Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"I've been watching your world from afar, I've been trying to be whereOn Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:23:46 -0700, RichD wrote:
It's the same type of thing - people want to believe in unsolvable
mysteries, they want unanswerable riddles. Human nature, what can ya do?
http://www.michaelshermer.com/weird-things/
Speaking of riddles, what does a woman say after she's been sexually
gratified?
(spoiler below)
v
v
v
v
v
(spoiler below)
v
v
v
v
v
(spoiler below)
v
v
v
v
v
(spoiler below)
v
v
v
v
v
(spoiler below)
v
v
v
v
v
I figured you wouldn't know.
;-)
Rich
Now you see why you're dumbfuckers....Heeheee.....They own the judges(arbitration companies), and the collection
agencies, and they like to beat you up. Attorney General caught them.
pay property tax and didn't pay. I ended paying penalty and everythingChase Manhattan screwed me and they owed me $650 since 2004, they
still haven't paid me back yet, they collected me mortgage money to
The best argument against UFOs being spacecraft is that the technologyRichD wrote:
On Oct 16, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
[...]
I don't know why people are so willing to believe these things.
Because it's more fun than boring old science...
wondering and speculating is more exciting than knowing.
[...]
Only if you don't know anything.
Which demonstrates the weak imaginations of those who are impressed byWolf K wrote:
RichD wrote:
On Oct 16, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
[...]
I don't know why people are so willing to believe these things.
Because it's more fun than boring old science...
wondering and speculating is more exciting than knowing.
[...]
Only if you don't know anything.
The best argument against UFOs being spacecraft is that the technology
demonstrated in "contacts" is so utterly primitive.
(sigh)Oh, like when Adamski *claimed* to give
his contact an unexposed film and then
*claimed* to receive it back days later
with an image exposed on it and
PUBLISHED those claims and that
image in a BOOK
and then TEN YEARS LATER an
explorer/archaeologist named Marcel Homet
dug up a 20,000 year old petroglyph with
virtually the same COMPLEX image ENGRAVED
on it, while excavating a tribe whose other
images depicted communication with
people who came from the sky?
(Sons of the Sun by Homet)
How does that happen in Dorkland?
john
his contact an unexposed film and thenWolf K wrote:
RichD wrote:
On Oct 16, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
[...]
I don't know why people are so willing to believe these things.
Because it's more fun than boring old science...
wondering and speculating is more exciting than knowing.
[...]
Only if you don't know anything.
The best argument against UFOs being spacecraft is that the technology
demonstrated in "contacts" is so utterly primitive.
Oh, like when Adamski *claimed* to give
Next you'll be telling us the transistor was reverse engineered fromOn Oct 21, 1:18 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
john wrote:
Oh, like when Adamski *claimed* to give
his contact an unexposed film and then
*claimed* to receive it back days later
with an image exposed on it and
PUBLISHED those claims and that
image in a BOOK
and then TEN YEARS LATER an
explorer/archaeologist named Marcel Homet
dug up a 20,000 year old petroglyph with
virtually the same COMPLEX image ENGRAVED
on it, while excavating a tribe whose other
images depicted communication with
people who came from the sky?
(Sons of the Sun by Homet)
How does that happen in Dorkland?
john
(sigh)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
How does someone publish a complex drawing
10 years BEFORE it is unearthed?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
You refuse to look at evidence
for things you don't believe in,
and you accept really, really, vague
evidence for things you
do believe in.
Really, man!!
Be a scientist!!
You need an OPEN mind.
john
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?john wrote:
Oh, like when Adamski *claimed* to give
his contact an unexposed film and then
*claimed* to receive it back days later
with an image exposed on it and
PUBLISHED those claims and that
image in a BOOK
and then TEN YEARS LATER an
explorer/archaeologist named Marcel Homet
dug up a 20,000 year old petroglyph with
virtually the same COMPLEX image ENGRAVED
on it, while excavating a tribe whose other
images depicted communication with
people who came from the sky?
(Sons of the Sun by Homet)
How does that happen in Dorkland?
john
(sigh)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
On Oct 21, 3:36 pm, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@gmail.com
john wrote:
On Oct 21, 1:18 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
john wrote:
Oh, like when Adamski *claimed* to give
his contact an unexposed film and then
*claimed* to receive it back days later
with an image exposed on it and
PUBLISHED those claims and that
image in a BOOK
and then TEN YEARS LATER an
explorer/archaeologist named Marcel Homet
dug up a 20,000 year old petroglyph with
virtually the same COMPLEX image ENGRAVED
on it, while excavating a tribe whose other
images depicted communication with
people who came from the sky?
