all this chaos, released by the technical-outlet at that time."

In 1930, Germany hears FM Radio. I am still beating any other
wave-transceiver with my Onkyo Tuner.... Digital??? What's that. etc.
etc. etc. etc. etc. Panavision etc. Jerry Lewis (what a great picture
quality on PAL and surely in NTSC, too), etc, etc.



Best regards,

Daniel Mandic

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:41:17 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
<nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:

"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
news:7vhai2t6o1b3m44o0qjgoue2s0bpenvd23@4ax.com...

If you want to get snippy, consider this: there are several times more
Native Americans alive now, in the USA, than there were when Columbus
landed in the Americas.

Pure blood?

Of course, idiot. What? Now you think we raped 'em all too?

 

[John Larkin]

On 05 Oct 2006 23:43:02 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
wrote:

I think you can count up to two, or three. At four you have actualley
stucked, as many other .... unfortunately.


Who is it now? The world leader... Rusia? USA? Europe?


No, no wait... it's the Moonstation Captain speaking to you... brzzz,
breeek, pam. USA - is - the - World - Moon - Leader -.

WhY? just look to the weird people there, buying claims on the moon. I
believe you could defent taht claims, but that shows even more that the
pure moron is found in the United States of America.



Best regards,

Daniel Mandic

Daniel,

Whereas I admire your determination to converse with other engineers
(you are an engineer, aren't you?) in what is obviously not your
native tongue, you really ought to know that your writing makes no
sense at all.

John

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:45:08 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

Kurt Ullman wrote:

So, we just all capitulate and become Muslim states?

Since when was that an option ?

You really shouldn't give so much credence to what a few thousand ppl say they
want.

Graham

Hahahah... that's funny. I'd bet your website visit history log
would show us that you do exactly that. I'd bet what you call a
legitimate news "source" comes nowhere close.

You do not expound history or news. You expound crap. Complete and
utter crap! That's what you are. That's who you are.

 

[Daniel Mandic]

Jim Thompson wrote:

Sounds like you've never actually seen the US. Bye.

...Jim Thompson

America? Yes, fine. Many good people there, many good people there.


USA sounds better ;-)




Better Regards,

Daniel Mandic


P.S.: United States of America even more. Although, I prefer to say
America.

 

[John Larkin]

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 01:34:58 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
<nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:452408AA.F58E3945@hotmail.com...

Your American Love of Violence is once again nnoted.

Do you think that violence is the only way to 'win an argument' ?

Isn't it the message of almost all US made movies?

I guess it is for all the ones you see. There's a wide variety of
movies available, and you can just watch "action" movies if that's
your taste. In the US, the rote violence-and-car-crash movies are in
fact not selling well any more... they're all the same, and video
games are cheaper. The megahit violence movies often turn a profit on
international distribution. I suppose violence is universal, whereas
American romance doesn't export as well.

"La Femme Nikita" was pretty gross. "My Big Fat Greek Wedding" was an
unexpected hit. You never know what will sell.

John

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:45:17 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:ums9i2lpttd3bcqks34ufl2n0tpnl6856i@4ax.com...
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 21:48:37 +0100, "T Wake"
usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

...are part of
the great Islamic quest for world domination....



What is so great about it?

Learn reading and comprehension. Great does not always mean "good."

It isn't "large" either, dumbass.

Do not presume that I was unaware of the word's definition, you
fucktard schmuck.

Regardless of what it was meant to mean, it accomplished neither.
It also went right over your head.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:46:48 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

Keith wrote:

In article <45244E9E.D8DD822E@hotmail.com>,
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com says...

What do you think about the Vincennes shooting down an Iranian Airbus then ?

Successful missile test?

How about proof of American sailors being trigger happy dickheads ?

The simple fact that you can make a joke out of the mass slaughter of innocent ppl
is one reason why the rest of the world looks at the USA in incredulity.

911

It is you, fuckhead, that is incredulous.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:48:48 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

Jim Thompson wrote:

You must be a Democrat.

So when does the new Civil War start ?

At least it'll keep you jerks out of everyone else's hair.

You're an idiot.

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:10:34 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:

A lot of this anti-US fervor started with Democrat Presidential
candidates trying out their sound bytes in 2002-2004 in Europe.

/BAH
OH BS. It started with Bush invading another nation.

Actually, it started with FDR invading another nation. France,
specifically.

You're being very very silly.

Graham

I don't think so. A couple of things are at work here. One is the
military and cultural and technological and scientific dominance of
the USA as compared to Europe, which is bound to cause some
resentment. The other is expressed in the Chinese proverb, "if you
save someone's life, they will hate you forever."

You really are monumentally stupid.

You are fat, poor, unhappy, and frustrated by the state of the world.
I am none of these. Explain to me why I am the stupid one here.

