Jihad needs scientists

[Eeyore]

JoeBloe wrote:

Yes. The difference between little London streets and the
metropolises contained in this country are vast.
There would be double decker spill overs everywhere. Most places
wouldn't support them at all due to the way our traffic light/power
line systems are strung.

So, if our double deckers work fine on our 'little London streets' how are they going
to have a problem on big American ones ?

Also, if you don't know how to put up traffic lights properly that's your problem !

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Daniel Mandic wrote:

He knows nothing about the 'Britonia Story' and the Austrian emigrant
(Hi.... is just an artist name, nothing real), knowing that period of
time better, thusand years afterwards.

You guys really do take it seriously about not mentioning the N... and
H..... words don't you ?

Graham

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:11:14 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

You can't accept that Islam isn't a threat to your lifestyle ?

Not only is it a threat, but it has already begun to
alter my lifestyle. My goal is to ensure that it
alter 100% of my lifestyle, if I'm allowed to exist.

Tell me more about this threat you perceive.

What exactly is it that you're afraid of ?

You're an idiot.

One fear is that there are too many complacent idiots, *just like
you*, and that there numbers will cause the economies of the world to
have roller-coaster repercussions.

Ooops... too late.

 

[Daniel Mandic]

Kurt Ullman wrote:

in the general direction (with a forewarning to
Pakistan) is not an "attempt to get OBL", just an attempt to show
that "something is being done".

It's still 100% more than GWB ever did.

Yep GWB never did get around to clearing out the Taliban and
exiling him to mountains at the border.

Staple one madness over the next madness, makes the madnessin the first
forget. China was a good example, bez they are known that no one would
attack them.

I would suggest the UAS AREMEE to go there and care for rights, HUHman
rights. Hahaha, you would get cold feet ,
erm... suggest to the US Governement.




Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic

 

[Eeyore]

Daniel Mandic wrote:

John Fields wrote:

My reference to not speaking English as a first language was a
euphemism for being conquered, which was related to an earlier post
by Graham stating that had the US not become involved in WW2,
England and Germany might have teamed up to fight Russia after
Germany double-crossed Russia. In my opinion that would have been
suicide for England, as depleted as it would have been, when Russia
came rolling in to get Germany.

So yes, the question was loaded, but it wasn't Monday morning
quarterbacking. Monday morning quarterbacking would have been more
like: "If only Germany had done thus and such, she would have won."

What things do you write about. My dear, your insights of the Human
history is reduced to a period of 7 years, yes?

C'mon, let's get some million years back.....

America's only got a couple of hundred years of history.

It makes them dizzy thinking much further back.

Graham

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:16:50 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:
lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:

Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush calling
a
criticism "unacceptable."

Which criticism was unacceptable?

Watch this.

I can't. I'm not going to the library for this one.

Why do you need to go to the library ?

Graham

Idiot! For someone that claims to have been in these groups for so
long, I find it had to believe (not) that you are oblivious as to whom
/BAH is.

 

[Eeyore]

lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote

I see terrorist attack doesn't make the top twenty then That war on
tobacco really needs to get started soon.

It has, thankfully. Most major cities in the US ban tobacco use in public
places, and several states are considering state-wide bans. Still perfectly
legal at home and in most places outdoors, but at least I can eat dinner in
a restaurant without smoke making me physically ill.

I can barely wait for the UK law banning smoking in public places to come into
effect. It'll be so much nicer.

Graham

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:22:17 -0400, Keith <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

In article <eg335h$5l0$10@leto.cc.emory.edu>, lparker@emory.edu
says...
In article <eg2od9$8qk_004@s829.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:
In article <VAVUg.13310$7I1.3298@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:452415BE.DB0DBC1E@hotmail.com...


Keith wrote:

rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com says...

And you think you can defeat 'radical Islam' with bombs and bullets ?

I know there is no choice. Perhaps you want to submit?

There is no need to 'submit'

You're living in a perversely stupid fantasy paranoid world.

It comes from the constant bombardment by Bush's fear-mongering--it's his
way of keeping power over people.

I think you should start to listen to Bush instead of listening
to other people supposedly repeating what Bush said. I would
suggest you start with his January, 2006 TV speech.

