Electrical licensing FWIW.

  • Thread starter Dianci Maichong
  • Start date
On Dec 8, 3:06 pm, Tom <t...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
On 8/12/2010 12:11 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:

I'm pretty sure that doesn't include just laying them loose across the
tops of the ceiling structure and insulation batts where they're likely
to be trodden on and tripped over by anyone who's in the roof space.

Sylvia.

That's how its done in QLD, every house I've seen including mine which
is only 1 year old.

Tom
Agree, In QLD I have been in many ceilings, and wire is always laid
loose across battens.
 
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 22:14:34 -0800 (PST), kreed <kenreed1999@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Dec 8, 3:06 pm, Tom <t...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
On 8/12/2010 12:11 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:

I'm pretty sure that doesn't include just laying them loose across the
tops of the ceiling structure and insulation batts where they're likely
to be trodden on and tripped over by anyone who's in the roof space.

Sylvia.

That's how its done in QLD, every house I've seen including mine which
is only 1 year old.

Tom

Agree, In QLD I have been in many ceilings, and wire is always laid
loose across battens.
In Darwin it gets even better.

They sling from pillar to post (without a catenary).

It must be some sort of tropical syndrome. but on further analysis it
does make sense ,in terms of thermal constraints.
 
kreed wrote:
On Dec 8, 3:06 pm, Tom<t...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
On 8/12/2010 12:11 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:

I'm pretty sure that doesn't include just laying them loose across the
tops of the ceiling structure and insulation batts where they're likely
to be trodden on and tripped over by anyone who's in the roof space.

Sylvia.

That's how its done in QLD, every house I've seen including mine which
is only 1 year old.

Tom

Agree, In QLD I have been in many ceilings, and wire is always laid
loose across battens.

It can not be laid across battens or joists where it can be trodden on
but If you nail bits of wood across the joists you can lay it between
the bits of wood
 
On 8/12/2010 9:45 PM, F Murtz wrote:
kreed wrote:
On Dec 8, 3:06 pm, Tom<t...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
On 8/12/2010 12:11 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:

I'm pretty sure that doesn't include just laying them loose across the
tops of the ceiling structure and insulation batts where they're likely
to be trodden on and tripped over by anyone who's in the roof space.

Sylvia.

That's how its done in QLD, every house I've seen including mine which
is only 1 year old.

Tom

Agree, In QLD I have been in many ceilings, and wire is always laid
loose across battens.


It can not be laid across battens or joists where it can be trodden on
but If you nail bits of wood across the joists you can lay it between
the bits of wood
Don't know what the regulations say but from my observations I've never
seen bits of wood or anything in QLD.

Tom
 
On 9/12/2010 9:15 AM, Tom wrote:
On 8/12/2010 9:45 PM, F Murtz wrote:
kreed wrote:
On Dec 8, 3:06 pm, Tom<t...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
On 8/12/2010 12:11 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:

I'm pretty sure that doesn't include just laying them loose across the
tops of the ceiling structure and insulation batts where they're
likely
to be trodden on and tripped over by anyone who's in the roof space.

Sylvia.

That's how its done in QLD, every house I've seen including mine which
is only 1 year old.

Tom

Agree, In QLD I have been in many ceilings, and wire is always laid
loose across battens.


It can not be laid across battens or joists where it can be trodden on
but If you nail bits of wood across the joists you can lay it between
the bits of wood

Don't know what the regulations say but from my observations I've never
seen bits of wood or anything in QLD.

Tom
So much for the idea that you need to employ a professional to have it
done safely.

Sylvia.
 
On 9/12/2010 8:15 AM, Tom wrote:
On 8/12/2010 9:45 PM, F Murtz wrote:
kreed wrote:
On Dec 8, 3:06 pm, Tom<t...@no.spam.invalid> wrote:
On 8/12/2010 12:11 PM, Sylvia Else wrote:

I'm pretty sure that doesn't include just laying them loose across the
tops of the ceiling structure and insulation batts where they're
likely
to be trodden on and tripped over by anyone who's in the roof space.

Sylvia.

That's how its done in QLD, every house I've seen including mine which
is only 1 year old.

Tom

Agree, In QLD I have been in many ceilings, and wire is always laid
loose across battens.


It can not be laid across battens or joists where it can be trodden on
but If you nail bits of wood across the joists you can lay it between
the bits of wood

Don't know what the regulations say but from my observations I've never
seen bits of wood or anything in QLD.

Tom
My understanding the electrical work like all cable should not be placed
on the ceiling in new construction or additions , certainly with
commercial work it is now so so I would expect domestic to be the same
now in Qld

--
X-No-Archive: Yes
 
"Jasen Betts" <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote in message
news:idvcvp$7mj$1@reversiblemaps.ath.cx...
Many people whose house burns down aren't able to produce the invoice
from the electrician, but in any case an invoice proves nothing.
Someone else could have fucked it up afterwards. It's not like
electricians
put tamper-evident seals on all thir work.
Right, and all insurance claims for electrical fires are not rejected or
contested. A glaringly obvious wiring problem might make them do so however.

MrT.
 
