Isn't this a Contradiction in Terms? IBM Dishes Out Small,

[Watson A.Name - "Watt Sun]

In article <PZHGAWD$87t$Ewc3@jmwa.demon.co.uk>,
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk mentioned...

I read in sci.electronics.design that Watson A. Name - Watt Sun, Dark
Remover <alondra101@hotmail.com> wrote (in <MPG.1a21589ca5e4bf10989939@n
ews.dslextreme.com&gt about 'Isn't this a Contradiction in Terms? IBM
Dishes Out Small, Low-Power Supercomputer', on Sun, 16 Nov 2003:

But how does one do this in windows, with longer filenames? Does it
require a utility? Thanks.

No. If you right-click on the filename in Windows Explorer you get a
drop-down menu that includes 'Rename', which highlights the filename and
puts the cursor at its end. Very convenient for deleting the extension,
which is probably NOT what you want to do. (;-)

You can also do this by left-clicking once on the filename to highlight
it and then again, NOT TOO QUICKLY, to rename.

Well, in my DOS example, I tried to show that I was renaming multiple
files, all at once.


--
@@F@r@o@m@@O@r@a@n@g@e@@C@o@u@n@t@y@,@@C@a@l@,@@w@h@e@r@e@@
###Got a Question about ELECTRONICS? Check HERE First:###
http://users.pandora.be/educypedia/electronics/databank.htm
My email address is whitelisted. *All* email sent to it
goes directly to the trash unless you add NOSPAM in the
Subject: line with other stuff. alondra101 <at> hotmail.com
Don't be ripped off by the big book dealers. Go to the URL
that will give you a choice and save you money(up to half).
http://www.everybookstore.com You'll be glad you did!
Just when you thought you had all this figured out, the gov't
changed it: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
@@t@h@e@@a@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@m@e@e@t@@t@h@e@@E@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@

 

[Spehro Pefhany]

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:43:39 +0000, the renowned John Woodgate
<jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:

Yes, I find Acrobat (5.0.5) to be troublesome. It grabs huge chunks of
memory for no reason, screws up the icons on the desktop (replacing the
little arrow on short-cut icons with something indecipherable) and
generally shows instability.

If you kill it in the task manager and restart it, you can get around
most of that stuff without rebooting.

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany
--
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
speff@interlog.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
Embedded software/hardware/analog Info for designers: http://www.speff.com

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Watson A. Name - Watt Sun, Dark
Remover <alondra101@hotmail.com> wrote (in <MPG.1a217a6bb7811898993e@new
s.dslextreme.com&gt about 'Isn't this a Contradiction in Terms? IBM
Dishes Out Small, Low-Power Supercomputer', on Sun, 16 Nov 2003:

Well, in my DOS example, I tried to show that I was renaming multiple
files, all at once.

So you did, and I didn't realise. Sorry.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!

 

[Mark Jones]

In news:bunfrvsd106vg5lnrlha5hc6iq0mtbp2j1@4ax.com (Spehro Pefhany):

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:43:39 +0000, the renowned John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:


Yes, I find Acrobat (5.0.5) to be troublesome. It grabs huge chunks of
memory for no reason, screws up the icons on the desktop (replacing the
little arrow on short-cut icons with something indecipherable) and
generally shows instability.

If you kill it in the task manager and restart it, you can get around
most of that stuff without rebooting.

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany

Just an aside, I've never had to terminate the LizardTech .DjVu viewer
process, nor the encoder.

Acrobat reader occasionally locks up though even in XP, so I disabled the
..PDF browser plugin, and it works much better that way. Can only have one
..PDF open at a time then, however.

I guess we're stuck with it though, huh. Bugs and all.

 

[Damien]

"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:3krdrvoe0h1ckebo55sof5ik1id91498sk@4ax.com...

What are you doing on your "always crashing" box?

Starting it! Before I've even had a chance to log on, it just blue screens,
and starts dumping memory. Not a lot to be done when it does that!

Damien

 

[Greg Pierce]

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 06:20:14 -0800, the highly esteemed Watson A. Name -
"Watt Sun, Dark Remover" enlightened us with these pearls of wisdom:

In article <pan.2003.11.16.06.46.46.221887@nospam.com>,
trash.can@nospam.com mentioned...

[snip]

Yes, my system has been up for 46 days, 8 hours and 51 minutes. The
last reboot was due to a kernel upgrade.

And there lies the rub. All those long unbooted systems could be guilty
of being neglected or unattended, or admins have been negligent in proper
OS maintenance/upgrades.