John

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:55:32 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

invade our newsgroup

Hahahahahaha... You're a fucking joke.

Here... in Usenet... *you* *own* NOTHING!

Also, here, a twit like you doesn't get five seconds of fame, much
less the 15 seconds the rest of us get.

You misspelled your name, T Weak boy.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:55:46 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

Keith wrote:

jmfbahciv@aol.com says...
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:

Well, I'd like to have a few less crapolas posts so I can find
the ones were posted by thoughtful people.

Yet another American dismisses non-American thing thinking as crap.

All you seem to do is post lines like this. You have no dialog
just a gut reaction that happens to be deemed to be politically
correct at the moment.

Yep! /BAH, this is the stuffed donkey. Stuffed donkey, this is
/BAH. The stuffed donky is one of SED's most prominent (and least
useful) anti-American Europeons.

If a stuffed donkey can outhink most Americans it doesn't say much for
America does it ?

You're stuffed? Got any video, or is that too advanced for an ass
like you?

I figure if we saw the real you, you'd instantly make more kill
files, and the group might finally be rid of your stupid ass.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:56:36 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

"YD" <ydtechHAT@techie.com> wrote in message
news:esn9i2dmt34geb4aqp39u5dknbp1bqms6p@4ax.com...

Overall damn immature, and that goes for those bothering to keep it
going too.

Sadly true. Still entertainment is where you can find it and there are some
reasonable people (on both sides of the fence) posting in this thread.

We're ALL bozos on this bus, you retarded fuckheads. Claim that you
aren't and you lose twenty more IQ points.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 20:59:52 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> Gave us:

lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:6d%Ug.9902$e66.1245@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:tOmdnf6_-qawlbnYRVnyiw@pipex.net...

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4522F755.6FBE3BED@hotmail.com...


T Wake wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

That's not my recollection.

Ok, it is my recollection though.

Fair nuff !

You need to stop reading too much implied criticism where there isnt
any.

There's been *loads* !

In my posts?

A misunderstanding it seems.

Possibly. The joys of the text based USENET.

Yes, let's do stick to getting offended by the *ex*plicit insults. There
are way more than enough of those in this thread to go around.

Yes. Easier to not get offended by anything here

It's really difficult to accomplish though, as you keep returning :-]

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:58:30 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
John Larkin wrote:

So, seriously: why do you care now?

America is now threatening my way of life.

Bizarre. How?

Because of all the wars you've been pointlessly starting and you want to
start more.

Have any bombs fallen in your neighborhood?

It's horrible. There's death and destruction on the news every night.

Bad news sells. Television news is crap, so don't watch it. That's one
thing you can rationally decide to do that will make you feel better.

British lads are dying for America

"For America"? What did we do, press them at sea? And why did they
join a volunteer army if they didn't want to be warriors?

and all you do is tell us we're wrong
to criticise.

That's certainly not "all I do." In fact, I don't do that at all.

I can assure you that the British public is getting VERY
pissed off. I was just watching 'Question Time' and there was a very
anti-US feeling from the audience.

All those MPs watch too much TV, too.

Without a change of tack, I can see the North Atlantic Alliance falling
apart in the next couple of years.

Since the Russians are fairly docile these days, and Germany is
united, and Eastern Europe is free, it may as well; NATO did its job,
and did it well, and it's time for us to spend our money elsewhere.
Send us a "thank you" card and some chocolates maybe. Unless Russia
invades Georgia... that would be nasty, but the resulting European
dynamics would be interesting, probably hilarious in a sick sort of
way.

John

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 21:08:36 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

John Fields wrote:

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:
"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote

Sounds like it. Wasn't there a recent suggestion that the Nazis and
the Brits should have made a deal?

The British were asked to help take out Hitler before WWII and refused.
Big mistake, since no heir would have been as bad.

No way of knowing that for sure. Hitler's insanity contributed heavily to
his forces defeats. If they had a competent, sane, commander in chief it may
have gone differently.

---
It certainly _would_ have.

Just for starters, there would have been no holocaust.

The holocaust was actually set in motion not by Hitler but by his cronies.

At *HIS* behest, you retarded fuck!

 

In article <igiai25e5nq59bupp5ko8l96ek978lhmrj@4ax.com>, John Larkin <jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> writes:

On Thu, 05 Oct 06 09:43:44 GMT, lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:


The military commissions part. Bush tried to claim Gitmo was outside the
federal courts' jurisdiction. The courts all rejected that.

Good. Sticking to principles is the best thing, in the long run.


BTW, the SCotUS is not superior to any other branch, or at least is
not supposed to be. They've been told before "with what army are
you going to enforce your decision".

I don't think any other branch of government has ever defied the
Supremes, which is remarkable clout for "nine old men."

Well, Lincoln defied them, once. Those were exceptional times,

though.

Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"