Christmas vs "Holidays"

"Rich Grise" <rich@example.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.12.18.00.43.15.204048@example.net...
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 22:30:15 +0000, John Woodgate wrote:


Has anyone ever determined exactly how a common housefly lands on a
ceiling? Does he do a loop-the-loop, or a barrel roll?

Thanks,
Rich

Yes, it has been determined to be a last-second barel roll.
 
awnospamj@ev1.net wrote:
"Kevin Aylward" <salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote in message
news:biFwd.2299$Qo4.555@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
Rich The Philosophizer wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:26:15 +0000, Kevin Aylward wrote:

Pretty simple. Its full of demonstrable blatant contradictions, so
this view is not debateable. In science, when when get
contradictions, we declare the thing to be false. e.g.
www.evilbible.com.
Well, I know now you can not be a scientist,
oh?

because the ones I know
say that if they get solutions that are contradictory, they first
check the input for errors and then rerun the program.
I didn't claim that *only* when a *solution* is *apparently*
contradictory that the thing is false. I said when we get
contradictions. This implicitly implies that there exists a *verifiable*
contradiction at the deepest level.

Of course, it is trivially obvious that the contradiction must be real.
i.e. the equipment and all that stuff is verified, so why should this be
stated?

Contradictions are NOT proof of falsehood, they only speak to the
need for further research.
If a contradiction is real, it is indeed proof of a falsehood. Your
arguing about whether or not the contraction is real or not. This is
assumed to be the case from the outset. If the contradiction is not
real, then we don't have a contradiction. Dah...

IF all scientists had the view that you
have we would NOT be able to communicate this way and bumble bees
would not fly.
Unfortunately you don't understand the views of scientists, or science.
Your certainly way out of date on the theory of bumble bee flight.


Kevin Aylward
salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk
http://www.anasoft.co.uk
SuperSpice, a very affordable Mixed-Mode
Windows Simulator with Schematic Capture,
Waveform Display, FFT's and Filter Design.
 
"jsmith" <juddo@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:1103081068.f4c58340a6a4fb6c079c5594718575bc@sonicnews...
The secularists have been chipping away at the word Christmas for a number
of years now and are substituting irrelevant (religious ??) concoctions to
diminish the value of the celebration of the birth of Christ. Isn't it
time
we begin boycotting those merchants who in their TV advertising are
exploiting the Christmas tradition yet not acknowledging that this is
truly
the Christmas season. The code word "holiday" season is coming into
increasing use in an effort to minimize the influence the Truths that were
taught by the Prince of Peace.
but holiday just means holy day so that is no better for us evangelical
atheists.
 
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 10:59:31 GMT, "Kevin Aylward"
<salesEXTRACT@anasoft.co.uk> wrote:

3 Is GWB a right twat?
As opposed to a Left twat? That's a given.

Scary part is over half of the US population has yet to notice his
twatism.
 
TAKE YOUR FRIGGIN XTIAN XMAS AND GO STRAIGHT TO *HELL* WITH IT. AS FAR
AS I'M CONCERNED, YOUR GODDAM NATIVITY SCENES SHOULD ALL BE SMASHED.
TAKE *YOUR* ILLITERATE AND IGNORANT IDEA OF XIANITY AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR
ASS- YOU ARE HOPELESS MORON IN NEED OF A PSEUDO-PARENT AKA JC.

jsmith wrote:
> The secularists ... [SNIP GRABAGE]
 
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:06:34 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:

TAKE YOUR FRIGGIN XTIAN XMAS AND GO STRAIGHT TO *HELL* WITH IT. AS FAR
AS I'M CONCERNED, YOUR GODDAM NATIVITY SCENES SHOULD ALL BE SMASHED.
TAKE *YOUR* ILLITERATE AND IGNORANT IDEA OF XIANITY AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR
ASS- YOU ARE HOPELESS MORON IN NEED OF A PSEUDO-PARENT AKA JC.
Hey, very nice caps.

John
 
A&T wrote:

We aren't sure when Christ was born, but we celebrate in on December 25.

I wish the people who still believe that Christ was born (whenever it was)
would revolt against the people trying to take it away from us.

Tricia
Once again, don't be such a dumbass. No one is trying to take christmas
away from anyone.
 
Would you fuckheads stop crossposting to rec.travel.cruises?


"Fred Bloggs" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:41C45537.8050404@nospam.com...
TAKE YOUR FRIGGIN XTIAN XMAS AND GO STRAIGHT TO *HELL* WITH IT. AS FAR
AS I'M CONCERNED, YOUR GODDAM NATIVITY SCENES SHOULD ALL BE SMASHED.
TAKE *YOUR* ILLITERATE AND IGNORANT IDEA OF XIANITY AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR
ASS- YOU ARE HOPELESS MORON IN NEED OF A PSEUDO-PARENT AKA JC.

jsmith wrote:
The secularists ... [SNIP GRABAGE]
 
Would you fuckheads stop crossposting to rec.travel.cruises?


"John Larkin" <john@spamless.usa> wrote in message
news:6qm8s098mfa8nmdi7mhcu2ii767gj06h1h@4ax.com...
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:06:34 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com
wrote:

TAKE YOUR FRIGGIN XTIAN XMAS AND GO STRAIGHT TO *HELL* WITH IT. AS FAR
AS I'M CONCERNED, YOUR GODDAM NATIVITY SCENES SHOULD ALL BE SMASHED.
TAKE *YOUR* ILLITERATE AND IGNORANT IDEA OF XIANITY AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR
ASS- YOU ARE HOPELESS MORON IN NEED OF A PSEUDO-PARENT AKA JC.


