Jihad needs scientists

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 06:42:40 GMT, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> Gave us:

Daniel Mandic wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Thompson and Terrell are amongst the lowest forms of life posting
here. JoeBloe beats them hands down though.

Graham

Ermm, is Terrell not an electronic guru?


The jury is still out on that one. Its a hung jury. I hanged them
myself. ;-)

Does an electronic guru behave well enough to fool folks thinking
they are speaking with a flesh and blood guru? :-]

Do they have rubber facial appliances to make them look better?

Do they do a better job at "Guhury"? What about spirited guhury?

Are electronic gurus going to replace all the human gurus?

I'm an atomic guru. I operate on a little Tritium sphere fusion
reactor, courtesy of Doc Oc! Just a little piece of the sun. :-]

How am I doin' so far, Mike?

 

[T Wake]

"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:C2hVg.51713$E67.13924@clgrps13...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:VaadnRIaRcHlD7jYnZ2dnUVZ8qudnZ2d@pipex.net...

I don't have to. Your country can intercept other nations to gather
foreign intelligence.

With the help of the British. Menwith Hill.

Yep. British soil. British (RAF) base. US personnel. US equipment. US feed.

 

[Kurt Ullman]

In article <C2hVg.51715$E67.41475@clgrps13>,
"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4525946B.609BE651@hotmail.com...

20,000 killed by sex and yet only 13,426 of that number from Aids ? What's
going
on ?

That's what comes of abstinence only courses. They don't get the message
about lamp sockets.

Or vaccum cleaners or stray farm animals, or the gas tanks of '69
Dodge Chargers (I will never let my friend live that one down) or...

 

[John Fields]

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:21:31 +0100, "T Wake"
<usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:g9c8i29evm2kjknll6i0e1ske20ourmbk6@4ax.com...
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:51:08 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



John Fields wrote:

I think the US's actions speak otherwise in that, clearly, we have
no aspirations to Empire.

" the Project for the New American Century is a non-profit, educational
organization
whose goal is to promote American global leadership "

http://www.newamericancentury.org/aboutpnac.htm


Had we chosen to we could have kept
Germany and Japan after we beat them, but we didn't.

The *USA* didn't beat them and they weren't yours to keep.

---
We sure as hell did, and they were spoils of war, to do with as we
saw fit.

And you did. You held on to Japan for quite some time, and ensured the
previous government system was never going to be returned.

---
Yes, and it's worked out quite well for everyone concerned, I
believe.
---

Germany was never America's to keep. I seem to remember it being split
somewhat.

---
Rent asunder... You're right; I'd forgotten about that.
---

How do you think England got to be an empire, by giving it all back?

Eventually you have to give the toys back. It is a sad day. Some toys go
earlier than others, and grow up to take over the toy collection.

---
Yes, I know.

I was born in Panama and raised in the Canal Zone, and there were
tugs on my heartstrings when Carter gave that toy "back" to Panama.


--
John Fields
Professional Circuit Designer

 

[JoeBloe]

On 05 Oct 2006 10:25:35 GMT, "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@aon.at>
Gave us:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:

The jury is still out on that one. Its a hung jury. I hanged them
myself. ;-)


Hang 'em lower.

Whack a mole!

Or in his case... Whack yer pole!

 

[Kurt Ullman]

In article <2o6bi2ttekkan84qullno6ils8pnnmgdf1@4ax.com>,
John Fields <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

I was born in Panama and raised in the Canal Zone, and there were
tugs on my heartstrings when Carter gave that toy "back" to Panama.

"Of course the Canal is ours. We stole it fair and square"
SI Hiakawa, Senator from California during the return
debates.

 

[Homer J Simpson]

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:AY2dnTM9F40PA7jYRVnyvw@pipex.net...

I see terrorist attack doesn't make the top twenty then That war on
tobacco really needs to get started soon.

WHAT!! How dare you! Why, some of our finest congress things are
supported by the good folks that make cigarettes.

Fair point. Let us declare war on the things which kill less people
then

Who is up for the war on fruit flies?

They banned the hell out of lawn darts - for sure.

 

[Homer J Simpson]

"Kurt Ullman" <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:kurtullman-FADAE0.20082605102006@customer-201-125-217-207.uninet.net.mx...

That's what comes of abstinence only courses. They don't get the message
about lamp sockets.

Or vaccum cleaners or stray farm animals, or the gas tanks of '69
Dodge Chargers (I will never let my friend live that one down) or...

As long as it doesn't involve liver or apple pies . . . . .

 

[Daniel Mandic]

Eeyore wrote:

It's so utterly insane that I'm inclined to find a way to campaign
against such crass Republican stupidity.

Graham

Aaaah, you mean this utterly disgusting-looklike, stupid short-hats....?




Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic

 

[Daniel Mandic]

Homer J Simpson wrote:

But who wrote Mein Kampf?

A typing machine. And a telephone beside it, not connected to the line,
of course.


Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic

 

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:FbOdnVmGg9Q_E7jYnZ2dnUVZ8qudnZ2d@pipex.net...

"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
newsNfVg.51683$E67.16735@clgrps13...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news:OMydnTZT299zHLjYnZ2dnUVZ8tSdnZ2d@pipex.net...

Before Hitler - no holocaust.

After Hitler - no holocaust.

Wow. Before [Insert anyone who lived between 1930 - 1945] no holocaust.
After [same person] no holocaust.

So you see no connection between Hitler and the holocaust.

I see a connection but the same connection can be said about many people.
Your example was meant to imply that Hitler was the sole driving force for
the Holocaust. This is not the case.

Sure, there were other forces. Yes, there was plenty of anti-Jewish
sentiment in Germany around then. The economy was still in the toilet from
the Great Depression, but it's not clear to me that the average German
blamed the Jews--even if so, I suspect not anywhere near the way Hitler did.
However, don't you think it really required a charming (in a Germanic sort
of way) misanthropic psychopath with a *serious* chip on his shoulder about
the Jews, to whip everybody into a "the Jews caused *all* of your problems"
frenzy so they could put aside their personal revulsion at eventually
killing millions of their fellow human beings? I guess there could have
been another person that combined that level of insanity, misanthropy,
megalomania, cunning, opportunity and charm, but I'd be really surprised.

Eric Lucas

 

<lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:jggVg.7734$TV3.3307@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...

"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
newsNfVg.51684$E67.19559@clgrps13...

lucasea@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:r3fVg.8959$GR.3051@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net...

Some linguists even interpret the shifts in England as related to
blueblood Londoners putting on airs, and that accent subsequently
catching on in other parts of the country. I suspect this last part is
a bit of a stretch, but the whole thing is an interesting thesis. I
find it fascinating to think about how people spoke in the past, and how
language has evolved. Puts a whole new perspective in the various new
inner-city lexicons and pronunciations that have developed, even in my
lifetime.

Read "The Mother Tongue" by Bill Bryson.

I've written almost everything he's written. I love his very odd
combination of American and British humor. It's kind of
over-the-top-subtle.

D'oh! Obviously I meant "I've read almost everything he's written."

Eric Lucas

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:32:57 -0400, Keith <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

In article <eg2mp9$8qk_005@s829.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com>,
jmfbahciv@aol.com says...
In article <452390B0.7B5389D0@hotmail.com>,
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:


jmfbahciv@aol.com wrote:

Well, I'd like to have a few less crapolas posts so I can find
the ones were posted by thoughtful people.

Yet another American dismisses non-American thing thinking as crap.

All you seem to do is post lines like this. You have no dialog
just a gut reaction that happens to be deemed to be politically
correct at the moment.

Yep! /BAH, this is the stuffed donkey. Stuffed donkey, this is
/BAH. The stuffed donky is one of SED's most prominent (and least
useful) anti-American Europeons.

It would appear as though I am not at the bottom of your heap any
longer, Keith.

That's funny. Donkey boy had to work hard to get there.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:45:39 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:47:30 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



John Fields wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax wrote:
T Wake wrote:
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
T Wake wrote:

The same reason unthinking Muslims support groups considered terrorist by
the west.

Is Hezbollah a terrorist organisation ?

If you are asking my opinion..... then yes. A nasty, ruthless one. However
sometimes terrorists seem to come in from the cold.

That's the point at which they've won.

Looks like they won in that case.

---
A skirmish, perhaps, but not the war.

Israel can only 'win' by erasing Lebanon.

---
Trying to set up another straw man?
---

Is that what you want ?

---
Nope, but since you state that that's the only way Israel can win,
it seems that if you don't want Israel destroyed, that's what
_you're_ advocating.

In reality, though, your preferred "solution" would be to see Israel
("The Real Demon" according to you) destroyed, and yet you pretend
to advocate non-violence.

How can you reconcile that hypocrisy?

I can't wait to see this one get answered.

I'll bet he dodges it.

Hey! Donkey boy! We don't want the polygraph answer, donkey boy...
We want the long, technical response.

That is... if you have the character for it.

You already lost any honor you ever had.

Good one, John.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:49:33 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 20:48:51 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



lucasea@sbcglobal.net wrote:

jmfbahciv@aol.com> wrote in message
lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker) wrote:

Keith Olbermann had a good commentary a week or two ago about Bush calling
a criticism "unacceptable."

Which criticism was unacceptable?

I don't understand you people; first you complain that he can't
think for himself; then, you object when he expresses his opinion about
something.