People start to lose perspective on what
is happening and why. It really is a very powerful narcotic.

People can also lose perspective if they assume that Bush
is always wrong

So what has he been right about?

and is the cause of all ills which is the
only thing you hear from his political opposition.

This causes a lot of people to overlook the fact that these
same politicians do not intend to deal with the threat
to the nation.


Bush has increased the threat. His own NIE says so.

You're in a fantasy land. ONE SENTENCE of the NIE report was
leaked by the Democrats to try to discredit Bush. The four pages
around that one sentence, later released, say exactly the opposite.
Please get your "news" from someone other than Franken.

Good one.

 

[Daniel Mandic]

<lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

...integrated over the history of the automobile, it's within a
factor of two of 3 orders of magnitude. It's closer to 3 orders of
magnitude than 2 or 4. Sheesh, in case you missed my point, driving
a car is vastly more of a threat to society than is terrorism.

Eric Lucas

It's getting better......... at this precise moment. (I like this
English vernaculars, sorry )


:-|



Tomorrow?

Next day?


A year?




..the Day




Ciao,

Daniel Mandic

 

[Eeyore]

YD wrote:

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 08:09:10 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 00:40:45 -0300, YD <ydtechHAT@techie.com> wrote:
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 08:58:53 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 12:43:32 -0300, YD <ydtechHAT@techie.com> wrote:

Most certainly Jim's claim to be libertarian.

- YD.

[cross-posting to non S.E.D deleted]

War: To the right of Attila the Hun
Threat to the US in any form: Nuk'em
Religious terrorists: Kill and desecrate their bodies
Guns: Everyone should have at least one, AND sufficient ammo
Economics: No taxes except for infrastructure; free market,
no gov't controls, no social legislation
Abortion: Pro
Stem Cell Research: Pro
Personal Consumption of Drugs: Go ahead and kill yourself if you like
Gay: I could care less... just stay out of my face
Religion: I could care less... just stay out of my face
Democrats: OK, if you are that ignorant... just stay out of my face
In my face: Eat a bullet
Global warming caused by man: Hogwash
Graham/Eeyore: Ignorance to the point of PRICELESS ;-)
Eric Lucas: A close second

Sounds Libertarian to me ;-)


No, it doesn't.

- YD.

Which part doesn't meet your expectation ?

...Jim Thompson

Pretty much all of the redneck attitude.

- YD.

He'll be all upset now but he can go and cry about it with his biker mates.

Graham

 

[Eeyore]

Homer J Simpson wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

WhY? just look to the weird people there, buying claims on the moon. I
believe you could defent taht claims, but that shows even more that the
pure moron is found in the United States of America.

You're *so* right !

No, but I do think that the inhabitants of the US are the most gullible
people on earth. Odd, because with so much deceptive advertising and often
outright lying in advertising you'd think they would be immune to BS.

Apparently ppl actually fall in love with the BS !

Graham

 

"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:2fhVg.51722$E67.4255@clgrps13...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:AY2dnTM9F40PA7jYRVnyvw@pipex.net...

I see terrorist attack doesn't make the top twenty then That war on
tobacco really needs to get started soon.

WHAT!! How dare you! Why, some of our finest congress things are
supported by the good folks that make cigarettes.

Fair point. Let us declare war on the things which kill less people
then

Who is up for the war on fruit flies?

They banned the hell out of lawn darts - for sure.

Those damn things *were* terrorist weapons! :^) Fun, though. "Here kid,
time to learn a new sport--the javelin catch. Go long."

Eric Lucas

 

[Eeyore]

JoeBloe wrote:

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:11:14 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

What exactly is it that you're afraid of ?

You're an idiot.

You failure to communicate using the English language is noted.

Graham

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:44:44 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

JoeBloe wrote:

Fuck off, retard.

The classic American debating postion.

Don't you ever see why we'd like to get you retards off our backs when you
respond to perfectly reasonable criticism like this ?

Still haven't learned the punctuation thing, eh donkey boy?

 

[Eeyore]

Daniel Mandic wrote:

Kurt Ullman wrote:

in the general direction (with a forewarning to
Pakistan) is not an "attempt to get OBL", just an attempt to show
that "something is being done".

It's still 100% more than GWB ever did.