(Sons of the Sun by Homet)
How does that happen in Dorkland?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
How does someone publish a complex drawing
10 years BEFORE it is unearthed?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
You refuse to look at evidence
for things you don't believe in,
and you accept really, really, vague
evidence for things you
do believe in.
Really, man!!
Be a scientist!!
You need an OPEN mind.
Next you'll be telling us the transistor was reverse engineered from
Roswell!
No, we're not to 'next' yet, Dirk.
Tell me how someone hoaxes publishes the
same complex diagram that will not be dug up
for ten years and in both appearances
it is connected with extraterrestrial humans?
Two hoaxes?
Pretty gullible, you are, John.Tell me how someone hoaxes publishes the
same complex diagram that will not be dug up
for ten years and in both appearances
it is connected with extraterrestrial humans?
john
John, have you any idea how much out right fraud is published in books?Homet wrote a book and
supplied pictures of
all his 20,000 year old glyphs.
Written in stone, buddy.
john
Right! http://ancientx.com/nm/anmviewer.asp?a=90Marcel Homet was a widely-travelled doctor of
archaeology, and author whose book containing his
pictures of all the petroglyphs I read back before computer fakery.
There were plenty of pictures- see "Sons of the Sun(?)
by Marcel Homet
I'm pretty sure he showed these rocks to others who would
probably be able to determine if he had just recently carved
them with his little scout knife.
I'm sure after the effort it takes getting to some
of those places in Brazil, he would be in good enough shape to do that
after supper. As would you, I'm sure.
john
john wrote:
On Oct 21, 1:18 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
john wrote:
Oh, like when Adamski *claimed* to give
his contact an unexposed film and then
*claimed* to receive it back days later
with an image exposed on it and
PUBLISHED those claims and that
image in a BOOK
and then TEN YEARS LATER an
explorer/archaeologist named Marcel Homet
dug up a 20,000 year old petroglyph with
virtually the same COMPLEX image ENGRAVED
on it, while excavating a tribe whose other
images depicted communication with
people who came from the sky?
(Sons of the Sun by Homet)
How does that happen in Dorkland?
john
(sigh)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
How does someone publish a complex drawing
10 years BEFORE it is unearthed?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
You refuse to look at evidence
for things you don't believe in,
and you accept really, really, vague
evidence for things you
do believe in.
Really, man!!
Be a scientist!!
You need an OPEN mind.
john
Next you'll be telling us the transistor was reverse engineered from
Roswell!
No, we're not to 'next' yet, Dirk.
It's the interpretation that is in question, John!On Oct 21, 6:03 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
john wrote:
Marcel Homet was a widely-travelled doctor of
archaeology, and author whose book containing his
pictures of all the petroglyphs I read back before computer fakery.
There were plenty of pictures- see "Sons of the Sun(?)
by Marcel Homet
I'm pretty sure he showed these rocks to others who would
probably be able to determine if he had just recently carved
them with his little scout knife.
I'm sure after the effort it takes getting to some
of those places in Brazil, he would be in good enough shape to do that
after supper. As would you, I'm sure.
john
Right! http://ancientx.com/nm/anmviewer.asp?a=90
I think what Homet came up
with was pretty concrete, Sam.
Nobody disputes his finding these rocks.
Unfortunately they don't have a tour schedule, being
rather heavy, you know, so if you won't believe pictures or books
perhaps South America would be a good holiday for you?
john
This was the same Adamski who claimed that the far side of theOn Oct 21, 11:31=A0am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wolf K wrote:
RichD wrote:
On Oct 16, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
[...]
=A0I don't know why people are so willing to believe these things.
Because it's more fun than boring old science...
wondering and speculating is more exciting than knowing.
[...]
Only if you don't know anything.
The best argument against UFOs being spacecraft is that the technology
demonstrated in "contacts" is so utterly primitive.
Oh, like when Adamski *claimed* to give
his contact an unexposed film and then
*claimed* to receive it back days later
with an image exposed on it and
PUBLISHED those claims and that
image in a BOOK
and then TEN YEARS LATER an
explorer/archaeologist named Marcel Homet
dug up a 20,000 year old petroglyph with
virtually the same COMPLEX image ENGRAVED
on it, while excavating a tribe whose other
images depicted communication with
people who came from the sky?
(Sons of the Sun by Homet)
How does that happen in Dorkland?