On 11/12/2010 7:49 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:
On 2010-12-08, Sylvia Else<sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote:
On 8/12/2010 10:35 AM, Metro wrote:
I can honestly say that
standard of workmanship is the worse that I have ever seen. Possible because
that all jobs are no longer tested by an authority. It is all tested on a
random basis. Very random...........Got to go.

Perhaps that explains why I have had to call tradesmen back to do things
properly.

Once when air-conditioning installers had just laid cables loose across
the roof space - I made them come back and anchor them properly. The
same mob, incidentally, removed a tile from my roof during their work,
and neglected to put it back, letting the rain in. The cost of a
building inspector to check for damage got deducted from their bill.

Another time was when the electricians and gas-fitters installing a
kitchen left the gas pipes for the stove unlawfully obstructing the
power socket that had been installed for the same stove.

It should be noted that in both cases, they were subcontractors, or
perhaps employees. The electricians I've contracted with directly have
all been very concientious, as far as I can tell. Maybe that says
something, though I'm not sure exactly what.

subcontractors often aren't paid well enough to do a good job.
That's no excuse. If they can't do the job properly for the amount
offered, then they shouldn't accept the contract.

Sylvia.
 
"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote in message
news:8mto14FquhU1@mid.individual.net...
That's no excuse. If they can't do the job properly for the amount
offered, then they shouldn't accept the contract.
Right, if only they did so. If only ALL businesses and contractors were
honest. Would make life so much easier.
I won't hold my breathe!

MrT.
 
On 11/12/2010 6:49 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:
On 2010-12-08, Sylvia Else<sylvia@not.here.invalid> wrote:
On 8/12/2010 10:35 AM, Metro wrote:
I can honestly say that
standard of workmanship is the worse that I have ever seen. Possible because
that all jobs are no longer tested by an authority. It is all tested on a
random basis. Very random...........Got to go.

Perhaps that explains why I have had to call tradesmen back to do things
properly.

Once when air-conditioning installers had just laid cables loose across
the roof space - I made them come back and anchor them properly. The
same mob, incidentally, removed a tile from my roof during their work,
and neglected to put it back, letting the rain in. The cost of a
building inspector to check for damage got deducted from their bill.

Another time was when the electricians and gas-fitters installing a
kitchen left the gas pipes for the stove unlawfully obstructing the
power socket that had been installed for the same stove.

It should be noted that in both cases, they were subcontractors, or
perhaps employees. The electricians I've contracted with directly have
all been very concientious, as far as I can tell. Maybe that says
something, though I'm not sure exactly what.

subcontractors often aren't paid well enough to do a good job.

Of course they are , doing it right is usually faster than coming back
to fix it

--
X-No-Archive: Yes
 
On 16/12/2010 7:29 PM, atec77 wrote:
On 11/12/2010 6:49 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:

subcontractors often aren't paid well enough to do a good job.

Of course they are , doing it right is usually faster than coming back
to fix it
Except that most of the time shoddy work won't be picked up by the
customer, and they'll get away with it.

Sylvia.
 
On Dec 11, 6:32 pm, Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> wrote:
On 2010-12-06, Sylvia Else <syl...@not.here.invalid> wrote:

Thinking laterally now. How about you call the people who insure your
home about the cost of annual renewal. Tell them that you rewired your
home yourself. Tell them also that you thought long and hard about the
pros and cons and that to save money you did not think it was
necessary to use an electrician ( aka - a rip-off artist )

Let us know what they say.

They'll probably toe the party line.

But what of countries where people are permitted to do this? Do insurers
bother to ask? If not, what does that say about the actual level of risk
to the insurer?

Insurers typically don't bother to ask questions until a claim is made.
when the claim is made, then they try to get out of paying. (this
applies in every country)

Many people whose house burns down aren't able to produce the invoice
from the electrician, but in any case an invoice proves nothing.
Someone else could have fucked it up afterwards. It's not like electricians
put tamper-evident seals on all thir work.

--
⚂⚃ 100% natural

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...@netfront.net ---

Invoice means nothing. You could have had wiring done 35 years ago,
that was done legally, it still is up to standard (AFAIK, most of the
power points, light switches and wire used mostly look the same in the
mid the 1970s as they are now).
and there is no reason to believe it unsafe. No one would keep an
invoice from back then, and
even so, the electrician in question would not be able to remember
doing the job, let alone the details.

Unless people can claim the work as a tax deduction, they are unlikely
to need an invoice. Even so, if you have
kept one for a tax deduction claim, you are only required to keep it
for 5 years under Australian Tax Law.
The invoice is likely to just have vague description like "electrical
work", "install power socket in kitchen", "supply and fit ceiling
fans" etc.

Unless it was a simple job that was visible and obvious like replacing
a defective power point/light switch,
the consumer would be very unlikely to have a clue even WHAT work was
done behind the scenes, where the wiring went, whether work was done
in the meterbox etc. (ie: for example installing a 15a/20a/25a socket
is very different to a regular power socket as it needs a dedicated
connection and separate circuit), but in most cases all the consumer
sees is a power socket, possibly a conduit going into the ceiling or
floor, they don't have a clue what else is involved. They might know
to only plug their big welder etc into that socket and thats all.

Even if they did know and watch everything, remembering it later,
particularly trying to describe in detail in a burnt down property
would be a waste of time.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top