Yep GWB never did get around to clearing out the Taliban and
exiling him to mountains at the border.

Staple one madness over the next madness, makes the madnessin the first
forget. China was a good example, bez they are known that no one would
attack them.

I would suggest the UAS AREMEE to go there and care for rights, HUHman
rights. Hahaha, you would get cold feet ,
erm... suggest to the US Governement.

Too right !

They won't invade N. Korea either.

Graham

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:jj8bi2120tk92eg3el475f66v1p5sa946k@4ax.com...

Good one, John.

Sycophant.

Eric Lucas

 

"JoeBloe" <joebloe@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:fu8bi2h0pfrimp5kfqphg8g8ner12tb8vg@4ax.com...

When the other end of the line is in a
mosque in Iran (number captured on a &bad_guy's_laptop), I _demand_
that your call be intercepted.

As do I.

Your "Constitutional rights" have
nothing to do with it.

Right again! Fun time is over, till we get this shit band of
scimitar wielding idiots wiped out.

Oh, goody, so I get to pick one of Sycophant's Constitutional rights to take
away, too! This is gonna be so much FUN!

Eric Lucas

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 18:46:37 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> Gave us:

JoeBloe wrote:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:57:03 GMT, Gordon <gordonlr@DELETEswbell.net
Gave us:

Okay, I'm a little slow this morning. What's the second purpose?
I can see where purpose # 1 is to get rid of the excess young
men, by brainwashing them into being suicide bombers, so the
ruthless leaders can have more of the young women to themselves,
but what's purpose #2?

From their POV or ours? We of course say there is no purpose, but
you readily see in the world what they think they are getting. There
are actually entire nations of ill informed societies that have
actually been duped into thinking these extreme bastards have a
righteous cause.

What do you mean by 'duped' ? You think they imagine it ?

The word for today is propaganda, dipshit. Go look it up.

Taking Afghanistan as an example... they were allowed NO radios, no
tapes or tape players, no foreign newspapers. All they "knew" was what
was "fed" to them.

Maybe one day you'll get the clue that this is how all the "Islamic
Extremist" groups operate. This is how UN signatory nations mutate so
perversely as to raise their kids to hate their neighboring country
and teach them to suicide themselves for a purely propagandized
"cause".

Maybe one day, you'll get a clue.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:52:02 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
<nobody@nowhere.com> Gave us:

The law is now an arcane thing to be twisted as desired, not a servant of
the public good.

You must have gone into the reactor vessel.

 

[MathFreak NoMore]

On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:05:51 GMT,
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

Refusal to convert would result in death.

No, not quite. True about the part of world domination, not about the
other one. Islam recognizes two categories of non-believers. One is
"polytheists" for whom, indeed, the accepted options are conversion or
death. The other is "Um al_Kitab", meaning "Nations of the Book",
which includes Christians and Jews. These may be allowed to live
without converting but only as "dhimmi" (you may check on this term).
Meaning, second class subjects, possessing the (limited) rights
granted them by their Muslim rulers, with the stipulation that said
rights may be withdrawn at the whim of the rulers.

Hahahhah I know where you're hurting

Listen "dhimmi", the rules that a Moslem-majority
society has for Christians and Jews (and Zoroastrian
and ...) are natural consequences of highly developed
and engulfing rules of everyday conduct in the society
for Moslems. It is simply _impractical_ for Moslems to
have people of other faiths among them with no
modifications and accomodations made in response to
the differences that exist between their modes of
behavior and practice. For instance (because I'm sure
you're tribal enough to have wanted to miss the point)
you Jews drink alcohol and are fond of it too. Well,
you cannot do that openly among Moslems when drinking
alcohol in their presence is a grave insult to them.
Your so-called "freedom" had to be modified and
adjusted to make you a person whose confused ass can
behave well enough in a Moslem society. You don't like
this? Then either get your ass out of their abodes, or
go skin a couple more children of theirs so perhaps
you could forget the pain of being a "dhimmi" for a few
hours.

What a confused uneducatable piece of a jackass can a
life-long subservience to tribalism make out of a
scientist :-(

Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"

"No Lord but Jehovah; no tax but that of the Temple; no
friend but the Zealots."


--

"khAneye dustAn berub va dare doshmanAn nakub."