Now watch all the feathers fly, as *nix defenders try to whittle what I've
said down to matchsticks. I didn't say that the above was bad; if the box
is doing its job, then no sense in fixin' what ain't broken. But just the
increasing demand for services should put those archaic boxes out to
salvage and get them replaced with a more powerful box. Unless, of
course, you have acres of rack space. ;-)

My system isn't a server, its a workstation. I installed the latest kernel
to get all the latest features. This is seldom necessary for a server,
where all you are concerned with is stability, security, and that it does
the job. If all of these criteria are met, there is no real reason to
install a newer kernel, and some good reasons not to. The older
kernels continue to be tested and monitored, so they are usually
going to be a bit better in terms of security and stability - which is
why these systems have such long uptime and haven't been hacked.
You are mistaking *nix systems for being like Windows, where you
have to "upgrade" frequently to fix bugs or gaping security holes.


--
Greg

--The software said it requires Win2000 or better, so I installed Linux.

 

[John Larkin]

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 14:10:08 -0600, "Tim Williams"
<tmoranwms@charter.net> wrote:

"Jeff" <levy_jeff@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:quCtb.20879$R13.782447@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
see www.fuckmicrosoft.com

OMG! WTF is CP/M doing on the sidebar! I haven't seen that in
ten years, booting a Kaypro from one of those big 5 1/4" floppies

Tim

Big? The Dec floppies were 8". A dual drive with unibus interface used
to cost about 4 grand.

John

 

[John Larkin]

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:50:17 -0000, "Mjolinor" <mjolinor@hotmail.com>
wrote:

3) DATA IS NOT INSTRUCTIONS.

Surely
Data are not instructions
or
A Datum is not an instruction
let's get the programming right

Picky, picky. Consider the statement to be a shortened version of "a
block of data is not a list of instructions." Or, if you prefer, DON'T
EXECUTE BUFFERS, DAMMIT!

John

 

[Mike Cukr]

Have to keep that in mind, thanks. BTW, I can go to DOS box and
rename a bunch of similar filenames in 8.3 format to a different name,
like xxx123 and xxx124 to yyy123 and yyy124, etc.
Like c:> REN xxx*.ext yyy*.ext

But how does one do this in windows, with longer filenames? Does it
require a utility? Thanks.

snip

Try quoting the file names ie

ren "xxx*.ext" "yyy*.ext"

otherwise the file names get mangled into 8.3 format. That
should work unless the combined file name and path length
exceeds 128 chars---the whole thing is a PITA.

Mike

 

[Bill Garber]

"Damien" <nomail@nowhere> wrote in message
news:3fb7fb56$0$20418$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...

"DarkMatter" <DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote in message
news:3krdrvoe0h1ckebo55sof5ik1id91498sk@4ax.com...

What are you doing on your "always crashing" box?

Starting it! Before I've even had a chance to log on, it just blue
screens,
and starts dumping memory. Not a lot to be done when it does that!

Damien

If it's windows, simply reinstall it over the present
installation. Should correct whatever is wrong. I've
done that twice this year just as a precaution. I hate
to wait until it goes completely. Do it each time you
begin to see subtle discrepencies in operation. A .DLL
cleaner will help too. There are free ones and cheap
ones that do the job nicely. Also a Registry Cleaner
will get rid of entries from software that has been
uninstalled and merely marked as unused.

Bill @ GarberStreet Enterprizez };-)
Web Site - http://garberstreet.netfirms.com
Email - willy4SPAM6pa@comXcast.net
Remove - SPAM and X to contact me



---
This email ain't infected, dude!

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.537 / Virus Database: 332 - Release Date: 11/6/03

 

[Tom Del Rosso]

In news:nmEtb.35460$hV.1367664@news2.tin.it,
Ban typed:

I cannot imagine a better idea than what BGates had, to create a
common OS-interface for all apps.

Idea that WHO had??? Maybe Steve Jobs or maybe somebody at Xerox, but
it definitely wasn't Bill's idea.


--
-Reply in group, but if emailing add 2 more zeros-
-and remove the obvious-

 

[John Woodgate]

I read in sci.electronics.design that Bill Garber
<willy46pa@comcast.net> wrote (in <ZYydnT69x_VQtCWi4p2dnA@comcast.com&gt
about 'Isn't this a Contradiction in Terms? IBM Dishes Out Small, Low-
Power Supercomputer', on Sun, 16 Nov 2003:

If it's windows, simply reinstall it over the present installation.

How do you re-install all the upgrades and patches? I had to do it once
and it took 6 hours to get all the stuff from the Net to fix the
original files from the CD-ROM.
--
Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk
Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to
http://www.isce.org.uk
PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL!

 

[Bill Garber]

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message
news:W6bwIFBCBIu$EwVw@jmwa.demon.co.uk...

I read in sci.electronics.design that Bill Garber
willy46pa@comcast.net> wrote (in <ZYydnT69x_VQtCWi4p2dnA@comcast.com&gt
about 'Isn't this a Contradiction in Terms? IBM Dishes Out Small, Low-
Power Supercomputer', on Sun, 16 Nov 2003:

If it's windows, simply reinstall it over the present installation.