Hey, very nice caps.

John
 
Would you fuckheads stop crossposting to rec.travel.cruises?


"Bryan" <bryanNO459@NOpacbell.invalid.net> wrote in message
news:JPZwd.266$yV1.63@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
A&T wrote:

We aren't sure when Christ was born, but we celebrate in on December 25.

I wish the people who still believe that Christ was born (whenever it
was)
would revolt against the people trying to take it away from us.

Tricia

Once again, don't be such a dumbass. No one is trying to take christmas
away from anyone.
 
Would you fuckheads stop crossposting to rec.travel.cruises?


"Bryan" <bryanNO459@NOpacbell.invalid.net> wrote in message
news:dTZwd.267$yV1.52@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com...
wrongaddress@att.net wrote:

People always adopt local traditions, holidays and pagents
as their own. Get over it and enjoy the holidays


So, how come the salvation army bell ringers are not ringing the bell
at Target stores and the local post office this year?
.
How will we give to the poor if nobody is ringing the bell?

-Bill

There are hundreds of ways to give to the poor without handing pocket
change to bell ringers.

Personally, the bell ringers didn't bother me, but the stores can't say
no to the krishnas and yes to the bell ringers.
 
"Diane James" <^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^> wrote in message
news:10s8rotkkskqj79@corp.supernews.com...
Would you fuckheads stop crossposting to rec.travel.cruises?

And to alt.genealogy, please.

Tricia
 
Diane James <^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ .> wrote:
Would you fuckheads stop crossposting to rec.travel.cruises?

Gee, *that's* a sure-fire way to get people to comply with your
request: insult them and call them names.



Geoff

--
"My only regret with Timothy McVeigh is he did not go
to the New York Times Building." -- Ann Coulter
 
geoffm posted:

Diane James wrote:
Would you fuckheads stop crossposting to rec.travel.cruises?


Gee, *that's* a sure-fire way to get people to comply with your
request: insult them and call them names.
--

Looks like a clear case of "When on a techie board, post as the techies do."
 
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:06:34 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

TAKE YOUR FRIGGIN XTIAN XMAS AND GO STRAIGHT TO *HELL* WITH IT. AS FAR
AS I'M CONCERNED, YOUR GODDAM NATIVITY SCENES SHOULD ALL BE SMASHED.
TAKE *YOUR* ILLITERATE AND IGNORANT IDEA OF XIANITY AND SHOVE IT UP YOUR
ASS- YOU ARE HOPELESS MORON IN NEED OF A PSEUDO-PARENT AKA JC.

jsmith wrote:
The secularists ... [SNIP GRABAGE]
Interestingly, God even loves _you_.

Merry Kwanzaa!
--
The Pig Bladder From Uranus, still waiting for
some hot babe to ask what my favorite planet is.
 
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:35:05 +0000, Bryan wrote:

wrongaddress@att.net wrote:

People always adopt local traditions, holidays and pagents
as their own. Get over it and enjoy the holidays


So, how come the salvation army bell ringers are not ringing the bell
at Target stores and the local post office this year?
.
How will we give to the poor if nobody is ringing the bell?

-Bill

There are hundreds of ways to give to the poor without handing pocket
change to bell ringers.

Personally, the bell ringers didn't bother me, but the stores can't say
no to the krishnas and yes to the bell ringers.
Why not? It's their property.

<rec.trave.cruises left in to piss off dickhead Diane>

--
Keith
 
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:36:34 +0000, Paul Burke wrote:

jsmith wrote:
The secularists have been chipping away at the word Christmas for a number
of years now and are substituting irrelevant (religious ??) concoctions to
diminish the value of the celebration of the birth of Christ.

Keep your sticky fingers off our Yule. We (humans) were celebrating the
Winter Solstice thousands of years before you traduced the teachings of
Bar Yussuf.
Traduce? Is that like promulgate?

Thanks,
Rich
 
Bryan <bryanNO459@NOpacbell.invalid.net> wrote:
A&T wrote:

We aren't sure when Christ was born, but we celebrate in on December
25.

I wish the people who still believe that Christ was born (whenever
it was) would revolt against the people trying to take it away from
us.

Tricia

Once again, don't be such a dumbass. No one is trying to take
christmas away from anyone.
Indeed. Mostly we would be happy if the Christians would agree to "you
celibrate the holiday your way, and let us celibrate it our way" phylosophy.
 
Nicholas O. Lindan <see@sig.com> wrote:
"Bryan" <bryanNO459@NOpacbell.invalid.net> wrote

I choose to see language like winter break and happy holidays
as a positive effort to include all religions and non-religions
[and rec.travel.cruises].

An object creates the meaning of a word. Changing the word does
not change the object.

You can't include everybody. You shouldn't even try.
Yes, you can. That is the whole point.
 
Lucky those who can choose between holiday and Xmas.
Possibly employees, nothing-doers and slaves.
There are others to that these couple days at the
year's end mean a lot of work can be done.
Eg me : selfemployed, the days are never long enough,
the weeks are not not long enough and the year is not
long enough to do all the work that has to be done.
The 25th is family day, the others are work days.

Rene

jsmith wrote:

The secularists have been chipping away at the word Christmas for a number
of years now and are substituting irrelevant (religious ??) concoctions to
diminish the value of the celebration of the birth of Christ. Isn't it time
we begin boycotting those merchants who in their TV advertising are
exploiting the Christmas tradition yet not acknowledging that this is truly
the Christmas season. The code word "holiday" season is coming into
increasing use in an effort to minimize the influence the Truths that were
taught by the Prince of Peace.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top