You can't have it both ways.

Calling "criticism" "unacceptable" is not an opinion--it's an
argument-winning tactic that involves tacitly silencing anybody who
disagrees with you.

Criticism was considered unacceptable in 1930s Germany too.

---
If the parallel is valid, expect to hear someone knocking on your
door because of your antics here.

Ooooooohhhh.... That would be so.... R I G H T E O U S !!!

I'd love to see the video on Cops!

 

[Jim Thompson]

On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 00:08:27 GMT, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com>
wrote:

[snip]

or the gas tanks of '69
Dodge Chargers (I will never let my friend live that one down) or...

Bwahahahahaha! ROTFLMAO! I guess that one way to get lead in your
dick ;-)

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.

 

[JoeBloe]

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 11:54:41 -0400, Keith <krw@att.bizzzz> Gave us:

In article <HLVUg.13315$7I1.5654@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
lucasea@sbcglobal.net says...

"Keith" <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote in message
news:MPG.1f8dd485be8e903f989d78@News.Individual.NET...
In article <0h18i21ket4s0m5rkk8gckp0kk4oih33hh@4ax.com>, To-Email-
Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com says...
On Wed, 04 Oct 06 14:48:36 GMT, lparker@emory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:

In article <MPG.1f8db6b8105f0bb9989d69@News.Individual.NET>,
Keith <krw@att.bizzzz> wrote:
[snip]

Phones (of the domestic type, anyway) aren't tapped without
warrant. Get with the program.


Tapped? That's semantics. How does the NSA know a call is going to
involve
someone of interest? They monitor all calls and a computer "listens"
for
certain key words and phrases.

[snip]

That's rarely the case, and not without warrant.

What NSA was doing was using computer perusal of telephone _records_,
"To/From" data.

From those suspicious records, taps were authorized by a judge.

YEs, and the foreign "taps" were intercepted calls from
"interesting" foreign numbers. They were not taps on phones.

I don't care. If you're listening to a phone call to which the phone in my
living room is party, then as a citizen of the US, I demand that your
listening be carried out according to my Constitutional rights.

Your "demands" are silly.

ESPECIALLY in time of war.

When the other end of the line is in a
mosque in Iran (number captured on a &bad_guy's_laptop), I _demand_
that your call be intercepted.

As do I.

Your "Constitutional rights" have
nothing to do with it.

Right again! Fun time is over, till we get this shit band of
scimitar wielding idiots wiped out.

 

[Eeyore]

T Wake wrote:

"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
T Wake wrote:
"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
T Wake wrote:

Planes to the US are becoming a joke now, all because of four domestic
flights being taken over. How many flights take off each day?

Taken over ?

I don't think a single one has been 'taken over'.

Hmm. Pedantry again. What terminology would you use to describe the
actions of the terrorists who flew the planes into the world trade centre?

Did they not "take over" the plane? Was it not a domestic flight?

I may be mistaken, and I often am.

You said 'to the US' not 'in the US' so I took it to mean international
flights.

Sorry, I meant the flights going to the US were a joke, because four
domestic US flights had been taken over.

On re-reading I got it.

The idea was to highlight the
foolishness of the resulting "Airport Security" actions. Interesting
(related) article linked to from this page -
http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2006/09/28/slashdot-effect-still-working/

Ridiculous !

God Bless American fucktards !

Graham

 

"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ZjgVg.51695$E67.45514@clgrps13...

"T Wake" <usenet.es7at@gishpuppy.com> wrote in message
news4Kdnb9ApIGR47jYRVnyrw@pipex.net...

3000 people (not all of whom were US citizens) have been killed by
Islamic terrorist attacks on the Mainland US in (shall we say 80 years).
How many have died in car accidents in that time?

#8 - Suicide 30,575 -(2)

Well, hell! On average you're 10 times more likely to take your own life
than to have a terrorist take it!! And that's comparing an *average* year
for suicide compared to the *worst year ever* for terrorism (at least in the
US). And if you're going to argue that people at least have control over
whether they commit suidcide, I would argue that they don't, not entirely.
Anybody who would stop their own life is suffering from malicious brain
chemistry over which they have no control. Nobody who has the ability to
*not* commit suicide would ever stop their own existence.

Eric Lucas

 

"Homer J Simpson" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:_jgVg.51697$E67.48853@clgrps13...

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:q23bi21n7lmr88rj37gl5e2e1dq6dd11r0@4ax.com...

They have the rough end of the deal though - the sensible ones moved to
New
Zealand.

---
I've never been there, but I'd like to go.

Everything about it seems beautiful.

Except the foreigners.

Reminds me of a bumper sticker when I was in grad school in Boston and used
to go up into northern New England on road trips: "Welcome to Vermont. Now
go home."

Eric Lucas