C
Clarence
Guest
"Reg Edwards" <g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote in message
news:cmrmrt$609$1@titan.btinternet.com...
PLONK! ! !
news:cmrmrt$609$1@titan.btinternet.com...
PLONK! ! !
J
John Fields
Guest
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 00:24:10 GMT, "Clarence" <no@No.com> wrote:
When you plonk someone, why do you find it necessary to post that you
did?
--
John Fields
---
When you plonk someone, why do you find it necessary to post that you
did?
--
John Fields
R
Reg Edwards
Guest
The USA's political and economic short-term objectives have been
successfully achieved.
The so-called war in Iraq has been, as usual, an entirely one-sided
massacre. Just like Vietnam and Gambodia, Nagasaki and Horoshima, and many
other areas of this overpopulated Earth.
Regardles of political affilliations, ALL American armed-to-teeth citizens
are guilty.
Blythely, obliviously, they drive around in their Earth-warming,
gas-guzzling, atmospheric-polluting cars, interested only in the outcome of
the next ball-game.
The Iraqian oil wells and pipelines are now in the hands of the American and
international oil companies, bankers and the other all-powerful
multi-nationals. They need guarding of course by a long term body of troops.
And Bush and Blair can be quietly and richly-paid or services rendered.
All that remains is to let (presently forgotten about) Saddam out of an
American prison to tidy up the horrible Iraqian and Palestinian mess,
including 1 million dead civilians, the results of 12 years of continuous
American bombing and, as I write, is yet again building up to another
one-sided cresendo.
It's obvious Saddam will be much preferable by the Iraqis to the Americans.
No wonder there are so many suicide-bombers about. The American way of Life,
for them and their families, is not worth living for!
Next on the typical American citizen's list are Syria, Iran, Central Asia,
North Korea and ultimately that square in Beijing. Or is Armageddon already
here?
Actually I'm an optimist. <smiley>
----
Reg.
successfully achieved.
The so-called war in Iraq has been, as usual, an entirely one-sided
massacre. Just like Vietnam and Gambodia, Nagasaki and Horoshima, and many
other areas of this overpopulated Earth.
Regardles of political affilliations, ALL American armed-to-teeth citizens
are guilty.
Blythely, obliviously, they drive around in their Earth-warming,
gas-guzzling, atmospheric-polluting cars, interested only in the outcome of
the next ball-game.
The Iraqian oil wells and pipelines are now in the hands of the American and
international oil companies, bankers and the other all-powerful
multi-nationals. They need guarding of course by a long term body of troops.
And Bush and Blair can be quietly and richly-paid or services rendered.
All that remains is to let (presently forgotten about) Saddam out of an
American prison to tidy up the horrible Iraqian and Palestinian mess,
including 1 million dead civilians, the results of 12 years of continuous
American bombing and, as I write, is yet again building up to another
one-sided cresendo.
It's obvious Saddam will be much preferable by the Iraqis to the Americans.
No wonder there are so many suicide-bombers about. The American way of Life,
for them and their families, is not worth living for!
Next on the typical American citizen's list are Syria, Iran, Central Asia,
North Korea and ultimately that square in Beijing. Or is Armageddon already
here?
Actually I'm an optimist. <smiley>
----
Reg.
K
Ken Finney
Guest
"Kim" <ksleep@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:_sfjd.32265$OD3.1639220@news20.bellglobal.com...
post them here. One place I've been meaning to look and haven't yet,
is in Circuit Cellar INK magazine.
news:_sfjd.32265$OD3.1639220@news20.bellglobal.com...
I've been looking for the same thing, if you get any private replies, please
post them here. One place I've been meaning to look and haven't yet,
is in Circuit Cellar INK magazine.
R
Rich The Philosophizer
Guest
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:12:10 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Hey, Fred! Should I needle you for drawing your schematic backwards?
;^J
Rich
Hey, Fred! Should I needle you for drawing your schematic backwards?
;^J
Rich
F
Fred Bloggs
Guest
Rich The Philosophizer wrote:
What's backwards about it?