How do you re-install all the upgrades and patches? I had to do it once
and it took 6 hours to get all the stuff from the Net to fix the
original files from the CD-ROM.

I skip all the updates, upgrades, and patches. I find they crash
my system more than if I simply use the base system from the
installation CD. If the original recognizes all your hardware,
then you need no upgrades or patches. If it doesn't, then your
hardware should have come with a driver disk. Be sure to use
the original OEM installation CD, not a copy. Copies will not
work properly.

Bill @ GarberStreet Enterprizez };-)
Web Site - http://garberstreet.netfirms.com
Email - willy4SPAM6pa@comXcast.net
Remove - SPAM and X to contact me



---
This email ain't infected, dude!

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.537 / Virus Database: 332 - Release Date: 11/6/03

 

[Watson A.Name - "Watt Sun]

In article <1069025118.874893@rh9cache>, cukr@massnet1.net
mentioned...

Have to keep that in mind, thanks. BTW, I can go to DOS box and
rename a bunch of similar filenames in 8.3 format to a different name,
like xxx123 and xxx124 to yyy123 and yyy124, etc.
Like c:> REN xxx*.ext yyy*.ext

But how does one do this in windows, with longer filenames? Does it
require a utility? Thanks.

snip

Try quoting the file names ie

ren "xxx*.ext" "yyy*.ext"

otherwise the file names get mangled into 8.3 format. That
should work unless the combined file name and path length
exceeds 128 chars---the whole thing is a PITA.

Yeah, thanks. I think when I tried that, the files got changed to the
~1 on the end. I'm not sure, I'll have to try it again.

Mike

--
@@F@r@o@m@@O@r@a@n@g@e@@C@o@u@n@t@y@,@@C@a@l@,@@w@h@e@r@e@@
###Got a Question about ELECTRONICS? Check HERE First:###
http://users.pandora.be/educypedia/electronics/databank.htm
My email address is whitelisted. *All* email sent to it
goes directly to the trash unless you add NOSPAM in the
Subject: line with other stuff. alondra101 <at> hotmail.com
Don't be ripped off by the big book dealers. Go to the URL
that will give you a choice and save you money(up to half).
http://www.everybookstore.com You'll be glad you did!
Just when you thought you had all this figured out, the gov't
changed it: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
@@t@h@e@@a@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@m@e@e@t@@t@h@e@@E@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@

 

[Watson A.Name - "Watt Sun]

In article <bunfrvsd106vg5lnrlha5hc6iq0mtbp2j1@4ax.com>,
speffSNIP@interlogDOTyou.knowwhat mentioned...

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:43:39 +0000, the renowned John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:


Yes, I find Acrobat (5.0.5) to be troublesome. It grabs huge chunks of
memory for no reason, screws up the icons on the desktop (replacing the
little arrow on short-cut icons with something indecipherable) and
generally shows instability.

If you kill it in the task manager and restart it, you can get around
most of that stuff without rebooting.

I'm beginning go get to the point where I unconsciously, without even
thinking, click on ACRORD32.EXE and end task. :-/

And when I run Photoshop, I sometimes have to do it to that, too.

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany

--
@@F@r@o@m@@O@r@a@n@g@e@@C@o@u@n@t@y@,@@C@a@l@,@@w@h@e@r@e@@
###Got a Question about ELECTRONICS? Check HERE First:###
http://users.pandora.be/educypedia/electronics/databank.htm
My email address is whitelisted. *All* email sent to it
goes directly to the trash unless you add NOSPAM in the
Subject: line with other stuff. alondra101 <at> hotmail.com
Don't be ripped off by the big book dealers. Go to the URL
that will give you a choice and save you money(up to half).
http://www.everybookstore.com You'll be glad you did!
Just when you thought you had all this figured out, the gov't
changed it: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
@@t@h@e@@a@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@m@e@e@t@@t@h@e@@E@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@

 

[Watson A.Name - "Watt Sun]

In article <W5adnRdD-NVZaSqiRVn-gg@buckeye-express.com>, "Mark Jones"
<127.0.0.1> mentioned...

In news:bunfrvsd106vg5lnrlha5hc6iq0mtbp2j1@4ax.com (Spehro Pefhany):
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:43:39 +0000, the renowned John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:


Yes, I find Acrobat (5.0.5) to be troublesome. It grabs huge chunks of
memory for no reason, screws up the icons on the desktop (replacing the
little arrow on short-cut icons with something indecipherable) and
generally shows instability.

If you kill it in the task manager and restart it, you can get around
most of that stuff without rebooting.

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany


Just an aside, I've never had to terminate the LizardTech .DjVu viewer
process, nor the encoder.

But the viewer is a plug-in.