<shaking head> Scientific evidence? None!The interpretaion is this; extraterrestrial humans have
been trying to advance our scientific knowledge with
basically the same bunch of drawings
for 20,000 years.
Good luck. We're real slow.
john
Homet wrote a book andIn article <d5e0ec1d-8875-4194-bc82-f607b6992...@m13g2000vbf.googlegroups..com>,
john <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote:
On Oct 21, 11:31=A0am, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wolf K wrote:
RichD wrote:
On Oct 16, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
[...]
=A0I don't know why people are so willing to believe these things.
Because it's more fun than boring old science...
wondering and speculating is more exciting than knowing.
[...]
Only if you don't know anything.
The best argument against UFOs being spacecraft is that the technology
demonstrated in "contacts" is so utterly primitive.
Oh, like when Adamski *claimed* to give
his contact an unexposed film and then
*claimed* to receive it back days later
with an image exposed on it and
PUBLISHED those claims and that
image in a BOOK
and then TEN YEARS LATER an
explorer/archaeologist named Marcel Homet
dug up a 20,000 year old petroglyph with
virtually the same COMPLEX image ENGRAVED
on it, while excavating a tribe whose other
images depicted communication with
people who came from the sky?
(Sons of the Sun by Homet)
How does that happen in Dorkland?
This was the same Adamski who claimed that the far side of the
moon had trees and mountains with snow-capped peaks? That he
had snacked on Venusian plants? That dude?
Homet was familiar with Adamski's claims and I can't find any
pictures of the petroglyph in question. Is it beyond the realm
of possibility that Homet faked the finding?
Alan
--
Defendit numerus- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
archaeology, and author whose book containing hisOn Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:10:40 -0700, john wrote:
On Oct 21, 3:36 pm, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <dirk.bru...@gmail.com
john wrote:
On Oct 21, 1:18 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
john wrote:
Oh, like when Adamski *claimed* to give
his contact an unexposed film and then
*claimed* to receive it back days later
with an image exposed on it and
PUBLISHED those claims and that
image in a BOOK
and then TEN YEARS LATER an
explorer/archaeologist named Marcel Homet
dug up a 20,000 year old petroglyph with
virtually the same COMPLEX image ENGRAVED
on it, while excavating a tribe whose other
images depicted communication with
people who came from the sky?
(Sons of the Sun by Homet)
How does that happen in Dorkland?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
How does someone publish a complex drawing
10 years BEFORE it is unearthed?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
Sam, what kind of proof do you need?
You refuse to look at evidence
for things you don't believe in,
and you accept really, really, vague
evidence for things you
do believe in.
Really, man!!
Be a scientist!!
You need an OPEN mind.
Next you'll be telling us the transistor was reverse engineered from
Roswell!
No, we're not to 'next' yet, Dirk.
Tell me how someone hoaxes publishes the
same complex diagram that will not be dug up
for ten years and in both appearances
it is connected with extraterrestrial humans?
Two hoaxes?
Marcel Homet was a widely-travelled doctor of
I think what Homet came upjohn wrote:
Marcel Homet was a widely-travelled doctor of
archaeology, and author whose book containing his
pictures of all the petroglyphs I read back before computer fakery.
There were plenty of pictures- see "Sons of the Sun(?)
by Marcel Homet
I'm pretty sure he showed these rocks to others who would
probably be able to determine if he had just recently carved
them with his little scout knife.
I'm sure after the effort it takes getting to some
of those places in Brazil, he would be in good enough shape to do that
after supper. As would you, I'm sure.
john
Right! http://ancientx.com/nm/anmviewer.asp?a=90
been trying to advance our scientific knowledge withjohn wrote:
On Oct 21, 6:03 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
john wrote:
Marcel Homet was a widely-travelled doctor of
archaeology, and author whose book containing his
pictures of all the petroglyphs I read back before computer fakery.
There were plenty of pictures- see "Sons of the Sun(?)
by Marcel Homet
I'm pretty sure he showed these rocks to others who would
probably be able to determine if he had just recently carved
them with his little scout knife.
I'm sure after the effort it takes getting to some
of those places in Brazil, he would be in good enough shape to do that
after supper. As would you, I'm sure.
john
Right! http://ancientx.com/nm/anmviewer.asp?a=90
I think what Homet came up
with was pretty concrete, Sam.
Nobody disputes his finding these rocks.
It's the interpretation that is in question, John!
The interpretaion is this; extraterrestrial humans have