What's backwards about it?
F
Francois Choquette
Guest
There are two major state machine types : Moore and Mealy.
Moore : output is only dependent on the current state
Mealy : output is a combinatorial function of current state and
current input(s)
So, for your example, Output column should be for time (T), not (T+1).
You may take a look at Randy H Katz Contemporary Logic Design book
from '93, available online at
http://www2.ele.ufes.br/~ailson/digital2/cld/CLD.html, chapter 8 :
Finite state machine design.
Have fun!
Francois Choquette
Steven O. <null@null.com> wrote in message news:<sgf2p0l4uvjcvh7bar9sn2mpt3uonn3tqb@4ax.com>...
Moore : output is only dependent on the current state
Mealy : output is a combinatorial function of current state and
current input(s)
So, for your example, Output column should be for time (T), not (T+1).
You may take a look at Randy H Katz Contemporary Logic Design book
from '93, available online at
http://www2.ele.ufes.br/~ailson/digital2/cld/CLD.html, chapter 8 :
Finite state machine design.
Have fun!
Francois Choquette
Steven O. <null@null.com> wrote in message news:<sgf2p0l4uvjcvh7bar9sn2mpt3uonn3tqb@4ax.com>...
M
Max Hauser
Guest
"Paul Burridge" in news:jlbgo0l0ip7cg79coj2tiqqkqi1cf44uu5@4ax.com...
defend poor Herr Kirchhoff, for what it's worth: I for one spend all day
solving what many would call practical electrical problems and I make use
often of Kirchhoff's two handy laws for voltage and current (affectionately
KVL and KCL), they are foundations on which you can build an analysis of a
circuit if you really need to know what it does. I use these things as part
of my tools, just as in the lab I would use a trusty DVM or spectrum
analyzer or screwdriver.
Regarding good old red plonk, if anyone doesn't know this, alt.food.wine is
now a very constructive wine newsgroup; helpful discussion of all styles and
price levels.
Cheers -- Max
(I would suppose more likely Tellegen than Thévenin in this context) but to
defend poor Herr Kirchhoff, for what it's worth: I for one spend all day
solving what many would call practical electrical problems and I make use
often of Kirchhoff's two handy laws for voltage and current (affectionately
KVL and KCL), they are foundations on which you can build an analysis of a
circuit if you really need to know what it does. I use these things as part
of my tools, just as in the lab I would use a trusty DVM or spectrum
analyzer or screwdriver.
Regarding good old red plonk, if anyone doesn't know this, alt.food.wine is
now a very constructive wine newsgroup; helpful discussion of all styles and
price levels.
Cheers -- Max
R
Rich The Philosophizer
Guest
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 07:59:23 -0700, Mark Fergerson wrote:
I've also read that:
Capitalism is based on the fallacy that you can win,
Socialism is based on the fallacy that you can break even,
Mysticism is based on the fallacy that you can quit the game.
;^j
Cheers!
Rich
i.e., We're all bozos on this bus!
I've also read that:
Capitalism is based on the fallacy that you can win,
Socialism is based on the fallacy that you can break even,
Mysticism is based on the fallacy that you can quit the game.
;^j
Cheers!
Rich
R
Rich The Philosophizer
Guest
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 18:06:07 +0100, Stefan Heinzmann wrote:
been extracting revenge on every non-Jew ever since.
Getting the Cheney/Rumsfeld/Bush cabal into their pocket hasn't done
any harm to them -
in the short term.
Good Luck!
Rich
Well, I will. Hitler drove the Jews out of Nazi Germany, and they've
been extracting revenge on every non-Jew ever since.
Getting the Cheney/Rumsfeld/Bush cabal into their pocket hasn't done
any harm to them -
in the short term.
Good Luck!
Rich
R
Rich The Philosophizer
Guest
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:06:44 -0800, John Larkin wrote:
Thanks,
Rich
murder?
Thanks,
Rich
R
Rich The Philosophizer
Guest
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 20:42:03 +0100, Frithiof Andreas Jensen wrote:
also happens to be their main icon.