Every time I upgrade Mozilla (which is about once a month lately), it
says it removed those plug-ins. So I got tired of putting Djvu back
in, and besides, I almost never have to use it anyway. Except for
some diehards here who won't go to .PDFs.

Acrobat reader occasionally locks up though even in XP, so I disabled the
.PDF browser plugin, and it works much better that way. Can only have one
.PDF open at a time then, however.

I notice that when I end the ACRORD32 task, it sometimes comes up as
the full program instead of the plug-in. Which I like, because it
doesn't have the lock-up problem.

I guess we're stuck with it though, huh. Bugs and all.

Maybe it's the OS causing the prob, not the reader. )


--
@@F@r@o@m@@O@r@a@n@g@e@@C@o@u@n@t@y@,@@C@a@l@,@@w@h@e@r@e@@
###Got a Question about ELECTRONICS? Check HERE First:###
http://users.pandora.be/educypedia/electronics/databank.htm
My email address is whitelisted. *All* email sent to it
goes directly to the trash unless you add NOSPAM in the
Subject: line with other stuff. alondra101 <at> hotmail.com
Don't be ripped off by the big book dealers. Go to the URL
that will give you a choice and save you money(up to half).
http://www.everybookstore.com You'll be glad you did!
Just when you thought you had all this figured out, the gov't
changed it: http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
@@t@h@e@@a@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@m@e@e@t@@t@h@e@@E@f@f@l@u@e@n@t@@

 

[DarkMatter]

On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 21:36:38 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> Gave us:

On 15 Nov 2003 19:06:54 -0800, jeffm_@email.com (JeffM) wrote:


The Rules of Operating System Design
1) Applications must not crash the operating system.
2) APPLICATIONS MUST NOT CRASH THE OPERATING SYSTEM.

3) DATA IS NOT INSTRUCTIONS.

John

Data transfers from one motherboard locale to another should also
NOT crash the system.

 

[Tim Auton]

"Bill Garber" <willy46pa@comcast.net> wrote:

"John Woodgate" <jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote in message
news:W6bwIFBCBIu$EwVw@jmwa.demon.co.uk...
I read in sci.electronics.design that Bill Garber
willy46pa@comcast.net> wrote (in <ZYydnT69x_VQtCWi4p2dnA@comcast.com&gt
about 'Isn't this a Contradiction in Terms? IBM Dishes Out Small, Low-
Power Supercomputer', on Sun, 16 Nov 2003:

If it's windows, simply reinstall it over the present installation.

How do you re-install all the upgrades and patches? I had to do it once
and it took 6 hours to get all the stuff from the Net to fix the
original files from the CD-ROM.

I skip all the updates, upgrades, and patches. I find they crash
my system more than if I simply use the base system from the
installation CD. If the original recognizes all your hardware,
then you need no upgrades or patches.

If you don't care about security then you can ignore the patches. I
take it you have a substantial firewall and up-to-date anti-virus
software. An unpatched Windows box on the net is wide open.


Tim
--
And the beast shall be made legion. Its numbers shall be increased a
thousand thousand fold. The din of a million keyboards like unto a great
storm shall cover the earth, and the followers of Mammon shall tremble.
- The Book of Mozilla, 3:31

 

[DarkMatter]

On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:06:58 -0500, "Mark Jones" <127.0.0.1> Gave us:

In news:bunfrvsd106vg5lnrlha5hc6iq0mtbp2j1@4ax.com (Spehro Pefhany):
On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 15:43:39 +0000, the renowned John Woodgate
jmw@jmwa.demon.contraspam.yuk> wrote:


Yes, I find Acrobat (5.0.5) to be troublesome. It grabs huge chunks of
memory for no reason, screws up the icons on the desktop (replacing the
little arrow on short-cut icons with something indecipherable) and
generally shows instability.

If you kill it in the task manager and restart it, you can get around
most of that stuff without rebooting.

Best regards,
Spehro Pefhany


Just an aside, I've never had to terminate the LizardTech .DjVu viewer
process, nor the encoder.

Acrobat reader occasionally locks up though even in XP, so I disabled the
.PDF browser plugin, and it works much better that way. Can only have one
.PDF open at a time then, however.

I guess we're stuck with it though, huh. Bugs and all.

Mozilla or Firebird. The problem isn't acrobat. It's Billy's
Browser... Patches and all.
>

 

[Iwo Mergler]

John Larkin wrote:

On 15 Nov 2003 19:06:54 -0800, jeffm_@email.com (JeffM) wrote:



The Rules of Operating System Design
1) Applications must not crash the operating system.
2) APPLICATIONS MUST NOT CRASH THE OPERATING SYSTEM.


3) DATA IS NOT INSTRUCTIONS.

4) STACK IS NOT INSTRUCTIONS.

Iwo