Guest
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:54:12 -0700 (PDT), "andy@hotmail.com"
<keith@kjwdesigns.com> wrote:
Why would it expensive to add plumbing to old houses. Just install the
tubing _outside_ the house as they did in UK.
Of course the obvious objection is that the exposed tubing will easily
freeze. The counter argument is that exposed tubing is easy to melt
with a blowtorch
>I remember as a child using a tin bath in front of the fire because the house didn't have a bathroom or even plumbing.
<keith@kjwdesigns.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 June 2019 14:33:31 UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:
...
I'm not a shower designer, but the method used works well and is
reliable, I guess it's cheaper too. And you'd still need the flow
control knob unless you restrict the flow to something which 10kW at the
coldest input could heat adequately.
Cheers
That sounds like a lot of complexity to take a shower. We have a
gas-fired 80 gallon hot water tank and two knobs in the shower, hot
and cold.
..
Many older houses were not plumbed for hot water - it would be even more complex and expensive to put in the required plumbing.
Why would it expensive to add plumbing to old houses. Just install the
tubing _outside_ the house as they did in UK.
Of course the obvious objection is that the exposed tubing will easily
freeze. The counter argument is that exposed tubing is easy to melt
with a blowtorch
>I remember as a child using a tin bath in front of the fire because the house didn't have a bathroom or even plumbing.