God Forbid they should ever accidentally get their mouth near the
mutilated penis of a helpless baby!
Feh.
Nah, they only drink the blood and eat the flesh of some dead guy, who
also happens to be their main icon.
God Forbid they should ever accidentally get their mouth near the
mutilated penis of a helpless baby!
Feh.
R
Rich The Philosophizer
Guest
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:15:20 +1300, Terry Given wrote:
was to give Ratch "food" for "thought". ;-) It's a test, you see.
If a guy shows you his dick, and you kill him, you're guaranteed
to go to heaven!
Cheers!
Rich
Come on, Terry! We all know that the only reason God created homos
was to give Ratch "food" for "thought". ;-) It's a test, you see.
If a guy shows you his dick, and you kill him, you're guaranteed
to go to heaven!
Cheers!
Rich
R
Rich Grise
Guest
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 12:42:20 +0000, Paul Burridge wrote:
Have you done all the standard "blow stuff up" experiments? ;-)
Good Luck!
Rich
Well, that's about all I had. )-;On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 02:13:30 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:
Get a meter and a soldering iron and some parts and a proto-board or
one of those 101-in-1 kits, and read a lot.
Thanks for the encouragement, Rich, but I did all that in the late
60's! I'm convinced it's a problem with the way I look at things. I
often overlook the obvious, simple solutions and see things as far
more complicated than they are. Occasionally, of course, they *are*
actually more complicated than they seem. But I can't tell which is
which!
Have you done all the standard "blow stuff up" experiments? ;-)
Good Luck!
Rich
T
Terry Given
Guest
Ratch wrote:
as you are no doubt aware, I dont agree with you wrt gays etc. But let
me just thank you for being willing to enter into a debate, and for
actually reading the posts with which you disagree (and posting
meaningful rebuttal). All to often opponents (pick a side, any side)
just end up screaming obscenities at one another, whilst demonstrating a
lack of reading comprehension.
Cheers
Terry
Hi Ratch,
as you are no doubt aware, I dont agree with you wrt gays etc. But let
me just thank you for being willing to enter into a debate, and for
actually reading the posts with which you disagree (and posting
meaningful rebuttal). All to often opponents (pick a side, any side)
just end up screaming obscenities at one another, whilst demonstrating a
lack of reading comprehension.
Cheers
Terry
T
Terry Given
Guest
Andrew Holme wrote:
converter which does exactly that with the leakage and/or mag energy.
Terry
indeed. oops. my excuse is I was simulating a diagonal half-bridge
converter which does exactly that with the leakage and/or mag energy.
Cheers
Terry
R
Rich The Philosophizer
Guest
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:30:33 +0000, Guy Macon wrote:
nimrod.
Sheesh!
Rich
What do you care? You've plonked the whole fucking group, you
nimrod.
Sheesh!
Rich
R
Rich The Philosophizer
Guest
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 02:47:18 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:
Thanks,
Rich
You've got the signal going from right to left.
Thanks,
Rich
K
Ken Smith
Guest
In article <0f0to0l5m6uc0s1e7214kccj4v79d1pd9b@4ax.com>,
Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com> wrote:
4) The design goal is for 10KW of audio
--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com> wrote:
3) The music is intended for dogs, cats or bats.
4) The design goal is for 10KW of audio
--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
R
Ratch
Guest
"Rich The Philosophizer" <null@example.net> wrote in message
newsan.2004.11.07.19.17.16.689680@neodruid.org...
concerned with other peoples sex lives when they have strange proclivities,
and want the majority of society to approve their lifestyle and change laws
to coincide with their aberrant behavior?" Learn to ask the right
questions. Ratch
news
an.2004.11.07.19.17.16.689680@neodruid.org...It's a concern, not an obsession. You should have asked, "Why are you
concerned with other peoples sex lives when they have strange proclivities,
and want the majority of society to approve their lifestyle and change laws
to coincide with their aberrant behavior?" Learn to ask the right
questions. Ratch